Pediatric Maxillary Fractures:

Pediatric Le Fort, Zygomatic, and Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Fractures

Fractures of the pediatric midface are infrequent, particularly in children in the primary dentition, due to the prominence of the upper face relative to the midface and mandible. With downward and forward growth of the face, there is an increasing frequency of midface injuries seen in children in the mixed and adult dentitions. Midface fracture patterns seen in young children are quite variable; those in children at or near skeletal maturity mimic patterns seen in adults. Non-displaced injuries can typically be managed with observation. Displaced fractures require treatment with appropriate reduction and fixation and longitudinal follow-up to evaluate growth.

Surgical management of maxillary trauma in pediatric special needs patient using modified cap splint

Pediatric maxillofacial trauma is a rare entity, which is primarily the reason for an individual surgeon's inexperience in managing such injuries. More so, maxillary injuries are infrequent. Pediatric maxillofacial injuries are usually a result of blunt force trauma such as falls, motor vehicle accidents, bicycle injuries, sports-related injuries, assault, and child abuse. The atypical pattern of facial injuries in the pediatric population necessitates each surgeon to approach individual cases with a unique and innovative technique of management, while still following the basic principles of surgical management of maxillofacial injuries. Since facial trauma and surgical interventions both have the potential to lead to disturbance in growth and development, management should be as conservative as possible. The foundation of any surgical intervention must be developed keeping in perspective, the future growth, and development of dentofacial structures. Pediatric facial trauma management is in itself a disconcerting situation for a maxillofacial surgeon, but when a special needs child is involved it becomes an even more perplex decision. We present a case of maxillary trauma in a pediatric patient with global developmental delay, the treatment dilemma, and a review of current literature.

A Simple Method of Transoperative Maxillomandibular Fixation in Pediatric Facial Fractures

ABSTRACT

Maxillomandibular fixation in pediatric facial fractures is quite challenging to be achieved, especially in mid-mixed dentition. Traditional well established intermaxillary devices have a lot of limitations in these patients. This article presents a case of a 9-year-old female patient with a displaced mandibular fracture in which orthodontic buttons were used for transoperative maxillomandibular fixation followed by internal fixation after adequate occlusion reestablishment and fracture reduction. The method showed high efficacy and celerity, allowing the success of treatment, with satisfactory evolution of the patient.

Facial Fractures and Mixed Dentition - What Are the Implications of Dentition Status in Pediatric Facial Fracture Management?

INTRODUCTION

The stage of maturation of the pediatric facial skeleton at the time of injury has a significant impact on both facial fracture patterns and management strategies. For instance, the relative prominence of the pediatric cranium during the early years of life affords protection to the structures of the midface, whereas delayed aeration of the frontal sinuses may predispose younger patients to frontal bone fractures. The dentition status of a pediatric patient may have similar implications in the setting of facial fracture. In this study, the authors examine the effect of dentition status on facial fracture patterns and management strategies at an urban, level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all cases of facial fracture occurring in the pediatric patient population at a level 1 trauma center (University Hospital in Newark, NJ) between 2002 and 2014. A database including patient demographics, facial fracture, and concomitant injury patterns, and operative management data was constructed and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with mixed dentition met inclusion criteria for our study and were compared against patients with primary (n = 35) and permanent (n = 349) dentition. The mean age at presentation was 9.2 years, with a male predominance of 68%. The most common fracture etiology was pedestrian struck accident (n = 23), fall (n = 21), motor vehicle collision (n = 12), and assault (n = 9). The most frequently identified facial fractures were that of the orbit (n = 31), mandible (n = 21), nasal bone (n = 19), and frontal sinus (n = 14). Additionally, 8 Le Fort and 4 nasoorbitoethmoid fractures were identified. Twenty-one patients (29%) required operative management for 1 or more facial fractures. Operative intervention was required in 38% of mandibular fractures, with 6 patients requiring only maxillomandibular fixation and 2 requiring open reduction and internal fixation with titanium plating. Nine cases of orbital fracture (29%) were managed operatively - 4 with absorbable plates, 3 with Medpor implants, and 8 with titanium plating. Management of all nasal fractures requiring operative intervention was accomplished through closed reduction. Concomitant injuries included traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 35), skull fracture (n = 24), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (n = 20), and long bone fracture (n = 12). Seventeen patients required admission to the intensive care unit. Patients with mixed dentition were significantly more likely to sustain frontal sinus and Le Fort fractures (P < 0.01), as well as skull fracture, ICH, and TBI (P < 0.01) as compared to those with permanent dentition.

CONCLUSIONS

The dentition status of a pediatric patient may have significant implications in both patterns of injury and operative management strategies in the setting of acute facial trauma. Our study finds that Le Fort and frontal sinus fractures were significantly more common in patients with mixed dentition. Severe concomitant injuries such as ICH and TBI were also significantly more likely in this cohort. A patient's dentition status may also play a role in the decision for ridged fixation of mandibular and orbital fractures, as well as the method of maxillomandibular fixation in maxillary and mandibular alveolar fracture.

Assessment of Panfacial Fractures in the Pediatric Population

PURPOSE

Management of panfacial fractures is critical and often difficult in adults; however, there is little to no literature regarding these fractures in the pediatric population. In this study, we present our experience to provide insight and further investigation regarding prevention and management strategies within the pediatric population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all panfacial fractures in the pediatric population between 2002 and 2014 treated at an urban, level 1 trauma center (University Hospital, Newark, NJ). Data including patient demographic characteristics, mechanisms of injury, locations of fractures, concomitant injuries, and surgical management strategies were collected.

RESULTS

We identified 82 patients aged 18 years or younger who had sustained a panfacial fracture. The mean age at the time of injury was 12.9 years, with a male predominance of 64.9%. A total of 335 fractures were identified on radiologic imaging. The most common etiologies were motor vehicle accidents and pedestrians being struck. Orbital, frontal sinus, nasal, and zygoma fractures were the most common fractures. The mean score on the Glasgow Coma Scale on arrival was 12.0. A total of 29 patients were intubated on arrival-or before arrival-at the trauma bay. A surgical airway was required in 9 patients. The most common concomitant injuries were traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, and skull fracture. Surgical repair was required in 38 patients. The cephalic-to-caudal approach was used most, followed by caudal to cephalic, medial to lateral, and lateral to medial. Within a year of the initial surgical procedure, 4 patients underwent reoperations for complications. Four patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric panfacial fractures are rare occurrences; however, the impact of these injuries can be devastating, with concomitant life-threatening injuries and complications. Given the lack of literature, as well as the preventable nature of these injuries, we hope this study can address primary prevention strategies and provide insight toward the management and characteristics of these fractures.

Rattled: Analysis of Facial Trauma Among Toddlers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the national incidence of facial trauma among toddlers and delineate patterns of injury and their causes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was designed to explore patterns of maxillofacial trauma within toddler-aged children using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System from the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The database was searched for emergency department visits involving facial trauma sustained by children 12 months through 3 years of age from 2010 through 2014 and analyzed for patient demographics, primary diagnosis, and associated products/activities. Subset analyses were performed between age groups to determine the relationship between causes of injury and age using extrapolated national incidences.

RESULTS

A sample of 45,249 patients extrapolated to an estimated 1.3 million emergency department visits for facial trauma in toddlers from 2010 to 2014, averaging 260,000 annually. Injuries involving foreign bodies and fractures had a higher incidence in toddlers 2 years or older, and fractures comprised fewer than 1% of facial injuries in any age group. Furniture was the most common source of trauma overall, with a higher frequency among toddlers aged 12 to 17 months. Trauma in the setting of sports was more common in toddlers aged 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The low incidence of facial fractures further supports recommendations against routine imaging in toddler facial trauma and suggests that more focus should be placed on investigating for concurrent traumas and soft tissue injuries where fractures are involved. Our findings highlight prevention opportunities, particularly in furniture-related injuries for toddlers aged 12 to 17 months and sports-related traumas in toddlers aged 3 years. Our study also suggests restricting certain toys from 3-year-old toddlers to decrease the risk of aspiration.