1
|
Smith EB, Patel LD, Dreizin D. Postoperative Computed Tomography for Facial Fractures. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021; 32:231-254. [PMID: 34809841 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In order for a radiologist to create reports that are meaningful to facial reconstructive surgeons, an understanding of the principles that guide surgical management and the hardware employed is imperative. This article is intended to promote efficient and salient reporting by illustrating surgical approaches and rationale. Hardware selection can be inferred and a defined set of potential complications anticipated when assessing the adequacy of surgical reconstruction on postoperative computed tomography for midface, internal orbital, and mandible fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elana B Smith
- Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Lakir D Patel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - David Dreizin
- Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boscà-Ramon A, Dualde-Beltrán D, Marqués-Mateo M, Nersesyan N. Multidetector computed tomography for facial trauma: structured reports and key observations for a systematic approach. RADIOLOGIA 2019; 61:439-452. [PMID: 31155225 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2019.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Facial fractures, often related to traffic accidents, assault, work-related accidents, or falls, account for a considerable number of emergencies in our hospitals and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the imaging technique of choice in this scenario because it is widely available, fast, and useful for characterizing facial fractures and associated complications, including those located in the head. For all these reasons, MDCT is fundamental in the clinical management of these patients and in planning surgery. This paper describes the radiological anatomy of the facial region, underlining the importance of the facial buttresses, and it indicates the key points necessary for carrying out a structured approach and elaborating the corresponding radiologic report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Boscà-Ramon
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - D Dualde-Beltrán
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España.
| | - M Marqués-Mateo
- Servicio de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - N Nersesyan
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dreizin D, Nam AJ, Diaconu SC, Bernstein MP, Bodanapally UK, Munera F. Multidetector CT of Midfacial Fractures: Classification Systems, Principles of Reduction, and Common Complications. Radiographics 2018; 38:248-274. [PMID: 29320322 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The advent of titanium hardware, which provides firm three-dimensional positional control, and the exquisite bone detail afforded by multidetector computed tomography (CT) have spurred the evolution of subunit-specific midfacial fracture management principles. The structural, diagnostic, and therapeutic complexity of the individual midfacial subunits, including the nose, the naso-orbito-ethmoidal region, the internal orbits, the zygomaticomaxillary complex, and the maxillary occlusion-bearing segment, are not adequately reflected in the Le Fort classification system, which provides only a general framework and has become less relevant in contemporary practice. The purpose of this article is to facilitate the involvement of radiologists in the delivery of individualized multidisciplinary care to adults who have sustained blunt trauma and have midfacial fractures by providing a clinically relevant review of the role of multidetector CT in the management of each midfacial subunit. Surgically relevant anatomic structures, search patterns, critical CT findings and their management implications, contemporary classification systems, and common posttraumatic and postoperative complications are emphasized. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Dreizin
- From the Section of Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B.), and the Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N., S.C.D.), R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; the Division of Trauma and Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.P.B.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Arthur J Nam
- From the Section of Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B.), and the Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N., S.C.D.), R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; the Division of Trauma and Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.P.B.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Silviu C Diaconu
- From the Section of Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B.), and the Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N., S.C.D.), R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; the Division of Trauma and Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.P.B.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Mark P Bernstein
- From the Section of Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B.), and the Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N., S.C.D.), R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; the Division of Trauma and Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.P.B.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Uttam K Bodanapally
- From the Section of Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B.), and the Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N., S.C.D.), R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; the Division of Trauma and Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.P.B.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Felipe Munera
- From the Section of Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B.), and the Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N., S.C.D.), R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; the Division of Trauma and Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (M.P.B.); and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi KJ, Chang B, Woodard CR, Powers DB, Marcus JR, Puscas L. Survey of Current Practice Patterns in the Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2017; 10:106-116. [PMID: 28523084 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 10/22/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of frontal sinus fractures has evolved in the endoscopic era. The development of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has been incorporated into management algorithms proposed by otolaryngologists, but the extent of its influence on plastic surgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons is heretofore unknown. A cross-sectional survey was performed to assess the practice pattern variations in frontal sinus fracture management across multiple surgical disciplines. A total of 298 surveys were reviewed. 33.5% were facial plastic surgeons with otolaryngology training, 25.8% general otolaryngologists, 25.5% plastic surgeons, and 15.1% oral and maxillofacial surgeons. 74.8% of respondents practiced in an academic setting. 61.7% felt endoscopic sinus surgery changed their management of frontal sinus fractures. 91.8% of respondents favored observation for uncomplicated, nondisplaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures. 36.4% favored observation and 35.9% favored endoscopic sinus surgery for uncomplicated, displaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures. For complicated, displaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures, obliteration was more frequently favored by plastic surgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons than those with otolaryngology training. The utility of FESS in managing frontal sinus fractures appears to be recognized across multiple surgical disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Choi
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bora Chang
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Charles R Woodard
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David B Powers
- Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey R Marcus
- Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Liana Puscas
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
YOSHIOKA N. Modified cranialization and secondary cranioplasty for frontal sinus infection after craniotomy: technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014; 54:768-73. [PMID: 25169030 PMCID: PMC4533363 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.tn.2014-0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Frontal sinus infection after incorrect treatment of an opened frontal sinus may require extended approaches. This article aims to introduce modified cranialization technique and secondary cranioplasty for frontal sinus infection involving the frontal sinus outflow tract after craniotomy. Eight patients with delayed onset frontal sinus infection involving frontal outflow tract after craniotomy were treated from 2008 to 2012. Debridement and cranialization involving the elimination of the frontal outflow tract was performed. Unilateral sinus cranialization combined with reduction of the non-affected contralateral sinus was carried out for the patients with unilateral sinusitis. A pericranial-frontalis muscle flap was used to separate the intracranial and extracranial spaces. Secondary cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite was performed approximately 3 months after the cranialization. The patients' original conditions included brain tumors (n = 3), frontal sinus fractures (n = 2), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 3). The mean interval between the initial treatment and the onset of sinus infection was 23 years. The frontal sinus infection was bilateral in six cases and unilateral in two cases. Frontal sinus outflow tract was involved in sinus infection in every case. None of the patients suffered recurrent rhinogenic infections within the follow-up period (mean = 35 months) after the secondary cranioplasty. Aesthetic results were satisfactory in every case. Modified cranialization involving elimination of the frontal outflow tract is an alternative method for the patients with pathology in the frontal outflow tract after frontal craniotomy. Secondary cranioplasty provides an esthetically pleasing appearance in such cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobutaka YOSHIOKA
- Department of Craniofacial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Osaka
- Address reprint requests to: Nobutaka Yoshioka, MD, PhD, Department of Craniofacial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Tominaga Hospital, 1-4-48 Minatomachi, Naniwa-ku, Osaka, Osaka 556-0017, Japan. e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|