Secondary Coronal Synostosis After Early Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Implications for Cranial Growth

Springs Produce Favorable Morphologic Outcomes Relative to H-Craniectomy According to a Two-Center Comparison of Matched Cases

BACKGROUND

Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

Comparisons were performed using available preoperative and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the 2 craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform 2 different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy (the Renier technique). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index, and age. Cephalic index, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of preoperative and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires 2 operations, the mean total operation time was similar for the methods. Of the 3 complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, 2 were spring-related. The compiled analysis of changes in cephalic index and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphologic correction.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in cephalic index and total and partial ICVs over time.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Secondary metopic craniosynostosis after posterior cranial decompression in cloverleaf skull deformity

Cloverleaf skull deformity or Kleeblattschadel syndrome is a severe condition where multiple cranial sutures are absent and prematurely fused, leading to a trilobate head shape. The remaining open sutures or fontanelles compensate for rapid brain expansion, while the constricted fused calvarium restricts brain growth and results in increased intracranial pressure. Recent data show that early posterior cranial and foramen magnum decompression positively affects infants with cloverleaf skulls. However, long-term sequelae are still rarely discussed. We hereby report a child who developed secondary metopic craniosynostosis after posterior cranial decompression, which required a front-orbital advancement and cranial remodelling as a definitive procedure.

A Systematic Review of Idiopathic Secondary Stenosis Following Index Surgery for Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Primary craniosynostosis is a congenital craniofacial disorder in which cranial sutures prematurely close. Iatrogenic secondary stenosis is abnormal cranial suture closure caused by surgical manipulation of the suture. In contrast, idiopathic secondary stenosis develops in a suture that did not undergo surgical manipulation. The objective of this systematic review was to consolidate and characterize the incidence, classification, and management of idiopathic secondary stenosis in the literature.

METHODS

Literature from PubMed, Web Of Science, and EMBASE from 1970 to March 2022 was reviewed. The following information was extracted for individual patients: incidence of idiopathic secondary stenosis, index primary craniosynostosis, primary surgical correction, presenting signs of secondary stenosis, management, and further complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles detailing 1181 patients were included. Ninety-one developed idiopathic secondary stenosis (7.7%). Only 3 of these patients were syndromic. The most common index craniosynostosis was sagittal synostosis (83.5%). The most common suture undergoing idiopathic secondary stenosis was the coronal suture (91.2%). Patients presented at a median age of 24 months. The most common presenting sign was a radiologic finding (85.7%), although some patients presented with headache or head deformity. Only 2 patients, both syndromic, had complications following surgical correction of secondary stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Idiopathic secondary stenosis is a rare, long-term complication following index surgical repair of craniosynostosis. It can occur following any surgical technique. It most commonly affects the coronal suture but can affect any of the sutures, including pansynostosis. Surgical correction is curative in nonsyndromic patients.

Does Coronal Suturectomies and Occipital Barrel Staves Make a Difference in Early Reconstruction for Sagittal Craniosynostosis?

BACKGROUND

Various surgical methods are used for early treatment of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. The craniofacial centers in Uppsala and Helsinki fundamentally both use the H-Craniectomy: Renier's technique. However, the Helsinki group systematically adds coronal suturectomies to prevent secondary coronal synostosis and posterior barrel staves to address posterior bulleting. The effects of these additions in early treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis are currently unknown.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients from Uppsala and 27 patients from Helsinki were included in the study. Clinical data and computed tomography scans were retrieved for all patients.

RESULTS

The Helsinki patients had a smaller preoperative Cranial index (CI) (65 vs 72) and a smaller preoperative width (10.1 vs 11.2). There was no difference in postoperative CI, corresponding to a difference in change in CI. Regression analysis indicated that the larger change in CI in the Helsinki group was mainly due to a lower preoperative CI allowing for a larger normalization. The Helsinki patients had less growth in length (1.5 vs 2.1 cm) and more growth in width (2.3 vs 1.9 cm). There were no differences in head circumference or surgical complications. Secondary coronal synostosis was present in 43% of the Uppsala group at 3 years of age, while calvarial defects located at sites of previous coronal suturectomies and posterior barrel staving were seen in the Helsinki group 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative CI appears to be the main factor in determining the amount of normalization in CI. Prophylactic coronal suturectomies do not seem to benefit preservation of coronal growth function since the modification correlates to less sagittal growth and more growth in width.