Orbital Floor Reconstruction

High-Density Porous Polyethylene Implant Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

Porous polyethylene has been widely used in craniofacial reconstruction due to its biomechanical properties and ease of handling. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to summarize outcomes utilizing high-density porous polyethylene (HDPP) implants in cranioplasty. A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify original studies with HDPP cranioplasty from inception to March 2023. Non-English articles, commentaries, absent indications or outcomes, and nonclinical studies were excluded. Data on patient demographics, indications, defect size and location, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were extracted. Summary statistics were calculated using weighted averages based on the available reported data. A total of 1089 patients involving 1104 cranioplasty procedures with HDPP were identified. Patients' mean age was 44.0 years (range 2 to 83 y). The mean follow-up duration was 32.0 months (range 2 wk to 8 y). Two studies comprising 17 patients (1.6%) included only pediatric patients. Alloplastic cranioplasty was required after treatment of cerebrovascular diseases (50.9%), tumor excision (32.0%), trauma (11.4%), trigeminal neuralgia/epilepsy (3.4%), and others such as abscesses/cysts (1.4%). The size of the defect ranged from 3 to 340 cm 2 . An overall postoperative complication rate of 2.3% was identified, especially in patients who had previously undergone surgery at the same site. When data were available, contour improvement and high patient satisfaction were reported in 98.8% and 98.3% of the patients. HDPP implants exhibit favorable outcomes for reconstruction of skull defects. Higher complication rates may be anticipated in secondary cranioplasty cases.

The Use of Functional Biomaterials in Aesthetic and Functional Restoration in Orbital Surgery

The integration of functional biomaterials in oculoplastic and orbital surgery is a pivotal area where material science and clinical practice converge. This review, encompassing primary research from 2015 to 2023, delves into the use of biomaterials in two key areas: the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures and the development of implants and prostheses for anophthalmic sockets post-eye removal. The discussion begins with an analysis of orbital floor injuries, including their pathophysiology and treatment modalities. It is noted that titanium mesh remains the gold standard for orbital floor repair due to its effectiveness. The review then examines the array of materials used for orbital implants and prostheses, highlighting the dependence on surgeon preference and experience, as there are currently no definitive guidelines. While recent innovations in biomaterials show promise, the review underscores the need for more clinical data before these new materials can be widely adopted in clinical settings. The review advocates for an interdisciplinary approach in orbital surgery, emphasizing patient-centered care and the potential of biomaterials to significantly enhance patient outcomes.

Advances and Prospects in Materials for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction

The craniofacial region is composed of 23 bones, which provide crucial function in keeping the normal position of brain and eyeballs, aesthetics of the craniofacial complex, facial movements, and visual function. Given the complex geometry and architecture, craniofacial bone defects not only affect the normal craniofacial structure but also may result in severe craniofacial dysfunction. Therefore, the exploration of rapid, precise, and effective reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects is urgent. Recently, developments in advanced bone tissue engineering bring new hope for the ideal reconstruction of the craniofacial bone defects. This report, presenting a first-time comprehensive review of recent advances of biomaterials in craniofacial bone tissue engineering, overviews the modification of traditional biomaterials and development of advanced biomaterials applying to craniofacial reconstruction. Challenges and perspectives of biomaterial development in craniofacial fields are discussed in the end.

Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Clefts

Craniofacial clefts have an incidence of 1/700 [...]

Management of orbital floor fractures in France: Results of a national online survey

INTRODUCTION

Orbital floor fractures (OFF) are common facial trauma injuries, and there are no official guidelines for their medical and surgical management. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the management of OFF in France.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online questionnaire was sent to 144 surgeons at the 88 French centers involved in the management of OFF (2019 data from the National Health Insurance Body). The questions related to the preoperative clinical and radiographic examinations, the criteria for surgical indication, the materials used, and the elements of the postoperative period.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 42 questionnaires were analyzed (32 from oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS), 8 from ophthalmologists, and 2 from ENT or plastic surgeons). For 69% of the surgeons, a systematic ophthalmological examination was carried out, 3-7 days after the trauma, and based on a Lancaster test or visual acuity (97.6% and 83.3% of the responders, respectively). The most important criteria for the therapeutic decision were diplopia or oculomotor disorder that persisted for more than 7 days (76.2%), clinical enophthalmos (54.8%), a large fracture (52.4%), and ptosis of the orbital content on CT scan (38.1%). The mean surgical delay was 7-15 days for 54.8% of the responders. Resorbing sheets were the preferred materials to repair small fractures, while larger fractures required alloplastic implants (titanium mesh).

CONCLUSION

This survey confirms the diversity of practices in France regarding the management of OFF. Further studies are needed before guidelines can be developed.

Management of Orbital Floor Fractures: Our Experience in 10 Years

Purpose

Orbital floor Fractures are the most common fractures involving the facial skeleton and usually occurs after traumatic events. The reconstruction of the orbital floor can be performed with different biocompatible materials. The aim of our retrospective study is to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of surgically treated patients based on the material used to repair the orbital floor.

Methods

We enrolled 146 patients hospitalized for orbital floor fractures in the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of the Federico II University of Naples from 1 to 2010 to July 2020. All the fractured orbital floors were reconstructed with non-resorbable (Titanium Mesh, SynPor, SuPor and MedPor implants) or resorbable (collagen membrane, bovinum pericardium membrane, autologous bone graft) materials.

Results

We utilized non-resorbable materials in 56% (82 cases) and resorbable implants in 44% (64 cases). An improvement of the preoperative symptomatology and an aesthetical good outcome was achieved in most cases.

Conclusions

Data obtained supports that both resorbable and non-resorbable materials for orbital floor reconstruction are a safe and effective alternatives and offer satisfactory results in functional and aesthetic evaluations.

Buccal fat pad flap, an option for surgical reconstruction of orbital floor defect: A case report

Buccal fat pad (BFP) is widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with paucity of literature describing its use in orbital reconstruction. We report a case of a 23year old female who had orbital floor defect surgically reconstructed with a pedicled buccal fat pad following maxillectomy.

Resorbable Versus Titanium Hardware for Rigid Fixation of Pediatric Upper and Midfacial Fractures: Which Carries a Lower Risk Profile?

PURPOSE

Titanium associated risks have led to interest in resorbable hardware for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pediatric facial fractures. This study aims to systematically review and compare the outcomes of titanium/resorbable hardware used for ORIF of upper/midfacial fractures to determine which hardware carries a higher complication rate in the pediatric patient.

METHODS

Studies published between 1990 and 2020 on the ORIF of pediatric upper/midfacial fractures were systematically reviewed. A retrospective institutional review was also conducted, and both arms were compiled for final analysis. The primary predictor value was the type of hardware used and the primary outcome was the presence of a complication. Fisher's exact test and 2-proportion 2-tailed z-test calculations were used to determine statistical significance, which was defined as a P value < .05. The low quality of published evidence precluded meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Systematic review of 23 studies identified 659 patients, and 77 patients were identified in the institutional review. A total of 736 patients (299 resorbable, 437 titanium) were included in the final analysis. Total complication rate was 22.8%. The titanium group had a higher complication rate (27 vs 16.7%; P < .01), and more often underwent elective hardware removal (87.3 vs 0%, P < .01). In each hardware subgroup, the incidence of complications was analyzed by fracture site. In the titanium group, complication incidence was higher when treating maxillary fractures (32.8 vs 22.9%, P = .03). When comparing the 2 hardware groups by fracture site, maxillary fractures had a higher rate of complications when treated by titanium hardware compared with resorbable hardware (32.8 vs 18%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Upper/midfacial pediatric fractures requiring ORIF, especially maxillary fractures, may be best treated with resorbable hardware. Additional hardware-specific outcomes data is encouraged.

Cranial Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh for Open Depressed Skull Fracture in Children: Reports of Two Cases with Long-term Observation

In the treatment of open depressed skull fracture in pediatric cases, it is preferable to use the patient's own bone material rather than artificial material. However, there are occasions when self-material reconstruction may be impossible. In such cases the safe option is to leave the defect until future replacement of the skull becomes possible, however this often causes such children to experience severe limitations to school life. We present two thought-provoking cases in which we solved such issues by early stage cranioplasty using a titanium mesh. The first case involved a 9-year-old boy who sustained a depressed fracture in the right temporal region after falling down a riverbank. Although he underwent surgical repair, bacterial infection forced removal of the bone flap postoperatively. His school life was severely restricted and sports activities were prohibited due to the residual regional bone defect. Cranial reconstruction with a titanium mesh made it possible for him to enjoy a more active lifestyle. The second case involved a 7-year-old boy who sustained a right frontal depressed fracture in a traffic accident. The fractured skull was promptly replaced by a titanium mesh at the initial surgery due to the extreme degree of bone fragmentation. Both boys returned to school life enjoying normal activities and without any complications for up to 8 years now. The cases presented here indicate that early cranioplasty even using artificial material is not only safe but enables school age patients to participate in physical activities. From the standpoint of physical and psychological development, early stage cranioplasty with titanium mesh may be a valuable treatment option for pediatric open depressed skull fracture.

Periorbital Reconstruction by "Periorbital Patch" Technique Using a Pericardium-Based Collagen Membrane and Titanium Mesh

OBJECTIVE

Titanium mesh is a commonly used material for the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures. However, in some instances, a subsequent inflammatory reaction can occur that causes the adhesion of orbital tissue to the titanium mesh. The adhesion of the orbital soft tissue to the mesh causes diplopia, lid rigidity and extraocular movements restriction. This study was performed to determine if the placement of a collagen membrane over a titanium mesh can prevent the adhesion of orbital soft tissue for an improved clinical outcome. Clinical considerations: A case study was performed investigating 106 patients undergoing a periorbital restoration. Seventy-two patients received a titanium mesh without a barrier membrane, 12 patients received a barrier membrane composed of autologous auricular cartilage to provide a barrier function and 22 patients received a pericardium collagen membrane and titanium mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium has been shown to generate an intense inflammatory reaction in host tissues, which can cause fibrosis to adjacent structures. Fibrosis is an essential factor in the repair of fracture sites, however this can lead to adverse effects in the orbital socket. Fibrosis can cause cicatrization and lower eyelid retraction when induced along the lower orbital rim. An improved outcome can be achieved by using a barrier between the titanium mesh and the soft tissue, such as autogenous auricular cartilage, however, only patients treated with a resorbable collagen membrane to act as a soft tissue barricade during site regeneration, prevented the fibrosis reaction and related problems from occurring.

Resorbable Material for Pediatric Orbital Floor Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The use of resorbable materials is becoming more popular for pediatric orbital floor reconstruction. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the various materials used in pediatric orbital floor reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify all relevant articles reporting complications following pediatric orbital floor reconstruction. The search included published articles in three electronic databases-Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed starting from database establishment to July 2017. Primary endpoints were enophthalmos, diplopia, and infection. Resorbable material was compared to autologous grafts and nonresorbable material.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies containing 248 patients were included in this review. Fifty-four (21.8%) patients had reconstruction performed with autologous grafts, 72 (29.0%) patients with resorbable material, and 122 (49.2%) patients with nonresorbable material. Resorbable materials had the lowest rate of postoperative enophthalmos (3/52; 5.8%) and the highest rate of postoperative diplopia (19/72; 26.4%). In contrast, nonresorbable materials had the lowest rate of postoperative diplopia (5/122; 4.1%), the highest rate of postoperative enophthalmos (14/102; 13.7%). Autologous reconstruction was associated with an 11.1% (4/36) rate of postoperative enophthalmos and a 22.2% (12/54) rate of postoperative diplopia. Nine cases (8.8%) of postoperative infection were documented with nonresorbable materials. No cases of infection were reported with autologous grafts or resorbable materials.

CONCLUSION

Newer resorbable implants are safe and have a similar complication profile as traditional autologous grafts in pediatric orbital floor reconstruction.

Is Orbital Floor Reconstruction With Titanium Mesh Safe?

To reconstruct the orbital floor defects there are a lot of reconstruction materials, the surgeon must choose one of them. The authors share their experience with 10 patients suffering from orbital trauma causing orbital floor fracture; those fractures were reconstructed using titanium mesh. No complications were encountered postoperatively apart from 1 patient with ectropion. Titanium mesh is a perfect material for the reconstruction of the orbital fractures, eliminating the need for autogenous bone graft.

The Efficacy of Bioabsorbable Mesh in Craniofacial Trauma Surgery

Background

The ultimate goal of craniofacial reconstructive surgery is to achieve the most complete restoration of facial functions. A bioabsorbable fixation system which does not need secondary operation for implant removal has been developed in the last decade. The purpose of this study is to share the experience of authors and to demonstrate the efficacy of bioabsorbable mesh in a variety of craniofacial trauma operations.

Methods

Between October 2008 and February 2015, bioabsorbable meshes were used to reconstruct various types of craniofacial bone fractures in 611 patients. Any displaced bone fragments were detached from the fracture site and fixed to the mesh. The resulting bone-mesh complex was designed and molded into an appropriate shape by the immersion in warm saline. The mesh was molded once again under simultaneous warm saline irrigation and suction.

Results

In all patients, contour deformities were restored completely, and bone segments were fixed properly. The authors found that the bioabsorbable mesh provided rigid fixation without any evidence of integrity loss on postoperative computed tomography scans.

Conclusion

Because bioabsorbable meshes are more flexible than bioabsorbable plates, they can be molded and could easily reconstruct the facial bone in three dimensions. Additionally, it is easy to attach bone fragments to the mesh. Bioabsorbable mesh and screws is effective and can be easily applied for fixation in various craniofacial trauma reconstructive scenarios.

An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

The use of alloplastic material in cranial reconstruction has been well described in the adult population, especially when a paucity of autologous tissue exists. In children it is unknown how long-term growth, however, may be affected by the implantation of nonexpansible alloplastic material. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing alloplastic versus autologous cranial reconstruction.

METHODS

To assess the safety and long-term outcomes of alloplastic cranioplasty in children, an institutional review board-approved, retrospective, single institution review of pediatric patients undergoing cranioplasty was performed from 2000 to 2014. The age at surgery, cause of the cranial defect, defect size, time since initial surgery to reconstruction, implant type, and complications were assessed. Postreconstruction imaging was reviewed if available.

RESULTS

A reconstructive cranioplasty was performed in 41 pediatric patients (ages 1-19 years, average 7.35 years). Thirty patients underwent alloplastic reconstruction (age 4.37 ± 5.57 years), and 11 underwent autologous reconstruction (age 2.00 ± 3.74 years). The size of the cranial defects was 144.01 ± 393.04 cm for autologous and 405.31 ± 572.96 cm for alloplastic reconstructions. Follow-up for all patients was an average of 2.33 ± 2.76 years (0.1-9 years). No patients in either group showed evidence of elevated intracranial pressure after cranioplasty. In long-term follow-up, none of the implants were exposed or lost because of infection. Computed tomography and physical examination demonstrated that there was no skull growth restriction in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that alloplastic cranioplasty in the pediatric population is a safe alternative, when autologous cranial bone is not available.

Reconstruction of Maxillary and Orbital Floor Defect With Free Fibula Flap and Whole Individualized Titanium Mesh Assisted by Computer Techniques

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the clinical application of free fibula flap and individualized titanium mesh through the use of a virtual planning and guiding template to assist the reconstruction of maxilla and orbital floor defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2015 and 2016, a total of 6 adult patients with maxillary and orbital floor defects were enrolled in this study. Preoperative virtual planning, including virtual maxillary resection and fibular reconstruction, was performed in all cases according to 3-dimensional radiographic and clinical findings. A 3-dimensionally printed resin model and prebent templates were used to guide the harvesting and positioning of the fibula flap during surgery. Then, an individualized titanium mesh was used to support the orbital floor and restore the maxillary contour. The results were confirmed by postoperative computed tomography scans and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperative virtual planning and prebent templates can be used to guide the harvesting and positioning of the fibula flap, as well as the forming and positioning of the individualized titanium mesh, with satisfactory results. All flaps survived, and symmetrical facial contours were achieved with normal lower jaw movement and proper vertical distance for dental implants in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-aided techniques such as virtual planning, 3-dimensionally printed models, and prebent guide templates can be used to harvest and position a free fibula flap, form personalized titanium mesh, and ultimately improve the clinical efficacy of maxillary and orbital floor reconstruction.

Scapular Bone Grafts: Good Options for Craniofacial Defects?

INTRODUCTION

There is still no consensus on the ideal material to be used in craniofacial defects. Autogenous bone grafts are mostly preferred owing to their use with fewer complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the scapular bone graft can be used with equal or more advantages to other bone graft resources in orbital, maxillary sinus front wall, and frontal bone defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four orbital, maxillary sinus front wall, and frontal bone defects were reconstructed with scapular bone grafts. Sixteen patients presented with complicated orbital fractures, 5 patients presented with isolated orbital floor fractures, and 3 patients presented with frontal bone fractures. The grafts were radiologically evaluated 1 day, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively by 3-dimensional computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

All orbital, maxillary sinus front wall, and frontal bone defects were reconstructed successfully with scapular bone grafts. Clinical evaluation of the patients at 6 to 24 months of follow-up was considered satisfactory. Minimal donor site morbidity was observed. Scapular bone grafts adapted nicely to the recipient area, and bony union was complete as demonstrated by 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of orbital, maxillary sinus front wall, and frontal bone defects with scapular bone grafts is an easy and safe procedure with minimal donor site morbidity. Scapular bone graft is a good reconstructive option for orbital, maxillary sinus front wall, and frontal bone defects.

Reconstruction of Inferior Orbital Wall Fractures Using Bone Fragments

INTRODUCTION

Various materials have been used as implants in orbital floor fractures. The fractured bone fragments, however, are not usually used because of their small size and delicate characteristics. To overcome this limitation, the authors used autologous bone fragments combined with fibrin glue and an absorbable plate to repair inferior orbital wall fractures.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with orbital floor fractures treated in a single center from January 2013 to September 2014 were prospectively evaluated. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical signs and symptoms, physical examination findings, postoperative complications, and preoperative and postoperative computed tomography findings were assessed. Fracture repair by a transconjunctival approach in which bone fragments were merged with fibrin glue and an absorbable plate was performed in all the patients.

RESULTS

Postoperative computed tomography showed good orbital fracture reduction and soft tissue restoration in all the patients. Five patients developed postoperative diplopia; however, this symptom resolved spontaneously. Exophthalmometry showed that the degree of enophthalmos had improved significantly.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, the combination of autologous bone fragments and absorbable mesh appears to be a safe and feasible option for the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures.

Orbital Adherence Syndrome following the Use of Titanium Precontoured Orbital Mesh for the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Orbital Floor Defects

Orbital blowout fractures are a common occurrence following orbital trauma. Depending on the size of the defect and the contents that have herniated or incarcerated, possible sequelae include enophthalmos, diplopia, dystopia, and entrapment. Surgical intervention aims to prevent or alleviate this through the use of a bone graft or an alloplastic implant to reconstitute the continuity of the orbit. However, in doing so, the implant itself may result in the unexpected adherence of the periorbita, resulting in orbital adherence syndrome. We present two cases of orbital adherence syndrome following the use of titanium mesh for orbital floor reconstruction. In both cases, we also delineate the management of this syndrome. Our first patient reported good recovery after surgical intervention to relieve the tethering to the titanium mesh and subsequent placement of a smooth interface implant. The other patient was managed nonsurgically with resolution of symptoms. We highlight possible signs that might suggest the need for early surgical intervention. Orbital adherence syndrome is a poorly described and understood phenomenon and appears to occur after the use of large-pored titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction. Prevention is possible through careful patient selection and the placement of a smooth interface medium in the initial surgery.

A Wrapping Method for Inserting Titanium Micro-Mesh Implants in the Reconstruction of Blowout Fractures

Titanium micro-mesh implants are widely used in orbital wall reconstructions because they have several advantageous characteristics. However, the rough and irregular marginal spurs of the cut edges of the titanium mesh sheet impede the efficacious and minimally traumatic insertion of the implant, because these spurs may catch or hook the orbital soft tissue, skin, or conjunctiva during the insertion procedure. In order to prevent this problem, we developed an easy method of inserting a titanium micro-mesh, in which it is wrapped with the aseptic transparent plastic film that is used to pack surgical instruments or is attached to one side of the inner suture package. Fifty-four patients underwent orbital wall reconstruction using a transconjunctival or transcutaneous approach. The wrapped implant was easily inserted without catching or injuring the orbital soft tissue, skin, or conjunctiva. In most cases, the implant was inserted in one attempt. Postoperative computed tomographic scans showed excellent placement of the titanium micro-mesh and adequate anatomic reconstruction of the orbital walls. This wrapping insertion method may be useful for making the insertion of titanium micro-mesh implants in the reconstruction of orbital wall fractures easier and less traumatic.

Inaugural Survey on Practice Patterns of Orbital Floor Fractures for American Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

PURPOSE

In recent years, several studies have reported on practitioners' preferences for the treatment of orbital floor fractures, showing widely varying practice patterns. The purpose of the present study was to identify the practice patterns among oral and maxillofacial surgeons involved in the management of orbital floor fractures in the United States and compare them with the available published data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous survey was created and electronically mailed to surgeons. We also reviewed the published data on orbital floor fractures using a PubMed and MEDLINE search. The responses to the survey were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The factors that had the greatest influence on the surgeon's decision to operate were a defect size > 2 cm2, enophthalmos, entrapment, and persistent diplopia. The most common surgical approach reported was a preseptal transconjunctival approach (32.0%), followed by the subciliary (27.9%) and postseptal transconjunctival (26.2%) approaches. The most commonly reported implant for orbital reconstruction was titanium (65.4%), followed by Medpor (43.7%) and composite Medpor and titanium (26.4%). The review of the published data showed a consensus among many of the operative indications mentioned, including a large defect size, enophthalmos, clinical entrapment, and persistent diplopia.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the United States have a wide range of practice habits in the management of orbital floor fractures. Although the quality of the available evidence is poor, it supports a consistent approach to the management of orbital floor fractures in terms of the indications and surgical approach. The choice of reconstructive material and timing of repair remain more controversial. A clear need exists for improvement in the available data to help guide and set standards of care for the specialties managing orbital floor fractures.

A new option for the reconstruction of orbital floor defects with heterologous cortical bone

BACKGROUND

The orbital floor is one of the most frequently injured areas of the maxillofacial skeleton during facial trauma. A retrospective analysis of patients who have undergone treatment of orbital floor fractures with heterologous cortical bone is presented.

METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out with 21 patients over a period of 4 years between 2010 and 2014. All patients with a traumatic orbital floor defect who underwent reconstruction with heterologous cortical bone were included. The operations were carried out under general anesthesia for all patients. A subciliary incision was used in 20 patients and an infraorbital approach was used in one patient. All patients underwent follow-up examinations clinically as well as radiologically, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Computed tomographic scans were taken at the postoperative 6th month, and at the first postoperative year if needed.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the physical examination revealed diplopia in 17 patients (80.9%), gaze restriction in 14 patients (66.6%), enophthalmos in six patients (28.5%), and infraorbital nerve paresthesia in two patients (9.5%). None of the patients showed impaired visual acuity preoperatively or postoperatively. Diplopia and gaze restriction resolved postoperatively in all of the patients. All patients had a negative intraoperative forced duction test demonstrating free globe movement. Enophthalmos showed complete resolution in the postoperative period. In one of the two patients with preoperative infraorbital nerve paresthesia, this resolved at the postoperative fifth month. Scleral show appeared in six patients but resolved completely within 3-8 weeks with massage. There was no graft extrusion, resorption or displacement during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Tecnoss Semi Soft Lamina is a good alternative for the reconstruction of blowout fractures due to its plasticity and biocompatible structure. Without donor site morbidity, it is a safe and appropriate heterologous bone graft material for maxillofacial applications such as orbital floor reconstruction. We cannot recommend its use for near-total, wide orbital floor defects as it may not provide enough support in such circumstances.

Outcomes of Orbital Floor Reconstruction After Extensive Maxillectomy Using the Computer-Assisted Fabricated Individual Titanium Mesh Technique

PURPOSE

Orbital floor defects after extensive maxillectomy can cause severe esthetic and functional deformities. Orbital floor reconstruction using the computer-assisted fabricated individual titanium mesh technique is a promising method. This study evaluated the application and clinical outcomes of this technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 10 patients with orbital floor defects after maxillectomy performed from 2012 through 2014. A 3-dimensional individual stereo model based on mirror images of the unaffected orbit was obtained to fabricate an anatomically adapted titanium mesh using computer-assisted design and manufacturing. The titanium mesh was inserted into the defect using computer navigation. The postoperative globe projection and orbital volume were measured and the incidence of postoperative complications was evaluated.

RESULTS

The average postoperative globe projection was 15.91 ± 1.80 mm on the affected side and 16.24 ± 2.24 mm on the unaffected side (P = .505), and the average postoperative orbital volume was 26.01 ± 1.28 and 25.57 ± 1.89 mL, respectively (P = .312). The mean mesh depth was 25.11 ± 2.13 mm. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 ± 7.7 months (12 to 34 months). Of the 10 patients, 9 did not develop diplopia or a decrease in visual acuity and ocular motility. Titanium mesh exposure was not observed in any patient. All patients were satisfied with their postoperative facial symmetry.

CONCLUSION

Orbital floor reconstruction after extensive maxillectomy with an individual titanium mesh fabricated using computer-assisted techniques can preserve globe projection and orbital volume, resulting in successful clinical outcomes.

Le Fort I osteotomy combined with endoscopic assistance for treatment of compound fracture of maxilla, zygoma, and orbital floor

PURPOSE

The traditional surgery to reconstruct the compound fracture of the zygoma, maxilla, and orbital floor was usually open reduction and internal fixation using miniplate, and surgeons now can perform the endoscopic repair of relatively simple zygoma or orbital blowout fracture. In this study, we try to reconstruct midfacial complex fracture by combined application of intraoral approach and endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive method.

METHODS

Six patients with traumatic midfacial fracture, including maxilla, zygoma, and orbital floor fracture, were selected. Intraoral Le Fort I osteotomy approach and endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive method were combined and applied to treat this complex midfacial fracture.

RESULTS

The intraoral incision combined with endoscope offered suitable approach for reduction and fixation of fractured zygoma. The Le Fort I osteotomy could help to effectively reduce the fractured maxilla and offered useful operative approach for endoscope. The endoscope combined with a balloon catheter could successfully reconstruct the orbital floor fracture, and no intraoperative complications were encountered. The balloon catheter was removed 4 to 8 weeks after operation and did not lead to infection and obviously disrupt the healing of bone segments. The postoperative eye and occlusion function, evaluated by clinical examination, was satisfactory at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are some limitations and strict indications, the advantages of this method may offer alternative choice for reconstruction of compound midfacial fracture.

Structural pedicled mucochondral-osteal nasoseptal flap: a novel method for orbital floor reconstruction after sinonasal and skull base tumor resection

Unrepaired orbital floor defects after sinonasal and skull-base tumor resection can lead to herniation of orbital contents into the maxillary or ethmoidal sinuses, possibly resulting in infection and significant cosmetic and functional deficits. Orbital floor defects are usually repaired using prosthetic implants or autogenous material. Nasal septal cartilage has been used previously as a free graft for reconstruction. However, its reliance on local vascular supply can result in ischemia and necrosis in the postoperative period. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap, consisting of mucoperichondrium and mucoperiosteum, is routinely used as an effective reconstruction method for endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks arising from skull base dural defects. However, this flap does not provide rigid structural reconstruction when used alone. We report a case of an orbital floor defect repaired using a pedicled mucochondral-osteal nasoseptal flap. This technique incorporates the structural component of the nasal septal cartilage and bone with the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap. This repair technique may be useful in patients requiring postoperative radiotherapy.

Late orbital floor implant migration presenting as recurrent episcleritis

A 53-year-old patient presented with recurrent epicleritis of the right eye for 6 months and progressive diplopia. He had a past history of orbital floor repair over 30 years. A CT scan showed a radiodense migrated orbital floor sheet implant in the maxillary sinus causing obstruction of the maxillary sinus ostium, secondary maxillary sinusitis with retrobulbar involvement. The silastic orbital implant was removed via a Caldwell Luc approach and resolution of the patient's symptoms and signs quickly ensued. We discuss this late complication of orbital floor fracture repair presenting initially as recurrent episcleritis and maxillary sinusitis with intraorbital extension. This report also emphasizes the importance of history taking.

Late reconstruction of orbital and naso-orbital deformities

Acute orbital fractures and naso-orbital ethmoid fractures can result in chronic orbital and naso-orbital deformities. Understanding the acute injury is the first step in reconstructing the established late deformity. The best management strategy for reconstruction of orbital hypertelorism is to avoid late complications by repairing these deformities early near the time of the original fractures. New technologies from computer-guided surgical planning and additive manufacturing technology produce passive fitting implants tailored for patient-specific needs.

Computer-aided orbital wall defects treatment by individual design ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene implants

Despite of well-known advantages of high molecular weight polyethylene (Medpor, Synpore) in orbital reconstructions, the thickness of those implants significantly exceeds 0.5 mm and precise modification of thickness is limited. The aim of this study was to present the application of a self-developed method of treatment orbital wall fracture by custom implant made of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

First, the test of influence of sterilization process upon implant deformation was performed (autoclaving, ethylene oxide, gas plasma, irradiation). Next, ten cases for delayed surgical treatment of orbital fracture were included into this study (7 males, 3 females). Based on CT scan and mirrored technique, a CAD model of virtual implant for repairing orbital wall was made. Then, an implant was manufactured with a computer numerical controlled milling machine from UHMW-PE block, sterilized and used during a surgical procedure. Clinically used implants had thickness from 0.2 to 4.0 mm.

RESULTS

The best method of sterilization is ethylene oxide process, and the worst is autoclaving. In this series of delayed surgical cases, functional results of orbital surgery are worse than in simpler, early treated cases, but long-term subsidence of diplopia is noticeable [10% poor results]. The results of the treatment depend on the initial level of diplopia where severe initial diplopia to be corrected requires thicker implants (p < 0.01). It also leads to longer surgical procedures (p < 0.01), but prolongation of the surgery had no negative influence upon results of any investigated follow-up examinations. Obviously, the orbital destruction intensity is related to injury-evoked initial diplopia but it also influences whole results of treatment up to 12 months post-op. Interesting result is presented by the relation of maximal implant thickness to 12-month diplopia evaluation. Thicker implants used result in lower residual diplopia (p < 0.05). This is important because of the correlation between the higher orbital destruction intensity with a thicker UHMW-PE implant (p < 0.05) applied in this series.

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene implants enable precise reconstructions of orbital wall. One should not be afraid of a significant eye globe reposition caused by these thickness modulated implants, as such repositioning is essential for an efficient correction of enophthalmos.

Evaluation of the Biodegradable Plates (PG910/PDO) for Reconstruction of Various Sizes of Orbital Floor Defects in the Blow-Out Fractures

The aim of our study was to evaluate the biodegradable plates (PG910/PDO) for reconstruction of various sizes of the orbital floor defects in the blow-out fractures. We included patients who had an impure blow-out fracture. All patients had a recent trauma and also the surgical intervention was done between 1 and 10 days after trauma. The amount of the orbital floor defect was measured in each case through computed tomography scan. In the surgical intervention, a biodegradable plate was used for the reconstruction of the orbital floor defect along with titanium miniplates used for bone fixation in orbital rim. Due to aesthetic reasons, all patients underwent secondary surgery including removal of titanium miniplates after 18 months. The orbital floor was reevaluated during the removal of the miniplates. The clinical evaluation of remnant defects and biodegradable plates (presence of complete or partial resorption) were documented for each patient. In our study a total of 15 patients (10 males and 5 females) underwent the orbital floor reconstruction using biodegradable miniplates. The size of the orbital floor defects was meanly 3.51 ± 1.29 cm(2). Results demonstrated that 4 out of 15 patients had a remnant defect after resorption of the biodegradable plate. In 10 out of 15 patients, the biodegradable plates completely replaced with fibrous tissues after 18 months. Remaining five patients had partial resorption of plates. There was not any relationship between the defect size and the remnant defects (p > 0.05). A significant relationship was seen between the defect size and the plates' resorption rate (p < 0.001). There is a significant relationship between the resorption rate and the remnant defect. The risk to have remnant defects have been increased as the plates had incomplete resorption. The use of biodegradable plates is an appropriate option for reconstruction of the orbital floor defects. The defect size does not have any effect on the stability of the plate. However, incomplete plate resorption increases the risk of remnant defects in the orbital floor. The larger defects lead to slow degradation of biodegradable plates.

A safe and accurate method of assessing the size of implants required in orbital floor reconstruction

Many methods to determine the size of an orbital floor implant depend on trial and error. However, this technique is imprecise and the repeated insertion and removal of the implant leads to soft tissue trauma and swelling. A method of measuring orbital floor dimensions intraoperatively using a waterproof paper ruler is presented in this study. This technique has the advantage of being simple, precise, safe, and expedient.

Biomaterials for reconstruction of the internal orbit

Orbital floor injuries, alone or combination with other facial fractures, are one of the most commonly encountered midface fractures. Techniques for orbital reconstruction have migrated away from autogenous bone grafts to well-tolerated alloplasts, such as titanium and Medpor. Material for reconstructing the orbit can then be selected based on requirements of the defect matched to the mechanical properties of the material. Material selection is largely and ultimately dependent upon surgeon preference.

Pearls of orbital trauma management

Orbital fractures account for a significant portion of traumatic facial injuries. Although plastic surgery literature is helpful, additional pearls and insights are provided in this article from the experience of an oculoplastic surgeon. The fundamentals remain the same, but the perceptions differ and provide a healthy perspective on a long-standing issue. The most important thing to remember is that the optimal management plan is often variable, and the proper choice regarding which plan to choose rests upon the clinical scenario and the surgeon having an honest perception of his or her level of expertise and comfort level.

Nasal endoscopy-assisted reconstruction of orbital floor blowout fractures using temporal fascia grafting

PURPOSE

To present the experience and outcomes of an endoscopy-assisted reconstruction of isolated orbital floor blowout fractures using temporalis fascia grafting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 32 patients who underwent repair of orbital floor fractures using temporalis fascia grafting from January 1, 2004, through December 1, 2009, was conducted. All procedures were performed through an upper buccal sulcus incision and a transmaxillary endoscopic approach to the orbital floor. The area of displaced bone fragments was limited to 2 cm(2) in all patients in this study. The parameters evaluated before and after surgery included visual acuity, extraocular motility and diplopia, and exophthalmometry. All patients underwent computed tomography before and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

None of the 32 patients had a postoperative clinical infection or obvious inflammation. Visual acuity was better than or equal to 20/100 in 43% of patients before surgery compared with 76% of patients after surgery. All patients had diplopia before surgery; only 3 had diplopia 6 months after surgery. Enophthalmos was observed in all patients before surgery, and 4 patients still displayed enophthalmos at 6 months after surgery. No sagging of the reconstructed orbital floor was found on computed tomograms 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study is the first to show that the temporalis fascia is a reliable implant for the repair of orbital floor defects smaller than or equal to 2 cm(2).

Biomaterials and implants for orbital floor repair

Treatment of orbital floor fractures and defects is often a complex issue. Repair of these injuries essentially aims to restore the continuity of the orbital floor and to provide an adequate support to the orbital content. Several materials and implants have been proposed over the years for orbital floor reconstruction, in the hope of achieving the best clinical outcome for the patient. Autografts have been traditionally considered as the "gold standard" choice due to the absence of an adverse immunological response, but they are available in limited amounts and carry the need for extra surgery. In order to overcome the drawbacks related to autografts, researchers' and surgeons' attention has been progressively attracted by alloplastic materials, which can be commercially produced and easily tailored to fit a wide range of specific clinical needs. In this review the advantages and limitations of the various biomaterials proposed and tested for orbital floor repair are critically examined and discussed. Criteria and guidelines for optimal material/implant choice, as well as future research directions, are also presented, in an attempt to understand whether an ideal biomaterial already exists or a truly functional implant will eventually materialise in the next few years.