Time to Hemorrhage Control in a Hybrid ER System: Is it Time to Change?

EuroTrauma, delays in access to bleeding control. A comparison between a conventional and a hybrid trauma center, both European military trauma centers

PURPOSE

Comparison of access times to CT and surgical/radiological bleeding control between two European military trauma centers.

METHODS

Retrospective and observational study conducted in two military level 1 trauma centers in Toulon (France) and Koblenz (Germany) between 2013 and 2018. Inclusion of severe trauma patients with ISS > 15 with clinical and biological criteria of bleeding.

RESULTS

Inclusion of 607 patients (318 in Toulon and 289 in Koblenz). Mean ISS 30. Median access time to CT significantly lower for Koblenz, 14 vs. 30 min; p < 0.001. Median access time to the emergency bleeding control lower in Toulon 84 min vs. 92 (p = 0.114). No impact on mortality at 24 h 9% in Koblenz and 11% in Toulon. Mortality at 28 days identical 17%.

CONCLUSION

The organizational innovation at the military hospital in Koblenz saves time in the injury assessment. However, it has no impact on the access time to the scanner and on the mortality at 24 and 28 days. This fight against hemorrhage is a management bundle including delays, transfusion, and team training.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

2,002,878 v 0.

Retrospective value assessment of a dedicated, trauma hybrid operating room

BACKGROUND

In traumatic hemorrhage, hybrid operating rooms offer near simultaneous performance of endovascular and open techniques, with correlations to earlier hemorrhage control, fewer transfusions, and possible decreased mortality. However, hybrid operating rooms are resource intensive. This study quantifies and describes a single-center experience with the complications, cost-utility, and value of a dedicated trauma hybrid operating room.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 292 consecutive adult trauma patients who underwent immediate (<4 hours) operative intervention at a Level I trauma center. A total of 106 patients treated before the construction of a hybrid operating room served as historical controls to the 186 patients treated thereafter. Demographics, hemorrhage-control procedures, and financial data as well as postoperative complications and outcomes were collected via electronic medical records. Value and incremental cost-utility ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

Demographics and severity of illness were similar between cohorts. Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta was more frequently used in the hybrid operating room. Hemorrhage control occurred faster (60 vs. 49 minutes, p = 0.005) and, in the 4- to 24-hour postadmission period, required less red blood cell (mean, 1.0 vs. 0 U, p = 0.001) and plasma (mean, 1.0 vs. 0 U, p < 0.001) transfusions. Complications were similar except for a significant decrease in pneumonia (7% vs. 4%, p = 0.008). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification, ≥3) were similar. Across the patient admission, costs were not significantly different ($50,023 vs. $54,740, p = 0.637). There was no change in overall value (1.00 vs. 1.07, p = 0.778).

CONCLUSION

The conversion of our standard trauma operating room to an endovascular hybrid operating room provided measurable improvements in hemorrhage control, red blood cell and plasma transfusions, and postoperative pneumonia without significant increase in cost. Value was unchanged.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic/Value-Based Evaluations; Level III.

The Damage Control Resuscitation and Surgical Team: The New French Paradigm for Management of Combat Casualties

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work was to introduce the new French forward resuscitation and surgical unit. It's also to discuss the choices and waivers granted to fit the tactical context of modern conflicts and the current epidemiology of combat casualties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary task force of 11 people proceeded to the conception and the creation of a new military resuscitation and surgical unit. The preliminary work included a scoping review of the combat casualties' epidemiology in modern conflicts and an analysis of the recent French medical-surgical treatment facilities lessons learned. In April 2019, a technical-operational evaluation was conducted to confirm all the technical, ergonomic, and organizational choices made during the design phase.

RESULTS

The multidisciplinary task force resulted in the creation of the Damage Control Resuscitation and Surgical Team (DCRST). The DCRST focused on the resuscitation strategy, including transfusion of blood products, and the life-saving surgical procedures to be performed as close as possible to the point of injury. It was designed for the resuscitation of two patients: the life-saving surgery of two patients and the very short-term intensive care (<12 hours) of four patients at the same time. The DCRST provided sufficient autonomy to provide take care of four T1 and four T2 or T3 casualties per day for 48 hours. It was armed with 23 soldiers. The technical equipment represented 5,300 kg and 27 m3. All the technical medical equipment could be stored in two 20-foot containers.

CONCLUSION

The DCRST represents a new paradigm in medical support of French military operations. It offers the advantage of two combat casualties' surgical management at the same time, as close as possible to the combat zone. It responds to a 2-fold epidemiological and logistical challenge.

Clinical Impact of a Dedicated Trauma Hybrid Operating Room

BACKGROUND

Early hemorrhage control is essential to optimal trauma care. Hybrid operating rooms offer early, concomitant performance of advanced angiographic and operative hemostasis techniques, but their clinical impact is unclear. Herein, we present our initial experience with a dedicated, trauma hybrid operating room.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort analysis of 292 adult trauma patients undergoing immediate surgery at a Level I trauma center compared patients managed after implementation of a dedicated, trauma hybrid operating room (n = 186) with historic controls (n = 106). The primary outcomes were time to hemorrhage control (systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg without ongoing vasopressor or transfusion requirements), early blood product administration, and complication.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between cohorts (age 41 years, 25% female, 38% penetrating trauma). The hybrid cohort had lower initial hemoglobin (10.2 vs 11.1 g/dL, p = 0.001) and a greater proportion of patients undergoing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (9% vs 1%, p = 0.007). Cohorts had similar case mixes and intraoperative consultation with cardiothoracic or vascular surgery (13%). Twenty-one percent of all hybrid cases included angiography. The interval between operating room arrival and hemorrhage control was shorter in the hybrid cohort (49 vs 60 minutes, p = 0.005). From 4 to 24 hours after arrival, the hybrid cohort had fewer red cell (0.0 vs 1.0, p = 0.001) and plasma transfusions (0.0 vs 1.0, p < 0.001). The hybrid cohort had fewer infectious complications (15% vs 27%, p = 0.009) and ventilator days (2.0 vs 3.0, p = 0.011), and similar in-hospital mortality (13% vs 10%, p = 0.579).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a dedicated, trauma hybrid operating room was associated with earlier hemorrhage control and fewer early blood transfusions, infectious complications, and ventilator days.