1
|
Michael FA, Jung M, Reimers M, Oschwald C, Mihm U, Welsch C, Walter D, Finkelmeier F, Masseli J, Pathil A, Dultz G, Puhlmann D, Diaz-Martinez L, Hack D, Lingwal N, Bojunga J, Kempf VAJ, Zeuzem S, Friedrich-Rust M. A New Drying Method of Thermolabile Flexible Endoscope Channels by Laminar and Turbulent Airflow: A Prospective, Randomized-Controlled, Single-Center, Proof-of-Concept Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01338. [PMID: 39311431 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION International guidelines suggest different possibilities for drying of endoscopes during reprocessing. Clinical results of these available drying methods are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the drying cycle of a standard endoscope washer-disinfector (EWD) (standard drying method [SD]) with a shortened mandatory drying by the EWD followed by a special drying device using laminar and turbulent air flow (novel drying method [ND]). METHODS Sixty endoscopes (duodenoscopes, colonoscocopes, and gastroscopes) from 3 different manufacturers underwent high-level disinfection and drying depending on the randomization group. Operational time of drying was measured for both groups. Residual fluid in the channels was measured using a laboratory scale. After a 14-day storage period, a sample of the endoscope channels was obtained to determine bacterial contamination. RESULTS ND had significantly fewer residual water in endoscope channels (SD: 90% vs ND: 0%; P < 0.001) after high-level disinfection and drying and less bacterial contamination after storage for 14 days (SD: 47% vs ND: 20%; P = 0.028). Time consumed for drying in ND was also significantly shorter (SD: 16 minutes 4 seconds vs ND: 5 minutes 59 seconds; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION Drying with a special automatic drying device was superior compared with an EWD's drying program as evidenced by no measurable residual water, reduced microbiological contamination, and a more than 2-fold decrease in operational time. Thus, drying by laminar and turbulent airflow may represent an attractive alternative to the currently used standard approach in the reprocessing process of flexible endoscopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian A Michael
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Michael Jung
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Mike Reimers
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Clara Oschwald
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Ulrike Mihm
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Christoph Welsch
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Dirk Walter
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Fabian Finkelmeier
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Johannes Masseli
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Anita Pathil
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Georg Dultz
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Danuta Puhlmann
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Germany and and University Center of Competence for Infection Control of the State of Hessen, Frankfurt Main, Germany
| | - Laura Diaz-Martinez
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Germany and and University Center of Competence for Infection Control of the State of Hessen, Frankfurt Main, Germany
| | - Daniel Hack
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Germany and and University Center of Competence for Infection Control of the State of Hessen, Frankfurt Main, Germany
| | - Neelam Lingwal
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Germany
| | - Jörg Bojunga
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | - Volkhard A J Kempf
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Germany and and University Center of Competence for Infection Control of the State of Hessen, Frankfurt Main, Germany
| | - Stefan Zeuzem
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic 1, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calderwood AH, Day LW, Muthusamy VR, Collins J, Hambrick RD, Brock AS, Guda NM, Buscaglia JM, Petersen BT, Buttar NS, Khanna LG, Kushnir VM, Repaka A, Villa NA, Eisen GM. ASGE guideline for infection control during GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:1167-1179. [PMID: 29573782 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
5
|
Disposable Bronchoscope Model for Simulating Endoscopic Reprocessing and Surveillance Cultures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 38:136-142. [PMID: 27866488 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscope-associated infections are reported despite following proper reprocessing methods. Microbiological testing can confirm the adequacy of endoscope reprocessing. Multiple controversies related to the method and interpretation of microbiological testing cultures have arisen that make their routine performance a complex target. OBJECTIVE We conducted a pilot study using disposable bronchoscopes (DBs) to simulate different reprocessing times and soaking times and to compare high-level disinfection versus ethylene oxide sterilization. We also reviewed the time to reprocessing and duration of the procedures. METHODS Bronchoscopes were chosen because an alternative disposable scope is commercially available and because bronchoscopes are more prone to delays in processing. Disposable bronchoscopes were contaminated using a liquid bacterial suspension and were then incubated for 1-4 hours. Standard processing and high-level disinfection were performed on 36 endoscopes. Ethylene oxide sterilization was performed on 21 endoscopes. Endoscope cultures were performed using the standard "brush, flush, brush" technique. RESULTS After brushing was performed, a final water-flush culture procedure was the most effective method of detecting bacterial persistence on the disposable scopes. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most commonly recovered organism after reprocessing. Ethylene oxide sterilization did not result in total elimination of viable bacteria. CONCLUSION Routine endoscopy cultures may be required to assess the adequacy of endoscopic processing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:136-142.
Collapse
|
6
|
The role of biofilms in reprocessing medical devices. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41:S77-80. [PMID: 23622755 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2012] [Revised: 12/14/2012] [Accepted: 12/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Biofilms are communities of microorganisms within extracellular polymeric material attached to surfaces. Within a biofilm, cells have some protection from drying and other stress factors in their environment, including antimicrobial agents. In this article, the challenges to medical device reprocessing posed by biofilms are addressed. Biofilm formation on reusable medical device surfaces is a risk that can be controlled. By ensuring prompt device cleaning and reprocessing either by high-level disinfection or sterilization and proper drying, biofilms will not have a chance to form. Reusable medical devices like flexible endoscopes that are promptly cleaned and disinfected, rinsed and dried pose little risk to patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Saliou P, Garlantézec R, Baron R, Quiot JJ, Cholet F, Le Floch MF, Lejeune B. Contrôles microbiologiques des endoscopes au centre hospitalier régional de Brest du 1er janvier 2007 au 31 décembre 2009. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 59:88-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2010.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2010] [Accepted: 07/28/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|