Globalization of The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Over The Last Decade: A Continent, Country, and State Level Analysis

Content Analysis of the Top 25 Most Cited Articles of the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery With ChatGPT-4o

OBJECTIVE

Since 1990, the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery has been an important resource for clinicians and basic scientists. The journal addresses clinical practice, surgical innovations, and educational issues. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of these articles to clinical practice innovations and surgical procedures by analyzing the content of the 25 most cited articles published in the journal. It also aims to demonstrate the potential of artificial intelligence tools in academic content analysis.

METHODS

All articles published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery on June 13, 2024, were searched using the Web of Science Database, and the 25 most cited articles were identified. The full texts of these articles were saved in PDF format and metadata were saved as plain text files. Content analysis of these 25 articles was performed using ChatGPT-4o.

RESULTS

As a result of the analysis, some articles stood out in terms of clinical importance. It also appeared that ChatGPT could be used to compare multiple articles.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the authors analyzed the content of the 25 most cited articles published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery using ChatGPT-4o. These articles were evaluated according to the criteria of innovations in clinical practice and compliance with surgical procedures. This study presents interesting findings in terms of the use of artificial intelligence tools in academic content analysis. The authors thought that this study could be a source of inspiration for future studies.

Altmetric Analysis of the Most Mentioned Articles Online in the Contemporary Craniofacial Surgery Literature

As online media acquires increased utilization as a means of disseminating scientific research, Altmetric analyses are useful to identify socially impactful publications and their characteristics. Accordingly, the objective of this investigation was to determine the most mentioned articles online regarding craniofacial surgery and compare these articles with their most cited counterparts. Using the Web of Science database, 7097 craniofacial surgery publications were identified. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) and average citations per year (ACpY) were extracted, and articles were ranked by their social and scientific impact. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses were performed to examine characteristics including AAS, ACpY, country of origin, journal, open access (OA) status, publication year, study design, and topic. The average AAS of the 50 most mentioned articles was 83.68 (SD±107.40), and the average citation count of the 50 most cited articles was 76.38 (SD±35.15). OA status was significantly more prevalent among the most mentioned articles (24.0%) relative to all articles (10.72%) and the most cited articles (4.0%). The most mentioned and the most cited articles primarily originated from the United States (64.0% and 38.0%, respectively), discussed topics related to the medical and surgical management of patients (48.0% and 58.0%, respectively), and were systematic reviews (16.0% and 28.0%, respectively). However, there was significantly more geographic diversity in the latter cohort. In summary, this comparative examination reveals important differences between the most mentioned and most cited articles, highlighting the distinct utility of AAS and citation count when evaluating research impact.

The Impact of Senior Author Profile on Publication Level of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) incorporated the level of evidence (LOE) pyramid in 2011 to highlight evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the profile of senior authors publishing in PRS and the LOE of publications.

A Bibliometric Keyword and Term Analysis of the Articles Published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Between 1995 and 2020

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to analyze the terms in the abstract section and keywords of articles published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (J Craniofac Surg) bibliometrically. Using the advanced search section in the Web of Science database on February 26, 2021, all articles published in the J Craniofac Surg from 1995 to 2020 were listed. All records of the detected 11,888 articles were exported and both terms in the abstract and keywords used in the articles were determined through the VOSviewer (version 1.6.16) software. It was found that the 10 most common terms in the abstract were patient (n: 6820), study (n: 4729), surgery (n: 3422), case (n: 3230), year (n: 2585), treatment (n: 2430), author (n: 2303) complication (n: 2150), month (n: 2061), and technique (n: 2002), respectively. It was found that the 10 most common keywords were craniosynostosis (n: 408), distraction osteogenesis (n: 257), orthognathic surgery (n: 243), mandible (n: 225), cleft palate (n: 214), reconstruction (n: 206), surgery (n: 157), cranioplasty (n: 150), cleft lip (n: 133), and computed tomography (n: 132), respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first bibliometric keyword and term analysis in the field of craniofacial surgery. This study will enable us to have an idea about the past and current trends and the visibility of the articles published in the J Craniofac Surg.

The Most Frequently Cited References in the Articles Published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Between 1995 and 2020

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to examine the cited-references in the articles published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery between 1995 and 2020. On February 20, 2021, all articles published before January 1, 2021, in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery were listed using advanced search in the Web of Science database. The journal's ISSN and e-ISSN numbers were used to perform this search. All information about these articles has been marked and exported to Tab-delimited (Win) format. It was then analyzed with the VOSviewer software. In the Web of Science database, it was investigated that a total of 11,888 articles were published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery between 1995 and 2020. A total of 137,829 different cited-references were used in these 11,888 articles. The top 15 most cited-references were identified. It was found that the first 3 most cited journals were Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (n: 21,700; 15.74%), Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (n: 12,199; 8.85%), and Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (n: 9383, 6.81%), respectively. As far as we know, the present study is the first study to analyze the cited-references in the field of craniofacial surgery. The authors think that the publications determined in this study are fundamental building blocks for both the field of craniofacial surgery and the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.

The 25 Most Cited Articles in The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery: A Study Based on the Web of Science From 1995 to 2020

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to identified and analyzed the top 25 most cited articles among the articles published in The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (J Craniofac Surg) from 1995 to 2020 in the Web of Science database. Using the advanced search section in the Web of Science, all articles published in the J Craniofac Surg were listed. The distribution of the numbers of publications by years was determined. It was determined that a total of 11,888 articles were published in the J Craniofac Surg between 1995 and 2020. A total of 84,218 citations were made to these articles, and the h-index of these articles was 73. The top 25 most cited articles were determined. The top three countries that made the most cited to these 25 articles were the USA (n: 1112), China (n: 292), and Germany (n: 251), respectively. The top three journals that made the most cited to these 25 articles were the J Craniofac Surg (n: 378), Plast Reconstr Surg (n: 179), and J Oral Maxillofac Surg (n: 120), respectively. The authors think that this study may benefit researchers in this field by identifying the most cited articles in the J Craniofac Surg.