Comparison of Hamraʼs and Mendelsonʼs Models of Midface Lift:

Advances in Face-Lift Surgical Techniques: 2016-2021

BACKGROUND

Face-lift surgery is the most crucial and constantly evolving technique of facial rejuvenation. Periodic reviews synthesizing the latest face-lift techniques may help surgeons sharpen their surgical procedures.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted of the PubMed databases using the search term "face lift" and "rhytidectomy." Articles reporting rhytidectomy of the forehead/brow, midface, lower face, and neck were included. Sixty-nine articles were selected after independent screening by three of the authors. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine scale was used for evaluating evidence level.

RESULTS

Of the 69 candidate articles, 10 studies (15%) reported techniques of neck lifting; 10 studies (15%) introduced techniques of endoscopic brow lifting; 7 studies (10%) pertained to brow lifting without endoscopic techniques. The most frequently reported locations of rhytidectomy were the brow/forehead (20%), neck (19%), and face-neck (17%). Additionally, articles regarding Asian face-lifts (14%) have been increasing. The evidence level of the articles was generally low, with only 10 articles assessed as level 1-3 with 59 articles as level 4-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Face-lift articles with high-level evidence are still lacking. Prominently, forehead lifting and neck lifting have become upward trends of rhytidectomy in recent years, and the techniques of short-scar face-lift have been more valued.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Facelift With Power-Assisted Dissection: A Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous elevation of the skin has remained a key component in all facelift techniques.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this preliminary report was to introduce the ABC facelift as a 3-step method addressing photodamage, soft tissue laxity, and areas of bone and volume loss.

METHODS

The procedure consists of: (A) anatomic and regenerative adipose grafting prior to skin elevation; (B) the use of a Baraf elevator for takedown of perpendicular subcutaneous fibers following hydrodissection of the skin flaps with tumescent solution; and (C) cautery dissection of the superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) and platysma in the neck.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (31 females; 3 male), aged 50 to 77 years at the date of procedure, underwent an ABC facelift. Dissection of the skin flaps and SMAS elevation were faster than with traditional methods, averaging 10 to 15 minutes per hemiface. Bleeding was reduced (average estimated blood loss, 12 mL) and the skin flaps appeared better perfused with less venous engorgement and ecchymosis than achieved with sharp scissor dissection. In general, patients appeared to have shorter postoperative recovery courses and less social downtime secondary to bruising and edema.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABC facelift addresses facial laxity, volume loss, and skin aging with 3 simple steps: anatomic and regenerative fat grafting, combined with power-assisted dissection of the skin and cautery elevation of the SMAS. The use of more advanced hydrodissection tools to achieve further improvements in layer separation is currently being investigated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4