Intravenous Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis for Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Visual Outcomes from a Large Northern California Cohort

PURPOSE

To assess visual acuity (VA) outcomes in a large cohort of patients diagnosed with nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and to ascertain whether time from symptom onset to presentation, presenting VA, or conservative treatment delivery (anterior chamber paracentesis, ocular massage, intraocular pressure lowering drugs, hyperventilation, or some combination of those) impacted ultimate VA outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

The study included 794 patients who presented with CRAO between 2011 and 2020. Within this cohort, 484 individuals presented within 30 days of symptom onset and had comprehensive documentation regarding the details of their presentation, management, and follow-up ≥ 90 days postdiagnosis.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients with a diagnosis of CRAO initially identified via International Classification of Diseases coding, followed by confirmation of diagnosis by 2 retina specialists. Cases of arteritic CRAO were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity recovery, defined as improvement from ≤ 20/200 or worse at presentation to ≥ 20/100 ≥ 90 days after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 794 identified patients, 712 (89.7%) presented with VA of ≤ 20/200. Similarly, 447 (92.4%) of the 484-patient subset that presented within 30 days and had comprehensive documentation presented with VA ≤ 20/200. Of the 441 of those patients with documented follow-up, 380 (86.2%) remained at that level. Of the 244 patients who presented within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, 227 (93%) presented ≤ 20/200 and 201 (92.6%) of the 217 of those with follow-up data did not improve beyond that threshold. There was no significant difference (P < 0.05) in final VA between patients presenting before versus after 4.5 hours from time of vision loss. There was also no significant difference (P < 0.05) in VA outcomes between patients who did or did not receive conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This large retrospective study further highlights the poor visual prognosis for patients with CRAO. Earlier time to presentation did not seem to impact final VA outcome, nor did conservative treatment efforts. Efficacious evidence-based treatment options are needed for this patient population.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: An individual participant-level meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether thrombolysis improves outcomes in non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (naCRAO) is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the rate of visual recovery after intra-venous thrombolysis (IVT) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase among patients with naCRAO and explore the parameters affecting the final visual acuity (VA).

AIM

We systematically searched six databases. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and VA of ⩾20/100 were used to quantify visual recovery. To explore the role of other factors on visual recovery, we defined two models for studies with aggregated data (designs 1 and 2) and 16 models for individual participant data (IPD, models 1-16).

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

We included data from 771 patients out of 72 publications in nine languages. Visual improvement for ⩾0.3 logMAR was reported in 74.3% of patients who received IVT-tPA within 4.5 h (CI: 60.9-86.0%; unadjusted rate: 73.2%) and 60.0% of those who received IAT-tPA within 24 h (CI: 49.1-70.5%; unadjusted rate: 59.6%). VA of ⩾20/100 was observed among 39.0% of patients after IVT-tPA within 4.5 h and 21.9% of those with IAT-tPA within 24 h. IPD models highlighted the association between improved visual outcomes and VA at presentation, at least 2 weeks follow-up before reporting the final VA, antiplatelet therapy, and shorter symptom onset to thrombolysis window.

CONCLUSION

Early thrombolytic therapy with tPA is associated with enhanced visual recovery in naCRAO. Future studies should refine the optimum time window for thrombolysis in naCRAO.

Treatments for Acute Nonarteritic Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review

Many interventions for nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) are associated with serious complications and little effect on visual outcomes. We report on the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that searched seven databases for peer-reviewed articles reporting on treatments for acute nonarteritic CRAO. We assessed six randomized controlled trials, including interventions such as tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), isovolumic hemodilution, eyeball massage, intraocular pressure reduction, anticoagulation, vasodilation, oxygen inhalation, laser embolysis, transcorneal electrical stimulation, thrombolysis, pentoxifylline, and enhanced external counterpulsation. However, none of the randomized controlled trials demonstrated significant improvement in visual acuity at 1 month compared to observation, and some patients treated with t-PA experienced serious adverse effects including intracranial hemorrhage. Proposed interventions for acute nonarteritic CRAO may not be better than observation, but the evidence is uncertain. Larger, well-designed studies are necessary to determine the most effective management option for acute nonarteritic CRAO. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:650-653.].

Risk of stroke in patients with diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of diabetes that occurs at high frequencies (more than 20%) during the course of the disease. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the incidence of stroke in DR to determine whether DR is associated with stroke.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from their inception to December 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported DR and stroke events were included. The pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. For the incidences of DR and stroke, risk difference and standard error were measured. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess whether any single study could affect the overall outcome.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs involving 46,599 patients with diabetes were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of DR in all patients was 0.29 (95% CI 0.20-0.38). The incidence of any stroke in all patients was 0.03 (95% CI 0.03-0.04). The incidence of any stroke in patients with DR was 0.05 (95% CI 0.04-0.07), significant higher than that in all diabetes patients. The pooled risk ratio of stroke in patients with DR was 2.04 (95% CI 1.25-3.32). The estimated risk ratio of stroke in patients with DR without additional conditions was 1.70 (95% CI 1.43-2.03), which was lower than that in patients with DR with additional conditions (2.29, 95% CI 0.93-5.65).

CONCLUSION

The presence of DR is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Our findings indicate that DR is an important biomarker for the prediction of stroke, and periodic eye examinations should be conducted for stroke prevention.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Look at the Literature for the Emergency Medicine Physician

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a subtype of ischemic stroke and true ocular emergency presenting with acute, painless, monocular vision loss. Typical findings include poor visual acuity (VA), impaired color vision, relative afferent pupillary defect, and on fundoscopic evaluation, retinal edema, cherry red spot, and occasionally visualization of retinal artery emboli. While there are no proven treatments for CRAO, options include orbital massage, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and intra-arterial or intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). This study reviews the current literature on the efficacy of IVT for patients affected by acute, symptomatic CRAO and provides an up-to-date, evidence-based background for emergency physicians (EPs) who evaluate and manage these patients.

Interventions for acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion

BACKGROUND

Acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) occurs as a sudden interruption of the blood supply to the retina and typically results in severe loss of vision in the affected eye. Although many therapeutic interventions have been proposed, there is no generally agreed upon treatment regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of treatments for acute non-arteritic CRAO.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2022, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 15 February 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any interventions with another treatment in participants with acute non-arteritic CRAO in one or both eyes.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology and graded the certainty of the body of evidence for primary (mean change in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA]) and secondary (quality of life and adverse events) outcomes using the GRADE classification.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six RCTs with 223 total participants with acute non-arteritic CRAO; the studies ranged in size from 10 to 84 participants. The included studies varied geographically: one in Australia, one in Austria and Germany, two in China, one in Germany, and one in Italy. We were unable to conduct any meta-analyses due to study heterogeneity. None of the included studies compared the same pair of interventions: 1) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) versus intravenous saline; 2) t-PA versus isovolemic hemodilution, eyeball massage, intraocular pressure reduction, and anticoagulation; 3) nitroglycerin, methazolamide, mecobalamin tablets, vitamin B1 and B12 injections, puerarin and compound anisodine (also known as 654-2) along with oxygen inhalation, eyeball massage, tube expansion, and anticoagulation compared with and without intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA); 4) transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) with 0 mA versus with 66% of the participant's individual electrical phosphene threshold (EPT) at 20 Hz (66%) versus with 150% of the participant's individual EPT (150%) at 20 Hz; 5) ophthalmic artery branch retrograde thrombolysis versus superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis; and 6) pentoxifylline versus placebo. There was no evidence of an important difference in visual acuity between participants treated with t-PA versus intravenous saline (mean difference [MD] at 1 month -0.15 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.48 to 0.18; 1 study, 16 participants; low certainty evidence); t-PA versus isovolemic hemodilution, eyeball massage, intraocular pressure reduction, and anticoagulation (MD at 1 month -0.00 logMAR, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.23; 1 study, 82 participants; low certainty evidence); and TES with 0 mA versus TES with 66% of EPT at 20 Hz versus TES with 150% of EPT at 20 Hz. Participants treated with t-PA experienced higher rates of serious adverse effects. The other three comparisons did not report statistically significant differences. Other studies reported no data on secondary outcomes (quality of life or adverse events).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current research suggests that proposed interventions for acute non-arteritic CRAO may not be better than observation or treatments of any kind such as eyeball massage, oxygen inhalation, tube expansion, and anticoagulation, but the evidence is uncertain. Large, well-designed RCTs are necessary to determine the most effective treatment for acute non-arteritic CRAO.

Bridging a Century-Old Problem: The Pathophysiology and Molecular Mechanisms of HA Filler-Induced Vascular Occlusion (FIVO)-Implications for Therapeutic Interventions

Biocompatible hyaluronic acid (HA, hyaluronan) gel implants have altered the therapeutic landscape of surgery and medicine, fostering an array of innovative products that include viscosurgical aids, synovial supplements, and drug-eluting nanomaterials. However, it is perhaps the explosive growth in the cosmetic applications of injectable dermal fillers that has captured the brightest spotlight, emerging as the dominant modality in plastic surgery and aesthetic medicine. The popularity surge with which injectable HA fillers have risen to in vogue status has also brought a concomitant increase in the incidence of once-rare iatrogenic vaso-occlusive injuries ranging from disfiguring facial skin necrosis to disabling neuro-ophthalmological sequelae. As our understanding of the pathophysiology of these injuries has evolved, supplemented by more than a century of astute observations, the formulation of novel therapeutic and preventative strategies has permitted the amelioration of this burdensome complication. In this special issue article, we review the relevant mechanisms underlying HA filler-induced vascular occlusion (FIVO), with particular emphasis on the rheo-mechanical aspects of vascular blockade; the thromboembolic potential of HA mixtures; and the tissue-specific ischemic susceptibility of microvascular networks, which leads to underperfusion, hypoxia, and ultimate injury. In addition, recent therapeutic advances and novel considerations on the prevention and management of muco-cutaneous and neuro-ophthalmological complications are examined.

INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY FOR ACUTE NONARTERITIC CENTRAL RETINAL ARTERY OCCLUSION. A REVIEW

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a form of acute ischemic stroke. It is a critical condition that often leads to severe visual loss or blindness and can be a harbinger of further cerebrovascular events. Due to the lack of scientific data, there are no effective evidence-based forms of therapy for this condition. None of the conservative therapies have proven effective. The results of some previously published studies suggest a benefit of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in the same regimen as in the treatment of ischemic stroke. This work aims to present an overview of published clinical studies focused on the use of intravenous thrombolysis for CRAO, evaluate its efficacy and safety, and propose an optimal diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for acute management of CRAO. Summary statistics of patient data from relevant studies indicate that a significant visual acuity improvement was achieved by a total of 45 % of patients receiving alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptoms onset. The occurrence of adverse events in this time window was not significant. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy in CRAO thus appears to be effective and safe. However, we still lack data from adequate prospective randomized controlled trials to confirm this conclusion. To date, two randomized trials are being conducted. The intravenous thrombolysis administration, patient monitoring, etiologic workup, and setting of effective secondary prevention should be ensured at the centre of highly specialized cerebrovascular care. Urgent transport of the CRAO patient to the nearest centre is essential.

Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with central retinal artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

METHODS

We searched the database of PubMed and EMBASE for potentially eligible studies that reported IVT in CRAO patients from their dates of inception to May 19, 2021. The rate and odds ratios (OR) of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement, mean difference (MD) of BCVA with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled with random effects model.

RESULTS

We included 8 studies enrolling 316 CRAO patients, among them, 157 patients received IVT with alteplase while 159 patients did not. The rate of best BCVA improvement was 47% (95% CI 33-62%) in the CRAO patients treated with IVT, which was higher than that of 12% (95% CI 1-23%) in those without IVT (OR 5.97, 95% CI [2.77-12.86]). In the setting of similar baseline BCVA (MD [logMAR] 0.16, 95% CI [- 0.15 to 0.46]), compared with those who did not receive IVT, the CRAO patients who received IVT had better best BCVA (MD [logMAR] - 0.23, 95% CI [- 0.44 to - 0.02]), but had no significant better final BCVA (MD [logMAR] - 0.10, 95% CI [- 0.32 to 0.12]). Two CRAO patients had complicated symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after IVT.

CONCLUSIONS

IVT treatment might be effective and safe for CRAO patients, but ocular-specific complications which were not associated with thrombolysis could affect final visual acuity.