Orthognathic Surgery Rate in Cleft Care

Effectiveness of pre-alveolar bone graft orthodontics for patients with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of pre-alveolar bonegraft (ABG) orthodontics with no orthodontic treatment for patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate. All relevant studies from 1946 to October 30, 2022, were identified using several sources including The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE (Ovid) and EPUB ahead of publications and non-indexed citations. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and Controlled Clinical Trials (CCT) were included.

POPULATION

Non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate patients who have had ABG surgery.

INTERVENTION

Orthodontics prior to ABG. Comparison: No orthodontic treatment prior to ABG.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Successful eruption of permanent canines. All articles were screened for the title, abstract and full text independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. The quality assessment of RCT was performed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool and the CCT was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Of the 904 studies retrieved in the search, one RCT and one CCT were included. Both studies were judged as high risk of bias. The results from one study showed a statistically significant increase in bone volume and decreased bone defect post-ABG in the orthodontic treatment group. However, there was no difference with respect to other variables. Both included studies were of low quality. There is not enough evidence to recommend orthodontic treatment pre-ABG for patients with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Future high-quality studies are required to inform patients and clinicians about the effectiveness of pre-graft orthodontic treatment.

Correlation of Orthognathic Surgical Movements to Perception of Facial Appearance in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

STUDY DESIGN

Cephalometric scans were compared before and after surgery to assess the degree of correction. Correlations between skeletal movements and survey outcomes were determined using multivariate regression analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify relationships between subjective observer-reported improvements in esthetics and emotional appearance with specific surgical movements.

METHODS

Ten patients at a single tertiary institution (average age: 18.1 ± 0.8), 9 males and 1 female, underwent orthognathic repair and had comprehensive cephalometric records. Standardized anterior posterior and lateral pre and postoperative photographs of patients were included in a survey to clinicians to assess noncognitive domains on a Likert Scale (1-10). CLEFT-Q was administered to gauge patient satisfaction in categories of appearance, speech, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Per clinicians, multiple domains increased including facial attractiveness (4.1 ± 0.7 versus 7.3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001), friendliness (4.5 ± 0.4 versus 7.3 ± 0.5, P < 0.001), confidence (4.1 ± 0.4 versus 7.1 ± 0.4, P < 0.001), and recommendation for surgery decreased (8.9 ± 0.1 versus 3.6 ± 0.5, P < 0.001). Speech distress decreased with increased SNA and convexity, whereas Psychological and Social scores decreased with an increased ANB. Functional eating and drinking scores increased with maxillary depth.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthognathic surgery improves many noncognitive domains in patients with cleft lip and palate as assessed by both patients and clinicians on all aspects of facial attractiveness and perception. These findings demonstrate objective bases of skeletal adjustments for perceived improvements in facial appearance and emotion.

Two-stage palatal repair in non-syndromic CLP patients using anterior to posterior closure is associated with minimal need for secondary palatal surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess the need for secondary palatal corrective surgery in a concept of palate repair that uses a protocol of anterior to posterior closure of primary palate, hard palate and soft palate.

METHODS

A data base of patients primarily operated between 2001 and 2021 at the Craniofacial and Cleft Care Center of the University Goettingen was evaluated. Cleft lips had been repaired using Tennison Randall and Veau-Cronin procedures in conjunction with alveolar cleft repair. Cleft palate repair in CLP patients was accomplished in two steps with repair of primary palate and hard palate first using vomer flaps at the age of 10-12 months and subsequent soft palate closure using Veau/two-flap procedures 3 months later. Isolated cleft palate repair was performed in a one-stage operation using Veau/two-flap procedures. Data on age, sex, type of cleft, date and type of surgery, occurrence and location of oronasal fistulae, date and type of secondary surgery performed for correction of oronasal fistula (ONF)and / or Velophyaryngeal Insufficiency (VPI) were extracted. The rate of skeletal corrective surgery was registered as a proxy for surgery induced facial growth disturbance.

RESULTS

In the 195 patients with non-syndromic complete CLP evaluated, a total number of 446 operations had been performed for repair of alveolar cleft and cleft palate repair (Veau I through IV). In 1 patient (0,5%), an ONF occurred requiring secondary repair. Moreover, secondary surgery for correction of VPI was required in 1 patient (0,5%) resulting in an overall rate of 1% of secondary palatal surgery. Skeletal corrective surgery was indicated in 6 patients (19,3%) with complete CLP in the age group of 15 - 22 years (n = 31).

CONCLUSIONS

The presented data have shown that two-step sequential cleft palate closure of primary palate and hard palate first followed by soft palate closure has been associated with minimal rate of secondary corrective surgery for ONF and VPI at a relatively low need for surgical skeletal correction.

Premaxillary Setback in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical outcomes and maxillofacial growth in patients undergoing primary lip repair with or without premaxillary setback.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, California.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with bilateral cleft lip  ±  palate (BCLP) who underwent lip repair with or without premaxillary setback from January 1975 to September 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

No intervention was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Patient demographics, comorbidities, and syndromic status were obtained. Indications for premaxillary setback, incidence of midface hypoplasia, orthodontic and/or orthognathic treatments, follow-up, complications, and revisions were recorded and analyzed. Comparisons among long-term outcomes, particularly the development of midface hypoplasia were made between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients who underwent BCLP repair with premaxillary setback (BCLP  +  PS) and 31 matched control patients who underwent BCLP repair without premaxillary setback (BCLP - PS) were included. Among the 2 groups, multiple logistic regression demonstrated that when controlling for comorbidities, syndromic status, timing of lip repair, and timing of palate repair, premaxillary setback was neither significantly associated with the development of midface hypoplasia (P  =  .076) nor the timing of midface hypoplasia development (P  =  .940) in those that ultimately acquired this facial dysmorphology.

CONCLUSIONS

While a high incidence of midface hypoplasia was seen in both BCLP  ±  PS and BCLP - PS, our findings demonstrate no difference in midface hypoplasia irrespective of premaxillary setback in the setting of BCLP. Future prospective studies investigating the downstream ramifications of our suggested selection criteria for premaxillary setback are warranted.

Complications of orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Determine the main complications of orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate.

METHODS

PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were systematically reviewed. Studies addressing the complications of orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate were included. For the search, the strategy was used with the descriptors extracted from MeSH "Cleft Palate", "Orthognathic Surgery" and "Complications". The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Patients of any sex, age, and ethnicity with cleft lip and palate submitted to orthognathic surgery were included in this systematic review. The study followed the PRISMA 2020 standards and was registered in PROSPERO with protocol CRD42020195927.

RESULTS

In the initial search, 1090 articles were found and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eleven studies were selected. The sample consisted of 629 patients who underwent Orthognathic Surgery, with an average age of 21.52 years. The majority of patients (390) presented unilateral transforamen proposals. In total, 150 complications were identified in the included studies, the most frequent being relapse of movement with 77 cases (51.3 %). Other reported, but less frequent, complications were gingival recession with root exposure, premaxillary mobility, intraoperative hemorrhage, fistulas and infection and velopharyngeal impairment. Most included studies did not have a control group, making meta-analysis unfeasible. Seven of the included studies presented a low risk of bias according to the NOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients is a safe procedure, however it presents particularities and more complications when compared to a non-cleft patient. In this study, the most common complication found was the relapse, and the surgeon must be aware of this complication and others, and try to minimize its negative effects on the patient. We strongly recommend further investigations with detailed methodologies, control groups, well-described criteria for reported complications, and comprehensive sample characteristics to provide higher-quality evidence.

Dental Protraction Versus Surgery for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Budget Impact Analysis

Class III malocclusion for individuals with cleft lip and palate has historically been managed with surgery. Orthodontic protraction is a noninvasive alternative that may be associated with lower costs. This analysis investigated the budget impact of protraction versus surgery from an institutional perspective. Using a decision tree, analysis was conducted using costs derived from Medicaid reimbursement codes and using actual institutional reimbursement. Probabilities of success, failure, and complications were based on a clinical trial comparing the 2 treatment modalities. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results to model parameters. Based on Medicaid fee schedules and failure rates requiring additional surgery, the total cost of protraction was $79,506 versus $172,807 for surgery, resulting in $93,302 cost-savings per patient. The cost and probability of surgery success, as well as the cost of surgery failure and repeat surgery, had the largest impact on these cost-savings. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cost-savings of nearly $92,000 or higher in >50% of simulations. This study showed that protraction is associated with lower costs than surgery and may present a cost-effective alternative to surgery in eligible, appropriate patients.

Rhinoplasty and Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy in Cleft Patients

INTRODUCTION

Cleft patients often need orthognathic surgery to correct maxillary hypoplasia and rhinoplasty to correct nasal deformity. Rhinoplasty can be performed as a staged procedure after orthognathic surgery or simultaneously with maxillary osteotomy.

AIM

The authors evaluated need for and complications of staged and simultaneous rhinoplasties in patients with different cleft types undergoing maxillary osteotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study examined 99 (54 females) consecutive nonsyndromic patients with cleft lip/palate [23 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), 51 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and 25 cleft palate (CP)] with a mean age of 17.8 (range: 11.5-45.3) years who had undergone Le Fort I maxillary advancement or bimaxillary osteotomy at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between 2002 and 2016. Medical charts were accessed through the hospital's archives and database.

RESULTS

Of patients who underwent maxillary osteotomy, 45% (45/99) needed rhinoplasty (14 BCLP, 27 UCLP, and 4 CP). A significant difference (P<0.01) existed in the need for rhinoplasty between different cleft types, those with BCLP and UCLP needing the most operations (60% and 53%). In 20 patients (20%), rhinoplasty was performed simultaneously with maxillary osteotomy, and in 25 patients (25%) in a second operation after osteotomy. The overall complication rate was 14%. No difference existed in complication rate in patients with or without simultaneous rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Of cleft patients who underwent maxillary osteotomy, 45% needed rhinoplasty. Patients with BCLP and UCLP needed rhinoplasty most often. Staged and simultaneous procedures were almost equally common with similar complication rates.

Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Has Asymmetry of Bony Orbits: A Retrospective Study

Facial asymmetry is common in unilateral clefts. Since virtual surgical planning (VSP) is becoming more common and automated segmentation is utilized more often, the position and asymmetry of the orbits can affect the design outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients requiring orthognathic surgery have asymmetry of the bony orbits. Retrospectively, we analyzed the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or computed tomography (CT) data of UCLP (n = 15) patients scheduled for a Le Fort 1 (n = 10) or bimaxillary osteotomy (n = 5) with VSP at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center, Helsinki University Hospital. The width, height, and depth of the bony orbit and the distance between the sella turcica and infraorbital canal were measured. A volumetric analysis of the orbits was also performed. The measurements were tested for distribution, and the cleft side and the contralateral side were compared statistically with a two-sided paired t-test. To assess asymmetry in the non-cleft population, we performed the same measurements of skeletal class III patients undergoing orthognathic surgery at Päijät-Häme Central Hospital (n = 16). The volume of bony orbit was statistically significantly smaller (p = 0.014), the distance from the infraorbital canal to sella turcica was shorter (p = 0.019), and the anatomical location of the orbit was more medio-posterior on the cleft side than on the contralateral side. The non-cleft group showed no statistically significant asymmetry in any measurements. According to these preliminary results, UCLP patients undergoing orthognathic surgery show asymmetry of the bony orbit not seen in skeletal class III patients without a cleft. This should be considered in VSP for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia and facial asymmetry in patients with UCLP.

Does Early Referral Lead to Early Repair? Quality Improvement in Cleft Care

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip and palate is the most common congenital defect of the head and neck, occurring in 1 of 700 live births. Diagnosis often occurs in utero by conventional or 3-dimensional ultrasound. Early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (<3 months of life) for unilateral cleft lip (UCL), regardless of cleft width, has been the mainstay of lip reconstruction at Children's Hospital Los Angeles since 2015. Historically, traditional lip repair (TLR) was performed at 3 to 6 months of life ± preoperative nasoalveolar molding (NAM). Previous publications highlight the benefits of ECLR, such as enhanced aesthetic outcomes, decreased revision rate, better weight gain, increased alveolar cleft approximation, cost savings of NAM, and improved parent satisfaction. Occasionally, parents are referred for prenatal consultations to discuss ECLR. This study evaluates timing of cleft diagnosis, preoperative surgical consultation, and referral patterns to validate whether prenatal diagnosis and prenatal consultation lead to ECLR.

METHODS

Retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent ECLR versus TLR ± NAM from 2009 to 2020. Timing of repair, cleft diagnosis, and surgical consultation, as well as referral patterns, were abstracted. Inclusion criteria dictated: age < 3 months for ECLR or 3 to 6 months for TLR, no major comorbidities, and diagnosis of UCL without palatal involvement. Patients with bilateral cleft lip or craniofacial syndromes were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients, 51 (47.7%) underwent ECLR whereas 56 underwent TLR (52.3%). Average age at surgery was 31.8 days of life for the ECLR cohort and 112 days of life for the TLR cohort. Furthermore, 70.1% of patients were diagnosed prenatally, yet only 5.6% of families had prenatal consults for lip repair, 100% of which underwent ECLR. Most patients were referred by pediatricians (72.9%). Significance was identified between incidence of prenatal consults and ECLR (P = 0.008). In addition, prenatal diagnosis was significantly correlated with incidence of ECLR (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate significance between prenatal diagnosis of UCL and prenatal surgical consultation with incidence of ECLR. Accordingly, we advocate for education to referring providers about ECLR and the potential for prenatal surgical consultation in the hopes that families may enjoy the myriad benefits of ECLR.