Capsule formation can make secondary reconstruction of the dura mater unnecessary after cranial infection

Accelerated Cranioplasty with Perforator-preserved Split Flap Sandwiched Plate for Treatment of Infected Cranial Defects

Large cranial vault defects are challenging to manage due to the need to balance infection control, skin coverage, and restoration of the protective mechanical rigidity of the skull while also ensuring good head and neck aesthetic results. Conventional-staged treatment requires a long time period that includes debridement and scalp skin defect coverage with flaps as a first step, followed by definitive plate reconstruction 3–9 months later after infection control and flap atrophy resolution. We report a case of successful early cranioplasty in a factory worker who developed a large full-thickness cranial skull defect following artificial dura infection. Reconstruction was performed in two stages using an anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. In the first stage, the scalp defect was covered with an ALT flap to close the skin following debridement. In the second stage performed 6 weeks later, the ALT flap was split into adiposal and adipocutaneous flaps to sandwich a computer-aided design custom-made titanium plate with an opening for the perforator to complete the cranioplasty. The patient successfully returned to work without recurrence of infection with 1-year follow-up. We report this case to demonstrate the utility of adipocutaneous flap plate sandwiching techniques in providing well-vascularized cover for early definitive cranial reconstruction and accelerated patient recovery.

Initial Histological Evaluation of a Novel Dura Mater Graft Based on Capsule Granulation Harvested from Subcutaneous Tissue: Experimental Model

INTRODUCTION

Autografts are useful but unfortunately are limited in big dural defects, in such cases, synthetic implants have been recommended. Extensive evidence in the literature suggests that sometimes synthetic implants had high rates of complications like infections. This paper aims to present a novel dura matter graft based on capsule granulation tissue harvested from subcutaneous space as a dura substitute and its histological findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wistar rats between 240 and 430 grams of both genders were included. First stage procedure introducing silicon spheres in the subcutaneous tissue. Second stage procedure 4 weeks later harvested de capsule granulation tissue that contain them. Then a craniectomy was performed to create a dura mater defect. This defect was reconstructed with the granulation tissue was placed onlay the defect. After another 4 weeks the subjects were euthanized and sent to an external pathology unit for analysis with validated integration scales.

RESULTS

A total of 5 subjects were included (3 males and 2 females) with weight between 240 and 430 grams. Only 2 outcome out of 6 scales had significance difference between the samples: adhesions P = 0.011 and integration P = 0.006.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological findings shown that capsule granulation graft is a compatible, autologous compatible substitute for dura mater. It has a great potential of full integration and an acceptable grade of adhesions.

Cranial Reconstruction following the Removal of an Infected Synthetic Dura Mater Substitute

Background:

The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of an algorithmic approach to cranial reconstruction following the removal of an infected synthetic dura mater substitute due to postcraniotomy infection.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted of the cases of 12 patients who underwent cranial reconstruction from 2006 to 2013 after the removal of an infected expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet (a synthetic dura mater substitute) due to postcraniotomy infection.

Results:

Average patient age was 46 years (range, 19–70 years). Follow-up was 4.6 years. The expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheets were implanted after decompressive craniectomy or after combined resection of the dura mater and a tumor. Epidural, but not subdural, abscesses were found in 6 patients, in whom a sufficient capsule developed underneath the synthetic dura mater. Both epidural and subdural abscesses were found in the remaining 6 patients, and the capsule remained intact after debridement of the subdural abscesses in half of them. Secondary cranial reconstruction was safely performed by leaving the capsule intact in the 9 cases in which no additional dural reconstruction was performed. In the remaining 3 patients, in whom no capsule remained after debridement, secondary cranial reconstruction was carried out by leaving the pericranium over the brain surface. None of the patients developed postoperative complications in follow-up periods.

Conclusions:

Staged cranial reconstruction after the removal of an infected synthetic dura mater substitute using an algorithmic approach is feasible and safe, produces satisfactory cosmetic results, and is not associated with any complications.