1
|
Zhao M, Guo Z, Zou YH, Li X, Yan ZP, Chen MS, Fan WJ, Li HL, Yang JJ, Chen XM, Xu LF, Zhang YW, Zhu KS, Sun JH, Li JP, Jin Y, Yu HP, Duan F, Xiong B, Yin GW, Lin HL, Ma YL, Wang HM, Gu SZ, Si TG, Wang XD, Zhao C, Yu WC, Guo JH, Zhai J, Huang YH, Wang WY, Lin HF, Gu YK, Chen JZ, Wang JP, Zhang YM, Yi JZ, Lyu N. Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:4-31. [PMID: 37864725 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10599-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment is widely accepted as one of the alternative therapeutic modalities for HCC owing to its local control effect and low systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, although accumulating high-quality evidence has displayed the superior survival advantages of HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) compared with standard first-line treatment in different scenarios, the lack of standardization for HAIC procedure and remained controversy limited the proper and safe performance of HAIC treatment in HCC. Therefore, an expert consensus conference was held on March 2023 in Guangzhou, China to review current practices regarding HAIC treatment in patients with HCC and develop widely accepted statements and recommendations. In this article, the latest evidence of HAIC was systematically summarized and the final 22 expert recommendations were proposed, which incorporate the assessment of candidates for HAIC treatment, procedural technique details, therapeutic outcomes, the HAIC-related complications and corresponding treatments, and therapeutic scheme management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
| | - Zhi Guo
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying-Hua Zou
- Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Ping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min-Shan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Jun Fan
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Liang Li
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ji-Jin Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Chen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Feng Xu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue-Wei Zhang
- Hepatopancreatbiliary Center, Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kang-Shun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Hui Sun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Ping Li
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Jin
- The Interventional Therapy Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Hai-Peng Yu
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Duan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Wen Yin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hai-Lan Lin
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Long Ma
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hua-Ming Wang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, The Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shan-Zhi Gu
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tong-Guo Si
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Wang
- Departments of Interventional Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Zhao
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Wen-Chang Yu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Hai Guo
- Departments of Interventional Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Zhai
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong-Hui Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Yu Wang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai-Feng Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Yang-Kui Gu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Zhang Chen
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Peng Wang
- Department of Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Yi-Min Zhang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Zhe Yi
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ning Lyu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bethlehem MS, Katsarelias D, Olofsson Bagge R. Meta-Analysis of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion and Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184726. [PMID: 34572953 PMCID: PMC8469397 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Isolated hepatic perfusion is one of the available treatment options for patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma. This is an open surgical procedure where the liver is isolated from the circulation and perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent. A modern development is the minimally invasive percutaneous hepatic perfusion, where the liver is endovascularly isolated and then perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent through a catheter in the arterial system. Within this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to compare these modalities in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, complications and response. Abstract Background: Uveal melanoma is the most commonly occurring primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and patients have a high risk of developing metastatic disease, mostly in the liver. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a liver-directed therapy for patients with liver metastases. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a minimally invasive technique, is available as well. PHP benefits from the fact that the procedure can be repeated and therefore possibly offers better survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing both techniques. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic databases of Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of nine articles reporting on eight studies were included in the analysis. Individual survival data were extracted from each study. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 17.1 months for IHP and 17.3 months for PHP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months for IHP and 9.6 months for PHP. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 10 months for IHP and 9.5 months for PHP. The complication rate and 30-day mortality rate were 39.1% and 5.5% for IHP and 23.8% and 1.8% for PHP. Conclusion: There was no difference in OS or PFS between IHP and PHP for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases, but patients have significantly less of a risk for complications and mortality following PHP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn S. Bethlehem
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yan LH, Zhang D, Mo SS, Yuan H, Mo XW, Zhao JM. Anlotinib suppresses metastasis and multidrug resistance via dual blockade of MET/ABCB1 in colorectal carcinoma cells. J Cancer 2021; 12:2092-2104. [PMID: 33754008 PMCID: PMC7974540 DOI: 10.7150/jca.45618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Anlotinib, a highly selective multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has therapeutic effects on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, the anti-tumor activity and molecular mechanism of anlotinib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was explored. The anti-angiogenesis, anti-metastasis, anti-proliferative, and anti-multidrug resistance efficacy of anlotinib were analyzed by using in vitro and in vivo models of human CRC cells. The results indicated that anlotinib boosted chemo-sensitivity of CRC cells, and restrained its proliferation. Besides the suppression of the MET signaling pathway, anlotinib also inhibited invasion and migration of CRC cells. Furthermore, anlotinib prevented VEGF-induced angiogenesis, N-cadherin (CDH2)-induced cell migration, and reversed ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) -mediated CRC multidrug resistance in CRC. The CRC liver metastasis and subcutaneously implanted xenograft model testified that anlotinib could inhibit proliferation and liver metastasis in CRC cells. Such an observation suggested that a combination of anlotinib with anti-cancer drugs could attenuate angiogenesis, metastasis, proliferative, and multidrug resistance, which constitutes a novel treatment strategy for CRC patients with metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Hai Yan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.,Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.,Department of Pharmacology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.,Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Si-Si Mo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.,Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Hao Yuan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.,Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Xian-Wei Mo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.,Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Jin-Min Zhao
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyu N, Kong Y, Mu L, Lin Y, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zheng L, Deng H, Li S, Xie Q, Guo R, Shi M, Xu L, Cai X, Wu P, Zhao M. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 69:60-69. [PMID: 29471013 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS To compare the overall survival (OS) and disease progression free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC) who are undergoing hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) treatment vs. sorafenib. METHODS This retrospective study was approved by the ethical review committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients before treatment. HAI of FOLFOX (HAIF) was recommended as an alternative treatment option for patients who refused sorafenib. Of the 412 patients with Ad-HCC (376 men and 36 women) between Jan 2012 to Dec 2015, 232 patients were treated with sorafenib; 180 patients were given HAIF therapy. The median age was 51 years (range, 16-82 years). Propensity-score matched estimates were used to reduce bias when evaluating survival. Survival curves were calculated by performing the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test and Cox regression models. RESULTS The median PFS and OS in the HAIF group were significantly longer than those in the sorafenib group (PFS 7.1 vs. 3.3 months [RECIST]/7.4 vs. 3.6 months [mRECIST], respectively; OS 14.5 vs. 7.0 months; p <0.001 for each). In the propensity-score matched cohorts (147 pairs), both PFS and OS in the HAIF group were longer than those in the sorafenib group (p <0.001). At multivariate analysis, HAIF treatment was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.389 [RECIST]/0.402 [mRECIST]; p <0.001 for each) and OS (HR 0.129; p <0.001). CONCLUSION HAIF therapy may improve survival compared to sorafenib in patients with Ad-HCC. A prospective randomized trial is ongoing to confirm this finding. LAY SUMMARY We compared the hepatic arterial infusion of FOLFOX (a combination chemotherapy) with sorafenib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, retrospectively. It was found that hepatic arterial infusion of FOLFOX therapy may improve both progression free and overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Lyu
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanan Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Luwen Mu
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Youen Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Jieyang Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Jieyang, China
| | - Jibin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaru Liu
- Medical Imaging Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenfeng Zhang
- Medical Imaging Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lie Zheng
- Medical Imaging Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haijing Deng
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaolong Li
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiankun Xie
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rongping Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiuyu Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peihong Wu
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Department of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boone BA, Perkins S, Bandi R, Santos E, McCluskey K, Bartlett DL, Pingpank JF. Hepatic artery infusion of melphalan in patients with liver metastases from ocular melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:940-946. [PMID: 29878390 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Ocular melanoma has a predilection for liver metastases. Systemic treatment is ineffective and the optimal regional therapy approach is poorly defined. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan has emerged as a viable treatment option, however a subset of patients are not candidates for this treatment. We therefore sought to determine if melphalan could be safely administered via the hepatic artery for these patients. METHODS A retrospective review of patients treated with hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of melphalan was undertaken. All patients had contraindications to IHP and were without other therapy options. Melphalan infusion was repeated every four weeks with consideration for dose escalation in the absence of toxicity or significant disease progression. RESULTS Fourteen patients were treated with HAI of melphalan from 2010 to 2015. All patients had hepatic dysfunction or prohibitive tumor volume precluding IHP. There were no procedure-related complications. Three patients (21%) died within 30 days and the median survival was 2.9 months. Elevated baseline bilirubin > 2.5 mg/dL was associated with worse overall survival (0.93 vs 6.3 months, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION HAI of melphalan is safe and feasible for patients with metastatic ocular melanoma. Further study to determine the optimal utilization of this treatment approach is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Boone
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samantha Perkins
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rupal Bandi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ernesto Santos
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - Kevin McCluskey
- Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim M, Fisher DT, Powers CA, Gabriel EM, Korman AM, Sexton S, Gudkov AV, Skitzki JJ. Novel mouse models of hepatic artery infusion. J Surg Res 2017; 219:25-32. [PMID: 29078890 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The liver has unique anatomy in that most blood flow to normal hepatocytes is derived from the portal venous system, whereas liver tumors obtain their nutrient blood supply exclusively from the hepatic artery. The focused arterial delivery of anticancer agents to liver tumors has been performed for decades; however, preclinical models to standardize drug regimens and examine novel agents have been lacking. The purpose of this study was to establish preclinical hepatic artery infusion (HAI) models in a mouse and to evaluate the safety and delivery capability of the models. MATERIAL AND METHODS C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were used to develop models of HAI via the hepatic artery (HA), superior pancreaticoduodenal artery (SPDA), or lienogastric artery (LGA). Success rates, distribution of perfusion, and associated morbidity and mortality were analyzed between groups. RESULTS All three models were feasible and reproducible in mice, and there was no statistical difference on body weight change between models. The HA model had a 13.3% mortality from acute liver failure, and the SPDA model demonstrated duodenal and pancreatic toxicity. SPDA and LGA routes had the highest success rates (96.7% and 91.4%, respectively) with low mortality, better drug delivery, and preserved physiologic liver function compared with the HA model. CONCLUSIONS The optimal route of HAI was mouse breed specific; SPDA access in BALB/c mice, and the LGA access in C57BL/6 mice. The described techniques serve as a reproducible platform for the identification and characterization of therapeutics for diverse metastatic liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minhyung Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Daniel T Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Colin A Powers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Emmanuel M Gabriel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Alexis M Korman
- Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sandra Sexton
- Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Andrei V Gudkov
- Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Joseph J Skitzki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meng T, Li GQ, Dai MH. Isolated hepatic perfusion for unresectable hepatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4:105-117. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i5.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) in the management of unresectable liver malignancies.
METHODS Studies were identified manually and on-line by using PubMed and EMBASE database. We formulate the eligibility criteria according to the PICOS elements, and accessed the quality of studies using the MINORS instrument. Data from all included studies were carefully investigated. We calculated the pooled response rate and incidences of mortality reported from all eligible studies by using the Meta-Analyst software, and we computed a pooled relative risk (RR) and 95%CI by using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Heterogeneity was quantified evaluated using I2 statistic.
RESULTS Eight studies, including 502 patients, were selected. Of these, six studies performed IHP, while the other two studies performed percutaneous IHP. The results showed that the pooled response rate was 60.8% (95%CI: 53.1%-68%), I2 = 37.1%. The median overall survival was 20 mo (range: 12.1 to 25 mo) following IHP or PIHP. The pooled mortality rate was 5.4% (95%CI: 2.5%-11.2%), I2 = 37.5%. Prognostic factors predict the response to IHP or survival, and were reported in six studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Gender was not associated with overall survival (RR = 0.877, 95%CI: 0.564-1.365); however, carcino-embryonic antigen ≤ 30 ng/mL was associated with a significant improvement in survival outcomes with colorectal cancer patients (RR = 2.082, 95%CI: 1.371-3.163), and there was no significant heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION The present systemic review and meta-analysis suggest that IHP and PIHP are potentially efficient and safe techniques for unresectable liver primary and secondary malignancies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Phase II multicenter clinical trial of pulmonary metastasectomy and isolated lung perfusion with melphalan in patients with resectable lung metastases. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 9:1547-53. [PMID: 25105436 DOI: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 5-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing complete surgical resection of pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) and sarcoma remains low (20-50%). Local recurrence rate is high (48-66%). Isolated lung perfusion (ILuP) allows the delivery of high-dose locoregional chemotherapy with minimal systemic leakage to improve local control. METHODS From 2006 to 2011, 50 patients, 28 male, median age 57 years (15-76), with PM from CRC (n = 30) or sarcoma (n = 20) were included in a phase II clinical trial conducted in four cardiothoracic surgical centers. In total, 62 ILuP procedures were performed, 12 bilaterally, with 45 mg of melphalan at 37°C, followed by resection of all palpable PM. Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Operative mortality was 0%, and 90-day morbidity was mainly respiratory (grade 3: 42%, grade 4: 2%). After a median follow-up of 24 months (3-63 mo), 18 patients died, two without recurrence. Thirty patients had recurrent disease. Median time to local pulmonary progression was not reached. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 57% ± 9% and 36% ± 8%, respectively. Lung function data showed a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and diffusing capacity of the alveolocapillary membrane of 21.6% and 25.8% after 1 month, and 10.4% and 11.3% after 12 months, compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSION Compared with historical series of PM resection without ILuP, favorable results are obtained in terms of local control without long-term adverse effects. These data support the further investigation of ILuP as additional treatment in patients with resectable PM from CRC or sarcoma.
Collapse
|
9
|
Evrard S. Limits of colorectal liver metastases resectability: how and why to overcome them? For progress in cancer research. Recent Results Cancer Res 2014; 203:213-29. [PMID: 25103008 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Offering surgery is to date the best case scenario for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Few oncological topics have progressed as much as the treatment of CRLM. New surgical techniques, conversion therapies, and imaging allow us to pursue the ultimate limit for surgery of CLM before compromising patient benefits. Pushing the limits of surgery involves pushing the limits of conversion therapies too, increasingly taking risks in the surgical process. Finally, toxicities add up and the patient benefit could disappear. The apparent paradox of efficiency and toxicity might be addressed by separating the two treatment targets: (1) The metastatic burden for which a clear escalation in medical and surgical aggressiveness is still required. (2) The healthy parenchyma which should be preserved as much as possible and for which a clear de-escalation is anticipated. A new strategy exists that integrates both fundamental endpoints in the battle against CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France,
| |
Collapse
|