1
|
Tekin B, Dundar S, Tekin S, Emine Sukuroglu E, Khurshid Z, Ezgi Y, Demirci F, Faheemuddin M. Effect of micro-arc oxidation coatings with graphene oxide and graphite on osseointegration of titanium implants-an in vivo study. Saudi Dent J 2024; 36:591-595. [PMID: 38690378 PMCID: PMC11056396 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This in vivo study evaluated the effect of graphene oxide and graphite coatings, coupled with the micro-arc oxidation (MAO) surface roughening technique, known for their mechanical strength, chemical stability, and antibacterial properties. The main objective was to assess the degree of improvement in osseointegration of titanium implants resulting from these interventions. Materials and methods In this study, 32 female rats were utilized and randomly allocated into four groups (n = 8 each): machined surface titanium implants (control), those roughened by the MAO method, those coated with graphene oxide-doped MAO, and those with a graphite-doped MAO coating. Titanium implants were surgically placed in the right tibia of the rats. Rats undergoing no additional procedures during the 4-week experimental period were sacrificed at the end. Then, the implants and surrounding bone tissues were separated and embedded in acrylic blocks for reverse torque analysis. Using a digital torque device, the rotational force was applied to all samples using a hex driver and racquet until implant separation from the bone occurred, with the corresponding values recorded on the digital display. Then, statistical analysis was performed to analyze the data. Results No statistically significant difference between the groups was observed in the biomechanical bone-implant connection levels (N/cm) (P = 0.268). Post-hoc tests were not required because no discernible differences were identified between the groups. Conclusion Within the scope of this study, implants treated with the MAO method, along with those coated with graphene oxide- and graphite-doped MAO method, did not exhibit significant superiority in terms of osseointegration compared to machined surface titanium implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahar Tekin
- Firat University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Serkan Dundar
- Firat University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Samet Tekin
- Firat University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Ebru Emine Sukuroglu
- Gumushane University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Gumushane, Turkey
| | - Zohaib Khurshid
- King Faisal University, Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, College of Dentistry, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yusuf Ezgi
- Batman University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Batman, Turkey
| | - Fatih Demirci
- Inonu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Muhammad Faheemuddin
- King Faisal University, Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, College of Dentistry, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guler R, Dundar S, Bozoglan A, Ozcan EC, Ozupek MF, Acikan I, Gunes N, Bingul MB. The Biomechanical Investigation of Osseointegration Levels in Titanium Implants Simultaniously Placed with Different Bone Grafts. Niger J Clin Pract 2024; 27:310-316. [PMID: 38528350 DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_529_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental implant-supported prostheses have been scientifically accepted and have been a common treatment choice in the case reconstructing of partial or total tooth loss. In additon, bone grafts (alloplast, xsenograft, allograft) are frequently used in implant and sinus lift surgical procedures. AIM The aim of this study is to investigate the bone-implant osseointegration levels of titanium implants simultaniously placed with different bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the study, 32 female S. Dawley rats were divided into four groups. In the control group (n = 8), turned surface implants with a 2.5 mm diameter and a 4 mm length were placed in the tibia of the rats without the use of a graft material. In the experimental groups, bone cavities were opened in the tibias of the rats and a synthetic (alloplast) graft (n = 8), human allograft (n = 8), and bovine xsenograft (n = 8) were placed simultaniously with a 2.5 mm diameter and a 4 mm length turned surface titanium implants. The cavities in the experimental groups were opened with a 4 mm diameter and a 5 mm length. After 8 weeks of recovery, all rats were sacrificed at the end of the experimental period. The implants and surrounding bone tissue were removed. The removed tissue was subjected to biomechanical analysis in order to evaluate bone-implant osseointegration and peri-implant new bone formation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used in the study. Significance was evaluated at the P < 0.05 level. RESULTS In the biomechanical analyses, it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between the control group and the other three groups in which different graft materials were applied in terms of bone-implant osseointegration (P > 0.05). In other words, in the biomechanical analyses, no statistical difference was found between any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS As a result of this study, it can be thought that different graft materials can be successfully used in peri-implant-guided bone regeneration and may be an alternative to autogenous grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Guler
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - S Dundar
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dnetistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - A Bozoglan
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dnetistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - E C Ozcan
- Department of Esthetic, Plastic and Reconsructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - M F Ozupek
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - I Acikan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - N Gunes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - M B Bingul
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sanliurfa Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fatani B, Almutairi ES, Almalky HA, Mubarki MI, Al-Safadi A. A Comparison of Knowledge and Skills Related to Up-to-Date Implant Techniques Among Prosthodontists, Periodontists, and Oral Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e30370. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
4
|
Evaluation of the Effects of Systemic Irisin Application on Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-implant Bone Defects. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33:2272-2275. [DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000008747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
5
|
Luo D, Yao C, Zhang R, Zhao R, Iqbal MZ, Mushtaq A, Lee IS, Kong X. Silk Fibroin/Collagen Blended Membrane Fabricated via a Green Papermaking Method for Potential Guided Bone Regeneration Application: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2021; 7:5788-5797. [PMID: 34724784 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) technology is a commonly used surgical procedure for the repair of damaged periodontal tissues. Poor mechanical property and rapid degradation rate are the major reasons for GBR membrane failure in clinical applications. Herein, we applied a green papermaking method to fabricate silk fibroin (SF) membranes blended with collagen and tested their performance. The results showed that the blended SF75 (SF and collagen in a weight ratio of 75:25) membranes are biocompatible with good mechanical properties in the wet condition and appropriate biodegradation rate. MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell adhesion and proliferation on the membranes were improved by the hybrid biological functions of SF and collagen. Subcutaneous implantation in rats for 9 weeks demonstrated that the membranes induced a less severe inflammatory response. The biodegradation time of the SF75 membranes was appropriate for tissue regeneration. This research, for the first time, reports a blended membrane prepared from silk fibroin and collagen with an ecofriendly method, which shows promise for application in guided bone regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Luo
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,School of Textile Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| | - Chenxue Yao
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| | - Ruibo Zhao
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| | - M Zubair Iqbal
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| | - Asim Mushtaq
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| | - In-Seop Lee
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Institute of Natural Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Xiangdong Kong
- Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China.,Zhejiang-Mauritius Joint Research Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evaluation of the Effects of Systemic Irisin Hormone Application on Osseointegration of Titanium Implants: An Experimental Study. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 33:e402-e405. [PMID: 34611101 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000008267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study aimed to conduct a biomechanical investigation of the effects of systemic irisin hormone application on the osseointegration of titanium implants in rat tibias. After surgical implementation of titanium implants in the metaphyseal part of the tibiae of rats, the rats were randomly divided into 2 equal groups: control group (n = 10) and irisin group (n = 10). After surgery in the control group, the rats received no further treatment during the 4-week experimental period. The rats in the irisin group were given 100 ng/kg irisin every day for the 4-week experimental period after surgery. At the end of the experimental period, the rats were euthanized. Implants and surrounding bone tissues were collected for biomechanical (Newton) bone implant connection analysis. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis. There were no significant differences in the biomechanical osseointeration values (Newton) of the groups (P > 0.05, P = 0.59). Also, in the irisin group, there was numerically but not statistically more bone implant connection than in the controls. Within the limitations of this study, irisin did not affect the osseointegration of titanium implants.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tekin S, Dundar S, Demirci F, Bozoglan A, Yildirim TT, Gunes N, Acikan I, Ozcan EC. Biomechanical and biochemical evaluation of the effect of systemic application of omeprazole on the osseointegration of titanium implants. Int J Implant Dent 2021; 7:27. [PMID: 33843027 PMCID: PMC8039067 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00310-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the effects of systemic omeprazole treatment on the osseointegration of titanium implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS After surgical insertion of titanium implants into the metaphyseal part of rats' both right and left tibial bones, the animals were randomly divided into three equal groups: control (n = 8), omeprazole dosage-1 (n = 8) (OME-1), and omeprazole dosage-2 (n = 8) (OME-2) and totally 48 implants were surgically integrated. The rats in the control group received no treatment during the four-week postoperative experimental period. In the OME-1 and OME-2 groups, the rats received omeprazole in doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, every 3 days for 4 weeks. After the experimental period, the rats were euthanized. One rat died in each group and the study was completed with seven rats in each group. Blood serum was collected for biochemical analysis, and the implants and surrounding bone tissue were used for biomechanical reverse-torque analysis. In the biomechanical analysis, implants that were not properly placed and were not osseointegrated were excluded from the evaluation. RESULTS One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test and Student's t test were used for statistical analysis. The reverse-torque test (control (n = 9), OME-1 (N = 7), and OME-2 (n = 7)) analysis of biochemical parameters (alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphorus, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine amino transferase, urea, and creatinine) revealed no significant differences between the groups (control (n = 7), OME-1 (N = 7), and OME-2 (n = 7)) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Omeprazole had no biomechanical or biochemical effects on the osseointegration process of titanium implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samet Tekin
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
| | - Serkan Dundar
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Fatih Demirci
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Alihan Bozoglan
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Tuba Talo Yildirim
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Nedim Gunes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Izzet Acikan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sütcü Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - Erhan Cahit Ozcan
- Department of Plastic-Reconstructive & Esthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|