A Novel Design of V-shaped Radial Forearm Free Flap Facilitates the Direct Closure of Donor Site Wound

A New Design for Forearm Skin Flaps for Areas that Do not Require Additional Grafting

Forearm skin flaps are widely used to reconstruct oral cancer due to their advantages, such as vascular stability, simple preparation, and a high success rate. However, traditional forearm skin flaps have shortcomings: the donor site requires grafting, which increases surgical trauma by creating a second surgical area, and the scarring at the donor site significantly affects the esthetics of the forearm. Therefore, we have designed a new ^-shaped radial forearm skin flap, in which the flap is designed as 2 semi-elliptical subunits. After the flap is harvested, these 2 subunits are joined, and the reserved skin at the donor site is directly sutured to the outer part of the donor site. The area of the ^-shaped radial forearm skin flap can be as large as that prepared with traditional forearm skin flaps, and there is no need for grafting at the donor site. This avoids additional trauma to the donor site after surgery, significantly reduces related complications, and enhances the esthetic outcome. This paper reports a case of a cheek cancer (carcinoma of the buccal mucosa) patient (T3N0M0), where the flap survived postoperatively, and both the surgical site and donor site healed in the first phase. The patient has no sensory or functional impairments; swallowing and speech functions are satisfactory.

Radially Pedicled In-Situ Split-Thickness Skin Grafts, an Alternative to Distal Split-Thickness Skin Grafts

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to introduce a novel radially pedicled in-situ split-thickness skin graft (STSG). The morbidity, esthetic, and functional outcomes of the radially pedicled in-situ STSG were in comparison with those of the distal STSG.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

A single-institution review.

METHODS

Seventy patients with oral cancer who underwent radical surgical resection and simultaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction from July 2021 to March 2022 were included. De-epithelialized RFFFs and traditional RFFFs were used to repair oral defects of 35 patients in Group A and Group B, respectively, while radially pedicled in-situ STSGs and distal STSGs taken from abdomens were used to repair donor site defects in the above groups, respectively. Patient demographics, wound healing complications, and esthetic and functional outcomes of the forearms were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference between Group A and Group B was observed in terms of donor site and recipient site complications. The esthetic outcome was superior in Group A compared to Group B (P = .011). The extension range, sensation, and pinch strength of operated forearms were significantly reduced in both groups after surgery (P < .05), however, intergroup differences were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results suggest that radially pedicled in-situ STSG is an applicable technique for direct closure and better esthetic outcomes in the forearm donor site.