Tipping the Scales: Prioritizing Mentorship and Support in Simulation Faculty Development

Exploring the Meta-debrief: Developing a Toolbox for Debriefing the Debrief

SUMMARY STATEMENT

Otherwise known as debriefing the debrief, meta-debriefing describes the practice of debriefing simulation facilitators after they have facilitated, or observed, a debriefing. It is a vital component of enhancing debriefing skills, irrespective of where debriefers may be in terms of their professional development journey from novice to expert. We present the following 4 fundamental pillars, which underpin the creation of an impactful meta-debriefing strategy: theoretically driven, psychologically safe, context dependent, and formative in function. Furthermore, we describe various strategies that, underpinned by these 4 key pillars, contribute to a toolbox of techniques that enable meta-debriefers to develop proficiency and flexibility in their practice. We have synthesized and critically reviewed the current evidence base, derived mostly from the debriefing literature, and highlighted gaps to address in meta-debriefing contexts. We hope this article stimulates discussion among simulation practitioners, progresses the science and art of meta-debriefing, and prompts further research so that meta-debriefing can become an integral evidence-based component of our faculty development processes.

DebriefLive: A Pilot Study of a Virtual Faculty Development Tool for Debriefing

INTRODUCTION

The quality of healthcare simulation learning relies heavily on effective debriefers. Traditional methods of faculty development in debriefing lack a structured approach to achieve expertise via graduated and reflective practice.

METHODS

The Simulation Learning, Education and Research Network (SimLEARN) developed DebriefLive, a virtual teaching environment, bringing together faculty and participant debriefers from across the Veterans Health Administration. Recorded simulation sessions were viewed followed by the opportunity for participant debriefers to debrief virtual learners. Participant debriefers were then provided structured and objective debriefings of the debriefings with the added opportunity for immediate practice. Program evaluation data for the pilot sessions were collected via electronic survey including a mix of Likert scale questions as well as short answer responses.

RESULTS

On a 7-point Likert scale, participant debriefers (n = 15) rated the content as effective (mean = 6.67, SD = 0.47) and appropriate to their level (mean = 6.47, SD = 0.47). The technology of video-based scenarios (mean = 6.6, SD = 0.61), followed by avatar-based debriefing sessions (mean = 6.6, SD = 0.8), was felt to be accurate and appropriate. All participants would agree or strongly agree with recommending this training program to colleagues.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation instructors and fellows across the spectrum of the Veterans Health Administration found the innovative computer-based faculty development program DebriefLive acceptable as well as effective in increasing self-efficacy in debriefing. DebriefLive is an innovative and potentially disruptive tool, combining best practices in simulation theory and virtual technologies, for the training and assessment of debriefers.

Formal Training Efforts to Develop Simulation Educators: An Integrative Review

STATEMENT

Formal training for educators who use simulation-based education (SBE) is required by standards of best practice, simulation guidelines, regulatory, and accrediting bodies. Training efforts to establish educator competency for SBE are being offered. However, a systematic review of this body of literature has yet to be conducted. The purpose of this integrative review was to appraise formal training efforts of educators who use SBE. The aims were to summarize the training topics, describe the structure of training programs, and explore evaluation methods of educators. The New World Kirkpatrick Model guided the review. A PRISMA search approach yielded 2007 citations of which 38 met inclusion criteria. Analysis supports a formalized training process that uses a combination of didactic material, time for repetitive practice, and ongoing feedback with longitudinal and scaffolded delivery approaches. An identified gap in the literature is threshold levels for determining competency of educators. Recommendations for planning simulation training programs are provided.