Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Resection of Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma: A Promising Surgical Approach

Endonasal versus supraorbital approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: Results and quality of life assessment from a single-surgeon cohort

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective non-randomized study we reported our experience related to planum sphenoidale (PS) and tuberculum sellae (TS) meningiomas in a similar cohort of patients operated via the endonasal or the supraorbital route. A comprehensive quality of life analysis has been performed.

METHODS

Being comparable in general features, between November 2017 to January 2020, a total of 20 patients with anterior skull base meningioma were included. Hence, 10 patients were treated using the supraorbital keyhole procedure (SO) while 10 patients received an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Both surgical techniques were analyzed and compared. Quality of life has been analyzed with the SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified who underwent either EEA (n=10) or SO (n=10). The average extent of resection achieved was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Post-operatively, the EEA group demonstrated a longer hospital stay and bed days compared with SO patients as well as a longer surgical time. There was a significant rate of more CSF leakage after EEA then after SO (20% vs 0%, p=0,0491). The follow-up period resulted shorter in the SO group, with a slight increased recurrence rate. Overall, no differences in visual outcome were detected. There were no differences in terms of quality of life between the two groups in all the explored items.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center single-surgeon study of similarly sized and located PS and TS meningiomas, EEA showed longer hospital stays with higher degree of CSF leak compared with the SO group. Supraorbital craniotomy via eyebrow incision reported a comparable quality of life results, even if with a slightly higher percentage of recurrence and less follow-up.

Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Approach for Medium-Sized Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas: A Cadaveric Stepwise Dissection, Technical Nuances, and Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) have traditionally been removed using a transcranial approach. In recent years, endoscopic surgery for TSMs has been reported with an expansion of indications.

OBJECTIVE

We have performed a fully endoscopic supraorbital keyhole approach for small to medium-sized TSMs and performed radical tumor removal similar to conventional transcranial procedure. We report the details of this surgical procedure including cadaveric stepwise dissection and initial surgical results for small to medium-sized TSMs.

METHODS

We used an endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow approach for 6 patients with TSMs between September 2020 and September 2022. Mean tumor diameter was 16.0 mm (range, 10-20 mm). The surgical approach included an eyebrow skin incision ipsilateral to the lesion, a small frontal craniotomy, subfrontal exposure of the lesion, removal of the tuberculum sellae, unroofing of the optic canal, and resection of the tumor. The extent of resection, preoperative and postoperative visual function, complications, and operative time were evaluated.

RESULTS

Optic canal involvement was observed in all patients. Two patients (33%) showed visual dysfunction before surgery. Simpson grade 1 tumor resection was achieved in all cases. Visual function was improved in 2 cases, and remained unchanged in 4 cases. Postoperative pituitary function was preserved in all cases, with no decreases in olfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow approach for TSMs allowed resection of the lesion, including tumor extending to the optic canal, with a good surgical view. This technique is minimally invasive for patients and may represent a good surgical option for medium-sized TSMs.

In-Hospital Cost Comparison for Open Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Meningioma Resection

Objective

To determine the in-hospital cost implications of an endoscopic expanded endonasal approach (EEEA) for meningioma resection relative to the open transcranial approach.

Methods

All anterior skull base meningioma surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 31th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using R software. All cost data were converted into August 2021-equivalent dollar amounts using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index.

Results

Thirty-five patients met study criteria, including 27 patients undergoing an open transcranial approach and 8 undergoing an EEEA. Average length of stay for patients undergoing an open approach was 9.3 days compared to 5.6 within the EEEA group ( P = .126). The average total in-hospital cost of patient undergoing an EEEA was $35417.1 compared to $46406.9 among patients undergoing an open transcranial approach ( P = .168). On univariate analysis, the cost of an open transcranial approach relative to the EEEA was $10989.8 ( P = .411).

Conclusions

The open transcranial approach remained the dominant surgical approach to anterior skull base meningiomas over our study time period. However, despite limited patient numbers the EEEA was associated with decreased total in-hospital costs.

Individualized surgical treatment of giant tuberculum sellae meningioma: Unilateral subfrontal approach vs. endoscopic transsphenoidal approach

Objective

Giant tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are deeply located in the suprasellar region and extensively compressed or encased in the surrounding neurovascular structures, making gross total resection (GTR) without postoperative visual impairment challenging. The authors presented individualized unilateral subfrontal approach and endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (ETSA) in a series of patients and elaborated on their advantages and indications in resecting giant TSMs.

Methods

A total of 38 patients with giant TSMs operated by a single surgeon between March 2012 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent unilateral subfrontal approach and ETSA according to preoperative imaging characteristics. Tumor characteristics, surgical details, preoperative symptoms, and neurological outcomes of TSMs patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

In 31 patients operated with the unilateral subfrontal approach, total resection (Simpson grade I or II) was achieved in 27 patients (87.0%), while 6 patients (85.7%) achieved GTR in 7 patients using ETSA. The postoperative visual improvement was maintained in 22 (81.5%) and 5 patients (83.3%). Recurrence or progression was only observed in 2 (7.4%) patients operated with the unilateral subfrontal approach. There was no mortality in our series.

Conclusions

Preoperative imaging and visual function are important for surgical approach selection. Maximum tumor resection and optic nerve protection can be achieved concurrently by taking advantage of these surgical approaches. The cerebral artery protection strategies and individualized surgical techniques provide great utility in improving a patient's quality of life.

Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningioma: Transcranial approach or endoscopic endonasal approach?

Background

Tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM), a common benign tumor in the sellae region, usually causes neurological deficits, such as vision impairment, by squeezing the peripheral neurovascular structures. Surgical management is recommended as the optimal strategy for TSM treatment and vision restoration. However, it remains challenging to resect TSM in the traditional transcranial approach (TCA). Recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as an effective option in skull base surgeries. Besides the effectivity, the advantages and limitations of EEA in TSM surgery remain controversial.

Object

We compared the surgical outcomes and complications between TCA and EEA surgeries to identify the principles in TSM surgical management.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on the patients, who underwent TSM surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were assigned to TCA or EEA group according to the surgery they experienced. All patients were analyzed with the extent of tumor resection, vision outcome, postoperative complications, and follow-up results.

Results

A total of 112 patients were enrolled in this study, including 78 in TCA group and 34 in EEA group. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months (range 3–36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and tumor characteristics between TCA and EEA groups. Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection with relatively high gross total resection rates (85.9% in TCA vs. 91.2% in EEA, p > .05). Meanwhile, EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery (74.6% in TCA vs. 93.1% in EEA, p < .05). Whereas EEA surgery causes more occurrences of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage than TCA surgery (0% in TCA vs. 11.8% in EEA, p < .05).

Conclusion

Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection. EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery, but induces higher risk of CSF leakage. As each approach has unique advantages and limitations, we must take all aspects into consideration, including approach feathers, tumor characteristics, and clinical requirements, to make the optimal choice in TSM surgical management.