1
|
Sriram S, Njoroge MW, Lopez CD, Zhu L, Heron MJ, Zhu KJ, Yusuf CT, Yang R. Optimal Treatment Order With Fibula-Free Flap Reconstruction, Oncologic Treatment, and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2024; 35:1065-1073. [PMID: 38666786 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000010127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients benefit from craniofacial reconstruction, but no clear guidance exists for rehabilitation timing. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the impact of oncologic treatment order on implant survival. An algorithm to guide placement sequence is also proposed in this paper. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on HNC patients with ablative and fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction surgeries and radiotherapy (RTX). Primary outcomes included treatment sequence, implant survival rates, and RTX dose. Of 661 studies, 20 studies (617 implants, 199 patients) were included. Pooled survival rates for implants receiving >60 Gy RTX were significantly lower than implants receiving < 60 Gy (82.8% versus 90.1%, P =0.035). Placement >1 year after RTX completion improved implant survival rates (96.8% versus 82.5%, P =0.001). Implants receiving pre-placement RTX had increased survival with RTX postablation versus before (91.2% versus 74.8%, P <0.001). One hundred seventy-seven implants were placed only in FFF with higher survival than implants placed in FFF or native bone (90.4% versus 83.5%, P =0.035). Radiotherapy is detrimental to implant survival rates when administered too soon, in high doses, and before tumor resection. A novel evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithm was presented for utilization when determining the optimal treatment order for HNC patients. The overall survival of dental prostheses is acceptable, reaffirming their role as a key component in rehabilitating HNC patients. Considerations must be made regarding RTX dosage, timing, and implant location to optimize survival rates and patient outcomes for improved functionality, aesthetics, and comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreya Sriram
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nham TT, Koudougou C, Piot B, Corre P, Bertin H, Longis J. Prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with jaw reconstruction by fibula free flap: A systematic review. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2024; 125:101735. [PMID: 38072231 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the dental prosthetic rehabilitation (DPR) in patients after jaw reconstruction with fibula free flap. Four databases were searched from January 2000 to January 2023. Of the 2507 studies identified, 36 observational studies were included. Cancer was the most common surgical indications for jawbone resection with 58.3 % of cases followed by benign tumours which representing 24 %. The DPR rate was estimated at 51.6 % across the studies (ranging from 38 % to 55 % depending on the benign or malignant nature of the tumors). Implant-supported prostheses represented 58.9 % of cases of which 66.9 % were fixed and 33.1 % were implant-stabilized overdentures. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) was used in 20 % of studies and aimed to improve the position of the grafted fibula, quality, and aesthetics of DPR and to decrease ischemia and the operating time. One in two authors performed DPR 12 months after jaw reconstruction. If implant survival rate reached 93 % in non-irradiated fibula, it fell to 38 %, 55 %, and 77 % if implantation occurred in the 12, 17, and 24 months after radiotherapy, respectively. Various parameters should be better investigated in further studies including the typology of the prostheses (implant-supported vs removable), the use of VSP, and the optimal time for DPR taking into account the characteristics of the tumor, the size of bone defect, and the need for external irradiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh-Thuy Nham
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Carine Koudougou
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Piot
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Pierre Corre
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France; Nantes Université, Oniris, UnivAngers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, RMeS, UMR 1229, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Hélios Bertin
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France; Nantes Université, UnivAngers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000 Nantes, France.
| | - Julie Longis
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, F-44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaiser M, Burg S, Speth U, Cotter ML, Smeets R, Gosau M, König D. Outcomes and influencing factors of dental implants in fibula, iliac crest, and scapula free flaps: a retrospective case-control study. Int J Implant Dent 2024; 10:8. [PMID: 38334913 PMCID: PMC10858007 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00522-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts after ablative surgery and subsequent dental rehabilitation with implants is often challenging; however, it helps improve the patient's quality of life. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine the implant survival/success rates in different vascularized bone grafts and potential risk factors. METHODS Only patients who received implants in free vascularized bone grafts between 2012 and 2020 were included. The free flap donor sites were the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula. The prosthetic restoration had to be completed, and the observation period had to be over one year after implantation. Implant success was defined according to the Health Scale for Dental Implants criteria. RESULTS Sixty-two patients with 227 implants were included. The implant survival rate was 86.3% after an average of 48.7 months. The causes of implant loss were peri-implantitis (n = 24), insufficient osseointegration (n = 1), removal due to tumor recurrence (n = 1), and osteoradionecrosis (n = 5). Of all implants, 52.4% were classified as successful, 19.8% as compromised, and 27.8% as failed. Removal of osteosynthesis material prior to or concurrent with implant placement resulted in significantly better implant success than material not removed (p = 0.035). Localization of the graft in the mandibular region was associated with a significantly better implant survival (p = 0.034) and success (p = 0.002), also a higher Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score with better implant survival (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION Implants placed in vascularized grafts showed acceptable survival rates despite the potential risk factors often present in these patient groups. However, peri-implantitis remains a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Kaiser
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Burg
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Speth
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Cotter
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Smeets
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Gosau
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniela König
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuroshima S, Ohta Y, Uto Y, Al-Omari FA, Sasaki M, Sawase T. Implant-assisted removable partial dentures: Part I. a scoping review of clinical applications. J Prosthodont Res 2024; 68:20-39. [PMID: 37164658 DOI: 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_22_00252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review aimed to systematically map research regarding implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs), and identify existing gaps in knowledge. STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers independently conducted a search of the MEDLINE-PubMed and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Review and included articles published in English up to August 31, 2022, including human studies, reviews, and in vitro studies. Expert opinions, animal studies, and clinical studies involving complete overdentures were excluded, and ten aspects for establishing the treatment strategy for IARPDs were examined. RESULTS One hundred and twelve articles were chosen. There were two treatment modalities: IARPDs retained by implant- and tooth-supported surveyed single crowns (SCs) or fixed partial dentures (FPDs). In IARPDs retained by tooth-supported surveyed SCs or FPDs, the survival rate of dental implants for IARPDs was relatively higher with a wide range of marginal bone loss and many complications, but with improved functional performance, oral health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. There were limited data on survival or success rates and designs of IARPDs, attachment selections, length and diameter, inclination, placement sites, and loading protocols of implants, regardless of prosthetic types. There was limited information on maxillary IARPDs except for survival rates of implants. CONCLUSIONS Although IARPDs could become a useful treatment strategy, there is limited scientific consensus with gaps in knowledge about their use. Additional well-designed clinical and in vitro studies are necessary to scientifically establish IARPDs as definitive prostheses in implant dentistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichiro Kuroshima
- Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Ohta
- Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yusuke Uto
- Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Farah A Al-Omari
- Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Muneteru Sasaki
- Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Sawase
- Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yusa K, Ishikawa S, Suzuki N, Kunii S, Okuyama N, Hemmi T, Iino M. Measures of oral health-related quality of life in patients with bone graft and implant prosthetic rehabilitation at the anterior of mandible/maxilla among young and middle-aged adults: a retrospective pilot study. Int J Implant Dent 2023; 9:39. [PMID: 37910231 PMCID: PMC10620345 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00496-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dental implants are believed to contribute to improved masticatory function and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL), but the details remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation after bone graft at the anterior mandible/maxilla based on OHRQOL, particularly in young and middle-aged patients. METHODS This retrospective study included 11 patients who received bone grafts at the anterior mandible/maxilla and dental implant surgery. Chewing function score and OHRQOL (using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire) were evaluated before and after completion of an implant-retained bridge or removable implant-supported denture. RESULTS Chewing function score tended to improve slightly after dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation, but none of the observed differences were significant. In the assessment of OHRQOL, relatively worse domain scores before completion of dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation were seen for Functional limitation, Psychological discomfort, and Psychological disability. Conversely, Social disability seemed relatively unaffected by tooth loss. All domain scores and total scores for items other than Physical disability and Social disability were significantly improved after completion of dental implant rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS Tooth loss in the anterior region may not significantly affect chewing function score, but can have a significant impact on OHRQOL. Bone grafts and dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation can resolve these problems, and the results of this study will benefit both patients and medical professionals in terms of treatment planning and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Yusa
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial-Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
| | - Shigeo Ishikawa
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial-Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
| | - Nagiko Suzuki
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial-Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kunii
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Okitama Public General Hospital, Yamagata, 992-0601, Japan
| | - Naoki Okuyama
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial-Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Hemmi
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial-Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Iino
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial-Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, 2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park HI, Lee JH, Lee SJ. The comprehensive on-demand 3D bio-printing for composite reconstruction of mandibular defects. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 44:31. [PMID: 36195777 PMCID: PMC9532487 DOI: 10.1186/s40902-022-00361-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The mandible is a functional bio-organ that supports facial structures and helps mastication and speaking. Large mandible defects, generally greater than 6-cm segment loss, may require composite tissue reconstruction such as osteocutaneous-vascularized free flap which has a limitation of additional surgery and a functional morbidity at the donor site. A 3D bio-printing technology is recently developed to overcome the limitation in the composite reconstruction of the mandible using osteocutaneous-vascularized free flap. Review Scaffold, cells, and bioactive molecules are essential for a 3D bio-printing. For mandibular reconstruction, materials in a 3D bio-printing require mechanical strength, resilience, and biocompatibility. Recently, an integrated tissue and organ printing system with multiple cartridges are designed and it is capable of printing polymers to reinforce the printed structure, such as hydrogel. Conclusion For successful composite tissue reconstruction of the mandible, biologic considerations and components should be presented with a comprehensive on-demand online platform model of customized approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Ick Park
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee-Ho Lee
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Sang Jin Lee
- Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brauner E, Valentini V, Romeo U, Cantore M, Laudoni F, Rajabtork Zadeh O, Formisano V, Cassoni A, Della Monaca M, Battisti A, Mezi S, Cirillo A, De Felice F, Botticelli A, Tombolini V, De Vincentiis M, Colizza A, Tenore G, Polimeni A, Di Carlo S. Dental Implant Failure Risk in Post Oncological Patients, a Retrospective Study and Sapienza Head and Neck Unit Decisional Protocol- 7 Years of Follow-Up. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081863. [PMID: 36010214 PMCID: PMC9406984 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Patients with head and neck cancer are treated by ablative surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these. The side effects of cancer therapies can compromise conventional prosthesis rehabilitation; therefore, dental implants can result in a more effective solution. The aim of the study is to explain how to rehabilitate a patient that underwent head and neck cancer therapy. (2) Methods: This retrospective study conducted from 2015 to 2021 included 223 postoncological patients, aged between 32 and 80 years old. Eighteen patients did not proceed with any treatment, and two died. Therefore, 203 patients have been analyzed and rehabilitated following our decisional protocol, with a mean period of follow-up of 4 years. The implant placement was considered successful when a mean bone loss of 1.6 mm for the first year and a mean of 0.13 mm in subsequent years occurred (3) Results: A total of 161 patients were rehabilitated with a conventional prosthesis, 42 patients (F:M ratio 19:23) with an implant-supported prosthesis and a total of 200 implants were placed; 9 implants were lost (4.5% of 200 implants). Conclusions: The results confirmed that by following our protocol it is possible to obtain an acceptable rate of implant survival, considering the delicacy and complexity of post-oncological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Brauner
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Valentino Valentini
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Umberto Romeo
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Marco Cantore
- Independent Researcher, Corso Italia 19, 58015 Orbetello, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Federico Laudoni
- Independent Researcher, via Garibaldi 141, 00012 Guidonia, Italy;
| | - Oriana Rajabtork Zadeh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | | | - Andrea Cassoni
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Marco Della Monaca
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Andrea Battisti
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Silvia Mezi
- Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (S.M.); (A.C.); (F.D.F.); (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Alessio Cirillo
- Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (S.M.); (A.C.); (F.D.F.); (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (S.M.); (A.C.); (F.D.F.); (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (S.M.); (A.C.); (F.D.F.); (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (S.M.); (A.C.); (F.D.F.); (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Marco De Vincentiis
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Andrea Colizza
- Department of Sense Organs, Policlinico Umberto 1 Sapienza University of Rome, viale Regina Elena 326, 00161 Roma, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Tenore
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Antonella Polimeni
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| | - Stefano Di Carlo
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.B.); (V.V.); (U.R.); (O.R.Z.); (A.C.); (M.D.M.); (A.B.); (M.D.V.); (G.T.); (A.P.); (S.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sozzi D, Filippi A, Canzi G, De Ponti E, Bozzetti A, Novelli G. Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11072060. [PMID: 35407667 PMCID: PMC8999643 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11072060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Methods: 21 patients surgically treated for mandibular neoplasm have been included in the analysis. The Brainlab Vector Vision 3.0® software for surgical navigation has been used for preoperative surgical planning and intra-operative navigation. A post-operative accuracy evaluation has been performed matching the position of mandibular landmarks between pre-operative and post-operative CT scans. Results: the maximal discrepancy observed was included between −3.4 mm and +3.2 mm, assuming negative values for under correction and positive values for overcorrection. An average grade of accuracy included between 0.06 ± 0.58 mm and 0.43 ± 0.68 mm has been observed for every mandibular landmark examined, except for mandibular angles that showed a mean discrepancy value included between 1.36 ± 1.73 mm and 1.46 ± 1.02 mm when compared to preoperative measurements. Conclusion: a satisfying level of accuracy has been observed in the protocol presented, which appears to be more versatile if compared to closed custom-made systems. The technique described may represent a valid option for selected patients, but it cannot be considered for routine activity because of the complexity of the method, the mobility of the jaw, the necessity of surgical navigator and the long surgical learning curve that is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Sozzi
- O.U. Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.F.); (A.B.); (G.N.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Andrea Filippi
- O.U. Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.F.); (A.B.); (G.N.)
- Post-Graduate School of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Canzi
- Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, ASST-GOM Niguarda, Niguarda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Department of Medical Physics, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Alberto Bozzetti
- O.U. Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.F.); (A.B.); (G.N.)
| | - Giorgio Novelli
- O.U. Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.F.); (A.B.); (G.N.)
| |
Collapse
|