A Noninvasive Stroke Volume Monitoring for Early Detection of Minimal Blood Loss: A Pilot Study

Accuracy of oscillometric-based blood pressure monitoring devices: impact of pulse volume, arrhythmia, and respiratory artifact

An oscillometric waveform (OMW) envelope-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring device is widely used to monitor blood pressure and prevent hypertension and adverse cardiovascular events. At present, all primary care physicians and clinicians widely recommend oscillometric-based BP devices. The consumer selects the device based on their own decision, without knowing whether the device is validated or not, resulting in over- or under-treatment of hypertension. It is imperative that each device must comply with international protocols. In this study, we have investigated the accuracy of inflation and deflation-based oscillometric BP monitoring devices in the case of sinus rhythm (SR). Since different health conditions of the patient affect the oscillometric waveform, which can affect the device's accuracy, in such cases, many BP monitors are skeptical of succeeding in the norms of international protocols. Therefore, this study also aims to calculate the accuracy of these devices in various health conditions and measure the effect of pulse volume, arrhythmia, and respiratory artifact on it using a non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) simulator. We found that the oscillometric BP devices failed to measure the correct blood pressure in several clinical conditions.

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Evaluation Following TAVI for Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background Various hemodynamic changes occur following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) that may impact therapeutic decisions. NICaS is a noninvasive bioimpedance monitoring system aimed at hemodynamic assessment. We used the NICaS system in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to evaluate short-term hemodynamic changes after TAVI. Methods and Results We performed hemodynamic analysis using NICaS on 97 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI using either self-expandable (68%) or balloon-expandable (32%) valves. Patients were more often women (54%) and had multiple comorbidities including hypertension (83%), coronary artery disease (46%), and diabetes (37%). NICaS was performed at several time points-before TAVI, soon after TAVI, at hospital discharge, and during follow-up. Compared with baseline NICaS measurements, we observed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure and total peripheral resistance (systolic blood pressure 132±21 mm Hg at baseline versus 147±23 mm Hg after TAVI, P<0.001; total peripheral resistance 1751±512 versus 2084±762 dynes*s/cm⁵, respectively, P<0.001) concurrent with a decrease in cardiac output and stroke volume (cardiac output 4.2±1.5 versus 3.9±1.3 L/min, P=0.037; stroke volume 61.4±14.8 versus 56.2±15.9 mL, P=0.001) in the immediate post-TAVI period. At follow-up (median 59 days [interquartile range, 40.5-91]) these measurements returned to values that were not different from the baseline. A significant improvement in echocardiography-based left ventricular ejection fraction was observed from baseline to follow-up (55.6%±11.6% to 59.4%±9.4%, P<0.001). Conclusions Unique short-term adaptive hemodynamic changes were observed using NICaS in patients with AS soon after TAVI. Noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation immediately following TAVI may contribute to the understanding of complex hemodynamic changes and merits favorable consideration.