The Impact on Nasal Septal Anatomy and Physiology Following Le Fort I Osteotomy for Orthognathic Surgery

Assessment of the Change in the Nasal Septum and Nasal Profile After Le Fort I With Cone Beam Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the relationship between nasal changes and the amount of advancement, impaction, and downward movement of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy.

METHODS

The study included 48 patients who underwent Le Fort I surgery and had pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography records. Changes in the nasal septum were evaluated by measuring septal deviation angles and volumes. In addition, nasolabial angle and width of nasal and alar base were examined. Groups were determined according to the movement of point A (the deepest point on the curvature of the maxillary alveolar process), using a threshold of 1.5 mm for vertical movements and 4 mm for sagittal movements. This resulted in the comparison of 6 groups of 8 people each. Results are presented as mean and standard deviation or median and range depending on the data distribution. Significance level was accepted as P < 0.05.

RESULT

There were no significant differences for each group on its own septal deviation volume or angle values pre/postoperatively. Groups 3 and 5, which both had at least 1.5 mm of impaction, showed significant changes in both deviation angle and volume between the preoperative and postoperative measurements. Nasolabial angle did not show significant changes between groups. Alar base width and nasal width increase was significantly highest in Group 1, which has more than 4 mm sagittal movement and less than 1.5 mm vertical movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Le Fort I osteotomy may lead to undesirable changes in the spatial positioning of the nasal septum. The results of this study suggest that maxillary advancement does not significantly impact septal deviation, whereas maxillary impaction increases the amount of deviation. In addition, nasal width and alar base width tended to increase, and the nasolabial angle tended to decrease slightly, regardless of the direction of movement of the maxilla after orthognathic surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should consider increased nasal septal deviation risks when planning impaction of the maxilla. The soft tissue changes in the nose vary according to different directions and amounts of Le Fort I surgery.

The Effect of Trans-Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis on Nasal Bone, Nasal Septum, and Nasal Airway in the Treatment for Midfacial Hypoplasia in Growing Patients

The purposes of this study were to analyze the effect of trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) on nasal bone, nasal septum, and nasal airway in the treatment of midfacial hypoplasia. A total of 29 growing patients with midfacial hypoplasia who underwent TSDO by a single surgeon were enrolled. The 3-dimensional measurement of nasal bone and nasal septum changes was performed using computed tomography (CT) images obtained preoperatively (T0) and postoperatively (T1). One patient was selected to establish 3-dimensional finite element models to simulate the characteristics of nasal airflow field before and after traction. After traction, the nasal bone moved forward significantly ( P <0.01). The septal deviation angle was lower than that before traction (14.43±4.70 versus 16.86 ±4.59 degrees) ( P <0.01). The length of the anterior and posterior margin of the vomer increased by 21.4% ( P <0.01) and 27.6% ( P <0.01), respectively, after TSDO. The length of the posterior margin of the perpendicular plate of ethmoid increased ( P <0.05). The length of the posterior inferior and the posterior superior margin of the nasal septum cartilage increased ( P <0.01) after traction. The cross-sectional area of nasal airway on the deviated side of nasal septum increased by 23.0% after traction ( P <0.05). The analysis of nasal airflow field showed that the pressure and velocity of nasal airflow and the nasal resistance decreased. In conclusion, TSDO can promote the growth of the midface, especially nasal septum, and increase the nasal space. Furthermore, TSDO is conductive to improve nasal septum deviation and decrease nasal airway resistance.

Does Le Fort I Osteotomy Influence Nasal Septum Deviation?

BACKGROUND

Le Fort I osteotomy is a technique for surgically correcting the maxillary position. Le Fort I osteotomy may affect the nasolabial structures since a very close relationship exists between the maxilla and the nose.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different maxillary movements on the nasal septum after Le Fort I osteotomies with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. We hypothesized that nasal septal angle changes after maxillary impaction and advancement movements.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

This retrospective cohort study involved patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy to correct the maxillary position at Erciyes University, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Hospital. This study included patients who had CBCT images before (T0) and ≥12 months after (T1) surgery. Patients with a history of septoplasty or rhinoplasty before orthognathic surgery, congenital deformities, or posttraumatic deformities were excluded.

PREDICTOR VARIABLES

Its predictor variable was the direction and magnitude of the maxilla's vertical and horizontal movements.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

Change in septal deviation (in degrees) was the main outcome of the study.

COVARIATES

Age, sex, operation (Le Fort I alone or double jaw surgery), cartilage reduction, and anterior nasal spine reduction during surgery were covariates.

DATA ANALYSIS

Angle values were compared with independent samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test in two-category variables. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the angle values according to the movement. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

This study evaluated 154 CBCT images of 77 patients (44 [57.1%] females and 33 [42.9%] males), of which 68 (88.3%) had double jaw surgery and nine (11.7%) had single Le Fort I surgery. The average nasal septum angle was significantly smaller preoperatively (166.2° [157.1° to 172.15°]) than postoperatively (168.7° [131.5° to 180.0°]) across subjects (P = .031). The septal angle decreased in 28 patients, and the rate of postoperative angular change was higher in patients with both advancement and impaction during the surgery (P = .014).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Septum deviation can occur in 37% of cases after Le Fort I surgery. Therefore, Le Fort osteotomies are associated with changes in nasal appearance.

Patient's Perception of Nasal Function and Cosmesis After Maxillomandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Background: Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) remains one of the most effective surgeries for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but it can be difficult to manage nasal and midfacial esthetics for patients requiring significant maxillary advancement. Objective: To evaluate changes in the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) after the modified MMA approach. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on subjects undergoing MMA at a tertiary referral center from September 2020 to August 2021. Nasal function, cosmesis, and sleepiness were assessed perioperatively with the SCHNOS, visual analog scale for nasal function and cosmesis, and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Objective polysomnography data were also investigated. Results: Thirty-one subjects met inclusion criteria. After MMA, SCHNOS-O (obstruction domain) improved from 44.38 ± 26.21 to 19.03 ± -4.75 (p < 0.001). The SCHNOS-C (cosmesis domain) improved significantly from 13.95 ± 19.32 to 5.27 ± 8.93 (p = 0.029). Specific items evaluating self-esteem, nasal straightness, and symmetry showed significant improvement (p = 0.006, 0.025, 0.044). The ESS also improved from 9.41 ± 6.11 to 3.26 ± 3.03 (p < 0.001), and it correlated with nasal obstruction scores. Conclusion: In this study, patients' perception of nasal obstruction and appearance improved after applying the nasal modifications to MMA described for OSA.