Continuous enteral and parenteral feeding each reduces heart rate variability but differentially influences monocyte gene expression in humans

Central nervous system injury-induced immune suppression

Central nervous system trauma is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Additionally, these injuries frequently occur in younger individuals, leading to lifetime expenses for patients and caregivers and the loss of opportunity for society. Despite this prevalence and multiple attempts to design a neuroprotectant, clinical trials for a pharmacological agent for the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or spinal cord injury (SCI) have provided disappointing results. Improvements in outcome from these disease processes in the past decades have been largely due to improvements in supportive care. Among the many challenges facing patients and caregivers following neurotrauma, posttraumatic nosocomial infection is a significant and potentially reversible risk factor. Multiple animal and clinical studies have provided evidence of posttraumatic systemic immune suppression, and injuries involving the CNS may be even more prone, leading to a higher risk for in-hospital infections following neurotrauma. Patients who have experienced neurotrauma with nosocomial infection have poorer recovery and higher risks of long-term morbidity and in-hospital mortality than patients without infection. As such, the etiology and reversal of postneurotrauma immune suppression is an important topic. There are multiple possible etiologies for these posttraumatic changes including the release of damage-associated molecular patterns, the activation of immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and sympathetic nervous system activation. Postinjury systemic immunosuppression, particularly following neurotrauma, provides a challenge for clinicians but also an opportunity for improvement in outcome. In this review, the authors sought to outline the evidence of postinjury systemic immune suppression in both animal models and clinical research of TBI, TBI polytrauma, and SCI.

Heart rate variability in critical care medicine: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Heart rate variability (HRV) has been used to assess cardiac autonomic activity in critically ill patients, driven by translational and biomarker research agendas. Several clinical and technical factors can interfere with the measurement and/or interpretation of HRV. We systematically evaluated how HRV parameters are acquired/processed in critical care medicine.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1996-2016) were searched for cohort or case-control clinical studies of adult (>18 years) critically ill patients using heart variability analysis. Duplicate independent review and data abstraction. Study quality was assessed using two independent approaches: Newcastle-Ottowa scale and Downs and Black instrument. Conduct of studies was assessed in three categories: (1) study design and objectives, (2) procedures for measurement, processing and reporting of HRV, and (3) reporting of relevant confounding factors.

RESULTS

Our search identified 31/271 eligible studies that enrolled 2090 critically ill patients. A minority of studies (15; 48%) reported both frequency and time domain HRV data, with non-normally distributed, wide ranges of values that were indistinguishable from other (non-critically ill) disease states. Significant heterogeneity in HRV measurement protocols was observed between studies; lack of adjustment for various confounders known to affect cardiac autonomic regulation was common. Comparator groups were often omitted (n = 12; 39%). This precluded meaningful meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Marked differences in methodology prevent meaningful comparisons of HRV parameters between studies. A standardised set of consensus criteria relevant to critical care medicine are required to exploit advances in translational autonomic physiology.

A path to precision in the ICU

Precision medicine is increasingly touted as a groundbreaking new paradigm in biomedicine. In the ICU, the complexity and ambiguity of critical illness syndromes have been identified as fundamental justifications for the adoption of a precision approach to research and practice. Inherently protean diseases states such as sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome have manifestations that are physiologically and anatomically diffuse, and that fluctuate over short periods of time. This leads to considerable heterogeneity among patients, and conditions in which a “one size fits all” approach to therapy can lead to widely divergent results. Current ICU therapy can thus be seen as imprecise, with the potential to realize substantial gains from the adoption of precision medicine approaches. A number of challenges still face the development and adoption of precision critical care, a transition that may occur incrementally rather than wholesale. This article describes a few concrete approaches to addressing these challenges.

First, novel clinical trial designs, including registry randomized controlled trials and platform trials, suggest ways in which conventional trials can be adapted to better accommodate the physiologic heterogeneity of critical illness. Second, beyond the “omics” technologies already synonymous with precision medicine, the data-rich environment of the ICU can generate complex physiologic signatures that could fuel precision-minded research and practice. Third, the role of computing infrastructure and modern informatics methods will be central to the pursuit of precision medicine in the ICU, necessitating close collaboration with data scientists. As work toward precision critical care continues, small proof-of-concept studies may prove useful in highlighting the potential of this approach.

A Systems Engineering Perspective on Homeostasis and Disease

Engineered systems are coupled networks of interacting sub-systems, whose dynamics are constrained to requirements of robustness and flexibility. They have evolved by design to optimize function in a changing environment and maintain responses within ranges. Analysis, synthesis, and design of complex supply chains aim to identify and explore the laws governing optimally integrated systems. Optimality expresses balance between conflicting objectives while resiliency results from dynamic interactions among elements. Our increasing understanding of life’s multi-scale architecture suggests that living systems share similar characteristics with much to be learned about biological complexity from engineered systems. If health reflects a dynamically stable integration of molecules, cell, tissues, and organs; disease indicates displacement compensated for and corrected by activation and combination of feedback mechanisms through interconnected networks. In this article, we draw analogies between concepts in systems engineering and conceptual models of health and disease; establish connections between these concepts and physiologic modeling; and describe how these mirror onto the physiological counterparts of engineered systems.