Health Services Research: Impact of Quality of Life Instruments on Craniofacial Surgery

Comparison of emotional and behavioral regulation between metopic and sagittal synostosis

PURPOSE

Children with surgically corrected nonsyndromic craniosynostosis have been previously found to have neurocognitive and behavioral difficulties. Children with metopic synostosis have been described to have more difficulties than children with sagittal synostosis. This study aims to characterize the behavioral differences between children with metopic and sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

Children with metopic and sagittal synostosis were recruited at school age. Parents completed four separated behavioral assessments: Conners-3 (evaluation of ADHD), Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2: evaluation of autism), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF-2: evaluation of executive function), and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL: evaluation of overall behavioral problems). Children underwent intelligence quotient (IQ) testing using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI-II).

RESULTS

There were 91 children (45 with metopic and 46 with sagittal synostosis). More children with metopic synostosis reported requiring supportive services (57.7% vs 34.7%, p = 0.02) and more reached or exceeded borderline clinical levels of two executive function subscales of the BRIEF-2 (emotion regulation index: 33.3% vs 17.4%, p = 0.05; global executive composite: 33.3% vs 17.4%, p = 0.05). Children with sagittal synostosis had higher scores on the rule-breaking and externalizing problem subscales of the CBCL. Increasing age at surgery was associated with worse executive function scores.

CONCLUSIONS

A relationship between suture subtype and behavioral outcomes exists at school age. More children with metopic synostosis required social services indicating more overall difficulties. Children with metopic synostosis have more specific problems with executive function, while children with sagittal synostosis had more difficulties with externalizing behaviors.

Quality of life in patients with craniosynostosis and deformational plagiocephaly: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a bony dysmorphism of the calvarium due to premature suture fusion and is classified as syndromic (part of congenital syndrome) or nonsyndromic (isolated). Deformational plagiocephaly (DP) is due to external positional forces on the skull after birth. This review aims to investigate the various quality of life (QoL) metrics across syndromic, nonsyndromic and DP patients.

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was done through EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science. After two stages of screening by two authors, seventeen articles met inclusion criteria; 11 on syndromic, 4 nonsyndromic, and 2 DP.

RESULTS

The literature suggests syndromic patients have more severe consequences on QoL, especially on psychological well-being, social functioning, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), leading to behavioral difficulties. Nonsyndromic patients show a less clear trend across QoL measures, but a majority stated QoL is comparable to the general population. DP patients noted motor development and QoL improvement as well as improved subjective aesthetic outcomes after orthotic helmet molding therapy (HMT).

CONCLUSIONS

While a majority of literature classifies QoL in syndromic craniosynostosis alone, this review highlights the importance of these factors in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and plagiocephaly patients. Psychological well-being, social functioning, and secondary health impacts such as OSA are important to consider in comprehensive craniofacial care in all calvaria deformities.

Photometric evaluation of cranial and facial symmetry in hemicoronal single suture synostosis treated with surgical fronto-orbital remodeling

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of frontal vault symmetry and progressive facial symmetrization in a cohort of patients with hemicoronal single suture synostosis treated with a standardized cranioplasty and rigid fixation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with hemicoronal synostosis operated between 1999 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Pre, immediately postoperative and yearly photographs from the top of the skull and frontal views of the face were taken with the same head position and projection. A photogrammetric method was applied to quantify the pre and postoperative contour changes. The anterior skull hemispheres were traced, divided into two equal parts and the areas were compared. Angular measurements obtained by the intersection of the interpupillary line and the glabella perpendicular vertical line were calculated. The average photographic follow-up was 6.8 years. Range 1-14 years.

RESULTS

The average advancement on the affected side was 18 mm (range: 16-23 mm). The pre-surgical cranial area on the affected side was increased on average 14.6 + 2.4% (range: 10-18%). The angular measurements documented the frontal symmetry obtained and the progressive improvement of facial symmetry.

CONCLUSION

Cranioplasty with rigid fixation achieved a stable correction of anterior plagiocephaly leading to subsequent symmetrical facial growth. Photogrammetry allowed fora quantitative long-term validation.