1
|
Zackoff MW, Cruse B, Sahay RD, Zhang B, Sosa T, Schwartz J, Depinet H, Schumacher D, Geis GL. Multiuser immersive virtual reality simulation for interprofessional sepsis recognition and management. J Hosp Med 2024; 19:185-192. [PMID: 38238875 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric mortality. While there has been significant effort toward improving adherence to evidence-based care, gaps remain. Immersive multiuser virtual reality (MUVR) simulation may be an approach to enhance provider clinical competency and situation awareness for sepsis. METHODS A prospective, observational pilot of an interprofessional MUVR simulation assessing a decompensating patient from sepsis was conducted from January to June 2021. The study objective was to establish validity and acceptability evidence for the platform by assessing differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. Interprofessional teams assessed and managed a patient together in the same VR experience with the primary outcome of time to recognition of sepsis utilizing the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique analyzed using a logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes were perceived clinical accuracy, relevancy to practice, and side effects experienced. RESULTS Seventy-two simulations included 144 participants. The cumulative odds ratio of recognizing sepsis at 2 min into the simulation in comparison to later time points by experienced versus novice providers were significantly higher with a cumulative odds ratio of 3.70 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-9.07, p = .004). Participants agreed that the simulation was clinically accurate (98.6%) and will impact their practice (81.1%), with a high degree of immersion (95.7%-99.3%), and the majority of side effects were perceived as mild (70.4%-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS Our novel MUVR simulation demonstrated significant differences in sepsis recognition between experienced and novice participants. This validity evidence along with the data on the simulation's acceptability supports expanded use in training and assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Zackoff
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Bradley Cruse
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rashmi D Sahay
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Tina Sosa
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- UR Medicine Quality Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Jerome Schwartz
- Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Holly Depinet
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel Schumacher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Gary L Geis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuesta-Montero P, Navarro-Martínez J, Yedro M, Galiana-Ivars M. Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old). J Pers Med 2023; 13:1475. [PMID: 37888086 PMCID: PMC10608191 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13101475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis is a critical and potentially fatal condition affecting millions worldwide, necessitating early intervention for improved patient outcomes. In recent years, clinical simulation has emerged as a valuable tool for healthcare professionals to learn sepsis management skills and enhance them. METHODS This review aims to explore the use of clinical simulation in sepsis education and training, as well as its impact on how healthcare professionals acquire knowledge and skills. We conducted a thorough literature review to identify relevant studies, analyzing them to assess the effectiveness of simulation-based training, types of simulation methods employed, and their influence on patient outcomes. RESULTS Simulation-based training has proven effective in enhancing sepsis knowledge, skills, and confidence. Simulation modalities vary from low-fidelity exercises to high-fidelity patient simulations, conducted in diverse settings, including simulation centers, hospitals, and field environments. Importantly, simulation-based training has shown to improve patient outcomes, reducing mortality rates and hospital stays. CONCLUSION In summary, clinical simulation is a powerful tool used for improving sepsis education and training, significantly impacting patient outcomes. This article emphasizes the importance of ongoing research in this field to further enhance patient care. The shift toward simulation-based training in healthcare provides a safe, controlled environment for professionals to acquire critical skills, fostering confidence and proficiency when caring for real sepsis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Cuesta-Montero
- Department of Clinical Simulation (SimIA Lab), Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Jose Navarro-Martínez
- Department of Clinical Simulation (SimIA Lab), Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Melina Yedro
- Department of Clinical Simulation (SimIA Lab), Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - María Galiana-Ivars
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim E, Song S, Kim S. Development of pediatric simulation-based education - a systematic review. BMC Nurs 2023; 22:291. [PMID: 37641090 PMCID: PMC10463597 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01458-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic literature review explored the general characteristics, validation, and reliability of pediatric simulation-based education (P-SBE). METHODS A literature search was conducted between May 23 and 28 using the PRISMA guidelines, which covered databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. In the third selection process, the original texts of 142 studies were selected, and 98 documents were included in the final content analysis. RESULTS A total of 109 papers have been published in the ten years since 2011. Most of the study designs were experimental studies, including RCT with 76 articles. Among the typologies of simulation, advanced patient simulation was the most common (92), and high-fidelity simulation was the second most common (75). There were 29 compatibility levels and professional levels, with 59 scenarios related to emergency interventions and 19 scenarios related to communication feasibility and decision making. Regarding the effect variable, 65 studies confirmed that skills were the most common. However, validity of the scenarios and effect variables was not verified in 56.1% and 67.3% of studies, respectively. CONCLUSION Based on these findings, simulation based-education (SBE) is an effective educational method that can improve the proficiency and competence of medical professionals dealing with child. Learning through simulation provides an immersive environment in which learners interact with the presented patient scenario and make decisions, actively learning the attitudes, knowledge, and skills necessary for medical providers. In the future, it is expected that such research on SBE will be actively followed up and verified for its validity and reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EunJoo Kim
- Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 150, Namwon-ro, Heungop- myeon, Wonju-si, 26403, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| | - SungSook Song
- Department of Nursing, INHA University, 313, Docbae-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon, 22188, Republic of Korea
| | - SeongKwang Kim
- Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 150, Namwon-ro, Heungop- myeon, Wonju-si, 26403, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robson PC, O’Connor D, Pardini P, Akard TF, Dietrich MS, Kotin A, Solomon A, Chawla M, Kennedy M, Solomon SB. Hemoptysis associated with percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: Development of critical events checklist and procedure outcomes. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY NURSING 2021; 40:221-226. [PMID: 34483778 PMCID: PMC8409504 DOI: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) is performed to obtain tissue for a pathologic diagnosis. A PTNB is necessary prior to the initiation of many cancer treatments. There is a risk of hemoptysis, the expectoration of blood, with the possibility for adverse, life-threatening outcomes. A critical event checklist is a cognitive aid used in an emergency to ensure critical steps are followed. To date, there are no known checklists published for management of PTNB-related, life-threatening hemoptysis. The purpose of this report is to describe the development and implementation of a critical event checklist and the adoption of the checklist into hemoptysis management. METHODS In March 2017, a process improvement team convened to evaluate the hemoptysis response using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology. The checklist was evaluated and updated through September 2019. The team educated Interventional Radiology (IR) clinicians on the new checklist and conducted simulations on its use. A retrospective chart review was performed on hemoptysis events between the ten-year period of October 1, 2008 and September 30, 2018 to evaluate the adoption of the checklist into practice. RESULTS There were 231 hemoptysis events occurring in 229 patients (2 with repeat biopsies). Prior to implementing the protocol and checklist, there were 166 (71.9%) hemoptysis events. After implementation there were 65 (28.1%) events. The median amount of documented blood expectorated with hemoptysis was 100 mL (IQR 20.0-300.0). Twenty-six patients were admitted after PTNB for reasons related to the hemoptysis event (11.3%). During the procedure, four (1.7%) patients with hemoptysis suffered a cardiac arrest. Prior to implementation of the protocol and critical events checklist, nurses positioned patients in the lateral decubitus (LD) position in 40 out of 162 (24.7%) cases. After implementation of the critical events checklist, nurses positioned patients in the LD position 42 out of 65 cases (64.6%) (OR=5.57(95% CI 2.99-10.367), p<0.001). DISCUSSION Interventional Radiology nurses successfully adopted the checklist into management of hemoptysis events. The reported incidence of hemoptysis suggests a need for IR teams to prepare for and simulate hemoptysis events. Future research is needed to evaluate the change in patient outcomes before and after critical events checklist implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piera C. Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Department of Nursing and, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 1275 York Avenue, S121, New York, NY 10065
| | - David O’Connor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-613D, New York, NY 10065
| | - Perri Pardini
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, M2 D-desk, New York, NY 10065
| | - Terrah F. Akard
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 461 21 Ave South, 514 Godchaux Hall, Nashville, TN 37240
| | - Mary S. Dietrich
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing and School of Medicine (Biostatistics, VICC, Psychiatry), 461 21 Ave South, 410 Godchaux Hall, Nashville, TN 37240
| | - Alan Kotin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, 1275 York Avenue, C330A, New York, NY
| | - Alexandra Solomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Nursing, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY
| | - Mohit Chawla
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Kennedy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Nursing, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B. Solomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, H118, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walshe NC, Crowley CM, OʼBrien S, Browne JP, Hegarty JM. Educational Interventions to Enhance Situation Awareness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Simul Healthc 2020; 14:398-408. [PMID: 31116171 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of educational interventions on health care professionals' situation awareness (SA). We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, HW Wilson, ERIC, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO, psycARTICLES, Psychology and Behavioural Science Collection and the Cochrane library. Articles that reported a targeted SA intervention or a broader intervention incorporating SA, and an objective outcome measure of SA were included. Thirty-nine articles were eligible for inclusion, of these 4 reported targeted SA interventions. Simulation-based education (SBE) was the most prevalent educational modality (31 articles). Meta-analysis of trial designs (19 articles) yielded a pooled moderate effect size of 0.61 (95% confidence interval = 0.17 to 1.06, P = 0.007, I = 42%) in favor of SBE as compared with other modalities and a nonsignificant moderate effect in favor of additional nontechnical skills training (effect size = 0.54, 95% confidence interval = 0.18 to 1.26, P = 0.14, I = 63%). Though constrained by the number of articles eligible for inclusion, our results suggest that in comparison with other modalities, SBE yields better SA outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuala C Walshe
- From the Clinical Skills Simulation Resource Centre (N.C.W., C.M.C., SO'B), School of Nursing and Midwifery (J.M.H.); and School of Public Health (J.P.B.), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Impact of an Immersive Virtual Reality Curriculum on Medical Students' Clinical Assessment of Infants With Respiratory Distress. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:477-485. [PMID: 32106189 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether exposure to an immersive virtual reality curriculum on pediatric respiratory distress improves medical students' recognition of impending respiratory failure. DESIGN Randomized, controlled, prospective study conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. Evaluators blinded to student groupings. SETTING Academic, free-standing children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS All third-year medical students (n = 168) were eligible. The standard curriculum was delivered to all students during their pediatric rotation with optional inclusion of research data per Institutional Review Board review. A randomized selection of students was exposed to the virtual reality curriculum. INTERVENTION All students received standard training on respiratory distress through didactics and high-fidelity mannequin simulation. Intervention students underwent an additional 30-minute immersive virtual reality curriculum, experienced through an OculusRift headset, with three simulations of an infant with 1) no distress, 2) respiratory distress, and 3) impending respiratory failure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The impact of the virtual reality curriculum on recognition/interpretation of key examination findings, assignment of an appropriate respiratory status assessment, and recognition of the need for escalation of care for patients in impending respiratory failure was assessed via a free response clinical assessment of video vignettes at the end of the pediatric rotation. Responses were scored on standardized rubrics by physician experts. All eligible students participated (78 intervention and 90 control). Significant differences between intervention and control were demonstrated for consideration/interpretation of mental status (p < 0.01), assignment of the appropriate respiratory status assessment (p < 0.01), and recognition of a need for escalation of care (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS Exposure to an immersive virtual reality curriculum led to improvement in objective competence at the assessment of respiratory distress and recognition of the need for escalation of care for patients with signs of impending respiratory failure. This study represents a novel application of immersive virtual reality and suggests that it may be effective for clinical assessment training.
Collapse
|
7
|
Let's Get It Right, Set It Up Again: Achieving High Reliability Through Simulation and Debriefing. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20:497-499. [PMID: 31058791 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
8
|
Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Versus Reflective Debriefing for Pediatric Septic Shock Training. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20:481-489. [PMID: 30707211 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rapid cycle deliberate practice is a simulation training method that cycles between deliberate practice and directed feedback to create perfect practice; in contrast to reflective debriefing where learners are asked to reflect on their performance to create change. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of rapid cycle deliberate practice versus reflective debriefing training on resident application and retention of the pediatric sepsis algorithm. DESIGN Prospective, randomized-control study. SETTING A tertiary care university children's hospital simulation room, featuring a high-fidelity pediatric patient simulator. SUBJECTS Forty-six upper-level pediatric residents. INTERVENTIONS Simulation training using rapid cycle deliberate practice or reflective debriefing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Knowledge was assessed with a quiz on core sepsis management topics. The application of knowledge was assessed with a sepsis management checklist during the simulated scenario. The residents were assessed before and after the intervention and again at a follow-up session, 3-4 months later, to evaluate retention. Both groups had similar pre-intervention scores. Post-intervention, the rapid cycle deliberate practice group had higher checklist scores (rapid cycle deliberate practice 18 points [interquartile range, 18-19] vs reflective debriefing 17 points [interquartile range, 15-18]; p < 0.001). Both groups had improved quiz scores. At follow-up, both groups continued to have higher scores compared with the pre-intervention evaluation, with the rapid cycle deliberate practice group having a greater change in checklist score from pre-intervention to follow-up (rapid cycle deliberate practice 5 points [interquartile range, 3.5-7] vs reflective debriefing 3 points [interquartile range, 1.5-4.5]; p = 0.019). Both groups reported improved confidence in diagnosing and managing septic shock. CONCLUSIONS Both rapid cycle deliberate practice and reflective debriefing are effective in training pediatric residents to apply the sepsis algorithm and in improving their confidence in the management of septic shock. The rapid cycle deliberate practice method was superior immediately post-training; however, it is unclear if this advantage is maintained over time. Both methods should be considered for training residents.
Collapse
|