Vomopalatoplasty: a novel procedure to reduce velopharyngeal distance in cleft palate repair

Vomer Flaps Support Velopharyngeal Competency, Fistula Free Repair, and 3D Construction of Normal Anatomy in Patients with Cleft Palate

Cleft palate repair comprises the surgical creation of a congenitally nonexistent normal anatomy, to establish physiological function by moving tissues into their normal anatomical positions. In patients with isolated incomplete (IICP) or submucous (SMCP) cleft palate, the vomer is usually not completely attached to the palatal plate in the midline. This condition, which is visible through surgical access radiologically or via endoscope, is often disregarded during hard palate repair. This can lead to "hypernasality" despite a well-functioning velopharyngeal mechanism. The general practice of hard palate repair by suturing merely the nasal layers together separates the oral and nasal cavities. However, without incorporation of the vomer, it is impossible to build two separate nasal floors on the left and right sides. We consider that achieving normal speech and separation of the nasal cavities are mutually dependent and have to be considered equally.

Methods

We described hard palate repair involving the vomer for construction of both nasal floors. We presented the occlusal relationship, hypernasality, and fistula rates in 37 patients operated on between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018.

Results

One child presented minimal hypernasality; all others had normal resonance/voice. Fistula rate was zero, and no cross bites were observed.

Conclusions

The implicit connection between the inner nose, resonance/voice, and prevention of fistulae has not yet been acknowledged. The correct usage of vomer flaps in IICP and SMCP creating separate nasal floors supports the velopharyngeal competency, avoids fistula formation, and should be incorporated regularly, like in other cleft forms.

Vomer Flap: A Golden Tool for the Treatment of Cleft Palate

Despite the lack of consensus regarding the treatment of labio-palatal clefts, each treatment protocol is the expression of an individual perspective that accumulates the experience of each multidisciplinary group, which all pursue the same goal: to achieve adequate language development with the lowest possible impact on facial growth. To achieve this, a management scheme has been developed, this exploits vomer flaps for the closure of palatal clefts and limits dissections in the palatine segments. Modifications are presented in the design and dissection of vomer flaps, so as to use the largest amount of mucosal tissue available, thus facilitating closure of the different clefts, particularly in Veau Group III clefts.

Does contribution of extended vomer flap to palatoplasty affects speech results

Development of normal speech is the primary goal of successful palatoplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of the contribution of vomer flap to palatoplasty procedure for speech function. Eighty-one children who underwent 2 flap palatoplasty procedures for cleft palate repair between 2002 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed in 3 groups. Group 1 underwent palatoplasty without contribution of vomer flap. Group 2 underwent palatoplasty with standard dissection of vomer flap, whereas group 3 underwent palatoplasty with extended dissection of vomer flap. Speech function of the patients was evaluated using objective assessment tools such as nasopharyngoscopy and nasometer. Eighty-one children who underwent 2 flap palatoplasty were included in this study. The mean age at palatoplasty was 10.17 months, and mean length of follow-up was 72.33 months. For most syllables, patients repaired using extended vomer flap demonstrated lower nasalance scores. Nasopharyngoscopic examination revealed velopharyngeal motility in 24 patients (80%) in group 1 and in 20 (83.3%) and 23 (85.2%) patients in groups 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.930). In velopharyngeal closure, there were only 5 patients (18.5%) in group 3, whereas there were 6 patients (25.0%) for group 2 and 10 patients (33.3%) for group 1 with no closure (P = 0.311). Although most optimum results were observed in the group with extended dissection of the vomer flap, contribution of the extended vomer flap to the repair of the soft palate did not lead to significantly better speech results.

Musculo-nasomucosal unit with complete lateral bony freeing and medial rotation for ideal C-shape restoration and retropositioning of the levator veli palatini

No definitive procedure for cleft repair has been identified yet as the gold standard. Accordingly, this work tried to appraise the hypothesis that if the bony detachment and full retropositioning of the levator veli palatini muscle can ideally present an anatomical C-shape muscular sling restoration and if this is accompanied with pushback palatoplasty, would this present a better result in terms of tissue fistulation and phonetic impairment? A series of 74 different degrees of palatal clefts were operated by pushback palatoplasty combined with a modified approach of the levator vili palatini. This muscle was dissected only from the oral mucosa while kept attached to the nasal one as a musculo-nasomucosal unit. This unit was completely detached from the bony margin of the hard palate and then medially rotated and retropositioned in a typical C-shape mobile sling. Evaluations included suture line assessment and fistula development, and following the child's need for speech therapy. There were no intraoperative complications. Definite anterior fistulae with nasal air and foot leakage were observed in 2 cases. Four cases had postoperative velopharyngeal incompetence with a need for speech therapy. Tension-free closure, lower risk of fistula, good restoration of velopharyngeal functions, ability to be performed on all cleft types, ability to provide a good intraoperative exposure, and being a single stage seem to be the most important advantages of this unpublished technique.