Forces charging the orbital floor after fractures

The impact of polydioxanone (PDS) foil thickness on reconstruction of the orbital geometry after isolated orbital floor fractures

PURPOSE

The orbital floor is frequently involved in head trauma. Current evidence on the use of reconstruction materials for orbital floor repair is inconclusive. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare the impact of polydioxanone (PDS) foil thickness on reconstruction of the orbital geometry after isolated orbital floor fractures.

METHODS

Standardized isolated orbital floor fractures were symmetrically created in 11 cadaver heads that provided 22 orbits. PDS foils with thicknesses of 0.25-0.5 mm were inserted. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the native, fractured, and reconstructed orbits were obtained, and orbital volume, orbital height, and foil bending were measured.

RESULTS

Orbital volume and height significantly (p < 0.01) increased after the creation of isolated orbital floor fractures and significantly (p = 0.001) decreased with overcorrection of the orbital geometry after orbital floor reconstruction with PDS 0.25 mm or PDS 0.5 mm. The orbital geometry reconstruction rate did not differ significantly with respect to foil thickness. However, compared to PDS 0.5 mm, the use of PDS 0.25 mm resulted in quantitatively higher reconstructive accuracy and a restored orbital volume that did not significantly differ from the initial volume.

CONCLUSION

Orbital floors subjected to isolated fractures were successfully reconstructed using PDS regardless of foil thickness, with overcorrection of the orbital geometry. Due to its lower flexural stiffness, PDS 0.25 mm appeared to provide more accurate orbital geometry reconstruction than PDS 0.5 mm, although no significant difference in reconstructive accuracy between PDS 0.25 mm and PDS 0.5 mm was observed in this cadaveric study.

Recurrent Orbital Trauma Following Repaired Orbital Floor Fracture

A study of a 22-year-old male who was assaulted and sustained a left orbital floor blowout fracture was presented in this study. The orbital floor was repaired with a titanium-reinforced porous polyethylene implant. Two years postoperatively, the patient sustained repeated left orbital trauma. The orbital floor implant remained stable while the medial wall blew out.

Mechanical resistance of the periorbita and the orbital floor complex--are isolated orbital floor fractures only a soft tissue problem?

The primary aims of orbital floor reconstruction are to prevent enophthalmos and herniation of the orbital contents in order to achieve correct globe position. Theoretically, the mechanical load of the orbital floor is approximately 0.0005N/mm(2) (30g orbital content onto 600mm(2) of orbital floor area). Therefore, low mechanical stress from orbital floor reconstruction materials is expected. The periorbita and orbital floor complex (bony orbital floor with periorbita) of 12 human cadavers were investigated for their mechanical resistance to distortion and compared to different absorbable pliable reconstruction materials after modification with pores (Bio-Gide, Creos, and PDS). The human periorbita resistance (approximately 1.4N/mm(2)) was comparable to that of the absorbable membranes (Creos, Bio-Gide), and the resistance of PDS (approximately 2.3N/mm(2)) was comparable to that of the orbital floor complex. The periorbita has a higher stability than the bony orbital floor. Therefore, in isolated orbital floor fractures with a traumatized bony orbital floor and periorbita, reconstruction of the soft tissue as a periorbita equivalent with a resorbable membrane appears to be adequate to prevent enophthalmos and herniation of the orbital contents.

Mechanical properties of collagen membranes modified with pores--are they still sufficient for orbital floor reconstruction?

Adequate mechanical strength is essential for materials used to reconstruct the orbital floor, and collagen membranes have recently been suggested for the repair of isolated fractures of the orbital floor. However, their mechanical properties after modification with pores for increased drainage of blood into the sinus have not been sufficiently investigated. We have tested the mechanical resistance of polydioxanone foils (PDS) to distortion and compared it with that of 3 resorbable collagen membranes (Smartbrane(®), Bio-Gide(®), and Creos(®)) in mint condition and when artificially aged (3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks) after modification with pores (diameter 2mm) in a standard configuration (n=12 in each group). PDS and Creos(®) had comparable initial values for mechanical resistance of about 2.3N/mm(2), and Bio-Gide(®) and Smartbrane(®) had about 20% and 80% lower initial mechanical resistance, respectively. All materials tested had lower values after artificial ageing. After eight weeks of ageing, PDS lost about 99% of its initial mechanical resistance, Creos(®) about 66%, Bio-Gide(®) about 30%, and Smartbrane(®) about 95%. After 3 weeks the mechanical resistance in all groups was significantly less than the initial values (p=0.05), but there was no difference between samples aged artificially for 6 compared with 8 weeks. The mechanical resistance of the tested materials was not influenced by the presence of pores in a standard configuration and was in the appropriate range for moderate fractures of the orbital floor. We recommend further clinical investigations of collagen membranes modified with pores.

Mechanical properties of collagen membranes: are they sufficient for orbital floor reconstructions?

INTRODUCTION

The most common reconstruction materials for orbital floor fractures are PDS (polydioxanone) foil and titanium meshes. These materials have advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, new materials are needed to improve surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three resorbable collagen membranes (Smartbrane(®), BioGide(®), Creos(®)) were tested for their mechanical properties (puncture strength) in mint and artificially aged (3, 6, 8 weeks) conditions and were compared to PDS foil, titanium meshes (0.25 mm, 0.5 mm) and human orbital floors (n = 7).

RESULTS

The following puncture strengths were evaluated: human orbital floor, 0.81 ± 0.49 N/mm(2); 0.25 mm titanium mesh, 5.36 ± 0.25 N/mm(2); 0.5 mm titanium mesh, 16.08 ± 5.17 N/mm(2); Smartbrane, 0.74 ± 0.31 N/mm(2); BioGide, 1.65 ± 0.45 N/mm(2); and Creos, 2.81 ± 0.27 N/mm(2). After artificial aging, the puncture strengths were significantly reduced (p ≤ 0.05) at 3, 6 and 8 weeks as follows: Smartbrane, 0.05 ± 0.03 N/mm(2), 0.03 ± 0.02 N/mm(2), and 0.01 ± 0.01 N/mm(2), respectively; BioGide, 0.42 ± 0.06 N/mm(2), 0.41 ± 0.12 N/mm(2), and 0.32 ± 0.08 N/mm(2), respectively; and Creos, 2.02 ± 0.37 N/mm(2), 1.49 ± 0.42 N/mm(2), and 1.36 ± 0.42 N/mm(2), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The tested materials showed sufficient puncture strength for orbital floor reconstruction in mint condition. Moreover, after artificial aging, the Creos and BioGide membranes showed sufficient resistance, while Smartbrane showed equivocal data after eight weeks. Therefore, collagen membranes have adequate properties for further in vivo investigations for orbital floor reconstructions.