Sarcoma Resection With and Without Vascular Reconstruction: A Matched Case-control Study

Surgical outcomes of major vascular resection for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high‑volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Radical resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) may necessitate vascular resection and reconstruction. The study was conducted to assess surgical outcomes of surgery for RLPS with major vascular involvement.

METHODS

Patients with RLPS who underwent surgical resection at the Sarcoma Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital between April 2011 and December 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were classified into two groups: vascular resection and non-vascular resection groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to eliminate baseline differences between the groups. Surgical details and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Furthermore, prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 199 patients were identified and the median follow-up period was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 45-69) months. Vascular resection was performed in 42 (21%) patients, 25 of whom had vascular infiltration. A total of 39 patients had vascular replacement and 3 patients underwent partial resection (side-wall resection). Vascular resection was burdened by higher rates of major morbidity (38% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.005). After propensity-matched analysis, patients who underwent vascular resection had 5-year LRFS and OS rates comparable to those without vascular involvement. Major vascular resection was not an independent risk factor for LRFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although accompanied by increased risks of major morbidity and mortality, the major vascular resection enabled radical resection in patients with advanced RLPS, affording comparable 5-year LRFS and OS rates compared to those who did not.

Clinical outcomes after vascular reconstruction using synthetic grafts for limb salvage in patients with lower extremity sarcoma: a single-center retrospective experience

Introduction

Limb-salvage surgery has become the mainstream approaches for the treatment of sarcoma in the lower extremity. In cases where the sarcoma infiltrates the primary vessel, concurrent resection of the vessels and vascular reconstruction are required to ensure sufficient resection and preservation of limb function. The objective of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent vascular reconstruction utilizing synthetic grafts for limb salvage, specifically in terms of postoperative complications and limb functional status.

Methods

Between September 2016 and October 2021, 15 consecutive patients who underwent 15 arterial and 3 venous reconstruction procedures were included in this retrospective study. Incidence of postoperative morbidity, graft patency, rate of limb salvage, and overall survival of patients were analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up was 12.5 months (range, 4.5-72.0). Graft thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (33.3%) and graft occlusion occurred in 3 patients (20.0%). The median overall survival was 28.0 months with the estimated 2-year and 5-year overall survival of 57.8% and 43.4% respectively. The 1-year and 2-year estimated patency rates of arterial reconstructions were 82.3% and 62.1%, respectively. None of the included patients with limb amputation were observed as a consequence of severe vascular complications, while two patients underwent amputation due to the repeat recurrence, resulting in a limb salvage rate of 86.7%.

Conclusion

Our results show that the combination of vascular reconstruction and oncologic resection is a feasible option for preserving limbs in cases of musculoskeletal sarcoma with vessel involvement in the lower extremity. When vascular reconstruction surgery is performed, synthetic substitutes can be effectively used with low perioperative morbidity and an acceptable rate of limb salvage.

The role of vascular surgeons in the management of pediatric bone tumors

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to review the outcomes of a multidisciplinary approach to the surgical management of pediatric bone tumors with blood vessel involvement over a 14- year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all pediatric bone tumor resections performed with the assistance of vascular surgery at our institution between January 2006 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria for the study included the presence of a vascular surgeon at the operative resection and radiographic evidence of major blood vessel involvement.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2021, 117 patients underwent a bone tumor resection by a single orthopedic surgeon/vascular surgeon team. Sixty were malignant tumors, and 57 were benign. Of the 117 procedures, 5.1% (6/117) required reconstruction of an artery; five in malignant cases and one in benign. No venous reconstructions were undertaken in this study. Ligation of a major artery without reconstruction was performed in 8.8% (5/57) of malignant and 1.7% (1/60) of benign resections. Despite this vessel-sparing approach, microscopic margins were clear in all cases. Local recurrence occurred in a single patient in the malignant group at 61 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal management of pediatric bone tumors with major blood vessel involvement remains poorly defined. Our results demonstrate that even in the setting of radiographic evidence of vessel involvement, a multidisciplinary team of vascular and orthopedic surgeons can employ a vessel-sparing approach with minimal blood loss, excellent limb salvage, and minimal local recurrence.

Special clinical scenarios in RPS: Involvement of great vessels and pancreas and penetration across natural foramina

The primary treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas is surgery. This requires a carefully planned, typically multivisceral, resection. A few complex scenarios that may arise include vascular involvement, pancreatic involvement, or herniation of the tumor into another compartment outside of the retroperitoneum. These scenarios must be anticipated before surgery to optimize preoperative preparation, minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality, and improve oncologic outcomes. Our aim is to highlight these clinically challenging anatomic presentations that can be encountered in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Short- and long-term surgical outcomes of pancreatic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A long-term single-center experience of 90 cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) en bloc with pancreas is challenging and controversial. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the impact of pancreatic resection (PR) and its different types on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RPS.

METHODS

Data from 242 consecutive patients with RPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between January 2010 and February 2021 were analyzed. Out of these, 90 patients underwent PR, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in 31 and distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 59.

RESULTS

Patients in the PR group had a higher major morbidity (37.8% vs. 14.5%) and mortality (8.9% vs. 1.3%) than those in the non-PR group, with a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (46.9% vs. 53.6%). Patients in the PD and DP groups had a slight difference in major morbidity (48.4% vs. 32.2%), mortality (6.4% vs. 10.2%), and 5-year OS rates (43.3% vs. 49.3%). The PR type was not an independent risk factor for major morbidity or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

PR in RPS resection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality with minimal influence on survival. Patients with RPS undergoing PD and DP showed slight differences in terms of safety and OS.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Replacement Together with Curative Oncological Surgery in Retroperitoneal and Spinal Tumours

Malignancies with an extended encasement or infiltration of the aorta were previously considered inoperable. This series demonstrates replacement and subsequent resection of the thoracoabdominal aorta and its large branches as an adjunct to curative radical retroperitoneal and spinal tumor resection. Five consecutive patients were enrolled between 2016 and 2020, suffering from cancer of unknown primary, pleomorphic carcinoma, chordoma, rhabdoid sarcoma, and endometrial cancer metastasis. Wide surgical resection was the only curative option for these patients. For vascular replacement, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used as a partial left-heart bypass. The early technical success rate was 100% for vascular procedures and all patients underwent complete radical tumour resection with negative margins. All patients required surgical revision (liquor leak, n = 2; hematoma, n = 3; bypass revision, n = 1; bleeding, n = 1; biliary leak, n = 1). During follow-up (average 47 months, range 22–70) primary patency rates of aortic reconstructions and arterial bypasses were 100%; no patient suffered from recurrent malignant disease. Thoracoabdominal aortic replacement with rerouting of visceral and renal vessels is feasible in oncologic patients. In highly selected young patients, major vascular surgery can push the limits of oncologic surgery further, allowing a curative approach even in extensive retroperitoneal and spinal malignancies.

Abdominoinguinal approach in en bloc resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma involving iliac vessels with graft interposition

Background

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) located in the lower abdominal quadrants involving iliac vessels are difficult to manage. This study introduced a 5-step method for en bloc resection with graft interposition using the abdominoinguinal approach and evaluated its efficacy and safety.

Methods

Data of 24 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria from 272 patients with RPS who underwent surgical treatment between April 2015 and April 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

The patients underwent left- or right-sided abdominoinguinal incision. In all patients, the abdominoinguinal approach provided good exposure, and complete resection was achieved. Iliac artery+vein, vein, and artery resection and replacement by graft were performed in 70.8%, 25.0%, and 4.2% of patients, respectively. Additional resected organs mainly included the colon, ureter, bladder, kidney, and abdominal wall. The median number of organs resected was 5. In 37.5% of patients, reconstruction of the lower abdominal wall and inguinal ligament was performed using a mesh. Venous graft thrombosis occurred in 21.7% of patients, while no patient had pulmonary embolism or arterial occlusion. Major complications occurred in 20.8% of patients, and no 30-day mortality was observed. The estimated 5-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 54.4% and 22.1%, respectively, with a median recurrence-free survival of 27 months.

Conclusions

En bloc resection of RPS involving iliac vessels with graft interposition using the abdominoinguinal approach is feasible and advantageous. Good complete resection rate and safety can be achieved. The long-term survival benefit of this surgical approach should be verified by further large-scale prospective controlled studies.

Reconstruction of the superficial femoral vessels with muscle flap coverage for soft tissue sarcomas of the proximal thigh

Background

Surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma with a margin of healthy tissue may necessitate resection and reconstruction of major blood vessels together with soft tissues of the proximal thigh to preserve the limb. The long‐term functional outcomes of these reconstructions remain unestablished. The aim of this report was to assess the vascular and functional outcomes of soft tissue sarcoma patients with femoral vessel reconstructions.

Patients and Methods

Patients who had undergone oncovascular reconstruction during the treatment of proximal thigh soft tissue sarcoma in 2014–2020 were reviewed for details of the vascular and soft tissue reconstructions, and the oncological and functional outcomes. This included eight patients of a median age 59 (range 19–77) years. All had a reconstruction of at least the superficial femoral artery and vein as well as soft tissue reconstruction with a muscle flap. All vessel reconstructions were done with either autologous vein (six grafts/four patients) or allograft (10 grafts/six patients). A microvascular latissimus dorsi flap, with a skin island, was incorporated to cover the vascular grafts in five patients. A pedicled sartorius or gracilis muscle flap was used to fill the defect in three patients.

Results

Graft patency was assessed in seven patients with a median follow‐up of 48 (1–76) months. The arterial graft was patent in 6/8 and the vein graft in 2/8 patients. The gait had returned to normal in five of the six patients assessed. The median MTSS was 70 (43–87)% and the TESS 90 (75–100)%. No local recurrence of the sarcoma was detected.

Conclusions

Vascular reconstruction combined with soft tissue reconstruction enables limb‐sparing surgery in patients with soft tissue sarcoma involving proximal femoral vessels. Although the surgeries are complex with high early morbidity, the achieved long‐term functional outcomes are worthwhile.

Complete resection and arterial reconstruction for primary sarcoma arising from superior mesenteric artery

In the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma involving major vessels, complete resection with vascular reconstruction is challenging. We describe the case of a 72-year-old man who presented with 8 months of abdominal pain. Diagnostic workup revealed occlusion of the celiac trunk and the origin of the superior mesenteric artery due to a soft tissue sarcoma. Radical resection of the tumor and vessels was performed. Guided by intraoperative angiography, arterial reconstruction was performed without mesenteric ischemia. All arterial margins were negative. At the 6-year follow-up, the patient was alive with no evidence of recurrence.

The role of oncovascular surgery in gynecologic oncology surgery

Oncovascular surgery is a new term used to define tumor resection with simultaneous reconstruction of the great vessels when the tumor infiltrates or firmly adheres to such vessels. The benefit of oncovascular surgery has been widely described in patients with hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancers, retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, and in other areas of gynecologic oncology, such as the lateral compartment of the pelvis, retroperitoneum, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic region, with an increase in complete resections and without increasing the morbidity and mortality rates. In the latter decades of the past century, several advances and accumulating scientific evidence led gynecologic oncologists to perform more thorough cytoreductive surgeries that included multivisceral resections. But to our knowledge, published studies on the frequency and relevance of vascular surgery in gynecological oncology are scarce. Gynecologic oncologists still do not receive formal training in vascular surgery and additionally, with the current reduction in experience with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, as well as other types of radical abdominal and pelvic surgeries, trainees will encounter fewer vascular injuries and the opportunity to deal with a variety of management types required. Well-organized collaboration between each subspecialty with a multidisciplinary approach and adequate pre-operative planning are pivotal. The aim of this review is to pave the way towards the understanding that patients with suspicion of great vessels' infiltration or encasement by tumor require personalized and specialized treatment with the need to form an oncovascular surgery team, and that it is necessary for gynecologic oncology surgeons to take a step forward in surgical training.

Temporary Vascular Debranching to Facilitate Retroperitoneal Tumour en bloc Resection

Background

Oncovascular teams are known to be a cornerstone in planning and facilitating en bloc resection of large retroperitoneal masses. Vascular surgeons can help with dissection close to major vessels by vascular reconstruction when necessary, and also in performing specific procedures that can facilitate safe and optimal tumour mass resection. Two cases are reported where temporary vascular debranching of major arteries allowed safe tumour harvesting.

Case reports

A 68 year old man with a necrotic retroperitoneal carcinoma underwent en bloc resection with temporary debranching of the coeliac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and right renal artery using a multibranched bypass from the axillary artery. The post-operative course included septic shock related to pulmonary infection requiring a 10 day stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Renal function was normalised on day two. The patient was discharged on day 18. However, he died 78 months post-operatively from pulmonary metastases after anti-angiogenic treatment.

A 34 year old man with a retroperitoneal mature teratoma underwent en bloc resection with temporary debranching of the coeliac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, left and right renal arteries, and left and right common iliac arteries, with a multibranched bypass from the axillary artery. Post-operatively he required a five day stay in the ICU. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was noted, but it resolved without dialysis. The patient was discharged on day 16. After 78 months follow up he presented with chronic renal failure requiring dialysis. Follow up computed tomography angiography showed pulmonary metastases; although the metastases were manageable with surgical treatment, the patient refused further care.

Conclusions

Temporary extra-anatomical bypass from the axillary artery to the visceral arteries could be considered as an option to provide adequate perfusion and to prevent visceral ischaemia during en bloc resection of large retroperitoneal masses.

•

Temporary axillary bypass protects target organs from the risk of ischaemia.

•

Temporary axillary bypass allows tumour mobilisation without the risk of bleeding.

Surgical resection of leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: A case series and literature review

OBJECTIVES

We review our institution's experience in treating leiomyosarcomas involving the inferior vena cava, and we offer guidance on the management.

METHODS

A text-based search was performed to identify all patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2002 and October 2020. Clinicopathologic data, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were extracted from chart review.

RESULTS

Twelve of 16 patients (75%) had localized disease; the remaining had limited metastatic disease. Seven of 16 patients (44%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation; three patients had partial responses, and four patients had stable disease using RECIST 1.1 criteria. IVC reconstruction was performed in 14 of 16 patients (88%); IVC was ligated for the remaining two patients. Half of all patients had R0 resection on final pathology; the remaining had R1 resections. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not statistically different between patients with R0 and R1 resection. Median PFS was 1.8 years (95% CI 0.89 - not reached); median OS was 6.5 years (1.8 - not reached). Only one patient (6%) experienced local disease recurrence; 4 of 16 patients (25%) experienced disease recurrence distally without local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of IVC leiomyosarcomas at a sarcoma referral center with experience in vascular reconstruction can lead to many years of recurrence-free survival. Surgical resection should be offered to patients with a low volume of metastatic disease to reduce local complications from the primary tumor, many of which exert significant mass effect on surrounding organs. For patients with metastatic disease or large, high-risk tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can provide a biologic test of disease stability prior to resection.

Surgical and oncologic outcomes following arterial resection and reconstruction for advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although arterial involvement for advanced tumors is rare, vascular resection may be indicated to achieve complete tumor resection. Given the potential morbidity of this approach, we sought to evaluate perioperative outcomes, vascular graft patency, and survival among patients undergoing tumor excision with en bloc arterial resection and reconstruction.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, we identified nine patients with tumors encasing or extensively abutting major arterial structures for whom en bloc arterial resection and reconstruction was performed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 53 ± 20 years, and 89% were females. Diagnoses were primary sarcomas (5), recurrent gynecologic carcinomas (3), and benign retroperitoneal fibrosis (1). Tumors involved the infrarenal aorta (2), iliac arteries (6), and superficial femoral artery (1). Three patients (33%) had severe perioperative morbidity (Grade III + ) with no mortality. At a median follow-up of 23 months, eight patients (89%) had primary graft patency, and five patients (56%) had no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial resection and reconstruction as part of the multimodality treatment of regionally advanced tumors is associated with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes, including excellent graft patency. In appropriately selected patients, involvement of major arterial structures should not be viewed as a contraindication to attempted curative surgery.

Long-term outcome in pediatric surgical bypass grafting after traumatic injury and tumor resection: retrospective cohort analysis

Vascular bypass surgery in children differs significantly from adults. It is a rarely performed procedure in the setting of trauma and tumor surgery. Besides technical challenges to reconstruct the small and spastic vessels, another concern in bypass grafting is the adequate limb length growth over time. The primary aim of this study was to assess long-term outcome after pediatric bypass grafting, in a single academic center, focusing on potential effects on limb development. In this retrospective cohort analyses we included all pediatric patients undergoing vascular bypass grafting at our department between 2002 and 2017. All patients ≤ 18 years suffered a traumatic injury or underwent a tumor resection of the lower or upper limb. The youngest female patient was 0.4 years, the youngest male patient was 3.5 years. During the observation period, 33 pediatric patients underwent vascular repair, whereby 15 patients underwent bypass grafting. Median overall follow-up was 4.7 years (IQR ± 9). 8 patients (53%) had a traumatic injury (traumatic surgery group) and 7 patients had a planned orthopedic tumor resection (orthopedic surgery group). In 13/15 (87%) a great saphenous vein (GSV) graft and in 2/15 (13%) a Gore-Tex graft was used for bypassing. Both Gore-Tex grafts showed complete occlusion 12 and 16 years after implantation. No patient died in the early postoperative phase (< 30 days), however 3/7 (43%) in the orthopedic group died during follow-up. Revision surgery had to be performed in 1/15 (7%) patients. A functional use of the extremity was reported in all patients. Normal limb length growth according to the contralateral site, and therefore bypass growth, could be documented in 14/15 patients. Children are surgically challenging. In our study, surgery by a specialized vascular surgery team using GSV grafts led to adequate limb length and bypass growth, and we observed no functional restrictions.

The Orthopedic-Vascular Multidisciplinary Approach Improves Patient Safety in Surgery for Musculoskeletal Tumors: A Large-Volume Center Experience

Objective: Wide-margin resection is mandatory for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. However, this increases the complexity of resections, especially when vessels are involved. Patients in this high-risk clinical setting could be surgically treated using the multidisciplinary orthopedic-vascular approach. This study was carried out in this healthcare organization to evaluate patient safety in term of oncologic outcomes and reduction of the complication rate. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients (37 males, 37 females; mean age 46 years, range 9–88) who underwent surgical excision for bone/soft tissue malignant tumors closely attached to vascular structures from October 2015 to February 2019. Vascular surgery consisted of isolation of at least one vessel (64 patients), bypass reconstruction (9 patients), and end-to-end anastomosis (1 patient). Mean follow-up was 27 months. Patients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, adjuvant treatments, type of orthopedic and vascular procedures, and oncologic and functional outcomes and complications were recorded. Results: Overall survival was 85% at 3 years follow-up. In total, 22 patients experienced at least one major complication requiring further surgery and 13 patients experienced at least one minor complication, whereas 17 reported deviations from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological or interventional treatment. Major complications were higher in pelvic resections compared to limb-salvage procedures (p = 0.0564) and when surgical time was more than 4 h (p = 0.0364) at univariate analysis, whereas the most important multivariate independent predictors for major complications were pelvic resection (p = 0.0196) and preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.0426). Conclusions: A multidisciplinary ortho-vascular approach for resection of malignant bone and soft tissue tumors tightly attached to important vascular structures should be considered a good clinical practice for patient safety.

Major vascular resection in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery

Major blood vessels may be invaded either by primary sarcomas arising from the vessel wall or by secondary infiltration of a retroperitoneal sarcoma. The involvement of major blood vessels is not considered to be an absolute contraindication for surgical resection. The main issue when evaluating a possible major vascular resection is to balance the possible surgical morbidity with the expected survival benefit. This is strictly related to the tumor's biology and clinical behavior and to the patient's performance status and comorbidities. A multidisciplinary approach in a specialized center is mandatory when approaching a possible oncovascular resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma, given the rarity and the heterogeneity of these tumors.

Soft Tissue Tumors of the Abdomen and Retroperitoneum

Soft tissue tumors of the abdomen and retroperitoneum encompass a wide range of benign and malignant neoplasms. Retroperitoneal sarcomas, the most common, are composed of rare malignancies with numerous histiotypes. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment and the only curative option for retroperitoneal sarcomas. With histiotype-dependent local and distant recurrences, it is imperative these cases are discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board setting at specialized sarcoma centers. This review discusses the current evidence for the management of abdominal and retroperitoneal soft tissue tumors, with particular focus on retroperitoneal sarcomas and desmoid tumors.

Vascular reconstruction using autologous vs synthetic graft for patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcoma involving the major vessels

OBJECTIVE

Arterial reconstruction after radical limb-sparing resection of extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) involving great vessels is necessary. However, there is no agreement upon the optimal vascular substitute. This study prospectively evaluated the major vascular reconstructions in extremity STS surgery with vascular involvement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2017 and August 2019, 29 patients having extremity STS with major vascular reconstruction were enrolled. Recurrent, metastatic STSs or STSs of vascular origin were excluded. Patients were non-randomly divided into two groups according to the type of arterial substitute: group I, autologous graft (16 patients) and group II, synthetic graft (13 patients). Graft patency, postoperative morbidity, and patient and limb survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 12 months (range, 6-26). Early postoperative complications and overall survival were nonsignificantly different between groups. The 1-year primary patency was 92.85% vs 90% in groups I vs II, respectively, P = .704. Graft occlusion was nonsignificantly greater in the synthetic group, P = .107. Limb salvage was 93.75% in group I compared with 92.3% in group II, P = .87.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft choice should be based on autologous vein suitability regarding its length and caliber. If such requirements are not available, synthetic substitutes can be used with close surveillance of patency.

Oncovascular Surgery: Essential Roles of Vascular Surgeons in Cancer Surgery

For the modern practice of cancer surgery, the concept of oncovascular surgery (OVS), defined as cancer resection with concurrent ligation or reconstruction of a major vascular structure, can be very important. OVS for advanced cancers requires specialized procedures performed by a specialized multidisciplinary team. Roles of oncovascular surgeons are summarized as: a primary surgeon in vesselorigin tumors, a rescue surgeon treating complications during cancer surgery, and a consultant surgeon as a multidisciplinary team for cancer surgery. Vascular surgeons must show leadership in cancer surgery in cases of complex advanced diseases, such as angiosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, intravenous leiomyomatosis, retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, iatrogenic injury of the major vessels during cancer surgery, pancreatic cancer with vascular invasion, extremity soft tissue sarcoma, melanoma and others.

Analysis of outcomes and predictors of long-term survival following resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) include a heterogeneous group of rare malignant tumours, and various treatment algorithms are still controversially discussed until today. The present study aimed to examine postoperative and long-term outcomes after resection of primary RPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent resection of primary RPS between 2005 and 2015 were assessed, and predictors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were identified.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients underwent resection for primary RPS. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 31 and 3%, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 74 months, 5-year OS and DFS rates were 58 and 34%, respectively. Histologic high grade (5-year OS: G1: 92% vs. G2: 54% vs. G3: 43%, P = 0.030) was significantly associated with diminished OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. When assessing DFS, histologic high grade (5-year DFS: G1: 63% vs. G2: 24% vs. G3: 22%, P = 0.013), positive surgical resection margins (5-year DFS: R0: 53% vs. R1: 10% vs. R2: 0%, P = 0.014), and vascular involvement (5-year DFS: yes: 33% vs no: 39%, P = 0.001), were significantly associated with inferior DFS in univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade tumours indicated poor OS, while vascular involvement, positive surgical resection margins, and histologic grade are the most important predictors of DFS. Although multimodal treatment strategies are progressively established, surgical resection remains the mainstay in the majority of patients with RPS, even in cases with vascular involvement.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Limb-Sparing Surgery with Vascular Reconstruction for Soft Tissue Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is limb-sparing surgery. For a small subset of patients, concomitant vascular reconstruction may be required to preserve limb viability and function while completely excising the tumor with an adequate resection margin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes and clinical characteristics of patients with STS of the extremities requiring vascular reconstructions.

METHODS

From January 2002 through December 2014, 13 patients with limb STS presenting with vascular invasion underwent surgical resection, followed by vascular reconstruction. The medical records such as demographics, histopathological findings, complications, success of vascular reconstruction, and clinical and oncological outcomes were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected clinical database.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up period of 80.6 months, a total of 24 vascular reconstruction procedures (1 only arterial, 1 only venous, and 11 both arterial and venous) were performed. Contralateral great saphenous vein graft was the conduit of choice for vascular replacement. Five graft thromboses were observed in 4 patients. Arterial occlusion occurred in two cases, and venous bypasses occluded in three patients. The overall five-year patency for arterial and venous reconstructions was 84.6% and 75.2%, respectively. The mean survival period of patients was 105.5 months, with a 5-year disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate of 59.3% and 68.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular resection and reconstruction for STSs of extremity can be safely performed with acceptable short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes. Regardless of the surgical procedure, amputation or limb-sparing surgery, the primary focus should be to adhere to strict oncological principles. In addition, because of the complexity of these tumors, an appropriate preoperative planning and meticulous multidisciplinary approach are also crucial.

Aggressive Phenotype of Intravascular Lymphoma Relative to Other Malignant Intraabdominal Tumors Requiring Vascular Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Safe resection of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal malignancies with a goal of negative margins may require vascular surgical assistance with grafting of the aorta and/or vena cava. The current report reviews malignancies associated with major vascular reconstructions at a single tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Adults with abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors involving the aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries that underwent reconstruction with vascular grafts at the University of Michigan from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The initial presentation, surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with tumors involving the abdominal aorta, vena cava, or iliac arteries underwent major vascular reconstruction in this seven-year study period. Tumor pathology included solid tumors (leiomyosarcoma [n = 7], germ cell tumor [n = 3], and intravascular lymphoma [n = 2]). Surgical treatment included grafting of the vena cava (n = 6), aorta (n = 3), iliac artery (n = 4), or both the aorta and vena cava (n = 1). Patients with intravascular lymphoma were identified incidentally during treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm or on pathological analysis of thromboembolism from an aortic source. Other patients had planned resection. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 86 months (median: 28.9). There were no graft occlusions. Tumor metastasized or recurred in patients with sarcoma (n = 2; 28.6%), germ cell tumor (n = 1; 33.3%), and intravascular lymphoma (n = 2; 100%). Both patients with lymphoma had multiple anastomotic or tumor-embolic pseudoaneurysms for <14 months after vascular reconstruction. Both lymphoma patients died during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center review suggests that sarcoma and germ cell tumors may be safely resected in conjunction with major vascular reconstruction in carefully selected patients. In comparison, intravascular lymphoma identified incidentally at the time of aortic reconstruction resulted in a more malignant course with pseudoaneurysm formation of anastomoses or native vessels, cancer recurrence, and 100% mortality. Aneurysm contents and emboli should be carefully reviewed perioperatively by pathologists.

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes after Vascular Reconstruction for Patients with Lower-Extremity Soft-Tissue Malignant Tumors

Objective: To evaluate limb-salvage surgery including vascular resection for lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas and carcinomas for adult patients.

Materials and Methods: Eight consecutive patients (median age, 59 years) who underwent vascular replacement during surgery for malignant tumors in the lower limbs between November 2006 and March 2018 were evaluated. Patient data were retrospectively obtained in a computerized database. Arterial and venous reconstructions were performed for seven patients, with one additional patient receiving venous reconstruction only. Autologous-vein (n=6) and synthetic bypasses were used for arterial repairs, whereas only autologous veins were implanted for venous repairs.

Results: Morbidity was 62.5%, and in-hospital mortality was 12.5%. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the primary patency rates of arterial and venous reconstructions were 85.7% and 62.5%, respectively. Limb salvage was achieved in all cases.

Conclusion: Early and mid-term bypass patency rates, the high percentage of limb salvage, and the oncologic outcome underline the efficacy of en bloc resection of soft-tissue tumors involving major vessels of the lower limbs. The anticipated need for vascular resection and reconstruction should not be a contraindication to sarcoma and carcinoma resections. However, efforts to achieve better control over systemic spread are required for long-term survival.

Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma en-bloc with inferior vena cava: 20 year outcomes of a single institution

BACKGROUND

Margin negative resection offers the best chance of long-term survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). En-bloc resection of adjacent structures, including the inferior vena cava (IVC), is often required to achieve negative margins. We review our 20-year experience of en-bloc IVC and RPS resection.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with RPS resection involving the IVC were matched 1:3 by age and histology to RPS without IVC resection. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients underwent RPS resection en-bloc with IVC. They were matched with 96 cases of RPS without IVC resection. Median OS of 59 months and DFS 18 months in IVC resection group was comparable to RPS resection without vascular involvement: median OS 65 months, DFS 18 months (P = 0.519, P = 0.604). On multivariate analyses, R2 margin (OS: HR = 6.52 [95%CI: 1.18-36.09], P = 0.032) was associated with inferior OS. R2 margin and increased number of organs resected (DFS: HR = 5.07, [1.15-22.27], P = 0.031, HR = 1.28 [1.01-1.62], P = 0.014) were associated with inferior DFS. Reconstructions included graft (n = 19, 59%), patch (n = 4, 13%), primary repair (n = 6, 19%), and ligation (n = 4, 13%).

CONCLUSIONS

RPS resection en-bloc with IVC can achieve equivalent rates of DFS and OS to patients without vascular involvement.

Major vascular resections in retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) frequently involve major vessels, which either originate from them or secondarily encase or invade them. In this field, major vascular resections result in increased morbidity. However, survival does not seem to be affected by the need for vascular resection or by this higher morbidity. This paper aims to provide descriptions of the surgical strategy and outcomes for retroperitoneal sarcomas involving major vessels.

The Practice of Physical Activity in the Setting of Lower-Extremities Sarcomas: A First Step toward Clinical Optimization

Lower-extremities sarcoma patients, with bone tumor and soft-tissue sarcoma, are a unique population at high risk of physical dysfunction and chronic heart diseases. Thus, providing an adequate physical activity (PA) program constitutes a primary part of the adjuvant treatment, aiming to improve patients' quality of life. The main goal of this paper is to offer clear suggestions for clinicians regarding PA around the time between diagnosis and offered treatments. These preliminary recommendations reflect our interpretation of the clinical and preclinical data published on this topic, after a systematic search on the PubMed database. Accordingly, patients could be advised to (1) start sessions of supportive rehabilitation and low-intensity PA after surgery and (2) increase PA intensities progressively during home stay. The usefulness of PA during the preoperative period remains largely unknown but emerging preclinical data on mice bearing intramuscular sarcoma are most likely discouraging. However, efforts are still needed to in-depth elucidate the impact of PA before surgery completion. PA should be age-, sex-, and treatment-adapted, as young/adolescent, women and patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy are more susceptible to physical quality deterioration. Concerning PA intensity, the practice of moderate-intensity resistance and endurance exercises (30–60 min/day) are safe after surgery, even when receiving adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. The general PA recommendations for cancer patients, 150 min/week of combined moderate-intensity endurance/resistance exercises, could be feasible after 18–24 months of rehabilitation. We believe that these suggestions will help clinicians to design a low-risk and useful PA program.

[Surgery for soft-tissue sarcomas of the limbs and trunk wall]

Soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs or the trunk wall determine a heterogeneous group of tumours that tends to receive a more individualized approach. The surgeon in charge with soft-tissue sarcoma has to be familiar with these tumours in order to deliver an adequate treatment. Most important is the initial diagnostic procedure, comprising imaging with MRI, a core needle biopsy, and in France, referral to a centre of expertise within the clinical network NETSARC. Prior to surgery, a multidisciplinary conference determines its moment and the extent of surgical resection within the frame of a multidisciplinary approach, and also plans reconstructive surgery, when needed. A standardized operative report summarizes items necessary to describe the resection quality (i.e. tumour seen, tumour infiltrated?). In multidisciplinary staff meetings, they are compared to margins measured by the pathologist on the operative specimen. Hence, resection quality is determined collegially and defined by resection type R (R0, R1, R2) as a qualitative result. The quality of resection directly determines the 5-year risk of local recurrence, estimated between 10 and 20% in specialized centres, with the objective to attain 10%. Early rehabilitation favours better functional outcome. The surgeon's experience with soft-tissue sarcoma, as part of a multidisciplinary treatment, is key in achieving the best adequacy between oncological resection and favourable functional outcome. In France, a specific university course for soft-tissue sarcoma will be set-up.

Vascular resection en-bloc with tumor removal and graft reconstruction is safe and effective in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and retroperitoneum

BACKGROUND

To analyze the outcome of a series of patients who underwent vascular resection as part of an excision of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

STUDY DESIGN

All consecutive patients affected by localized STS of an extremity or retroperitoneum treated between January 2000 and December 2013 with surgery including vascular resection were considered. Overall survival (OS), crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases (DM) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Long-term vascular graft patency rate was assessed.

RESULTS

2692 patients received an operation for localized disease with 105 (3.9%) cases undergoing vascular resection. Median FU was 32 months. 5-year OS, CCI of LR and DM were 62%, 12% and 58% respectively. Vascular reconstructions consisted of 52 arterial and 16 venous grafts in extremities; 12 arterial and 33 venous grafts in the retroperitoneum. Graft thrombosis occurred in 16 patients (7/64 arterial and 9/49 venous reconstructions). Arterial occlusions occurred at a median of 36 months after surgery and were treated by prosthesis replacement (3), Fogarty catheter embolectomy (2), percutaneous angioplasty (1) and observation (1). One patient eventually required amputation. Venous occlusions occurred at a median of 4 months post surgery and were all treated conservatively. Overall arterial and venous reconstruction patency rates were 89% and 82% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular resection to facilitate resection of STS has an acceptable long term patency rate. However it was associated to a high risk of distant spread. Although the encasement of the vascular bundle does not represent a contraindication to surgery there is an association with a high metastatic risk by virtue of the locally advanced nature of the disease and this should be considered when planning treatment.