Autoresuscitation of Poloxamer 188 in Pigs With Traumatic Severe Hemorrhage

Assessment of ethynylestradiol-3-sulfate on coagulation, metabolism, and survival in pigs with traumatic hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of estrogens on survival from hemorrhage have been suggested in some preclinical models. This study investigated the effects of ethynylestradiol-3-sulfate (EE-3-S) on coagulation, metabolism and survival in pigs following traumatic hemorrhage.

METHODS

Twenty-six pigs were randomized into: normal saline group (NS, n = 10), EE-3-S group (EE-3, n = 11) groups, and no resuscitation group (NR, n = 5). Femur fracture was performed in each pig's left leg, followed by hemorrhage of 55% of estimated blood volume and a 10-minute shock period. Afterward, pigs were resuscitated with a small volume of either NS alone (4 mL/kg) or EE-3-S with NS (1 mL/kg at concentration of 1 mg/mL, plus NS solution of 3 mL/kg). Pigs in NR group were not resuscitated with any fluid. All pigs were then monitored for 6 hours or until death, with hemodynamics and survival times recorded. Blood samples were taken during the study for measurements of oxygen metabolism (oxygen delivery, extraction, and consumption) and coagulation function (using Rotem with Extem reagents).

RESULTS

All baseline measurements were similar among the three groups. In the NS group, femur fracture and hemorrhage immediately reduced mean arterial pressure (MAP, 74 ± 3 mm Hg to 44 ± 4 mm Hg) and increased heart rate (97 ± 5 bpm to 218 ± 14 bpm, both p < 0.05). Similar changes in MAP and heart rate were observed in the EE-3 and NR groups. There were no differences observed in changes of Rotem ® measurements or oxygen metabolism among the groups during the study. At 6 hours, four pigs in NS, four pigs in EE-3-S, and two pigs in the NR group survived to the end of the study. The mean survival times were similar among the NS (212 ± 43 minutes), EE-3 (212 ± 39 minutes), and NR (223 ± 63 minutes) groups ( p = 0.9845).

CONCLUSION

Following severe traumatic hemorrhage, hypotensive resuscitation with EE-3-S did not impact coagulation, metabolism, or survival in pigs.

The Use of Large Animal Models in Trauma and Bleeding Studies

BACKGROUND

 Major trauma often results in significant bleeding and coagulopathy, posing a substantial clinical burden. To understand the underlying pathophysiology and to refine clinical strategies to overcome coagulopathy, preclinical large animal models are often used. This review scrutinizes the clinical relevance of large animal models in hemostasis research, emphasizing challenges in translating findings into clinical therapies.

METHODS

 We conducted a thorough search of PubMed and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022. We used specific keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria centered on large animal models.

RESULTS

 Our review analyzed 84 pertinent articles, including four animal species: pigs, sheep, dogs, and nonhuman primates (NHPs). Eighty-five percent of the studies predominantly utilized porcine models. Meanwhile, sheep and dogs were less represented, making up only 2.5% of the total studies. Models with NHP were 10%. The most frequently used trauma models involved a combination of liver injury and femur fractures (eight studies), arterial hemorrhage (seven studies), and a combination of hemodilution and liver injury (seven studies). A wide array of coagulation parameters were employed to assess the efficacy of interventions in hemostasis and bleeding control.

CONCLUSIONS

 Recognizing the diverse strengths and weaknesses of large animal models is critical for trauma and hemorrhage research. Each model is unique and should be chosen based on how well it aligns with the specific scientific objectives of the study. By strategically considering each model's advantages and limitations, we can enhance our understanding of trauma and hemorrhage pathophysiology and further advance the development of effective treatments.

Valproic Acid During Hypotensive Resuscitation In Pigs With Trauma And Hemorrhagic Shock Does Not Improve Survival

BACKGROUND

Valproic acid (VPA) has been extensively used for treatment of anxiety and seizure. Recent studies have shown that VPA has cellular protective effects in preclinical models following severe hemorrhage. This study investigated the effects of VPA on coagulation and survival in pigs after traumatic hemorrhage and hypotensive resuscitation.

METHODS

Following baseline measurements, femur fracture was performed in 20 anesthetized and instrumented pigs (41 ± 2 kg), followed by hemorrhage of 55% of the estimated blood volume and a 10 min shock period. Pigs were then resuscitated over 30 min with: normal saline alone (NS group, n = 10, 4 ml/kg) or VPA solution (VPA group, n = 10, 90 mg/kg, 2 ml/kg of 45 mg VPA/ml, plus 2 ml NS/kg). All pigs were then monitored for 2 hrs or until death. Hemodynamics were recorded and blood samples were taken for blood and coagulation analysis (Rotem®) at baseline, after hemorrhage, resuscitation, and 2 hrs or death.

RESULTS

Femur fracture and hemorrhage caused similar reductions in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output and increase in heart rate in both groups. Resuscitation with NS or VPA did not return these measurements to baseline. No differences were observed in hematocrit, pH, lactate, base excess, or total protein between the groups. Compared to NS, resuscitation with VPA decreased platelet counts and prolonged aPTT, with no differences in fibrinogen levels, PT, or any of the Rotem® measurements between the two groups. Neither survival rates (NS: 7 of 10 pigs and VPA: 7 of 10 pigs) nor survival times after resuscitation (NS: 97 ± 40 min and VPA: 98 ± 43 min) differed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Following traumatic hemorrhage and hypotensive resuscitation in pigs, VPA provides no benefit towards improving coagulation function or survival times.

LEVELS OF RELEVANCE

N/A.