Influence of Depression on Recovery After Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Prevalence and characteristics of preoperative patients with depression

BACKGROUND

Within the perioperative period, depression-related diagnoses are associated with postoperative complications. We developed a perioperative depression screening programme to assess disease prevalence and feasibility for intervention.

METHODS

Adult patients in multiple surgical departments at a single academic centre were screened for depression via the electronic health record patient portal or preoperative anaesthesia clinic before surgery, using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and -8. We utilised a broad method, screening all patients, and a focused method, only screening patients with a history of depression. Logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with clinically significant depression (PHQ-8 ≥10). Symptomatic patients were administered a brief psychoeducational intervention and referred for mental health services.

RESULTS

A total of 3735 patients were identified by the broad and focused screens, of whom 2940 (79%) returned PHQ-2 data and were included in analysis. The broad screen (N=1216) found 46 (4%) patients who reported symptoms of moderate or greater severity. The focused screen (N=1724) found 242 (14%) patients with symptoms of moderate or greater severity and over all higher rates of depression across the symptom severity scale. Using the total screened pool, logistic regression identified a history of depression as the strongest associated patient characteristic variable but this did not capture most cases. Finally, we found that 66% of patients who were contacted about mental health services accepted referrals or sought outside care.

CONCLUSIONS

At least 4% of preoperative patients have clinically significant symptoms of depression, most of whom do not have a chart history of depression.

Impact of Depression and Anxiety on Patient Reported Outcomes Measures after Lumbar Fusion

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are common in patients undergoing spinal surgery and might negatively impact outcomes. This study investigates the possible effect of these diagnoses on patient reported outcomes following lumbar fusion.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a registry containing prospectively collected data of lumbar fusion procedures at a single institution was performed from May 23, 2012 to June 15, 2022. Patients with a minimum of two year follow-up were included. Demographic information, diagnoses, medications, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), and complications data at preoperative, three months, six months, 1 year, and two years postoperative were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests, χ2, binomial correlation, odds ratios, logistic regression, and mean clinically important difference.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included (60 males, 96 females) with mean age 62.6 ± 11.1 years at surgery. Thirty-nine (25%) had depression and/or anxiety (DA). Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol Group 5D questionnaire (EQ5D) scores were significantly worse in the DA cohort compared to controls (ODI 51.1 ± 18.3 vs. 42.9 ± 15.8; P = 0.010, EQ5D 0.46 ± 0.21 vs. 0.57 ± 0.21; P = 0.005). Both cohorts experienced similar relative improvement at two years (delta ODI -18.2 ± 27.9 vs. -17.8 ± 22.1; P = 0.924, EQ5D 6.8 ± 33.8 vs. 8.1 ± 32.9; P = 0.830). Absolute outcome scores were worse in the DA cohort at all intervals. DA were not independently predictive of changes in PROMs (delta ODI mean difference 4.49, r2 = 0.36, P = 0.924).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed similar improvement in PROMs following lumbar fusion for patients with anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. These data suggest these patients are no less likely to benefit from appropriately planned lumbar fusion.

Prehabilitation of surgical patients: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2023

BACKGROUND

Good preoperative conditions help patients to counteract surgical injury. Prehabilitation is a multimodal preoperative management strategy, including physical, nutritional, psychological, and other interventions, which can improve the functional reserve of patients and enhance postoperative recovery. The purpose of this study is to show the evolution trend and future directions of research related to the prehabilitation of surgical patients.

METHODS

The global literature regarding prehabilitation was identified from The Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric methods of the Bibliometrix package of R (version 4.2.1) and VOSviewer were used to analyze publication trends, cooperative networks, study themes, and co-citation relationships in the field.

RESULTS

A total of 638 publications were included and the number of publications increased rapidly since 2016, with an average annual growth rate of 41.0%. "Annals of Surgery", "British Journal of Surgery" and "British Journal of Anesthesia" were the most cited journals. Experts from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands contributed the most in this field, and an initial cooperative network among different countries and clinical teams was formed. Malnutrition, older patients, frailty, and high-risk patients were the hotspots of recent studies. However, among the top 10 cited articles, the clinical effects of prehabilitation were conflicting.

CONCLUSION

This bibliometric review summarized the most influential publications as well as the publication trends and clarified the progress and future directions of prehabilitation, which could serve as a guide for developing evidence-based practices.

Lower risk of depression after smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence in patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy: A population-based, nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although depression is associated with poor treatment outcomes in patients with cancer, little is known about whether lifestyle modifications could help prevent depression. The authors aimed to identify the effect of lifestyle modifications, including smoking cessation, alcohol abstinence, and starting regular physical activity, on new-onset depression in patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery.

METHODS

By using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2017 were identified. Self-reported lifestyle behaviors within 2 years before and after surgery were analyzed using the health examination database. Patients were classified according to changes in lifestyle behaviors, and their risk of new-onset depression was compared.

RESULTS

Among 18,902 patients, 2302 (12.19%) developed depression (26.00 per 1000 person-years). Smoking cessation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.91) and alcohol abstinence (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90) were associated with reduced risk of depression development compared with persistent smoking and persistent drinking, respectively. Starting regular physical activity was not associated with risk of depression. When lifestyle behaviors after gastrectomy were scored from 0 to 3 points (1 point each for not smoking, not drinking, and being physically active), the risk of depression tended to decrease as lifestyle scores increased from 0 points (reference) to 1 point (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.83), 2 points (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76), and 3 points (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45-0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence are associated with reduced risk of developing depression in patients with gastric cancer who undergo surgery.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative application of ketamine on postoperative depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Ketamine, a commonly used general anesthetic, can produce rapid and sustained antidepressant effect. However, the efficacy and safety of the perioperative application of ketamine on postoperative depression remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effect of perioperative intravenous administration of ketamine on postoperative depression. Randomized controlled trials comparing ketamine with placebo in patients were included. Primary outcome was postoperative depression scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and adverse effects associated with ketamine. Fifteen studies with 1697 patients receiving ketamine and 1462 controls were enrolled. Compared with the controls, the ketamine group showed a reduction in postoperative depression scores, by a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI, -1.27, -0.66], P < 0.001, I2 = 72% on postoperative day (POD) 1; SMD-0.65, 95% CI [-1.12, -0.17], P < 0.001, I2 = 94% on POD 3; SMD-0.30, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.14], P < 0.001, I2 = 0% on POD 7; and SMD-0.25, 95% CI [-0.38, -0.11], P < 0.001, I2 = 59% over the long term. Ketamine reduced VAS pain scores on POD 1 (SMD-0.93, 95% CI [-1.58, -0.29], P = 0.005, I2 = 97%), but no significant difference was found between the two groups on PODs 3 and 7 or over the long term. However, ketamine administration distinctly increased the risk of adverse effects, including nausea and vomiting (risk ratio [RR] 1.40, 95% CI [1.12, 1.75], P = 0.003, I2 = 30%), headache (RR 2.47, 95% CI [1.41, 4.32], P = 0.002, I2 = 19%), hallucination (RR 15.35, 95% CI [6.24, 37.34], P < 0.001, I2 = 89%), and dizziness (RR 3.48, 95% CI [2.68, 4.50], P < 0.001, I2 = 89%) compared with the controls. In conclusion, perioperative application of ketamine reduces postoperative depression and pain scores with increased risk of adverse effects.

Does Mental Distress Predict Cardiac Surgical Outcome?

BACKGROUND

 Mental distress is suspected to influence the morbidity of cardiac patients. Evaluating mental distress in cardiac patients is rare and the impact on surgical outcome is still not certified.

METHODS

 In 94 cardiac surgical patients, mental distress was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). We defined length of stay in hospital and on intensive care unit as well as time of mechanical ventilation as outcomes on surgery. Age, physical activity, diabetes, overweight, PHQ-4, and an inflammation marker were tested for their predictive value on outcomes.

RESULTS

 Reportedly prevalence of generalized anxiety was 16.0% and depression rate was 13.8%. Length of stay in hospital was 13 ± 8 days, time of mechanical ventilation was 10 (0-1,207) hours, and length of stay on intensive care unit was 3 ± 6 days. Length of stay in hospital was significantly predicted by age (p = 0.048), low physical activity (p = 0.029), and high C-reactive protein (CRP; p = 0.031). Furthermore, CRP was the only significant predictor of time of mechanical ventilation and length of stay on intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

 Outcome was not predicted by mental distress. However, inflammation marker CRP was predictive for outcome, potentially caused by higher cardiovascular risk profile. Additionally, depression was referred to be associated with inflammation. Probably, the small sample and the timing of assessment were responsible for the missing relation between mental distress and outcome. We presume a relation with low physical activity and depression. Nevertheless, further randomized studies are needed to pay more attention on patients' distress to intervene preoperatively to improve postoperative outcome.

Gut microbiota-mediated metabolic restructuring aggravates emotional deficits after anesthesia/surgery in rats with preoperative stress

Patients with preoperative stress are prone to postoperative emotional deficits. However, the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we characterize the changes of microbial composition and specific metabolites after anesthesia/surgery in rats with preoperative stress based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and non-targeted metabolomics technique. Consequently, we found that anesthesia/surgery aggravated anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors in rats under preoperative stress. Microglia were activated and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor ɑ (TNF-α) were upregulated after anesthesia/surgery. The postoperative gut microbiota and metabolite composition of rats exposed to preoperative stress differed from those of control rats. Lastly, emotional impairments, metabolic alterations, and neuroinflammation returned normal in antibiotics-treated rats. Our findings provide further evidence that abnormalities in the gut microbiota contribute to postoperative metabolic restructuring, neuroinflammation, and psychiatric deficits in rats under preoperative stress.

Effect of esketamine on perioperative depressive symptoms in major surgery patients (PASSION II): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Depressive symptoms are common for patients undergoing major surgery and may worsen their mental health and lead to poor clinical outcomes. It is essential to seek a safe rapid-acting treatment for relieving moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms in patients undergoing major surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a randomised, placebo-controlled and double-blinded trial aiming to determine the effect of esketamine on moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms in patients undergoing major surgery. Five hundred and sixty-four participants, aged 18-65 years old, undergoing major surgery will be randomly allocated into the esketamine and placebo groups at a 1:1 ratio. Esketamine or placebo will be given intravenously at the same speed on suturing the incision by anaesthesiologists in charge who are blinded to the randomisation. In the esketamine group, the total dosage of esketamine will be 0.2 mg/kg body weight. To estimate the efficacy and safety endpoints, blinded evaluation by trained researchers will be completed at 3 days, 5 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome is the remission rate at the third postoperative day. The secondary outcomes include depression-related scores, severe pain events and safety-related endpoints such as psychotic symptoms, manic symptoms and dissociative symptoms.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China on 30 October 2020 (KY-2020-058-02). This trial is designed to explore whether the administration of esketamine could improve the mental health of patients with depressive symptoms undergoing major surgery. The conclusions of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04425473.

Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: Evaluation of the impact of a perioperative clinical pathway, a pilot study

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Major abdominal surgery morbidity can reach 50%. Prehabilitation has shown promising results in decreasing complications. However, it is unknown if prehabilitation can have a positive effect specifically after major abdominal surgery. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a prehabilitation program before major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

All patients evaluated for major abdominal surgery between February and April 2018 were eligible. A 4-week trimodal prehabilitation program combining physical therapy, nutritional support and psychological preparation was set up.

RESULTS

Among 106 patients evaluated for major abdominal surgery during the study period, 60 were included in the prehabilitation program. No cardiovascular events occurred during prehabilitation. The 6-min walking distance increased significantly (+45 m, increase of 9.3%, p = 0.008) after prehabilitation (and before the operation). Anxiety, depression, and several quality of life (QoL) items improved. Postoperative 90-day mortality and morbidity were 3.4% and 48%, respectively. Median hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay were 14 and 6 days, respectively. For 19 patients readmitted, the treatment was medical, radiological, or surgical, for 11, 5, and 3 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery is feasible, safe, and improve patients' functional reserves, QoL, and psychological status.

The effect of intravenous ketamine on depressive symptoms after surgery: A systematic review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The development of depressive symptoms is an important complication experienced by patients postoperatively and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Ketamine is a feasible treatment option for depressive symptoms after surgery due to its known antidepressant effect. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current body of research regarding the effects of intravenous ketamine on depressive symptoms after surgery.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Perioperative care area.

PATIENTS

Adult surgical patients.

MEASUREMENTS

Systematic literature search was performed in the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, for randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of intravenous ketamine versus placebo on postoperative depressive symptoms as the primary outcome, with no language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened records for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random effects models were used to pool overall estimates. Postoperative pain intensity was also examined. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Out of 834 records screened, 9 studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 2468 patients. Compared with the control group, ketamine provided significant reduction of postoperative depression scale scores, by a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.89 (95% CI [-1.23, -0.73], P = 0.33, I² = 13%; 4 studies) on postoperative day (POD) 1, SMD -0.51 (95% CI [-0.99, -0.04], P < 0.001, I² = 93%; 4 studies) on POD 3, suggesting clinically relevant reduction in postoperative depressive symptoms. Postoperative depression scale scores on POD 7 were also reduced in patients receiving ketamine compared to the control group, with SMD -0.33 (95% CI [-0.52, -0.14], P = 0.36, I² = 2%; 3 studies), but the minimal clinical difference of 0.5 SMD was not reached. No significant difference was observed in the postoperative depression scale over the long term at 30 days' follow-up (SMD -0.13, 95% CI [-0.25, 0.00], P = 0.07, I² = 52%; 5 studies). A significant reduction of postoperative pain intensity on POD 1 was identified in patients following ketamine administration (SMD -1.29, 95% CI [-2.57, -0.01], P = 0.05, I² = 98%; 5 studies). However, administration of ketamine resulted in a significantly increased risk of nausea and vomiting (RR 1.71, 95% CI [1.25, 2.33], P = 0.17, I² = 35%; 6 studies), headache (RR 4.88, 95% CI [1.97, 12.06], P = 0.83, I² = 0%; 4 studies), and hallucination (RR 34.94, 95% CI [8.59, 142.17], P = 0.44, I² = 0%; 4 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence supports intravenous ketamine administration for the treatment of depressive symptoms after surgery. While ketamine administration has clinically significant side effects, future studies are needed in surgical populations at high risk of complications.

Ketamine Alleviates Depressive Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms occur in over 40% of neurosurgical patients during the perioperative period. However, no measure has been suggested to have a rapid effect on depressive surgical patients during increasingly shorter stays in the hospital. This study aimed to determine whether ketamine could improve depressive symptoms rapidly and safely during the hospital stay.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded trial. Patients with moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms undergoing elective supratentorial brain tumor resection were randomized to intravenously receive either (1) 0.5 mg·kg-1 ketamine for 40 minutes or (2) an identical volume of normal saline. The primary outcome was treatment response on postoperative day 3, defined as a ≥50% reduction from the baseline depressive score. The secondary outcomes included the rate of remission and safety outcomes. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale was applied by trained psychiatrists to evaluate depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 84 neurosurgical patients were enrolled in the trial. The response rate was increased by the administration of ketamine (41.5% [17/41] vs 16.3% [7/43]; relative risk [RR]: 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-5.50) relative to the administration of placebo at 3 days. Furthermore, the remission rate at discharge (29.3% [12/41] vs 7.0% [3/43]; RR: 4.20, 95% CI, 1.28-13.80) was also improved by ketamine. No psychotic symptoms or adverse events were reported to be substantially higher in the ketamine group.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial indicates that the intraoperative administration of ketamine could alleviate moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms in neurosurgical patients without worsening safety.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care.

OBJECTIVE

In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of merged data from two randomized clinical trials (SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS)

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are both effective surgical procedures to achieve weight reduction in patients with obesity. The trial objective was to merge individual-patient data from two RCTs to compare outcomes after LSG and LRYGB.

METHODS

Five-year outcomes of the Finnish SLEEVEPASS and Swiss SM-BOSS RCTs comparing LSG with LRYGB were analysed. Both original trials were designed to evaluate weight loss. Additional patient-level data on type 2 diabetes (T2DM), obstructive sleep apnoea, and complications were retrieved. The primary outcome was percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL). Secondary predefined outcomes in both trials included total weight loss, remission of co-morbidities, improvement in quality of life (QoL), and overall morbidity.

RESULTS

At baseline, 228 LSG and 229 LRYGB procedures were performed. Five-year follow-up was available for 199 of 228 patients (87.3 per cent) after LSG and 199 of 229 (87.1 per cent) after LRYGB. Model-based mean estimate of %EBMIL was 7.0 (95 per cent c.i. 3.5 to 10.5) percentage points better after LRYGB than after LSG  (62.7 versus 55.5 per cent respectively; P < 0.001). There was no difference in remission of T2DM, obstructive sleep apnoea or QoL improvement; remission for hypertension was better after LRYGB compared with LSG (60.3 versus 44.9 per cent; P = 0.049). The complication rate was higher after LRYGB than LSG (37.2 versus 22.5 per cent; P = 0.001), but there was no difference in mean Comprehensive Complication Index value (30.6 versus 31.0 points; P = 0.859).

CONCLUSION

Although LRYGB induced greater weight loss and better amelioration of hypertension than LSG, there was no difference in remission of T2DM, obstructive sleep apnoea, or QoL at 5 years. There were more complications after LRYGB, but the individual burden for patients with complications was similar after both operations.

Preoperative Depression and Anxiety Impact on Inpatient Surgery Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objectives

To determine the association of preoperative mood symptoms and postoperative adverse outcomes; to explore sex-specific differences.

Background

Depression and anxiety can increase postoperative mortality. Psychological stress is associated with a chronic inflammatory response unfavorable to postsurgical healing.

Methods

Prospective cohort study. Patients were recruited from surgical preadmission clinics at a university hospital. Preoperative depression and anxiety were measured via the Beck Depression and Beck Anxiety Inventories (BDI-II and BAI). Our primary outcome was a composite of postoperative complications, extended length of stay (ELOS) and early readmission. Associated variables included demographics, preoperative pain, pain tolerance/catastrophizing, coping mechanisms, postoperative pain, and opioid use. We adjusted for age, comorbidities, and surgical specialty.

Results

Of 1061 recruited patients (ten surgical specialties, 2015-2020), 455 males and 486 females had preoperative and postoperative data available. Mean age was 62.9 (range 20.2-96.2). At baseline, 9.3% of patients had moderate or severe depression; 7.4% had moderate or severe anxiety. Females were more likely to be moderately or severely depressed (11% vs 7%, P = 0.036) and moderately or severely anxious (9% vs 6%, P = 0.034). Females had significantly fewer reported comorbidities and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists category (P < 0.001). Increasing BDI-II and BAI scores significantly increased likelihood of postoperative complications, ELOS, and/or hospital readmission in females (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.57 for BDI-II 1-19 vs 0, P = 0.041; aOR = 4.48 for BDI-II > 19 vs 0, P = 0.008; aOR = 1.54 for BAI ≤ 6 vs >6, P = 0.038) but not in males. Mood symptoms did not influence postoperative pain or opioid use.

Conclusion

Preoperative depression and anxiety negatively impact surgical outcomes in female patients undergoing major surgery.

Preoperative opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use is associated with increased postoperative hospital costs in colorectal surgery

Background

Opioid (OPD), sedative (SDT), and antidepressant (ADM) prescribing has increased dramatically over the last 20 years. This study evaluated preoperative OPD, SDT, and ADM use on hospital costs in patients undergoing colorectal resection at a single institution.

Methods

This study was a retrospective record review. The local ACS-NSQIP database was queried for adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing open/laparoscopic, partial/total colectomy, or proctectomy from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016. Individual patient medical records were reviewed to determine preoperative OPD, SDT, and AD use. Hospital cost data from index admission were captured by the hospital cost accounting system and matched to NSQIP query-identified cases. All ACS-NSQIP categorical patient characteristic, operative risk, and outcome variables were compared in medication groups using chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

A total of 1185 colorectal procedures were performed by 30 different surgeons. Of these, 27.6% patients took OPD, 18.5% SDT, and 27.8% ADM preoperatively. Patients taking OPD, SDT, and ADM were found to have increased mean total hospital costs (MTHC) compared to non-users (30.8 vs 23.6 for OPD, 31.6 vs 24.4 for SDT, and 30.7 vs 23.8 for ADM). OPD and SDT use were identified as independent risk factors for increased MTHC on multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

Preoperative OPD and SDT use can be used to predict increased MTHC in patients undergoing colorectal resections.

A Retrospective Review: Patient-Reported Preoperative Prescription Opioid, Sedative, or Antidepressant Use Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use has been on the rise. The effect of these medications on outcomes in colorectal surgery has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative prescription opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use on postoperative outcomes following colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective database and medical record review.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at University of Kentucky utilizing the local American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database.

PATIENTS

All patients ≥18 years of age who underwent colorectal resection for all indications, excluding trauma, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 1201 patients, 30.2% used opioids, 18.4% used sedatives, and 28.3% used antidepressants preoperatively. Users of any medication class had higher ASA classification, rates of dyspnea, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than nonusers. Opioid users also had higher rates of ostomy creation, contaminated wound classification, prolonged operation time, and postoperative transfusion. Postoperatively, patients had higher rates of intra-abdominal infection (opioids: 21.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009; sedatives: 23.1% vs 15.7%, p = 0.01; antidepressants: 22.4% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) and respiratory failure (opioids: 11.0% vs 6.3%, p = 0.007; sedatives: 12.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.008; antidepressants: 10.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02). Reported opioid or sedative users had a prolonged hospital length of stay of 2 days (p < 0.001) compared with nonusers. After adjustment for all predictors of poor outcome, opioid and sedative use was associated with increased 30-day morbidity and mortality following colorectal procedures (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.91 and OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.08).

LIMITATIONS

This study was a retrospective review and a single-institution study, and it had unmeasured confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified that patient-reported prescription opioid and sedative use is associated with higher 30-day composite adverse outcomes in colorectal resections, highlighting the need for the evaluation of opioid and sedative use as a component of the preoperative risk stratification. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B226. REVISIÓN RETROSPECTIVA: EL USO DE OPIOIDES, SEDANTES O ANTIDEPRESORES EN EL PREOPERATORIO SE ASOCIAN CON MALOS RESULTADOS EN CIRUGÍA COLORECTAL: El uso de opioides, sedantes y antidepresores esta en aumento. No se ha establecido el efecto de estos medicamentos en los resultados de la cirugía colorrectal.Evaluar el impacto del uso preoperatorio de opioides, sedantes y antidepresores en los resultados después de una cirugía colorrectal.Base de datos retrospectiva y revisión de registros médicos.Este estudio se realizó en la Universidad de Kentucky utilizando la base de datos del Proyecto de Mejora de Calidad Quirúrgica Nacional del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos.Todos los pacientes ≥ 18 años que se sometieron a una resección colorrectal por diversas indicaciones, excluyendo los traumas, entre el 1 de Enero de 2013 y el 31 de Diciembre de 2016.Tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias a los 30 días.De 1201 pacientes, 30.2% usaron opioides, 18.4% usaron sedantes y 28.3% usaron antidepresores antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes tratados con cualquiera de los medicamentos mencionados, presentaban un ASA mas elevado, tasas de disnea y EPOC mas graves en comparación con pacientes sin tratamiento previo. Los consumidores de opioides también tuvieron tasas más altas de creación de ostomías, clasificación mas alta de heridas contaminadas, un tiempo de operación prolongado y transfusión postoperatoria mayor. Después de la cirugía los pacientes que tuvieron tasas más altas de infección intraabdominal (opioides: 21.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009, sedantes: 23.1% vs 15.7%, p = 0.01, antidepresivos: 22.4% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) e insuficiencia respiratoria (opioides: 11.0% vs 6.3%, p = 0.007, sedantes: 12.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.008, antidepresivos: 10.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02). Los consumidores de opioides o sedantes tuvieron una estadía hospitalaria prolongada de más de 2 días (p <0.001) en comparación con los consumidores. Después de haber realizado el ajuste de todos los predictores de mal pronóstico, el uso de opioides y sedantes se asoció con una mayor morbilidad y mortalidad a los 30 días después de cirugía colorrectal (OR 1.43 [IC 95% 1.07-1.91] y OR 1.48 [IC 95% 1.05-2.08], respectivamente)Revisión retrospectiva, estudio de una sola institución, factores de confusión no evaluados.Identificamos que el consumo de opiáceos y sedantes recetados a los pacientes se asocian con resultados adversos complejos más allá de 30 días en casos de resección colorrectal, destacando la necesidad de su respectiva evaluación como componentes de la estratificación de riesgo preoperatorio. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B226. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

The Effect of an Abnormal BMI on Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims: The aim of this systemic review is to identify the complications that arise in operating on orthopaedic trauma patients with an abnormal body mass index (BMI). Materials and Methods: Systematic literature search using a combination of MESH subject headings and free text searching of Medline, Embase, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases in August 2019. Any orthopaedic injury requiring surgery was included. Papers were reviewed and quality assessed by two independent reviewers to select for inclusion. Where sufficiently homogenous, meta-analysis was performed. Results: A total of 26 articles (379,333 patients) were selected for inclusion. All complications were more common in those with a high BMI (>30). The odds ratio (OR) for high BMI patients sustaining post-operative complication of any type was 2.32 with a 23% overall complication rate in the BMI > 30 group, vs. 14% in the normal BMI group (p < 0.05). The OR for mortality was 3.5. The OR for infection was 2.28. The OR for non-union in tibial fractures was 2.57. Thrombotic events were also more likely in the obese group. Low BMI (<18.5) was associated with a higher risk of cardiac complications than either those with a normal or high BMI (OR 1.56). Conclusion: Almost all complications are more common in trauma patients with a raised BMI. This should be made clear during the consent process, and strategies developed to reduce these risks where possible. Unlike in elective surgery, BMI is a non-modifiable risk factor in the trauma context, but an awareness of the complications should inform clinicians and patients alike. Underweight patients have a higher risk of developing cardiac complications than either high or normal BMI patient groups, but as few studies exist, further research into this group is recommended.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice.

METHODS

Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives.

RESULTS

Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes.

DISCUSSION

Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.

Tonsillectomy Outcomes among Children with Mental Health Disorders in the United States

Objectives

Recent evidence suggests that children with mental health disorders are more likely to have postoperative complications. Our aim was to determine if mental health disorders affect postoperative complications after tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy (T&A).

Setting

Cross-sectional analysis of national databases.

Subjects and Methods

The 2006 to 2016 Kids Inpatient Database and the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database were used to identify children (age <21 years) who underwent T&A. We compared children with mental health disorders (eg, autism, developmental delays, or mood disorders) to those without a mental health disorder. We contrasted gender, race, length of stay, complications, and 30-day readmissions.

Results

We estimated that 37,386 children underwent T&A, and there were 2138 (5.7%) diagnosed with a mental health disorder. Children with mental health disorders were older (6.0 vs 5.3 years, P < .001), more commonly males (64% vs 58%, P < .001), had a longer length of stay (3.4 days vs 2.3 days, P < .001), and had higher total charges even after controlling for length of stay ($19,000 vs $14,000, P < .001). Children with a mental health disorder were more likely to have a complication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.4; P < .001) including intubation, mechanical ventilation, or both (OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8; P < .001). The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was higher (12% vs 4.0%, P < .001).

Conclusion

Children with mental health disorders, especially development delays, have more frequent complications, longer lengths of stay, and readmissions than children without mental health disorders. This information should be included in preoperative counseling.

Depression is independently associated with increased length of stay and readmissions in multimorbid inpatients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the impact of depression across a broad range of multimorbid patients hospitalized for reasons other than depression. The objective of the study was to investigate in a large sample of multimorbid inpatients whether ancillary depression is associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and readmissions, two important clinical outcomes with implications for healthcare utilization and costs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 253,009 multimorbid inpatients aged ≥18 at an academic medical center, 8/2009-8/2017.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

LOS.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

LOS related to different main diagnoses, readmissions within 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months after discharge.

RESULTS

Multivariable linear regression showed 24% longer LOS in patients with ancillary depression (1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.25). Females stayed 22% longer (1.22; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.25), males 24% (1.24; 95% CI: 1.22, 1.27). We identified 16 main diagnosis clusters in which ancillary depression was associated with significant LOS increases, with associations being strongest for "Failure and rejection of transplanted organs and tissues", "Other noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis", and "Other soft tissue disorders, not elsewhere classified". Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression showed independent associations of ancillary depression with increased readmission odds and frequencies at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Ancillary depression was independently associated with increased LOS and more readmissions across a broad range of multimorbid inpatients.

The impact of improved functional capacity before surgery on postoperative complications: a study in colorectal cancer

Background: Poor functional capacity (FC) is an independent predictor of postoperative morbidity. However, there is still a lack of evidence as to whether enhancing FC before surgery has a protective effect on postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an improvement in preoperative FC impacted positively on surgical morbidity. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a cohort of patients who underwent colorectal resection for cancer under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery care. FC was assessed with the 6-min walk test, which measures the distance walked in 6 min (6MWD), at 4 weeks before surgery and again the day before. The study population was classified into two groups depending on whether participants achieved a significant improvement in FC preoperatively (defined as a preoperative 6MWD change ≥19 meters) or not (6MWD change <19 meters). The primary outcome measure was 30-d postoperative complications, assessed with the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The association between improved preoperative FC and severe postoperative complication was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 179 eligible adults were studied: 80 (44.7%) improved in 6MWD by ≥19 m preoperatively, and 99 (55.3%) did not. Subjects whose FC increased had lower CCI (0 [0-8.7] versus 8.7 [0-22.6], p = .022). Furthermore, they were less likely to have a severe complication (adjusted OR 0.28 (95% CI 0.11-0.74), p = .010), and to have an ED visit. Conclusion: Improved preoperative FC was independently associated with a lower risk of severe postoperative complications. Further investigation is required to establish a causative relationship conclusively.

Social Relationship Factors, Preoperative Depression, and Hospital Length of Stay in Surgical Patients

PURPOSE

The interrelated associations of social relationship factors, depression, and outcomes of surgical patients are yet unexplored. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether depression mediates effects of general social support, loneliness, and living alone on hospital length of stay (LOS) of 2487 patients from diverse surgical fields.

METHOD

Social relationship factors and depression were assessed prior to surgery. The PROCESS macro for SPSS was used to conduct three simple mediation models that tested the indirect effects of social relationship factors on LOS mediated through depression. The models were adjusted for age, gender, preoperative physical health, surgical field, severity of medical comorbidity, and extent of surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Social support and loneliness had significant indirect effects on LOS that were statistically mediated by preoperative depression. Lower social support and the feeling of loneliness were considerably related to higher depression which predicted longer LOS. While social support and loneliness had no direct effects on LOS, there was a small significant direct association of living alone with shorter LOS.

CONCLUSION

Data suggest that social support and loneliness are indirectly related with surgical outcomes by an association with depression which in turn is related to worse outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01357694.

Effect of low-dose ketamine on PerioperAtive depreSsive Symptoms in patients undergoing Intracranial tumOr resectioN (PASSION): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative depressive symptoms (PDS) are common mental comorbidities that influence clinical outcomes and prognosis. However, there is no rapid-acting treatment to address these symptoms during a limited hospital stay.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind trial. Randomization will be applied and stratified by the severity of PDS (moderate versus severe). Eighty patients who are scheduled for elective supratentorial brain tumor resection with PDS will be randomly allocated to the ketamine or placebo group with a ratio of 1 to 1. Patients in the ketamine group will be administered low-dose ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) intravenously for 40 min while the dural mater is being cut into, whereas patients in the placebo group will receive the same volume of normal saline at the same infusion rate at the same time points. The primary endpoint is the rate of PDS response at 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include efficacy parameters such as the rate of PDS remission and safety outcomes such as the incidence of postoperative delirium, quality of recovery, and psychiatric side effects.

DISCUSSION

This study aims to determine whether ketamine could improve the depressive symptoms of perioperative patients undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection. It will also examine the safety of administering ketamine as an intraoperative anti-depressant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03086148 . Registered on 22 March 2017.

The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®): Added Value and Clinical Perspectives 3 Years "Down the Line"

OBJECTIVE

To explore the added value of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to standard assessment of postoperative morbidity, and to clarify potential controversies for its application.

BACKGROUND

The CCI was introduced about 3 years ago as a novel metric of postoperative morbidity, integrating in a single formula all complications by severity, ranging from 0 (uneventful course) to 100 (death). It remains unclear, how often the CCI adds to standard reporting of complications and how to apply it in complex postoperative courses.

METHODS

CCI data were prospectively collected over a 1-year period at our institution. The proportion of patients with more than 1 complication and the severity of those complications were assessed to determine the additional value of the CCI compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complex and controversial cases were presented to 90 surgeons worldwide to achieve consensus in weighing each postoperative event. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate agreement among surgeons and to suggest solutions for consistent use of the CCI.

RESULTS

Complications were identified in 24% (290/1212) of the general surgical population. Of those, 44% (127/290) developed more than 1 complication by the time of discharge, and thereby CCI added information to the standard grading system of complications. Information gained by the CCI increased with the complexity of surgery and observation time.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCI adds information on postoperative morbidity in almost half of the patients developing complications, with particular value following extensive surgery and longer postoperative observation up to 3 months. Each single complication, independently of their inter-connection, should be included in the CCI calculation to best mirror the patients' postoperative morbidity.

Postoperative Delayed Paradoxical Depression After Uncomplicated Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delayed paradoxical depression (PDPD) is a psychiatric condition described in patients without a history of mood disorders who undergo major surgery without complications and become clinically depressed. PDPD has been recognized in major surgical interventions, including coronary artery bypass surgery. We sought to determine the incidence and potential factors associated with PDPD after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

The cohort of 105 patients was derived from a prospective observational data set of 3788 consecutive cases of intracranial aneurysms accrued from 1991 to 2015. Starting in 2010, patients with PDPD were identified, and psychiatric treatment and outcomes were documented. Incidence of PDPD and baseline characteristics were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze associations of variables with PDPD. Patients with preoperative depression or bipolar disorder were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 105 patients, 10.5% (n = 11) were found to have newly diagnosed major depressive disorder after surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. By univariate and multivariate analysis, the only significant difference between the 2 groups was full return to daily activities (P = 0.017 and P = 0.029, odds ratio = 0.06, 95% confidence interval [0.00, 0.70]), which was a result and not a cause of PDPD. All 11 patients with PDPD recovered fully, 9 after psychotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy and 2 without intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

PDPD after uncomplicated unruptured aneurysm surgery can be surprising to the neurosurgeon and the patient and should be promptly identified and addressed to achieve a full recovery. PDPD can be interpreted as a mild variant of post-traumatic stress disorder.