The Effect of Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence on the Comfort of Liver Transplant Recipients

Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Who Have Undergo Liver Transplantation: A Case Control Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the adherence to immunosuppressive medication use in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC reasons.

METHODS

The study population was determined as 242 patients with HCC and 1290 patients with non-HCC who had LT performed in our institute between March 2002 and November 2021; all these patients were contacted by phone in March 2022. The sample size was calculated using the MedCalc software program, and the number of patients required in each group was determined as 111 patients. Furthermore, we used the sample.int function, a random integer generator in the R (version 4.1.2) software program. Whereas demographic and clinical parameters were determined as independent variables, the immunosuppressive medication adherence scale (IMAS) score was determined as a dependent variable. Patients were evaluated by the IMAS. This 11-item IMAS scale evaluates the lowest compliance score as 11 and the highest as 55.

RESULTS

Out of a total number of 221 patients, 161 (72%) were men and 60 (27.1%) were women, with a median age of 58 years (IQR: 14); one patient in the non-HCC group was excluded due to lack of data. Among the HCC and non-HCC groups, significant differences were found in terms of the variables of age (P = .003), IMAS score (P < .001), sex (P = .001), working status (P = .004), chronic diseases (P = .008), tacrolimus alone (P < .001), tacrolimus plus everolimus (P < .001), and often medication changes (P < .001). A statistically significant correlation was found between the IMAS score and whether the patients had HCC (P < .001) and frequently changing immunosuppressive drugs (P = .023).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that patients with frequent drug changes or non-HCC etiology had better adherence to immunosuppressive drug use.

The analysis of immunosuppressant therapy adherence, depression, anxiety, and stress in kidney transplant recipients in the post-transplantation period

AIM

Our study aimed to analyze the immunosuppressant therapy adherence, anxiety, stress, and depression in kidney transplant recipients in the post-transplantation period.

METHOD

This study was conducted as descriptive and cross-sectional research with the participation of 260 recipients who underwent kidney transplantation and were already discharged from the hospital (n = 260). In the data collection process, we used the Personal Information Form, the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)-21. The One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Chi-Squared test, post hoc and Pearson Correlation analysis methods were used in data analysis.

FINDINGS

In our study all participant kidney transplant recipients, 45.4% were age 46-64 years and 81.5% were men. As the recipients' age levels increased, their immunosuppressant therapy adherence levels decreased (p < 0.05). Similarly, kidney recipients with at least 3 adverse events (infection, gastrointestinal problems, edema, blood disorders etc.) had a higher DASS-21 score and a lower ITAS score than those with low side effects. ITAS had a strong negative relationship with DASS-21 (p < 0.05). Recipients' depression, stress, and anxiety scores were, in general, above the medium level.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the immunosuppressive drug regimen after kidney transplantation and depression, anxiety and stress are in a bidirectional relationship. At the same time, the side effects of immunosuppressive drugs can trigger the development of depression, anxiety and stress. After kidney transplant, recipients are at risk for the development of depression, anxiety, and stress. We recommend early detection of this condition and taking preventive and symptom-reducing interventions.