Computer-Assisted Navigational Surgery Improves Outcomes in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery:

Intraoperative Image Guidance in Orbital and Lacrimal Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the efficacy and safety of the use of intraoperative image guidance (IIG) in orbital and lacrimal surgery.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed database was last conducted in November 2023 for English-language original research that assessed the use of any image guidance system in orbital and lacrimal surgery that included at least 5 patients. The search identified 524 articles; 94 were selected for full-text analysis by the panel. A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria. The panel methodologist assigned a level II rating to 2 studies and a level III rating to 30 studies. No study met the criteria for level I evidence.

RESULTS

Procedures reported on were as follows: fracture repair (n = 14), neoplasm and infiltrate biopsy or excision (n = 6), orbital decompression for Graves ophthalmopathy (n = 3), dacryocystorhinostomy (n = 1), and mixed etiology and procedures (n = 8). Four studies used more than one IIG system. One study that met level II evidence criteria compared the outcomes of orbital fracture repair with IIG (n = 29) and without IIG (n = 29). Borderline better outcomes were reported in the IIG group: 2% versus 10% with diplopia (P = 0.039) and 3% versus 10% with enophthalmos (P = 0.065). The other level II study compared the repair of fractures with navigation (n = 20) and without (n = 20). The group in which navigation was used had a measured mean volume reduction of 3.82 cm3 compared with 3.33 cm3 (P = 0.02), and there was a greater measured reduction in enophthalmos in the navigation group of 0.72 mm (P = 0.001). Although the remaining 30 assessed articles failed to meet level II criteria, all alleged a benefit from IIG. No complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

A small number of comparative studies suggest that there are improved outcomes when IIG is used in orbital fracture repair, but each study suffers from various limitations. No high-quality comparative studies exist for the management of lacrimal surgery, neoplastic disease, or decompression. Complications attributable to the use of IIG have not been identified, and IIG has not been analyzed for cost savings.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Image-guided navigation in posterior orbital tumour surgery: a comparative cohort study

PURPOSE

The posterior orbit is a confined space, harbouring neurovascular structures, frequently distorted by tumours. Image-guided navigation (IGN) has the potential to allow accurate localisation of these lesions and structures, reducing collateral damage whilst achieving surgical objectives.

METHODS

We assessed the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of using an electromagnetic IGN for posterior orbital tumour surgery via a comparative cohort study. Outcomes from cases performed with IGN were compared with a retrospective cohort of similar cases performed without IGN, presenting a descriptive and statistical comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar in mean age, gender and tumour characteristics. IGN set-up and registration were consistently achieved without significant workflow disruption. In the IGN group, fewer lateral orbitotomies (6.7% IGN, 46% non-IGN), and more transcutaneous lid and transconjunctival incisions (93% IGN, 53% non-IGN) were performed (p = .009). The surgical objective was achieved in 100% of IGN cases, with no need for revision surgery (vs 23% revision surgery in non-IGN, p = .005). There was no statistically significant difference in surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

The use of IGN was feasible and integrated into the orbital surgery workflow to achieve surgical objectives more consistently and allowed the use of minimal access approaches. Future multicentre comparative studies are needed to explore the potential of this technology further.

Mixed reality guided advancement osteotomies in congenital craniofacial malformations

This paper describes our experience with mixed reality (MR) intra-operative guides in patients with congenital craniofacial malformations. The first case was a patient with bilateral hemifacial microsomia. He underwent bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Pre-operative virtual planning determined the sites of osteotomy. Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files of mandibular 3D models with osteotomy sites were uploaded onto the HoloLens 2® MR glasses (Microsoft®, Washington, USA). The superimposed hologram denoted the osteotomy line. This was validated with a physical cutting guide. The second case was a patient with Crouzon's syndrome. A modified Lefort 2 advancement was performed to correct his midfacial deficiency. Pre-operative virtual planning was performed to determine the sites of osteotomies. Superimposed hologram using the Hololens 2® denoted the osteotomy sites. These were validated with a conventional intra-operative navigation system. The advantages of using MR include its immediate availability for use; saving time and costs. MR allows surgeons to maintain continuous line-of-sight within the operative field. A robust registration system is required to anchor the hologram onto the patient's skull without variations in hologram position from different angles of gaze. MR has the potential to function as an adjunct and possible replacement for conventional cutting guides and intra-operative navigation. LAY SUMMARY: We describe the use of mixed reality intra-operative guides in patients with congenital craniofacial malformations. Our experience shows the potential MR has as an adjunct and possible replacement for conventional cutting guides and intra-operative navigation.

Does Intraoperative Navigation Improve Implant Position Accuracy in Orbital Fracture Repair?

Purpose: Our aim was to determine if intraoperative navigation (ION) improved radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing delayed primary/secondary orbital reconstruction for inferomedial defects, as measured by volume restoration, enophthalmos correction, and positional accuracy of implants. Patients and Methods: A prospective quasiexperimental study was performed to compare two groups of patients requiring orbital reconstruction. Use of ION was the exposure evaluated. Outcome measures were (i) intraorbital volume and enophthalmos evaluated radiologically, (ii) implant position accuracy, and (iii) procedural duration. Data were analyzed statistically to compare variance between groups. Results: Forty patients (6 females and 34 males) were recruited into the study with a mean age of 27.3 years. The study group demonstrated a greater reduction of intraorbital volume (0.49 cu.cm; p = 0.02) and enophthalmos (0.72 mm; p = 0.001). Implant positioning was more accurate using ION, with less mediolateral (p = 0.006) and yaw (p = 0.04) deviations. Surgical time for implant positioning was shorter by 17 min, with navigation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of ION demonstrated radiographic improvements in volume restoration, enophthalmos correction, as well as accuracy of implant positioning, in patients requiring delayed primary/secondary orbital reconstruction.

Does Integration of Technology and Customization of Implants Produce Better Outcomes in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This review aims to compare and evaluate the outcomes achieved by integrating technological aids and the influence of different implant designs in the reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital defects.

METHODS

Electronic searches of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases until March 2023 were conducted. Clinical controlled trials, observational studies, cohort studies, and retrospective studies were identified and included. The predictor variables were the integration of technological aids namely, computer-assisted surgical planning, mirror image overlay, and intraoperative navigation with the utilization of different orbital implant designs (standard orbital meshes, preformed implants, prebent implants, and patient-specific implant [PSI]) during post-traumatic orbital reconstruction. The primary outcome variables were orbital volume, diplopia, and enophthalmos. Weighted or mean difference and risk ratios at 95% confidence intervals were calculated, where P ＜ .05 was considered significant and a random effects model was adopted.

RESULTS

This review included 7 studies with 560 participants. The results indicate that the difference in postoperative orbital volume between affected and nonaffected eye showed no statistically significant difference between PSI and prebent group (mean difference, -0.41 P = .28, I2 = 46%). PSI group resulted in diplopia 0.71-fold less than that of the standard orbital mesh group but was not statistically significant (P = .15). Standard orbital mesh group is 0.30 times at higher risk of developing enophthalmos as compared to PSI group (P = .010). The literature suggests PSIs are preferred for patients with large defects (Jaquiéry's III-IV), whereas prebent implants are equally effective as PSIs in patients with preserved infraorbital buttress and retrobulbar bulge.

CONCLUSION

PSIs are associated with improved outcomes, especially for correcting enophthalmos. The data suggests the potential efficacy of prebent implants and PSIs in orbital volume corrections. There is a lack of randomized studies. This review should serve as a recommendation for further studies to contribute to the existing literature.

Accuracy of surgical navigation for patient-specific reconstructions of orbital fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review the recent literature on the technical accuracy of surgical navigation for patient-specific reconstruction of orbital fractures using a patient-specific implant, and to compare surgical navigation with conventional techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane (Core Collection) databases on May 16, 2023. Literature comparing surgical navigation with a conventional method using postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography imaging was collected. Only articles that studied at least one of the following outcomes were included: technical accuracy (angular accuracy, linear accuracy, volumetric accuracy, and degree of enophthalmos), preoperative and perioperative times, need for revision, complications, and total cost of the intervention. MINORS criteria were used to evaluate the quality of the articles.

RESULTS

After screening 3733 articles, 696 patients from 27 studies were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate volumetric accuracy and revision rates. Meta-analysis proved a significant better volumetric accuracy (0.93 cm3 ± 0.47 cm3) when surgical navigation was used compared with conventional surgery (2.17 cm3 ± 1.35 cm3). No meta-analysis of linear accuracy, angular accuracy, or enophthalmos was possible due to methodological heterogeneity. Surgical navigation had a revision rate of 4.9%, which was significantly lower than that of the conventional surgery (17%). Costs were increased when surgical navigation was used.

CONCLUSION

Studies with higher MINORS scores demonstrated enhanced volumetric precision compared with traditional approaches. Surgical navigation has proven effective in reducing revision rates compared to conventional approaches, despite increased costs.

Accuracy of intraoperative navigation for orbital fracture repair: A retrospective morphometric analysis

In this retrospective case series, patients undergoing surgery to treat isolated orbital floor fractures were morphometrically analyzed. Cloud Compare was used to compare mesh positioning with a virtual plan, using the distance-to-nearest-neighbor method. To assess the accuracy of mesh positioning, a mesh area percentage (MAP) parameter was introduced and three distance ranges were defined as the outcome measures: the 'high-accuracy range' included MAPs at a distance of 0-1 mm from the preoperative plan; the 'intermediate-accuracy range' included MAPs at a distance of 1.1-2 mm from the preoperative plan; the 'low-accuracy range' included MAPs at a distance of >2 mm from the preoperative plan. To complete the study, morphometric analysis of the results was combined with clinical judgment ('excellent', 'good', or 'poor') of mesh positioning by two independent blind observers. In total, 73 of 137 orbital fractures met the inclusion criteria. In the 'high-accuracy range' the mean, minimum, and maximum MAP values were 64%, 22%, and 90%, respectively. In the 'intermediate-accuracy range', the mean, minimum, and maximum values were 24%, 10%, and 42%, respectively. In the 'low-accuracy range', the values were 12%, 1%, and 48%, respectively. Both observers classified 24 cases of mesh positioning as 'excellent', 34 as 'good', and 12 as 'poor'. Within the limitations of the study, it seems that virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation has the potential to add quality to the repair of the orbital floor and, therefore, should be taken into consideration whenever appropriate.

Surgical repair of large orbital floor and medial wall fractures with destruction of the inferomedial strut: Initial experience with a combined endoscopy navigation technique

The application of navigation and endoscope is an area of intense interest in the surgical repair of orbital fractures. This study explored the advantages of a combined endoscopy navigation technique (ENT) for repairing large orbital floor and medial wall fractures (OFMWFs) with destruction of the inferomedial strut (IMS). Fifty-two consecutive patients with large OFMWFs with the destruction of the IMS underwent ENT-assisted surgical repair from January 2013 to February 2016. Patient demographics, causes of injury, clinical features, imaging data, and follow-up information (diplopia, ocular dysmotility, enophthalmos, infraorbital hypoesthesia, and other conditions) were collected and analyzed. Orbital volumes and implant positions were also evaluated. The median follow-up duration was 21 (range, 16-29) months. At the end of the follow-up visits, orbital reconstruction was demonstrated by orbital computed tomography. Of the 30 patients with diplopia within the 30-degree visual field of gaze, 27 (90%) reached diplopia remission. Of 40 patients, 34 (85%) achieved complete elimination of ocular dysmotility. Of 47 patients with enophthalmos of >2 mm, 43 (91%) acquired good symmetry with a mean improvement of 3.00 ± 1.00 mm. Of 33 patients, 27 (82%) recovered from infraorbital hypoesthesia. The postoperative orbital volumes of the two sides showed no significant differences (p = 0.087, paired t-test). Early surgical repair showed better outcomes of diplopia, ocular motility, and enophthalmos than late repair (p = 0.001, p = 0.007, and p = 0.000, generalized estimated equations). No patient developed surgery-related complications of visual acuity compromise, strabismus, ectropion, entropion, or lacrimal canaliculus injuries. ENT-assisted surgery appears to be safe, precise, and effective for the repair of large OFMWFs with destruction of the IMS.

Sensory change and recovery of infraorbital area after zygomaticomaxillary and orbital floor fractures

BACKGROUND

To compare the sensory change and recovery of infraorbital area associated with zygomaticomaxillary and orbital floor fractures and their recoveries and investigate the factors that affect them.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 652 patients diagnosed with zygomaticomaxillary (n= 430) or orbital floor (n= 222) fractures in a single center between January 2016 and January 2021. Patient data, including age, sex, medical history, injury mechanism, Knight and North classification (in zygomaticomaxillary fracture cases), injury indication for surgery (in orbital floor cases), combined injury, sensory change, and recovery period, were reviewed. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Orbital floor fractures occurred more frequently in younger patients than zygomaticomaxillary fractures (p< 0.001). High-energy injuries were more likely to be associated with zygomaticomaxillary fractures (p< 0.001), whereas low-energy injuries were more likely to be associated with orbital floor fractures (p< 0.001). The sensory changes associated with orbital floor and zygomaticomaxillary fractures were not significantly different (p= 0.773). Sensory recovery was more rapid and better after orbital floor than after zygomaticomaxillary fractures; however, the difference was not significantly different. Additionally, the low-energy group showed a higher incidence of sensory changes than the high-energy group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.512). Permanent sensory changes were more frequent in the high-energy group, the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The study found no significant difference in the incidence of sensory changes associated with orbital floor and zygomaticomaxillary fractures. In case of orbital floor fractures and high-energy injuries, the risk of permanent sensory impairment should be considered.

Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures

Substantial controversy exists regarding the timing of intervention and management of patients with orbital floor fractures. Recent advances in computer-aided technology, including the use of 3-dimensional printing, intraoperative navigational imaging, and the use of novel implants, have allowed for improvement in prospective management modalities. As such, this article aims to review the indications and timing of repair, surgical approaches, materials used for repair, and contemporary adjuncts to repair. Indications for orbital floor fracture repair remain controversial as many of these fractures heal without intervention or adverse sequelae. Intraoperative navigation and imaging, as well as endoscopic guidance, can improve visualization of defects mitigating implant positioning errors, thereby reducing the need for secondary corrective procedures. Patient-specific implants may be constructed to fit the individual patient's anatomy using the preoperative CT dataset and mirroring the contralateral unaffected side and have been shown to improve pre-operative efficiency and minimize postoperative complications. With increased data, we can hope to form evidence-based indications for using particular biomaterials and the criteria for orbital defect characteristics, which may be best addressed by a specific surgical approach.

Prospective Evaluation of Two Wall Orbital Fractures Involving the Medial Orbital Wall: PSI Reconstruction versus PDS Repair—Worth the Effort?

Proper treatment of the two-wall fractured orbit is still controversial. Specifically, there is no consensus on the issue of the necessity of medial orbital wall repair. With anatomically critical structures at risk during the surgical approach, surgeons’ view on the necessity of medial orbital wall repair often is restricted and an aesthetically disturbing enophthalmos is more likely to be accepted. Therefore, treatment options range from leaving the medial wall without repair to reconstruction with autogenous tissue or alloplastic materials, which can lead to moderate to severe side effects. However, emerging technologies such as patient-specific implants (PSI) offer a reliable and anatomically correct reconstruction of the bony orbit. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of full orbital reconstruction using PSIs compared to only orbital floor repair using PDS (bioresorbable polydioxanone) foils leaving the medial orbital wall untouched in traumatic two-wall orbital fractures. Of all patients treated at the University Hospital of Düsseldorf between 2017 and 2019 who suffered from traumatic orbital fracture, only patients with a two-wall orbital fracture involving both the orbital floor and the medial wall (n = 68) were included. Patients were treated either with a PSI (n = 35) or a PDS foil (n = 33). Primary outcome parameters were ophthalmological disturbances analyzed via clinical investigation and intra-orbital angles, volumes and implant position analyzed with radiological 3D-datasets. While a two-wall reconstruction using PSIs led to a significant improvement of the enophthalmos, the rate of postoperative enophthalmos was significantly increased in cases of only orbital floor repair with PDS foils. Radiologically, a significant reconstruction of the three-dimensional bony orbit succeeded with the simple use of PSIs leading to a significant reduction in the traumatically enlarged orbital volume. PSI also led to a significant reduction in the traumatically enlarged medial angle of the orbit. This was not the case for single-floor repair with PDS foil. The results of this study suggest that complex orbital fractures can be reconstructed at an even higher degree of accuracy with selective laser-melted PSIs than PDS foils. In order to achieve a true to original reconstruction of the bony orbit, surgical treatment of the medial orbital wall can be advocated for in the long term depending on the indication.

Personalized Medicine Workflow in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction

Restoration of the orbit is the first and most predictable step in the surgical treatment of orbital fractures. Orbital reconstruction is keyhole surgery performed in a confined space. A technology-supported workflow called computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has become the standard for complex orbital traumatology in many hospitals. CAS technology has catalyzed the incorporation of personalized medicine in orbital reconstruction. The complete workflow consists of diagnostics, planning, surgery and evaluation. Advanced diagnostics and virtual surgical planning are techniques utilized in the preoperative phase to optimally prepare for surgery and adapt the treatment to the patient. Further personalization of the treatment is possible if reconstruction is performed with a patient-specific implant and several design options are available to tailor the implant to individual needs. Intraoperatively, visual appraisal is used to assess the obtained implant position. Surgical navigation, intraoperative imaging, and specific PSI design options are able to enhance feedback in the CAS workflow. Evaluation of the surgical result can be performed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Throughout the entire workflow, the concepts of CAS and personalized medicine are intertwined. A combination of the techniques may be applied in order to achieve the most optimal clinical outcome. The goal of this article is to provide a complete overview of the workflow for post-traumatic orbital reconstruction, with an in-depth description of the available personalization and CAS options.

Preliminary outcomes of the surgical navigation system combined with intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm computed tomography for zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction

This study analyzed the outcomes of zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction using the real-time navigation system with intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) C-arm computed tomography (CT). Fifteen patients with zygomatico-orbital or isolated orbital/zygoma fractures were enrolled in this prospective cohort. For zygoma reduction, the displacement at five key sutures and the differences between preoperative and intraoperative CT images were compared. For orbital reconstruction, the bilateral orbital volume differences in the anterior, middle, and posterior angles over the medial transitional buttress were measured. Two patients required implant adjustment once after the intraoperative 3D C-arm assessment. On comparing the preoperative and postoperative findings for the zygoma, the average sum of displacement was 19.48 (range, 5.1–34.65) vs. 1.96 (0–3.95) mm (P < 0.001) and the deviation index was 13.56 (10–24.35) vs. 2.44 (0.6–4.85) (P < 0.001). For the orbit, the mean preoperative to postoperative bilateral orbital volume difference was 3.93 (0.35–10.95) vs. 1.05 (0.12–3.61) mm³ (P < 0.001). The mean difference in the bilateral angles at the transition buttress was significantly decreased postoperatively at the middle and posterior one-third. There was no significant difference in orbital volume, angle of the transition zone, and the sum of five zygoma distances between post operative results and preoperative virtual planning. The surgical navigation system with the intraoperative 3D C-arm can effectively improve the accuracy of zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction and decrease implant adjustment times.

Is the Mirroring Technology Reliable in the Use of Computer-Aided Design for Orbital Reconstruction? Three-Dimensional Analysis of Asymmetry in the Orbits

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the orbital area remains a challenge in many cases. The recently introduced mirroring technology provides surgeons with patient-specific information for accurate orbital reconstruction; its premise is that the three-dimensional anatomy of craniofacial bone is symmetric. The purpose of this study was to verify this premise of the mirroring technology by assessing three-dimensional asymmetry.

METHODS

Facial computed tomographic data of 104 patients were imported into iPlan software. Four reference points (i.e., zygomaticofrontal suture, frontomaxillary suture, infraorbital foramen, and optic canal) were set, and the three-dimensional distances from these points to the anterior nasal spine on the mirroring plane were calculated. In addition, the orbital cavity volume and the three-dimensional distances from point optic canal to the other reference points were calculated for the assessment of the orbit anatomy. Three plastic surgeons performed these processes independently.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found in the three-dimensional distances between anterior nasal spine and the four reference points bilaterally. Also, no statistically significant difference in the three-dimensional distances between the point representing the optic canal and other reference points was detected bilaterally. Orbital cavity volume showed a mild asymmetry, but the discrepancy was acceptable for computer-aided design applications. For all reference points, the maximum value of the 95 percent CI was less than 1.4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The three-dimensional location of the orbits and the three-dimensional anatomy of the orbit were symmetric. Thus, the mirroring technology could be a reliable first step in computer-aided design, computer-assisted surgery, and navigation-assisted surgery.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Critical appraisal of patient-specific implants for secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstruction

In orbital reconstruction, a patient-specific implant (PSI) may provide accurate reconstruction in complex cases, since the design can be tailored to the anatomy. Several design options may be embedded, for ease of positioning and precision of reconstruction. This study describes a cohort of 22 patients treated for secondary orbital reconstruction with a PSI; one patient received two PSI. The preoperative clinical characteristics and implant design options used are presented. When compared to preoperative characteristics, the postoperative clinical outcomes showed significant improvements in terms of enophthalmos (P < 0.001), diplopia (P < 0.001), and hypoglobus (P = 0.002). The implant position in all previous reconstructions was considered inadequate. Quantitative analysis after PSI reconstruction showed accurate positioning of the implant, with small median and 90th percentile deviations (roll: median 1.3°, 90th percentile 4.6°; pitch: median 1.4°, 90th percentile 3.9°; yaw: median 1.0°, 90th percentile 4.4°; translation: median 1.4 mm, 90th percentile 2.7 mm). Rim support proved to be a significant predictor of roll and rim extension for yaw. No significant relationship between design options or PSI position and clinical outcomes could be established. The results of this study show the benefits of PSI for the clinical outcomes in a large cohort of secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstructions.

Use of computer-assisted surgery in the orbit

PURPOSE

To present the application of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in pre-operative planning, intra-operative navigation, and post-operative assessment as an adjunct tool in orbital surgery.

METHODS

An IRB-approved, retrospective review was performed to identify patients who had undergone orbital surgery by a single surgeon from July 2013 to December 2019 with attention to pre-operative virtual surgical planning, intra-operative navigation, and post-operative assessment. The reasons and methods of CAS use were classified.

RESULTS

The use of computer-assisted technologies was identified in 91 cases out of 464 orbital surgeries (19.6%). This included 23 (25.3%) orbital decompression surgeries, 39 (42.9%) fracture repairs, and 25 (27.5%) orbital tumors. In all cases, pre-, intra-, and post-operative CAS allowed for increased operative efficiency and safety with good outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of CAS in orbital surgery can allow for complex radiographic analysis and in select cases is a great tool to add to the orbital surgeon's armamentarium.

Image-guided surgery in otolaryngology: A review of current applications and future directions in head and neck surgery

Image-guided surgery (IGS) has become a widely adopted technology in otolaryngology. Since its introduction nearly three decades ago, IGS technology has developed rapidly and improved real-time intraoperative visualization for a diverse array of clinical indications. As usability, accessibility, and clinical experiences with IGS increase, its potential applications as an adjunct in many surgical procedures continue to expand. Here, we describe the basic components of IGS and review both the current state and future directions of IGS in otolaryngology, with attention to current challenges to its application in surgery of the nonrigid upper aerodigestive tract.

Facial Transplantation for an Irreparable Central and Lower Face Injury: A Modernized Approach to a Classic Challenge

BACKGROUND

Facial transplantation introduced a paradigm shift in the reconstruction of extensive facial defects. Although the feasibility of the procedure is well established, new challenges face the field in its second decade.

METHODS

The authors' team has successfully treated patients with extensive thermal and ballistic facial injuries with allotransplantation. The authors further validate facial transplantation as a reconstructive solution for irreparable facial injuries. Following informed consent and institutional review board approval, a partial face and double jaw transplantation was performed in a 25-year-old man who sustained ballistic facial trauma. Extensive team preparations, thorough patient evaluation, preoperative diagnostic imaging, three-dimensional printing technology, intraoperative surgical navigation, and the use of dual induction immunosuppression contributed to the success of the procedure.

RESULTS

The procedure was performed on January 5 and 6, 2018, and lasted nearly 25 hours. The patient underwent hyoid and genioglossus advancement for floor-of-mouth dehiscence, and palate wound dehiscence repair on postoperative day 11. Open reduction and internal fixation of left mandibular nonunion were performed on postoperative day 108. Nearly 1 year postoperatively, the patient demonstrates excellent aesthetic outcomes, intelligible speech, and is tolerating an oral diet. He remains free from acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors validate facial transplantation as the modern answer to the classic reconstructive challenge imposed by extensive facial defects resulting from ballistic injury. Relying on a multidisciplinary collaborative approach, coupled with innovative emerging technologies and immunosuppression protocols, can overcome significant challenges in facial transplantation and reinforce its position as the highest rung on the reconstructive ladder.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Implant-oriented navigation in orbital reconstruction part II: preclinical cadaver study

In orbital reconstruction, the acquired position of an orbital implant can be evaluated with the aid of intraoperative navigation. Feedback of the navigation system is only obtained after positioning of the implant: the implant's position is not tracked in real time during positioning. The surgeon has to interpret the navigation feedback and translate it to desired adjustments of the implant's position. In a previous study, a real-time implant-oriented navigation approach was introduced and the system's accuracy was evaluated. In this study, this real-time navigation approach was compared to a marker-based navigation approach in a preclinical set-up. Ten cadavers (20 orbital defects) were reconstructed twice, by two surgeons (total: 80 reconstructions). Implant positioning was significantly improved in the real-time implant-oriented approach in terms of roll (2.0° vs. 3.2°, P=0.03), yaw (2.2° vs. 3.4°, P=0.01) and translation (1.3mm vs. 1.8mm, P=0.005). Duration of the real-time navigation procedure was reduced (median 4.5 min vs. 7.5 min). Subjective appreciation of the navigation technique was higher for real-time implant-oriented navigation (mean 7.5 vs. 9.0). Real-time implant-oriented navigation feedback provides real-time, intuitive feedback to the surgeon, which leads to improved implant positioning and shortens duration of the navigation procedure.

Computer-assisted navigation in orbitofacial surgery

The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the most common indications, treatment, and outcomes of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in ophthalmological practice. CAS has evolved over the years from a neurosurgical tool to maxillofacial as well as an instrument to orbitofacial surgeries. A detailed and organized scrutiny in relevant electronic databases, journals, and bibliographies of the cited articles was carried out. Clinical studies with a minimum of two study cases were included. Navigation surgery, posttraumatic orbital reconstruction, computer-assisted orbital surgery, image-guided orbital decompression, and optic canal decompression (OCD) were the areas of interest. The search generated 42 articles describing the use of navigation in facial surgery: 22 on orbital reconstructions, 5 related to lacrimal sac surgery, 4 on orbital decompression, 2 articles each on intraorbital foreign body and intraorbital tumors, 2 on faciomaxillary surgeries, 3 on cranial surgery, and 2 articles on navigation-guided OCD in traumatic optic neuropathy. In general, CAS is reported to be a useful tool for surgical planning, execution, evaluation, and research. The largest numbers of studies and patients were related to trauma. Treatment of complex orbital fractures was greatly improved by the use of CAS compared with empirically treated control groups. CAS seems to add a favourable potential to the surgical armamentarium. Planning details of the surgical approach in a three-dimensional virtual environment and execution with real-time guidance can help in considerable enhancement of precision. Financial investments and steep learning curve are the main hindrances to its popularity.

Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation in Craniofacial Surgery: Review and Grading of the Current Literature

INTRODUCTION

Image-guided navigation has existed for nearly 3 decades, but its adoption to craniofacial surgery has been slow. A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the current status of navigation in craniofacial surgery.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) systematic review of the Medline and Web of Science databases was performed using a series of search terms related to Image-Guided Navigation and Craniofacial Surgery. Titles were then filtered for relevance and abstracts were reviewed for content. Single case reports were excluded as were animal, cadaver, and virtual data. Studies were categorized based on the type of study performed and graded using the Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales, when appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 2030 titles were returned by our search criteria. Of these, 518 abstracts were reviewed, 208 full papers were evaluated, and 104 manuscripts were ultimately included in the study. A single randomized controlled trial was identified (Jadad score 3), and 12 studies were identified as being case control or case cohort studies (Average Newcastle-Ottawa score 6.8) The most common application of intraoperative surgical navigation cited was orbital surgery (n = 36), followed by maxillary surgery (n = 19). Higher quality studies more commonly pertained to the orbit (6/13), and consistently show improved results.

CONCLUSION

Image guided surgical navigation improves outcomes in orbital reconstruction. Although image guided navigation has promise in many aspects of craniofacial surgery, current literature is lacking and future studies addressing this paucity of data are needed before universal adoption can be recommended.

A Novel Noninvasive Patient-Specific Navigation Method for Orbital Reconstructive Surgery: A Phantom Study Using Patient Data

BACKGROUND

The correction of orbital deformities is an ongoing challenge in maxillofacial surgery. Computer-assisted navigation can improve surgical outcomes. However, conventional registration methods for navigation are not appropriate for orbital reconstructive surgery. This study proposes an accurate, noninvasive, patient-specific navigation method and demonstrates its feasibility.

METHODS

A noninvasive, patient-specific registration frame based on the external auditory canals and upper front teeth was designed using software developed in-house. A three-dimensional craniofacial model was segmented from patient computed tomographic data for the registration frame. A customized craniofacial phantom was also made using this three-dimensional model, with 20 embedded target points on the orbital model and 21 landmark points on the reference standard model. The proposed method was compared with two conventional registration methods: the dental splint-based method and the invasive marker frame-based method. Twenty trials were conducted for evaluation. Target registration error and surface registration error were computed to measure accuracy.

RESULTS

The proposed method showed a target registration error of 1.05 ± 0.52 mm, with greater accuracy than conventional methods (dental splint, 2.10 ± 0.63 mm; invasive marker frame, 1.22 ± 0.46 mm). The proposed method yielded the best results for surface registration error, with 0.38 mm of deviation (dental splint, 0.82 mm; invasive marker frame, 0.60 mm).

CONCLUSION

The proposed noninvasive patient-specific registration method demonstrated superior results for both target registration error and surface registration error compared with other conventional registration methods for computer-assisted navigation in orbital reconstructive surgery.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Precision of a Novel Craniofacial Surgical Navigation System Based on Augmented Reality Using an Occlusal Splint as a Registration Strategy

The authors have developed a novel augmented reality (AR)-based navigation system (NS) for craniofacial surgery. In this study, the authors aimed to measure the precision of the system and further analyze the primary influencing factors of the precision. The drilling of holes into the mandibles of ten beagle dogs was performed under the AR-based NS, and the precision was analyzed by comparing the deviation between the preoperational plan and the surgical outcome. The AR-based NS was successfully applied to quickly and precisely drill holes in the mandibles. The mean positional deviation between the preoperative design and intraoperative navigation was 1.29 ± 0.70 mm for the entry points and 2.47 ± 0.66 mm for the end points, and the angular deviation was 1.32° ± 1.17°. The precision linearly decreased with the distance from the marker. In conclusion, the precision of this system could satisfy clinical requirements, and this system may serve as a helpful tool for improving the precision in craniofacial surgery.

Should Virtual Mirroring Be Used in the Preoperative Planning of an Orbital Reconstruction?

PURPOSE

Mirroring has been used as a diagnostic tool in orbital wall fractures for many years, but limited research is available proving the assumed symmetry of orbits. The purpose of this study was to evaluate volume and contour differences between orbital cavities in healthy humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the left and right orbital cavities of a consecutive sample of patients' computed tomograms were measured. Inclusion criteria were patients with no sign of orbital or sinus pathology or fracture. Outcome variables were differences in volume and contour. Descriptive statistics and Student paired t test were used for data analysis of orbital volume and distance maps were used for analysis of orbital contour.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 100 patients with a mean age of 57; 50% were men. The total mean orbital volume was 27.53 ± 3.11 mL. Mean difference between cavities was 0.44 ± 0.31 mL or 1.59% (standard deviation [SD], 1.10%). The orbital contour showed high similarity, with an absolute mean left-versus-right difference of 0.82 mm (SD, 0.23 mm).

CONCLUSION

The authors hypothesize that the measured differences between right and left orbital volumes and contours are clinically minor. In consequence, the use of mirroring tools as part of preoperative planning in orbital reconstruction is legitimate with the aim of simulating the pre-traumatized anatomy.

Surgical Navigation: A Systematic Review of Indications, Treatments, and Outcomes in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

PURPOSE

This systematic review investigates the most common indications, treatments, and outcomes of surgical navigation (SN) published from 2010 to 2015. The evolution of SN and its application in oral and maxillofacial surgery have rapidly developed over recent years, and therapeutic indications are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search in relevant electronic databases, journals, and bibliographies of the included articles was carried out. Clinical studies with 5 or more patients published between 2010 and 2015 were included. Traumatology, orthognathic surgery, cancer and reconstruction surgery, skull-base surgery, and foreign body removal were the areas of interests.

RESULTS

The search generated 13 articles dealing with traumatology; 5, 6, 2, and 0 studies were found that dealt with the topics of orthognathic surgery, cancer and reconstruction surgery, skull-base surgery, and foreign body removal, respectively. The average technical system accuracy and intraoperative precision reported were less than 1 mm and 1 to 2 mm, respectively. In general, SN is reported to be a useful tool for surgical planning, execution, evaluation, and research. The largest numbers of studies and patients were identified in the field of traumatology. Treatment of complex orbital fractures was considerably improved by the use of SN compared with traditionally treated control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SN seems to be a very promising addition to the surgical toolkit. Planning details of the surgical procedure in a 3-dimensional virtual environment and execution with real-time guidance can significantly improve precision. Among factors to be considered are the financial investments necessary and the learning curve.

Combining Virtual Surgical Planning, Intraoperative Navigation, and 3-Dimensional Printing in Prosthetic-Based Bilateral Microtia Reconstruction

Reconstructing auricular deformities for bilateral microtia is a demanding challenge especially after failed autologous reconstruction. This case report presents a novel application of virtual surgical planning, computer-assisted design, and intraoperative surgical navigation to preplan and execute placement of custom-tailored silicone auricular prostheses and titanium osseointegrated implants for a bone-anchored hearing aid system in a patient with Treacher Collins syndrome in whom autologous reconstruction had previously failed. Through a collaborative approach between the reconstructive surgeon and anaplastologist, the implementation of advanced digital technologies may offer a superior esthetic and functional outcome to patients with previously failed reconstruction.

A Novel System for Navigation-and Robot-Assisted Craniofacial Surgery: Establishment of the Principle Prototype

PURPOSE

The authors aimed to develop 1 novel navigation-guided robotic system for craniofacial surgery to improve accuracy during operation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A new 7-DOF (7-degree-of-freedom) robotic arm was designed and manufactured. Based on our self-developed navigation system TBNAVIS-CMFS, the key technique of integration was studied. A phantom skull model was manufactured based on computed tomography image data and used for the preexperimental study. Firstly, virtual planning was achieved through the TBNAVIS-CMFS, where the Le Fort I procedure was executed through simulation. Then, the actual Le Fort 1 osteotomy was expected to perform with the use of the robotic arm following the instructions from the navigation system.

RESULTS

The theoretical prototype of navigation-guided robotic system for craniofacial surgery was established successfully, which performed the planned Le Fort I procedure with the whole process visible on the screen.

CONCLUSIONS

The technical method of navigation-guided robotics system, allowing the operator to practice the virtual planning procedure through navigation system as well as perform the actual operation thru the robotic arm, could be regarded as a valuable option for benefiting craniofacial surgeons.

Controversies in the Management of the Trauma Patient

Facial trauma is a significant cause of morbidity in the United States. Despite the large volume of trauma surgeries at most academic institutions, there is still controversy regarding management of many traumatic injuries. The literature lacks clear-cut best practices for most fractures. In orbital trauma, there is debate about the optimal timing of repair, preferred biomaterial to be used, and the utility of evaluation afterward with intraoperative computed tomographic scan. In repair of mandible fractures, there is debate regarding open versus closed reduction of subcondylar fractures, or alternatively, endoscopic repair.

Orbital reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Post-traumatic orbital reconstruction is a complex issue that involves both the soft tissue and bony injury. The current literature focuses primarily on bony reconstruction, with fewer investigators evaluating soft-tissue injuries. This article will review recent advances in orbital reconstruction, including presurgical planning software, intra-operative navigation, patient-specific implants, and intra-operative imaging.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditional techniques for diagnosis and orbital injuries continue to be refined; however, advances in computer-aided surgery are allowing surgeons to significantly improve the anatomic accuracy of orbital reconstruction.

SUMMARY

While not all surgeons currently have access to computer-aided applications for orbital reconstruction, these techniques will continue to be refined, resulting in lower cost and greater access.