Patients' satisfaction after surgical facial reconstruction or after rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis

Midface microvascular reconstruction after maxillary complex tumor resection: A retrospective study

The study purpose is to review the surgical approach and evaluate the results in managing patients with advanced midface and maxillary complex tumors. The most common anatomical site of the primary tumor was the maxilla, sometimes with extension to the orbit and anterior fossa, parotid and middle ear or even the lip. Surgical resection included maxillectomy in the majority of cases, combined with orbital exenteration or orbitectomy and anterior fossa resection. Parotidectomy and mastoidectomy/core petrosectomy were also performed. Reconstruction was performed with radial forearm osteocutaneous free flap, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with scapular bone flap, lengthening temporalis myoplasty, rectus abdominis free flap, anterolateral thigh flap, in combination with temporalis and vastus lateralis, as well as pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A total of 36 midface tumor excisions were performed, followed by the appropriate reconstruction. The average follow-up period was 15 years. To date, 23 patients are disease free, while 6 patients presented disease recurrence and 7 patients died during the 15-year follow-up period. Surgical resection remains the gold standard for midface tumors management. When safely performed, combined with microvascular and dynamic face reconstruction, surgery can offer improvement in quality of life and prolong the overall survival.

Viscoelastic Properties of Human Facial Skin and Comparisons with Facial Prosthetic Elastomers

Prosthesis discomfort and a lack of skin-like quality is a source of patient dissatisfaction with facial prostheses. To engineer skin-like replacements, knowledge of the differences between facial skin properties and those for prosthetic materials is essential. This project measured six viscoelastic properties (percent laxity, stiffness, elastic deformation, creep, absorbed energy, and percent elasticity) at six facial locations with a suction device in a human adult population equally stratified for age, sex, and race. The same properties were measured for eight facial prosthetic elastomers currently available for clinical usage. The results showed that the prosthetic materials were 1.8 to 6.4 times higher in stiffness, 2 to 4 times lower in absorbed energy, and 2.75 to 9 times lower in viscous creep than facial skin (p < 0.001). Clustering analyses determined that facial skin properties fell into three groups-those associated with body of ear, cheek, and remaining locations. This provides baseline information for designing future replacements for missing facial tissues.

Patient satisfaction with different types of craniofacial prostheses

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A maxillofacial prosthesis represents an effective method of giving maxillofacial defects a positive esthetic appearance with minimal risk. However, studies of complications among prosthesis wearers are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine levels of patient satisfaction with various maxillofacial prostheses and retention types, as measured through a survey questionnaire package.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center Craniofacial Prosthetics Unit (CPU) since 2015 were included. They had been treated according to a standardized protocol and answered a survey questionnaire package with the following sections: demographics, frequency of prosthesis usage, and the Toronto Outcome Measure for Craniofacial Prosthetics (TOMCP-27) survey addressing patient satisfaction. To be eligible for this study, patients must have been more than 18 years of age, in possession of a maxillofacial prosthesis, and received treatment at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center CPU since 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were eligible and contacted, of whom 51 agreed to participate in the survey. The study population was overall extremely satisfied with their maxillofacial prostheses. In 77.8% of the TOMCP-27 questions, the largest group of patients chose the answer demonstrating the highest level of satisfaction. Of all prosthesis types surveyed, patients with auricular prostheses reported the greatest rates of satisfaction, with the entire group having selected answers corresponding to the highest levels of overall satisfaction. However, patients with orbital prostheses were more likely to experience varying degrees of dissatisfaction, with 72% of the highest reported levels of dissatisfaction being from this prosthesis group. In addition, patients with osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses reported higher satisfaction levels with other retention methods, with the bar clasp group outperforming the magnetic coupling retention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experienced an excellent overall rate of satisfaction with their maxillofacial prostheses. Future development should focus on the continued development of osseointegrated methods, improved magnetic coupling, and improved prosthesis technology, especially for orbital prostheses.

Osseointegrated Prosthetic Ear Reconstruction in Cases of Skin Malignancy: Technique, Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Ear reconstruction with osseointegrated prosthetic implants is a well-established method of reconstruction after resection of skin malignancies on the external ear. There is limited literature reporting technique, outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

We evaluated our outcomes over a 5-year period looking at osseointegrated prosthetic reconstruction after auriculectomy for external ear skin malignancies. We report demographics, disease characteristics, technique, and complications. The patients were surveyed looking at 6 domains: satisfaction, stability, comfort, ease of use, level of self-consciousness, and preoperative education.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients included in the study, 14 (67%) were treated for invasive melanoma (Breslow depth, >0.8mm), 4 (19%) for squamous cell carcinoma, 2 (10%) for basal cell carcinoma, and 1 (5%) for an atypical fibroxanthoma. Complications rates were low. There were no cases of infection, hematoma, or bleeding. In 2 patients (9.5%), 1 of the 3 implants failed to osseointegrate and was removed, but the prosthesis was able to be secured with the remaining 2 posts. There were 3 cases (14%) of delayed healing and 1 with excessive granulation tissue growth. Survey results showed high satisfaction in all measured domains.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of skin malignancy requiring total or subtotal auriculectomy, prosthetic ear reconstruction with osseointegrated implants is a good alternative to reconstruction with autologous tissue. Our experience demonstrates good outcomes and with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction.