Public Perception of a Normal Head Shape in Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in Vietnam: initial surgical outcomes of subspecialty mentorship

OBJECTIVE

There is a global deficit of pediatric neurosurgical care, and the epidemiology and overall surgical care for craniosynostosis is not well characterized at the global level. This study serves to highlight the details and early surgical results of a neurosurgical educational partnership and subsequent local scale-up in craniosynostosis correction.

METHODS

A prospective case series was performed with inclusion of all patients undergoing correction of craniosynostosis by extensive cranial vault remodeling at Children's Hospital 2, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were included in the study. The group was predominantly male, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.3:1. Sagittal synostosis was the most common diagnosis (50%, 38/76), followed by unilateral coronal (11.8%, 9/76), bicoronal (11.8%, 9/76), and metopic (7.9%, 6/76). The most common corrective technique was anterior cranial vault remodeling (30/76, 39.4%) followed by frontoorbital advancement (34.2%, 26/76). The overall mean operative time was 205.8 ± 38.6 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 176 ± 89.4 mL. Eleven procedures were complicated by intraoperative durotomy (14.5%, 11/76) without any damage of dural venous sinuses or brain tissue. Postoperatively, 4 procedures were complicated by wound infection (5.3%, 4/76), all of which required operative wound debridement. There were no neurological complications or postoperative deaths. One patient required repeat reconstruction due to delayed intracranial hypertension. There was no loss to follow-up. All patients were followed at outpatient clinic, and the mean follow-up period was 32.3 ± 18.8 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical care for pediatric craniosynostosis can be taught and sustained in the setting of collegial educational partnerships with early capability for high surgical volume and safe outcomes. In the setting of the significant deficit in worldwide pediatric neurosurgical care, this study provides an example of the feasibility of such relationships in addressing this unmet need.

Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Social media may be particularly valuable in research in rare genetic diseases because of the low numbers of patients and the rare disease community's robust online presence. The goal of this systematic review was to understand how social media is currently used in rare disease research and the characteristics of the participants in these studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of six databases to identify studies published in English between January 2004 and November 2020, of which 120 met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Most studies were observational (n = 114, 95.0%) and cross-sectional (n = 107, 89.2%), and more than half (n = 69, 57.5%) utilized only surveys. Only 101 rare diseases were included across all studies. Participant demographics, when reported, were predominantly female (70.1% ± 22.5%) and white (85.0% ± 11.0%) adult patients and caregivers.

CONCLUSION

Despite its potential benefits in rare disease research, the use of social media is still methodologically limited and the participants reached may not be representative of the rare disease population by gender, race, age, or rare disease type. As scholars explore using social media for rare disease research, careful attention should be paid to representativeness when studying this diverse patient community.

Objective Craniometric Versus Subjective Outcome Ratings in Endoscopic and Open Sagittal Synostosis Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in surgical treatments and assessments of objective outcomes in surgery for sagittal synostosis, there is no agreement regarding the optimal assessment of postoperative outcomes. Additionally, few studies have evaluated subjective assessments of cranial morphology after surgical correction. This study sought to evaluate the utility of subjective aesthetic outcome assessment and compare these assessments to established craniometric outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for isolated sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

Nineteen raters (5 parents, 4 surgeons, 5 trainees and 5 nurses) evaluated fifty patients who underwent surgical correction of isolated sagittal synostosis using standardized postoperative patient photos and a five-point Likert scale. Previously established anthropomorphic measurements were recorded postoperatively in these same patients and comparisons were made between the objective anthropomorphic and subjective outcome evaluations.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant correlations between age-controlled cephalic index, head circumference, or euryon-euryon diameter and subjective aesthetic scores. Lay persons assigned a significantly lower proportion of scores (37.9%) as middle values (2, 3, or 4) compared with faculty (64.8%). There was a statistically significant association between high scores given by surgical faculty and laypersons (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective measurement of cosmetic outcome is a useful metric in surgical correction of craniosynostosis. Although no correlations were found between objective measurements and subjective aesthetic scores, cosmetic assessments by surgeons demonstrated strong correlation with lay perception, indicating that these ratings may be a good gauge of overall cosmetic outcome. When used in combination, objective and subjective measurements provide unique value to assess outcomes after surgery for craniosynostosis.

Endoscopic Versus Open Total Vault Reconstruction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

: Sagittal craniosynostosis is the most common form of congenital cranial deformity. Surgical interventions are performed either open or endoscopic. Advancements in minimally invasive surgery have enabled the development of the endoscopic suturectomy technique. This is contrasted to the traditional open cranial vault reconstruction. There is a paucity of data comparing the head shape changes from both techniques. This study aims to compare the morphological outcome of endoscopic suturectomy versus total cranial vault reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study involving 55 cases of sagittal craniosynostosis, 37 of which has open total cranial vault reconstruction and 18 had endoscopic suturectomy procedure. Preoperative and postoperative 3D photographs of both groups were analyzed and compared. The change in correction between preoperative and postoperative state was measured against a crowd-driven standard for acceptable head shape.

RESULTS

Total cranial vault had higher percentage change between pre and postoperative cranial index than endoscopic suturectomy (14.7% versus 7.7%, P = 0.003). However, both techniques were able to achieve the minimum standard of 70% correction (TCV 107.5%, ES 100.4%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Total cranial vault and endoscopic suturectomy are effective in correcting scaphocephaly among children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Additionally, both techniques are able to achieve a percentage correction that exceeds the 70% benchmark established by the lay public.