Cranial Fossa Volume in Differing Subtypes of Apert Syndrome:

Genetic Subtypes of Apert Syndrome Are Associated With Differences in Airway Morphology and Early Upper Airway Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Apert syndrome is predominantly caused by 2 paternally inherited gain-of-function mutations in the FGFR2 gene, Pro253Arg, and Ser252Trp. Studies comparing phenotypic features between these 2 mutations have established differences in syndactyly severity and incidence of cleft palate. Obstructive sleep apnea can be debilitating in a subset of patients with Apert syndrome, yet is not well understood. This study aims to determine whether FGFR2 mutations impart differential effects on airway physiology and morphology.

METHODS

Patients with Apert syndrome and confirmatory molecular testing were reviewed for polysomnography, nasal endoscopy, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, and computed tomography imaging. Obstructive apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen saturation nadir, nasal airway volumes, choanal cross-sectional area, and midfacial cephalometric dimensions were compared across mutation types.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (13 Ser252Trp, 11 Pro253Arg) were included. Severe obstructive sleep apnea (obstructive apnea-hypopnea index>10) occurred in 8 (62%) patients with Ser252Trp mutations compared with 1 (9%) patient with Pro253Arg mutations ( P =0.009). Computed tomography imaging at 1 year of age demonstrated that nasopharyngeal airway volumes were 5302±1076 mm 3 in the Ser252Trp group and 6832±1414 mm 3 in the Pro253Arg group ( P =0.041). Maxillary length (anterior nasal spine-posterior nasal spine, P =0.026) and basion-anterior nasal spine ( P =0.007) were shorter in patients with Ser252Trp mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the Ser252Trp mutation in Apert syndrome is associated with higher severity obstructive sleep apnea and decreased nasopharyngeal airway volume. Heightened clinical awareness of these associations may inform treatment planning and family counseling.

Influence of Nonsyndromic Bicoronal Synostosis and Syndromic Influences on Orbit and Periorbital Malformation

BACKGROUND

Oculoorbital disproportion in patients with craniosynostosis has similarities and dissimilarities between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases. The authors hypothesized that these two conditions have specific individual influences as they relate to development of the orbital and periorbital skeletons.

METHODS

A total of 133 preoperative computed tomography scans (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 38; Apert syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 33; Crouzon syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 10; controls, n = 52) were included. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbit and periorbital anatomy were performed.

RESULTS

Orbital cavity volume was mildly restricted in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis (7 percent, p = 0.147), but more so in Apert and Crouzon syndromes [17 percent (p = 0.002) and 21 percent (p = 0.005), respectively]. The sphenoid side angle in Apert syndrome was wider than when compared to Crouzon syndrome (p = 0.043). The ethmoid side angle in Apert patients, however, was narrower (p = 0.066) than that in Crouzon patients. Maxilla anteroposterior length was more restricted in Apert syndrome than Crouzon syndrome (21 percent, p = 0.003) and nonsyndromic cases (26 percent, p < 0.001). The posterior nasal spine position was retruded in Crouzon syndrome (39 percent, p < 0.001), yet the anterior nasal spine position was similar in Apert and Crouzon syndromes.

CONCLUSIONS

Orbit and periorbital malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis is likely the combined influence of syndromic influences and premature suture fusion. Apert syndrome expanded the anteriorly contoured lateral orbital wall associated with bicoronal synostosis, whereas Crouzon syndrome had more infraorbital rim retrusion, resulting in more severe exorbitism. Apert syndrome developed maxillary hypoplasia, in addition to the maxillary retrusion, observed in Crouzon syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Does different cranial suture synostosis influence orbit volume and morphology in Apert syndrome?

This study was performed to compare the orbital and peri-orbital morphological variations in Apert syndrome patients with different cranial vault suture synostosis, so as to provide an anatomic basis for individualized surgical planning. Computed tomography scans of 57 unoperated Apert syndrome patients and 59 controls were subgrouped as follows: type I, bilateral coronal synostosis; type II, pansynostosis; type III, perpendicular combinations of cranial vault suture synostoses. Orbit bony cavity volume was significantly reduced in type I and type II, by 19% (P < 0.001) and 24% (P < 0.001), respectively. However, the reduction of orbital cavity volume in type III did not reach statistical significance. Globe volume projection beyond the orbital rim, however, increased by 76% (P < 0.001) in type III, versus an increase of 54% (P < 0.001) in type I and 53% (P < 0.001) in type II, due to different ethmoid and sphenoid bone malformations. Maxillary bone volume was only significantly reduced in type I bicoronal synostosis (by 24%, P = 0.048). Both type I and type II developed relatively less zygoma and sphenoid bone volume. Different cranial vault suture synostoses have varied influence on peri-orbital development in Apert syndrome. Instead of mitigating the abnormalities resulting from bicoronal synostosis in type I, additional midline suture synostosis worsens the exorbitism due to a more misshaped ethmoid.

Cephalocranial Disproportionate Fossa Volume and Normal Skull Base Angle in Pfeiffer Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Pfeiffer syndrome is a rare syndromic craniosynostosis disorder, with a wide range of clinical manifestations. This study aims to investigate the structural abnormalities of cranial fossa and skull base development in Pfeiffer patients, to provide an anatomic basis for surgical interventions.

METHOD

Thirty preoperative CT scans of Pfeiffer syndrome patients were compared to 35 normal controls. Subgroup comparisons, related to differing suture synostosis, were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, the volume of anterior and middle cranial fossae in Pfeiffer patients were increased by 31% (P < 0.001) and 19% (P = 0.004), versus controls. Volume of the posterior fossa in Pfeiffer patients was reduced by 14% (P = 0.026). When only associated with bicoronal synostosis, Pfeiffer syndrome patients developed enlarged anterior (68%, P = 0.001) and middle (40%, P = 0.031) fossae. However, sagittal synostosis cases only developed an enlarged anterior fossa (47%, P < 0.001). The patients with solely bilateral squamosal synostosis, developed simultaneous reduced anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae volume (all P ≤ 0.002). The overall skull base angulation, measured on both intracranial and subcranial surfaces, grew normally.

CONCLUSION

Enlarged anterior cranial fossae in Pfeiffer syndrome children is evident, except for the squamosal synostosis cases which developed reduced volume in all fossae. Volume of the middle cranial fossa is influenced by associated cranial vault suture synostosis, specifically, sagittal synostosis cases develop normal middle fossa volume, while the bicoronal cases develop increased middle fossa volume. Posterior cranial fossa development is restricted by shortened posterior cranial base length. Surgical intervention in Pfeiffer syndrome patients optimally should be indexed to different suture synostosis.

Airway Development Relevant to Cranial Vault Suture Synostosis Subtype in Apert Syndrome

Introduction: Based on an established classification system of Apert syndrome subtypes, we aim to directly analyze the correlation between segmented airway volume changes and different skull suture synostosis, so as to provide individualized surgical planning for each subgroup of Apert patients. Methods: CT scans of 44 unoperated Apert syndrome and 53 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; type II. Pansynostosis; type III. Perpendicular combinations of cranial vault synostosis. CT scans were measured using Mimics and 3-matics software. Results: Type I developed a 41% ( P = .116) reduction in the nasal cavity, yet a normal sized pharyngeal airway. The reduced nasal airway was linked to the decreased cross sectional area ( r = 0.598, P = .001), vertical dimension ( r = 0.719, P < .001), and narrower width ( r = 0.727, P < .001). Type II developed proportionally reduced nasal airway and pharyngeal airway volumes (both 47%, P = .113 and P = .041), along with the proportionally restricted cross sectional areas at choana and condylion levels by 62 to 65%. This reduction is related to the cranial base length ( r = 0.712, P = .048), and also cranial base angulation ( r = 0.780, P = .023). Nasal and pharyngeal airway developed normal volume in type III. However, the cross sectional areas at the gonion level diminished by 74% ( P < .001). Conclusion: Airway development is influenced by subtype of Apert suture synostosis. Type II pansynostosis Apert patients developed synchronous reduced nasal and pharyngeal airways, which is correlated with the slightly flattened cranial base. Type I bicoronal patients have a smaller nasal cavity, but normally sized hypopharynx. Yet, type III patients developed normal nasopharyngeal airway volume overall.