Modified Blumgart Mattress Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Suture in Pancreaticojejunostomy During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:243-251. [PMID: 29697455 PMCID: PMC6325750 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002802]

The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a highly difficult and invasive type of gastrointestinal surgery. Prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula is important, and this may be possible by the stapler method.

METHODS

STRAP-PD is a single center randomized controlled trial. We compare a method of transecting the pancreatic parenchyma in pancreaticoduodenectomy using a surgical stapler device with a conventional transecting method using energy devices (e.g., scalpel, ultrasonic coagulator and incision devices). Patients with soft pancreas who are scheduled to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy are randomized to arm A (conventional method) or arm B (stapler method). We aim to examine the safety and usefulness of dissection by the automatic suture device, with attention to the rate of pancreatic fistula ISGPF grade B or C and to postoperative complications. This is a single-center randomized study, which began in September 2023 at Wakayama Medical University Hospital.

DISCUSSION

Pancreatic parenchymal transection is typically performed either by direct incision using a scalpel or by employing energy devices such as ultrasonic coagulating cutting devices during pancreaticoduodenectomy. In a prospective pilot study, we conducted pancreatic parenchymal transection in 20 consecutive normal pancreatic cases during pancreaticoduodenectomy, observing postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B in one case (5%). Traditional methods involving scalpel incision or the use of ultrasonic coagulating cutting devices have been historically favored but perceived as technically challenging, and they have been reliant upon the surgeon's skill. Notably, relatively high incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula among patients with soft pancreas have also been observed. Our proposed stapler method may therefore be a useful method responsible for reducing the development of pancreatic fistula. This method would be as part of minimally-invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy. It uses an endoscopic linear stapler to cut the pancreatic parenchyma, so it is likely to be more convenient than conventional methods and can be used universally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000052089. the Registration Date on 1st September 2023.

A ligamentum teres hepatis and falciform ligament 'belt and braces' approach in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy using a modified Blumgart anastomosis to minimize severe pancreatic fistula and post-operative complications

BACKGROUND

To determine whether ligamentum teres hepatis and falciform ligament, wrapped around the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and reinforced the posterior wall in pancreatojejunostomy (PJ), protects the GDA stump and other skeletal blood vessels from erosive hemorrhage and reduces the incidence of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and post-operative complications after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

METHODS

We reviewed patients undergone LPD between January 2019 and June 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the ligamentous flap had been used to wrap the GDA stump (Group A) or to reinforce the posterior wall in PJ, together with the GDA wrapping procedure (Group B). Peri-operative data were reviewed to determine the effectiveness of this approach in preventing CR-POPF, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and other complications.

RESULTS

We enrolled 272 patients (Group A, 154 patients; Group B, 118 patients). Group B patients had significantly fewer ≥ Grade II Clavien-Dindo classification morbidities and CR-POPFs (P < 0.05), and lower length of hospital stay (LOS) and abdominal drainage tube insertion times. Risk factor analysis indicated that main pancreatic duct dilation, the PJ reinforcement procedure, and soft pancreatic tissue were associated with ≥Grade II Clavien-Dindo morbidities and CR-POPF complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The ligamentous flap application in LPD provided shelter to GDA stump and other skeletal blood vessels under PJ from erosive digestive juices, reinforced the posterior wall in PJ, reduced the incidence of CR-POPF and ≥Grade II Clavien-Dindo classification morbidities. This simple procedure is effective for improving surgical safety of LPD.

Safe and beneficial outcomes of pancreaticogastrostomy with endoscopic transgastric drainage for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSES

The optimal surgical technique and perioperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy have not yet been established. This study examined the perioperative outcomes of pancreaticogastrostomy with endoscopic transgastric drainage.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 191 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2016 and 2023. They were divided into two groups: pancreaticojejunostomy group (n = 135) and pancreaticogastrostomy group (n = 56). We compared preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes. We performed endoscopic drainage only in the pancreaticogastrostomy group.

RESULTS

Preoperative factors were similar between the two groups. Operative time [480 (404-542) vs. 382 (346-458) minutes], blood loss [505 (270-850) vs. 315 (145-535) g], pseudoaneurysm formation (7 % vs. 0 %), and postoperative hospital stay [28 (22-38) vs. 19 (17-24) days] were significantly lower in the pancreaticogastrostomy group. In the analysis of 41 patients with POPF, postoperative hospital stay [40 (23-108) vs. 27 (18-54) days] and hospital stay after POPF diagnosis [30 (10-99) vs. 15 (5-35) days] were significantly shorter in the pancreaticogastrostomy group. Endoscopic transgastric drainage was performed in 77 % of patients in the pancreaticogastrostomy group, and drainage was successfully completed in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Pancreaticogastrostomy with endoscopic transgastric drainage could be effective for the safe management of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Association of textbook outcomes with improved survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study

Background

Assessing the perioperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based solely on individual complications is not comprehensive, and the association between perioperative outcomes and the long-term prognosis of individuals diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains uncertain. Our study is designed to evaluate the impact of a novel composite indicator, textbook outcomes (TO), on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing PD for PDAC.

Methods

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 139 patients who underwent PD for pathologically confirmed PDAC at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 111 patients were included in the subsequent analysis. These patients were categorized into two groups: the non-TO group (n=42) and the TO group (n=69). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was employed to describe the relationship between TO and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression was employed to assess the impact of achieving TO on long-term survival. Logistic regression was employed to investigate the risk factors affecting the achievement of TO.

Results

Out of the 111 PDAC patients, 69 (62.2%) achieved TO following PD. The achievement of TO significantly improved the OS of PDAC patients [P=0.03; hazard ratio (HR) =0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.83]. Cox regression analysis indicated that achieving TO was a protective factor for OS (P=0.04; HR =4.08; 95% CI: 1.07-15.61). Logistic regression analysis indicated that high amylase in drainage fluid on the third day after surgery (>1,300 U/L) was detrimental to achieve TO [odds ratio (OR) =0.10; 95% CI: 0.02-0.58; P=0.01], longer surgery durations (≥6.25 hours) was detrimental to achieve TO (OR =0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.54; P=0.002), and soft pancreatic texture was detrimental to achieve TO (OR =0.31; 95% CI: 0.10-0.93, P=0.04).

Conclusions

Achievement of TO significantly improves the OS of PDAC patients and has the potential to serve as a robust prognostic indicator. Looking ahead, it is highly necessary for TO to become a standard surgical quality control measure in hospitals.

Technical details of robotic pancreatojejunostomy using a modified Blumgart anastomosis: Thread manipulation using gauze and an assisted port

BACKGROUNDS

Pancreatojejunostomy is a technically demanding procedure during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). Modified Blumgart anastomosis (mBA) is a common method for the pancreatojejunostomy; however, the technical details for robotic mBA are not well established. During RPD, we performed a mBA for the pancreatojejunostomy using thread manipulation with gauze and an additional assist port.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at Fujita Health University from November 2009 to May 2023 were retrospectively investigated, and technical details for the robotic-modified Blumgart anastomosis were demonstrated.

RESULTS

Among 78 patients who underwent RPD during the study period, 33 underwent robotic mBA. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred in six patients (18%). None of the patients suffered POPF Grade C according to the international study group of pancreatic surgery definition. The anastomotic time for mBA was 80 min (54-125 min).

CONCLUSION

Robotic mBA resulted in reasonable outcomes. We propose that mBA could be used as one of the standard methods for robotic pancreatojejunosotomy.

Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The flexibility of the robotic system in resection and reconstruction provides potential benefits in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Increasingly, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has been reported with favourable outcomes, but high-level evidence is still scarce. We aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of RPD with those of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), and hypothesised that postoperative length of hospital stay would be shorter after RPD than after OPD.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial was conducted at three high-volume hospitals in China. Patients were considered for participation in this trial if they were aged 18-75 years, had a resectable benign, premalignant, or malignant tumour in the pancreatic head or periampullary region; and were suitable for both RPD and OPD. Patients with distant metastases were excluded. Block randomisation was done with random block sizes of four, stratified by centre. Allocation was concealed via individual, sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the RPD group or the OPD group in a 1:1 ratio by a masked research assistant. Surgeons and patients were not masked to trial group, but data collectors, postoperative outcome assessors, and data analysts were. All patients underwent RPD or OPD according to previously reported techniques. Participating surgeons had surpassed the learning curves of at least 40 RPD and 60 OPD procedures. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay, which was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200056809) and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between March 5 and Dec 20, 2022, 292 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 164 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the RPD group (n=82) or the OPD group (n=82). 161 patients who underwent surgical resection were included in the mITT analysis (81 in the RPD group and 80 in the OPD group). 94 (58%) participants were male and 67 (42%) were female. Postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RPD group than in the OPD group (median 11·0 days [IQR 9·0 to 19·5] vs 13·5 days [11·5 to 18·0]; median difference -2·0 [95% CI -4·0 to 0·0]; p=0·029). During a follow-up period of 90 days, six (7%) of 81 patients in the RPD group and five (6%) of 80 patients in the OPD group required readmission. Reasons for readmission were intra-abdominal haemorrhage (one in each group), vomiting (two in the RPD group and one in the OPD group), electrolyte disturbance (one in each group), and fever (two in each group). There were two (1%) in-hospital deaths within 90 days of surgery, one in each group. The postoperative 90-day mortality rate (difference -0·02% [-5·6 to 5·5]; p=1·00) and the incidence of severe complications (ie, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3; difference -1·5% [-14·5 to 11·4]; p=0·82) were similar between the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

For surgeons who had passed the learning curve, RPD was safe and feasible with the advantage of shorter postoperative length of hospital stay than OPD. Future research should focus on the medium-term and long-term outcomes between RPD and OPD.

FUNDING

None.

Machine learning approach to predict postpancreatectomy hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a rare yet dreaded complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This retrospective study aimed to explore a machine learning (ML) model for predicting PPH in PD patients.

METHODS

A total of 284 patients who underwent open PD at our institute were included in the analysis. To address the issue of imbalanced data, the adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN) technique was employed. The best-performing ML model was selected using the PyCaret library in Python and evaluated based on recall, precision, and F1 score metrics. In addition to assessing the model's performance on the test data, bootstrap validation (n = 1000) with the original dataset was conducted.

RESULTS

PPH occurred in 11 patients (3.9%), with a median onset time of 22 days postoperatively. These minority cases were oversampled to 85 using ADASYN. The extra trees classifier demonstrated superior performance with recall, precision, and F1 score of 0.967, 0.914, and 0.937, respectively. Both validation using the test data and bootstrap resampling consistently demonstrated recall, precision, and F1 score exceeding 0.9. The model identified the peak value of C-reactive protein during the first 7 postoperative days as the most significant feature, followed by the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential of the ML approach to predict PPH occurrence following PD. Vigilance and early interventions guided by such model predictions could positively impact outcomes for high-risk patients.

Cattel and Blumgart Anastomosis: Comparison of Pancreatojejunostomy Techniques in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

BACKROUND

Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis has a high risk of pancreatic leakage, which several surgical techniques have been described. Our main objective is to determine what is the association of postoperative pancreatic leakage in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy according to the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique used (Cattel vs Blumgart)?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Historical cohort, all cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. From April 2020 to May 2021, Cattel technique was used; from June 2021 to June 2022, Blumgart technique was used. All procedures were performed by a single board-certified surgical oncologist at Oncology Hospital.

RESULTS

24 patients (11 men and 13 women). The first 9 procedures were performed with the Cattel technique, starting from procedure 10, the Blumgart technique was used. No differences were observed regarding the consistency of the pancreas (p=0.28) or the size of the duct (p=0.51) between the two groups. Pancreatic leakage was observed in 100% with the Cattel technique and in 6.7% with the Blumgart technique (p= 0.0001). An amylase value was observed in the left drainage at 6 days > 200 U/L with the Cattel technique and < 200 U/L with Blumgart (p=0.0001). Intraoperative bleeding (Cattel 1200 ml vs. Blumgart 400 ml, p= 0.03) and 90-day mortality (Cattel 33.3% vs. Blumgart 0%, Log-Rank: 0.022) also showed a difference in favor of Blumgart technique. Blumgart technique is a protective factor for the presence of pancreatic leakage (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.44, p=0.0001).

DISCUSSION

A lower risk of pancreatic leakage was found using the Blumgart technique, compared to the Cattel technique.

Comparison of Cefazolin and Ceftriaxone as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pancreatoduodenectomy with Preoperative Drainage: Incidence of Surgical Site Infection and Susceptibility of Bacteria in Bile

BACKGROUND

The optimal perioperative antimicrobial agent for preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 288 patients who underwent PD after PBD between 2010 and 2020 at our institution. Patients were classified into two groups according to the perioperative antimicrobial agent used (cefazoline [CEZ] group [n = 108] and ceftriaxone [CTRX] group [n = 180]). The incidence of SSI, type of bacteria in intraoperative bile culture (IBC), and antimicrobial susceptibility to prophylactic antimicrobial agents were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of incisional SSI was significantly lower in the CTRX group than in the CEZ group (18% vs. 31%, P = 0.021), whereas the incidence of organ/space SSI in the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent (35% vs. 44%, P = 0.133). Gram-negative rod (GNR) bacteria in the IBC showed better antimicrobial susceptibility in the CTRX group than in the CEZ group. In multivariate analysis, antimicrobial resistance due to GNR was a significant risk factor for incisional SSI (odds ratio, 3.50; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CTRX had better antimicrobial coverage than CEZ for GNR cultured from intraoperative bile samples. In addition, CTRX provides better antimicrobial prophylaxis than CEZ against superficial SSI in patients with PD after PBD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study was not a clinical trial and had no registration numbers.

Treatment strategies to prevent or mitigate the outcome of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): a review of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause for surgical mortality after pancreatic surgery. Several strategies for the prevention and management of PPH have been studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but a systematic review is lacking. We systematically reviewed RCTs regarding the impact of treatment strategies on the incidence and outcome of PPH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible RCTs reporting on impact of treatment on the rate of PPH were identified through a systematic literature search using the Evidence Map of Pancreatic Surgery (2012-2022). Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool for RCTs. Various definitions of PPH were accepted and outcome reported separately for the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.

RESULTS

Overall, 99 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria with a pooled 6.1% rate of PPH (range 1%-32%). The pooled rate of PPH defined as ISGPS grade B/C was 8.1% (range 0-24.9%). Five RCTs reported five strategies that significantly reduced the rate of PPH. Three concerned surgical technique: pancreatic anastomosis with small jejunal incision, falciform ligament wrap around the gastroduodenal artery stump, and pancreaticojejunostomy (vs pancreaticogastrostomy). Two concerned perioperative management: perioperative pasireotide administration, and algorithm-based postoperative patient management. No single RCT specifically focused on the treatment of patients with PPH.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review of RCTs identified five strategies which reduce the rate of PPH; three concerning intraoperative surgical technique and two concerning peri-operative patient management. Future studies should focus on the treatment of patients with PPH as RCTs are currently lacking.

Usage of a simplified blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) was shown to be an effective method for pancreaticojejunostomy in open pancreaticoduodenectomy. But the original Blumgart method is involved in complicated and interrupted sutures, which may not be suitable for the laparoscopic approach. In this study, we introduced a simplified Blumgart method for laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 90 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy in our institute from 2019 to 2022. Among them, 32 patients received LPD with simplified Blumgart PJ, while 29 received LPD with traditional duct-to-mucosal anastomosis (the Cattel-Warren technique) and 29 received OPD with traditional duct-to-mucosal anastomosis. And the time length for PJ and the surgical outcome were compared in these three groups.

RESULTS

The simplified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy was accomplished in all 32 cases with no conversion to open surgery due to improper sutures. And the time length for laparoscopic simplified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy was 26 ± 8.4 min, which was shorter than laparoscopic traditional ductal to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (39 ± 13.7 min). Importantly, the overall incidence for POPF and grade B&C POPF rate in the laparoscopic simplified Blumgart method group were 25% and 9.38% respectively, which were lower than the other two groups. Moreover, we performed univariate analysis and multivariate analysis and found soft pancreas, pancreatic ductal diameter < = 3 mm and intraoperative blood loss were independent risk factors for POPF after PD.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the simplified Blumgart method is a feasible and reliable method for laparoscopic PJ which deserves further validation.

[Anastomotic techniques in minimally invasive hepatobiliopancreatic surgery]

The established anastomotic techniques conventionally used in open surgery are increasingly being implemented in a minimally invasive approach and further developed. The aim of all innovations is to carry out a safe anastomosis with a feasible minimally invasive technique; however, there is currently no broad consensus about the role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in performing pancreatic anastomotic techniques. Pancreatic fistulas determine the morbidity following a minimally invasive resection. The simultaneous minimally invasive resection and reconstruction of pancreatic processes and vascular structures is currently exclusively performed in specialized centers.

Application of Simplified Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy for Nondilated Pancreatic Duct in Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of simplified duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in a nondilated pancreatic duct in laparoscopic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and 2 patients who underwent laparoscopic central pancreatectomy were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients underwent pure laparoscopic surgery successfully with simplified duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. The operation time of LPD was 365.11±41.56 minutes, the time of pancreaticojejunostomy was 28.39±12.58 minutes, and postoperative hospitalization time was 14.16±6.88 days on average. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients of LPD, including 2 cases of class B postoperative pancreatic fistula and 1 case of gastroparesis followed by gastrointestinal anastomotic perforation. The operative time of laparoscopic central pancreatectomy was 191.00±12.73 minutes, the time of pancreaticojejunostomy 36.00±5.66 minutes, and the postoperative hospitalization time 12.5±0.71 days on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The described technique is a simple and safe reconstruction procedure and suitable for patients with nondilated pancreatic duct.

Completely 3-dimensional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: an analysis of 100 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

Although laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is increasingly performed in high-volume centers, pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is still the most challenging procedure. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage remains a major complication after PD. Thus, various technical modifications regarding PJ, such as the Blumgart technique, have been attempted to simplify the procedure and minimize anastomotic leakage. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic systems have been shown to be particularly helpful in performing difficult and precise tasks. We present a modified Blumgart anastomosis in 3D-LPD and investigate its clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 patients who underwent 3D-LPD with modified Blumgart PJ from September 2018 to January 2020 was conducted. Data on the preoperative characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative characteristics of the patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and duration of PJ were 348.2 and 25.1 min, respectively. The mean estimated blood loss was 112 mL. The overall rate of postoperative complications over Clavien‒Dindo classification III was 18%. The incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was 11%. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14.2 days. Only one patient required reoperation (1%), and no patient died in the hospital or 90 days after the operation. High BMI, small main pancreatic duct diameter, and soft pancreatic consistency had a significant influence on the occurrence of CR-POPF.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical outcome of 3D-LPD with modified Blumgart PJ seems to be comparable to other studies in terms of operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication incidence. We consider the modified Blumgart technique in 3D-LPD to be novel, reliable, safe, and favorable for PJ in the PD procedure.

A Blumgart Anastomosis-Based Half-Invagination Pancreaticoenterostomy with Better Applicability to Laparoscopy and Lower Incidence of Pancreatic Leakage

Background

The Blumgart anastomosis (BA) is one of the safest anastomoses for pancreatic stump reconstruction. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and postoperative complications is low. However, how to make laparoscopic pancreaticoenterostomy easier and safer is still a topic to be discussed.

Methods

The data of patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) from April 2014 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Half-invagination anastomosis was performed in 20 cases (HI group), and the Cattell-Warren anastomosis was carried out in 26 cases (CW group). The amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time, and postoperative catheterization time in the HI group was significantly less than those in the CW group. Besides, the number of patients at the Clavien-Dindo grade III and above in the HI group was significantly less than that in the control group. Moreover, the incidence of POPF in the HI group was significantly lower than that in the CW group. Furthermore, fistula risk score (FRS) analysis showed that there was no high-risk group, and the highest risk in the medium-risk group was pancreatic leakage. In addition, the incidence of pancreatic leakage in the HI group and CW group was 7.7% and 46.67%, respectively, while the incidence of pancreatic leakage in the HI group was significantly lower than that in the CW group.

Conclusions

The half-invagination pancreaticoenterostomy based on the Blumgart anastomosis should have good applicability under laparoscopy and could effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage.

Positive drain fluid culture on postoperative day 1 predicts clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in early drain removal with higher drain fluid amylase after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the risk factors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after early drain removal with higher drain fluid amylase after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinical evaluation of early drain removal with a higher drain fluid amylase after pancreaticoduodenectomy has been controversial. The safety and effectiveness have not been sufficiently examined.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, prophylactic surgical drains were prospectively removed on postoperative day 4 regardless of drain fluid amylase level in 364 study-eligible patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients were classified according to drain fluid amylase on postoperative day 1: 281 patients with drain fluid amylase <4,000 U/L, and 83 patients with drain fluid amylase ≥4,000 U/L.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 40 of 364 enrolled patients (11.0%). In the entire cohort, male, positive postoperative day 1 drain fluid culture, and postoperative day 1 drain fluid amylase ≥4,000 U/L were independent risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after early drain removal. When stratifying by 4,000 U/L of postoperative day 1 drain fluid amylase, the rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in postoperative day 1 drain fluid amylase <4,000 U/L was significantly lower than that in postoperative day 1 drain fluid amylase ≥4,000 U/L (4% vs 35%, P < .001) after early drain removal. Moreover, in postoperative day 1 drain fluid amylase <4,000 U/L, positive postoperative day 1 drain fluid culture did not develop clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after early drain removal. However, in postoperative day 1 drain fluid amylase ≥4,000 U/L, multivariate analysis clarified that positive postoperative day 1 drain fluid culture was the only independent risk factor of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after early drain removal (odds ratio 26.27, 95% confidence interval 5.59-123.56, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Positive drain fluid culture on postoperative day 1 might predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in early drain removal with a higher drain fluid amylase.

Minimally invasive pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: multi-institutional step by step video description of the technique

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is attracting increased interest in the pancreatic surgical community with more and more teams reporting their experience worldwide. The pancreatic anastomosis (PA) is one of the key steps and challenging manoeuvre of this procedure. Since the introduction of the minimally invasive approach for PD, several PA types have been proposed, ranging from high to low complexity, but none of them have been proven unequivocally superior to the others. Therefore, definitive consensus has not been reached yet. In the present multimedia manuscript, we report the most commonly adopted minimally invasive PA and we propose a "complexity classification" to guide the choice accordingly to different characteristics of the pancreatic stump. We describe five possible different PA that might be tailored to each different case, depending mainly on texture of pancreatic stump (soft/hard, lean/fatty) and the size and visibility of main duct. This manuscript presents a step-by-step portfolio of the most commonly used mini-invasive PA. This technique requires experience in pancreatic surgery and advanced minimally invasive skills. Knowledge of and proficiency in different types of PA could help reducing the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Comparisons of short-term outcomes of anastomotic methods of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy: out-layer continuous suture versus modified Blumgart method

Purpose

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most troublesome complication after pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of 2 different methods of duct-to-mucosa PJ; out-layer continuous suture anastomosis (OCA) and the modified Blumgart method (mBM).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent curative-intent, open PD between 2015 and 2020. In mBM, 2 transpancreatic U-sutures were performed between the pancreatic margin and jejunum, with reinforced sutures in the central region. Patient demographics, diagnosis, intraoperative factors, postoperative complications, and POPF defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula were investigated. Clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) included grades B and C POPF.

Results

A total of 184 patients underwent OCA, and 96 patients underwent mBM. The mBM group had more patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy. The fistula risk scores were comparable between the 2 groups. Both groups showed no significant differences in CR-POPF and overall surgical complication rates. The total operation time was comparable, although the operation time for PJ was shorter in mBM.

Conclusion

No significant differences were observed in the postoperative outcomes between each group; the operation time for PJ in mBM was shorter. Therefore, mBM may be considered for utilization in duct-to-mucosa PJ.

Clinical Implications of Postoperative Hyperamylasemia after Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Introduction

The present study aimed to examine the clinical implications of postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

Data from all consecutive patients undergoing PD were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and reviewed. POH was defined as an elevation of serum pancreatic amylase above the upper limit of normal (53 U/L) on postoperative days 0-2. Clinically relevant POH (cr-POH) was defined as POH in patients with clinically relevant (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) postoperative complications.

Results

POH occurred in 61 of 170 (35.9%) and cr-POH in 24 of 170 (14.1%) patients. Patients with POH had higher rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (cr-POPF) (44.3 vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001) and clinically relevant postoperative complications than those without POH (39.3 vs. 21.1%, p = 0.001). Patients with cr-POH had higher C-reactive protein (CRP, milligrams per liter) levels on third (257.7 vs. 187.85 mg/L, p = 0.016) and fourth (222.5 vs. 151, p = 0.002) postoperative day (POD) than those with POH alone. Serum procalcitonin (PCT, micrograms per liter) levels on POD 2 (1.2 vs. 0.4 μg/L, p = 0.028) and POD 3 (0.85 vs. 0.4 μg/L, p = 0.001) were also higher in patients with cr-POH. Rates of cr-POPF in patients with cr-POH were higher than in those with POH alone (70.8 vs. 27%, p = 0.001). POH (OR 0.011, 95% CI: 0.001-0.097, p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of cr-POPF in the multivariable analysis. A high-risk pathology, defined as nonadenocarcinoma/nonchronic pancreatitis pathology (OR 0.277, 95% CI: 0.106-0.727, p = 0.009), and a small duct diameter (OR 0.333, 95% CI: 0.139-0.796, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of POH in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

POH is a frequent, but not always clinically relevant, finding after partial PD. Serum CRP and PCT levels in the early postoperative period can be used to identify patients with cr-POH. POH is an independent risk factor for increased postoperative morbidity, including cr-POPF, after partial PD.

Complications of modern pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the past decades, the perioperative management of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has undergone major changes worldwide. This review aimed to systematically determine the burden of complications of PD performed in the last 10 years.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted in PubMed for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting postoperative complications in at least 100 PDs from January 2010 to April 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool for randomized studies and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Pooled complication rates were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

A total of 20 randomized and 49 observational studies reporting 63 229 PDs were reviewed. Mean MINORS score showed a high risk of bias in non-randomized studies, while one quarter of the randomized studies were assessed to have high risk of bias. Pooled incidences of 30-day mortality, overall complications and serious complications were 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.9%; I² = 95.4%), 54.7% (95% CI: 46.4%-62.8%; I² = 99.4%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 21.8%-29.4%; I²= 92.9%), respectively. Clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk was 14.3% (95% CI: 12.4%-16.3%; I² = 92.0%) and mean length of stay was 14.8 days (95% CI: 13.6-16.1; I² = 99.3%). Meta-regression partially attributed the observed heterogeneity to the country of origin of the study, the study design and the American Society of Anesthesiologists class.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled complication rates estimated in this study may be used to counsel patients scheduled to undergo a PD and to set benchmarks against which centers can audit their practice. However, cautious interpretation is necessary due to substantial heterogeneity.

Reproduction of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in a robotic environment: a simple clipless technique

BACKGROUND

Although modified Blumgart anastomosis (MBA) in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been accepted as a simple and safe procedure that provides non-inferior surgical outcomes compared to open MBA, the details of the standardization of robotic MBAs have never been established. In this report, we detail the technical tips to reproduce MBA in the robotic environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January to December in 2021, 16 patients underwent our novel robotic MBA technique, which included clipless Blumgart suture and duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. To simplify the manipulation of sutures in robotic environment, short double-armed sutures in 15 cm length were created and used for Blumgart suture. Duct-to-mucosa anastomosis were done by 5-0 monofilament of 6 cm length. These tips enabled clipless anastomosis and minimized the burden of the patient-side assistant. Surgical and short-term outcomes were compared between patients with robotic MBA (Robo group) and those who underwent open MBA during 2021 (32 patients, Open group).

RESULTS

The median operation time was significantly longer in the Robo group than in the Open group (551 vs. 485.5 min, P = 0.0027). Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Robo group than in the open group (95 vs. 355 mL, P < 0.0002). The median duration of clipless MBA in the Robo group was 56 (46-68) min. The incidence of POPF (grade B or C) was not significantly different among the groups (19% vs. 22%, P = 0.71). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Robo group than in the Open group (18 vs. 24 days, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Clipless MBA in a robotic environment was safely performed with acceptable short-term outcomes and can be proposed as a standard technique for robotic pancreatojejunostomy.

Simulation training of laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy and stepwise training program on a 3D-printed model

AIM

Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy is among the most difficult and high-risk operations. Surgeons with low or moderate seniority rarely are allowed to perform this surgery in clinics. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a reliable simulation training model focused on laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy and an effective stepwise training program.

METHODS

Surgeons with different working experiences or exposure to different training programs at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital were divided into four groups. Each was required to perform laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy using a designed three-dimensional dry lab model. All surgeons' baseline characteristics and surgical performance, including operation time and score, were recorded and analysed. The authenticity of the model was evaluated by four senior surgeons.

RESULTS

The surgeon group with higher seniority had an older average age, longer working time, and had completed more laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration procedures. Meanwhile, the surgeon group with higher seniority presented better operation performance, including shorter operation time and higher operation score in their initial simulation training. Resident surgeons who underwent stepwise training with the laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis training program showed better initial performance than resident surgeons who underwent stepwise training with the laparoscopic basic suture training program. After repeated training, the surgeons showed improved surgical performance.

CONCLUSION

Our pancreaticojejunostomy model showed a good degree of discernibility, as surgeons with more experience performed better with the model for their initial simulation training in laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy. Stepwise training of the laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis training program helped surgeons obtain a better initial performance, and repeated simulation training on this model improved the surgeon's operative performance.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Clinical Trial Comparing Cattell-Warren and Blumgart Anastomoses Following Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy: PANasta Trial

Whether a Blumgart anastomosis (BA) is superior to Cattell-Warren anastomosis (CWA) in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Importance

Complications driven by POPF following pancreatic cancer resection may hinder adjuvant therapy, shortening survival. BA may reduce complications compared to CWA, improving the use of adjuvant therapy and prolonging survival.

Methods

A multicenter double-blind, controlled trial of patients undergoing resection for suspected pancreatic head cancer, randomized during surgery to a BA or CWA, stratified by pancreatic consistency and duct diameter. The primary end point was POPF, and secondary outcome measures were adjuvant therapy use, specified surgical complications, quality of life, and survival from the date of randomization. For a 10% POPF reduction, 416 patients were required, 208 per arm (two-sided α = 0·05; power = 80%).

Results

Z-score at planned interim analysis was 0.474 so recruitment was held to 238 patients; 236 patients were analyzed (112 BA and 124 CWA). No significant differences in POPF were observed between BA and CWA, odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) 1·04 (0.58-1.88), P = 0.887, nor in serious adverse events. Adjuvant therapy was delivered to 98 (62%) of 159 eligible patients with any malignancy; statistically unrelated to arm or postoperative complications. Twelve-month overall survival, hazard ratio (95% CI), did not differ between anastomoses; BA 0.787 (0.713-0.868) and CWA 0.854 (0.792-0.921), P = 0.266, nor for the 58 patients with complications, median (IQR), 0.83 (0.74-0.91) compared to 101 patients without complications 0.82 (0.76-0.89) (P = 0.977).

Conclusions

PANasta represents the most robust analysis of BA versus CWA to date.

Pancreatic juice outflow in pancreatojejunostomy monitoring with the inter-anastomosis drainage tube; a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula remains the biggest problem in pancreatic surgery. We have previously reported a new pancreatojejunostomy method using an inter-anastomosis drainage (IAD) suction tube with Blumgart anastomosis for drainage of the pancreatic juice leaking from the branched pancreatic ducts. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of our novel method, in pancreatojejunostomy and investigate the nature of the inter-anastomosis space between jejunal wall and pancreas parenchyma.

METHODS

This retrospectively study consist of 282 pancreatoduodenectomy cases, including 86 reconstructions via the Blumgart method plus IAD (B + IAD group) and 196 cases reconstructed using the Blumgart method alone (B group). Postoperative outcomes and the amylase value and the volume of the drainage fluids were compared between the two groups. The IAD tube was placed to collect amylase-rich fluid from the inter-anastomosis space during operative procedure between the jejunal wall and pancreatic stump.

RESULTS

The daily IAD drainage volume and the amylase level was significantly higher in patients with a soft pancreas (vs hard pancreas; 16.5 vs. 10.0 mL/day, p = 0.012; 90,900 vs. 1634 IU/L, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean amylase value of IAD collection in 86 cases of B + IAD group was 63,100 IU/L. The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula grade B and C (23.2% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.55) and the hospital stay was similar between the groups (median 17 vs. 18 days, p = 0.55). In 176 patients with soft pancreas, the incidence of pancreatic fistula grade B and C (33.3% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.67) and the hospital stay was also similar between the groups (median 22.5 vs. 21 days, p = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive effect of the IAD method observed in the pilot cases was not reproduced in the current study. IAD tube objectively demonstrated the existence of amylase-rich discharge at the anastomosis site, and countermeasures to eliminate this liquid are highly desired for preventing pancreatic fistula, especially in patients with soft pancreatic texture. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Association of a Modified Blumgart Anastomosis With the Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula and Operation Time After Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Cohort Study

Objective

To explore the association between a modified Blumgart anastomosis technique and the operative time and surgical complications.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study that analyzed the data of patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to March 2021. The primary outcome was to explore the association between the modified Blumgart anastomosis technique and operative time.

Results

A total of 282 patients were enrolled. There were 177 cases of pancreatic duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in the traditional surgery group, and 105 cases of the modified three-step Blumgart anastomosis in the modified group. There were no statistically significant differences in the general and intraoperative characteristics found between the two groups (P > 0.05). The surgical method was an independent predictor of operative time. Overall complications postsurgery were less common in the modified group than in the traditional group. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was higher in the traditional group than in the modified group (45 cases (25.4%) and 11 cases (10.5%), respectively). Fourteen cases (7.9%) in the traditional group and four case (3.8%) in the modified group had postoperative pancreatic fistula of grades B + C. The two groups had statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The results of the linear regression showed that the type of surgical method was associated with operation time (95% CI, −73.074 to −23.941, β: −0.438, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This modified three-step Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy was associated with the operation time.

Modified binding pancreaticogastrostomy vs modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumors

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreaticoenteric anastomosis is one of the technically challenging steps of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), especially during the learning curve. Despite multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, the type of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis as a risk factor for post-pancreatectomy complications is debatable. Also, the ideal technique of pancreatic reconstruction during the learning curve of laparoscopic PD has not been well studied.

AIM

To compare the short-term outcomes of modified binding pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) during learning curve of laparoscopic PD.

METHODS

The first 25 patients with resectable pancreatic or periampullary tumors who underwent laparoscopic PD with modified binding PG or modified Blumgart PJ between January 2015 and May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to compare perioperative outcomes during the same learning curve. A single layer of the full-thickness purse-string suture was placed around the posterior gastrotomy in the modified binding PG. In the modified Blumgart technique, only a single transpancreatic horizontal mattress suture was placed on either side of the pancreatic duct (total two sutures) to secure the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunum. Also, on the ventral surface, the knot is tied on the jejunal wall without going through the pancreatic parenchyma. Post pancreatectomy complications are graded as per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery criteria.

RESULTS

During the study period, modified binding PG was performed in 27 patients and modified Blumgart PJ in 29 patients. The demographic and clinical parameters of the first 25 patients included in both groups were comparable. Lower end cholangiocarcinoma and ampullary adenocarcinoma were the primary indications for laparoscopic PD in both groups (32/50, 64%). The median operative time for pancreatic reconstruction was significantly lower in the binding PG group (42 vs 58 min, P = 0.01). The clinically relevant (Grade B/C) postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was significantly more in the modified PJ group (28% vs 4%, P = 0.04). In contrast, intraluminal postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) was more in the binding PG group (32% vs 4%, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of delayed gastric emptying between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

During the learning curve of laparoscopic PD, modified binding PG reduces POPF but is associated with increased intraluminal PPH compared to PJ using the modified Blumgart technique.

Application of purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy for undilated pancreatic duct in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

To investigate the feasibility of purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy in complete laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with an undilated pancreatic duct.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 113 patients with undilated pancreatic ducts who had undergone laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy to analyze the perioperative outcomes.

Results

One hundred thirteen patients underwent successful LPD. The surgery time was 353 ± 41 min, the time required for pancreaticojejunostomy was 27 ± 5 min, and the hospital stay after surgery was 16 ± 8 days. Fifteen patients suffered postoperative complications, including twelve patients with pancreatic fistula, one with bile leakage, one with gastroparesis (complicated with abdominal infection), and one with abdominal bleeding. No perioperative death occurred.

Conclusions

Purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy is safe and feasible for patients with an undilated pancreatic duct.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01640-w.

Incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after using a defined pancreaticojejunostomy technique for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective multicenter study on 1033 patients

OBJECTIVE

This prospective multicenter study aimed to study the incidence of postoperative pancreatice fistula using a defined technique of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

BACKGROUND

PJ is a technically challenging and time-consuming procedure in LPD. Up to now, only a few small sample size studies have been reported on various PJ techniques in LPD, none of which has widely been accepted by surgeons.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent LPD using a defined technique of PJ at four institutions in China between January 2017 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Of 1045 patients, after excluding 12 patients (1.2%) due to conversion to open surgery, 1033 patients were analysed. The males comprised of 57.12% (590/1033), and females 42.88% (443/1033), with a mean age of 59.00 years. The mean ± s.d. operation time was (270.2 ± 101.8) min. The median time for PJ was 24min (IQR = 20.0-30.0). The overall incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was 12.6%, including 67 patients (6.5%) with Grade A biochemical leak, 50 patients (4.8%) with Grade B, and 13 patients (1.3%) with Grade C pancreatic fistulas. The overall incidence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥3) was 6.3% and the 30-day mortality was 2.8%.

CONCLUSION

The pancreaticojejunostomy technique for LPD was safe, simple and reproduceable with favorable clinical outcomes. However, further validations using high-quality RCTs are still required to confirm the findings of this study.

Comparison of early postoperative outcomes between omega-like duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy and conventional duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula is a life-threatening complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Omega-like duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy is a novel technique which helps reduce the risk of fistulation. This study aimed to compare early postoperative outcomes of omega-like and conventional pancreatojejunostomy.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre cohort study comparing outcomes of adult patients who underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy with conventional (CDMP) or omega-like duct-to-mucosa pancreatojejunostomy (ODMP) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. The primary outcome measure was the pancreatic fistula rate.

RESULTS

440 patients were included in this study of whom 233 underwent CDMP and 207 ODMP. The rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) was significantly higher after CDMP than ODMP (18.5% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.021). 153 patients in CDMP group and 99 patients in ODMP group developed one or more complications (65.7% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.004). The average hospitalization expenses were numerically decreased in ODMP group, although this was not statistically significant (120,000 ± 42,000 [Chinese Yuan] vs. 100,000 ± 40,000 [Chinese Yuan] or 18,581 ± 6503 [United States Dollar] vs. 15,484 ± 6194 [United States Dollar], P = 0.402).

CONCLUSION

ODMP may reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula and other early postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy reduced the rate of clinically related pancreatic fistula: a historic cohort comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

A novel procedure called shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy (SMP) was developed, for the reconstruction of the pancreatic stump which has a theoretical advantage for anastomosis healing and wide applicability.

METHODS

A comparative study of the patients who underwent SMP (SMP cohort) and those who underwent end-to-end dunking pancreaticojejunostomy (historic cohort) at Peking University Third Hospital was conducted. Each group was analyzed for the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and morbidities.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological data of 151 patients from the SMP cohort and 82 patients from the historic cohort were analyzed. In the SMP group, the rate of CR-POPF was 7.3% (11/151), which was significantly lower than the rate of CR-POPF in the historic group as 19.5% (16/82) (P = 0.005). The primary results were unaffected by sensitivity analyses based on several risk factors for CR-POPF. The rates of morbidities besides CR-POPF were 15.9% (24/151) in the SMP group and 17.1% (14/82) in the historic cohort (P = 0.194). The principal results were not changed by the propensity score matched (PSM) analysis.

CONCLUSION

SMP is a safe and simple surgical procedure for the reconstruction of the pancreatic stump compared with end-to-end dunking pancreticojejunostomy.

Application analysis of omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (175 cases)

Background

To explore the application value of free omental wrapping and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

The clinical data of 175 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. In total, 86 cases were divided into Group A (omental wrapping and modified pancreaticojejunostomy) and 89 cases were divided into Group B (control group). The incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications were compared between the two groups, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula. Risk factors associated with postoperative overall survival were identified using Cox regression.

Results

The incidences of grade B/C pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, delayed bleeding, and reoperation in Group A were lower than those in Group B, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Group A had an earlier drainage tube extubation time, earlier return to normal diet time and shorter postoperative hospital stay than the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) inflammatory factors 1, 3 and 7 days after surgery also showed significant. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24, pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm, no isolation of the greater omental flap and modified pancreaticojejunostomy were independent risk factors for pancreatic fistula (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that age ≥ 65 years old, body mass index ≥ 24, pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm, no isolation of the greater omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy, and malignant postoperative pathology were independent risk factors associated with postoperative overall survival (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Wrapping and isolating the modified pancreaticojejunostomy with free greater omentum can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and related complications, inhibit the development of inflammation, and favourably affect prognosis.

Duct-to-mucosa versus other types of pancreaticojejunostomy for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a common and serious complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy has been used in many centers to reconstruct pancreatic digestive continuity following pancreatoduodenectomy, however, its efficacy and safety are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy versus other types of pancreaticojejunostomy for the reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity in participants undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, and to compare the effects of different duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy techniques.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library (2021, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to 9 January 2021), Embase (1988 to 9 January 2021), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1982 to 9 January 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with other types of pancreaticojejunostomy (e.g. invagination pancreaticojejunostomy, binding pancreaticojejunostomy) in participants undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. We also included RCTs that compared different types of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in participants undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified the studies for inclusion, collected the data, and assessed the risk of bias. We performed the meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For all analyses, we used the random-effects model. We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs involving a total of 1696 participants in the review. One RCT was a dual-center study; the other 10 RCTs were single-center studies conducted in: China (4 studies); Japan (2 studies); USA (1 study); Egypt (1 study); Germany (1 study); India (1 study); and Italy (1 study). The mean age of participants ranged from 54 to 68 years. All RCTs were at high risk of bias. Duct-to-mucosa versus any other type of pancreaticojejunostomy We included 10 RCTs involving 1472 participants comparing duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with invagination pancreaticojejunostomy: 732 participants were randomized to the duct-to-mucosa group, and 740 participants were randomized to the invagination group after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Comparing the two techniques, the evidence is very uncertain for the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C; RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.26; 7 studies, 1122 participants; very low-certainty evidence), postoperative mortality (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.49; 10 studies, 1472 participants; very low-certainty evidence), rate of surgical reintervention (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.95; 10 studies, 1472 participants; very low-certainty evidence), rate of postoperative bleeding (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.42; 9 studies, 1275 participants; very low-certainty evidence), overall rate of surgical complications (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.36; 5 studies, 750 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and length of hospital stay (MD -0.41 days, 95% CI -1.87 to 1.04; 4 studies, 658 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The studies did not report adverse events or quality of life outcomes. One type of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy versus a different type of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy We included one RCT involving 224 participants comparing duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy using the modified Blumgart technique with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy using the traditional interrupted technique: 112 participants were randomized to the modified Blumgart group, and 112 participants were randomized to the traditional interrupted group after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Comparing the two techniques, the evidence is very uncertain for the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C; RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.61 to 3.75; 1 study, 210 participants; very low-certainty evidence), postoperative mortality (there were no deaths in either group; 1 study, 210 participants; very low-certainty evidence), rate of surgical reintervention (RR 1.93, 95% CI 0.18 to 20.91; 1 study, 210 participants; very low-certainty evidence), rate of postoperative bleeding (RR 2.89, 95% CI 0.12 to 70.11; 1 study, 210 participants; very low-certainty evidence), overall rate of surgical complications (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.51; 1 study, 210 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and length of hospital stay (15 days versus 15 days; 1 study, 210 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report adverse events or quality of life outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy compared to invagination pancreaticojejunostomy on any of the outcomes, including rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C), postoperative mortality, rate of surgical reintervention, rate of postoperative bleeding, overall rate of surgical complications, and length of hospital stay. The evidence is also very uncertain whether duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy using the modified Blumgart technique is superior, equivalent or inferior to duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy using the traditional interrupted technique. None of the studies reported adverse events or quality of life outcomes.

Effect of Modified Blumgart Anastomosis on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgeons continue to be concerned about complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula. Among the factors that cause postoperative pancreatic fistula, the pancreaticojejunostomy technique has stood out in recent studies. In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, especially POPF, of the modified Blumgart and the traditional anastomosis techniques in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

A total of 144 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were divided into 2 groups according to the performed pancreaticojejunostomy technique (modified Blumgart anastomosis, n = 91 and traditional anastomosis, n = 53). Preoperative clinicodemographic data, perioperative findings, and postoperative results were compared between the groups. Additionally, factors associated with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula were analyzed.

RESULTS

The modified Blumgart anastomosis group had lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate than traditional anastomosis group (n = 8 (8.8%) versus n = 14 (26.4%), P = .005). On the contrary, the biochemical leakage rate was higher in the modified Blumgart anastomosis group (n = 30 (33%) versus n = 9 (17%), P = .037). While postoperative pancreatic fistula-related reoperation rate was lower (n = 2 (2.2%) versus n = 7 (13.2%), P = .013), the length of hospital stay was also shorter (11 days (5-47 days) versus 21 days (6-46 days), P < .001) in the modified Blumgart anastomosis group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that modified Blumgart anastomosis was an independent and negative predictive factor for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio = 0.274, 95% confidence interval = 0.103-0.728, P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the traditional anastomosis, modified Blumgart anastomosis decreases the rate of transition from biochemical leakage to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatic fistula-related reoperation and also shortens the length of hospital stay. In addition, modified Blumgart anastomosis is an independent and negative predictive factor for the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.

What is the pancreatic duct size limit for a safe duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A retrospective study

Backgrounds/Aims

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains a dreadful complication. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (DTMPJ) is a commonly performed anastomosis after PD. This study aims to evaluate whether there is a size limit of pancreatic duct below which POPF rate increases significantly after DTMPJ.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed from a database with prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing DTMPJ.

Results

Between the years 2003 and 2019, a total of 288 patients with DTMPJ were recruited. POPF occurred in 56.3% of the patients, of which 43.8% were biochemical leak, 8.7% were grade B, and 1.4% were grade C. Overall operative morbidity was 51.4%, of which 19.1% were major complications. Five patients (1.7%) died within 90 days of operation. Patients with grade B/C POPF had significantly soft pancreas (p < 0.001), smaller duct size (p = 0.031), and a diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas (p = 0.027). When a clinically significant POPF rate was analysed based on the pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic duct size ≤ 1 mm had the highest POPF rate (35.7%). There was a significant difference in POPF rate between adjacent ductal diameter ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm to 2 mm (35.7% vs 13.3%; p = 0.040). Multivariable analysis showed that for the soft pancreas, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 1 mm was the only significant predictive factor for POPF (p = 0.027).

Conclusions

DTMPJ can be safely performed for pancreatic duct > 1 mm without significantly increased POPF risk.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy With Delayed Division of the Pancreatic Parenchyma: A Novel Technique for Reducing Pancreatic Fistula

Objectives

To review our novel technique of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) with delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

Background

The high operative morbidity and mortality rates after HPD remains a major issue. One of the most troublesome complications is POPF, which might possibly be caused by peripancreatic saponification due to long interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction, as most surgeons prefer a caudocranial approach, performing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) first and then hepatectomy (conventional HPD [C-HPD]).

Methods

A review of the patients undergoing C-HPD and HPD with DDPP was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors of POPF after HPD.

Results

One-hundred two patients comprised of 50 patients undergoing C-HPD and 52 patients undergoing HPD with DDPP. The interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction was significantly shorter in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (51 vs 263 minutes; P < 0.001). The incidence of POPF was significantly lower in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (32.7% vs 77.3%; P < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing HPD with DDPP than in those undergoing C-HPD (32 vs 45 days). A multivariate analysis revealed that body mass index >24 kg/m2 and conventional (PD first) procedure were significant risk factors for POPF after HPD.

Conclusions

A novel technique of HPD with DDPP is a simple procedure and the optimal treatment choice to reduce the risk of developing POPF after this extensive surgery.

Effect of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy on nutritional status in elderly patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy on the nutritional status in elderly patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Fifty-eight elderly patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital were evenly divided into the traditional group (receiving traditional Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy) and the modified group (receiving modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy).

RESULTS

In the modified group, intraoperative blood loss and 24-h VAS score were lower and time to off-bed activity and postoperative hospital stay were shorter than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). The levels of d-lactic acid, diamine oxidase, and endotoxin were increased after surgery and were higher in the modified group than those in the traditional group, while the digestive symptoms and cancer pain scores at 6 months after surgery and postoperative complication rate were lower than those of the traditional group (all P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction was higher in the modified group than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). The nutritional status, pancreatic endocrine function and pancreatic exocrine function showed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy can reduce the pain level, expedite postoperative rehabilitation, and improve the intestinal mucosal barrier function and quality of life of patients while not significantly affecting postoperative nutritional status and pancreatic function.

A preserved pancreatic exocrine function after pancreatectomy may be a crucial cause of pancreatic fistula: paradoxical results of the 13C-trioctanoin breath test in the perioperative period

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the association between pancreatic fistula (PF) and the sequential changes in the perioperative exocrine function after pancreatectomy.

METHODS

The subjects were 96 patients who underwent a ¹³C-trioctanoin breath test before and 1 month after pancreatectomy, between 2006 and 2018. We retrospectively compared the pre- and postoperative fat absorption levels between patients with PF (PF group; n = 17) and without PF (non-PF group; n = 79) using the breath test.

RESULTS

The preoperative level of ¹³C-trioctanoin absorption (%dose/h) was comparable between the non-PF and PF groups (36.5 vs. 36.9). In the non-PF group, ¹³C-trioctanoin absorption was significantly decreased after surgery in comparison to the preoperative setting (post-operative 28.5; pre-operative 36.5; p < 0.0001), whereas these values were comparable (post-operative 36.9; pre-operative 34.5; p = 0.129) in the PF group. Moreover, postoperative absorption in the PF group was significantly better than that in the non-PF group (34.5 vs. 28.5%, p = 0.0003). The maximum drain amylase level was significantly higher in patients with a ¹³C-trioctanoin absorption level (%dose/h) of ≥ 30 in comparison to patients with levels of < 30 (2502 vs. 398 U/L, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PF did not exacerbate the pancreatic exocrine function in the early postoperative period, and the acceleration or preservation of the exocrine function after surgery may be an important cause of PF.

Successful outcome of retrograde pancreatojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis and infected pancreatic cysts: A case report

BACKGROUND

Chronic pancreatitis occasionally requires surgical treatment that can be performed with various techniques. Often, this type of surgery presents with postoperative complications. We report a case of a successful retrograde pancreatojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis and infected pancreatic cysts.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old male with a 10-year history of chronic pancreatitis presented with epigastric pain for one week and a 20 kg weight loss over one year. Computed tomography showed stones in the pancreas (mainly the head), expansion of the main pancreatic duct, and thinning of the pancreatic parenchyma. Magnetic resonance imaging showed infected pancreatic cysts connected to the stomach with a fistula from the splenic hilum to the caudal portion of the liver’s lateral segment. An endoscopic retrograde pancreatography was performed; the guide wires could not pass through the stones in the pancreas and therefore, drainage of the main pancreatic duct was not achieved. Next, a distal pancreatomy and splenectomy were performed; however, the pancreatic juice in the remaining parenchyma was blocked by the stones. Hence, we performed a retrograde pancreatojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. The patient had no postoperative complications and was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 14.

CONCLUSION

A distal pancreatomy, retrograde pancreatojejunostomy, and Roux-en-Y anastomosis could be an effective surgical procedure for intractable chronic pancreatitis.

The standardized technique and surgical video of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Chinese PLA General Hospital

The technical complexity of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and lack of technical surgical standardization have slowed its widespread application. RPD is only routinely performed in a few highly specialized centers. This study describes in detail the standard steps and core techniques of an experienced robotic center in China. We took advantage of our single experience to provide a step-by-step technique and surgical video of our RPD standardized procedure. We divided RPD into 18 key steps. Demographics and perioperative outcomes of consecutive 20 patients who underwent the RPD standardized procedure were analyzed. For the 20 consecutive patients, the mean operative time was 253.6 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 210.0 mL. One patient required conversion to laparotomy due to the need for PV reconstruction. One patient had grade 3 complication. The median postoperative hospital stay was 11.0 days. No 90-day mortality was observed. By simplifying and optimizing the surgical techniques, the RPD procedure can be standardized and modeled to improve feasibility and repeatability.

[Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with Segmental Portal Vein Resection]

INTRODUCTION

Pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy is a complex visceral operation, especially when simultaneous resection and reconstruction of the portal venous axis is necessary. Pancreatic anastomosis plays a decisive role in this procedure, since postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a frequent complication, with serious consequences (morbidity and mortality) for the affected patient. Various techniques are available for anastomosing the residual pancreas: the duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, invaginating pancreatojejunostomy, Blumgart anastomosis and pancreatogastrostomy.

INDICATION

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head with portal vein infiltration.

PROCEDURE

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with portal vein resection.

CONCLUSION

A standardised and structured approach to pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy helps the surgeon to perform this procedure safely. Performing a simultaneous portal vein resection increases the complexity of the procedure, but nonetheless, if infiltration of the portal venous axis is suspected, the indication for en-bloc resection should be given generously, as intraoperatively it is not possible to differentiate reliably between inflammatory adherence and tumour infiltration and portal vein/V.-mesenterica-superior-resection does not increase morbidity and mortality. The choice of the surgical technique for anastomosing the residual pancreas should be made by the surgeon on the basis of his expertise and, if necessary, adapted to the patient's situs, since the most important pancreatic anastomosis techniques appear to be equivalent according to the current evidence.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A review of recent paradigms and advances in epidemiology, clinical diagnosis and management

Pancreatic cancer is one of the dreaded malignancies for both the patient and the clinician. The five-year survival rate of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) is as low as 2% despite multimodality treatment even in the best hands. As per the Global Cancer Observatory of the International Agency for Research in Cancer estimates of pancreatic cancer, by 2040, a 61.7% increase is expected in the total number of cases globally. With the widespread availability of next-generation sequencing, the entire genome of the tumors is being sequenced regularly, providing insight into their pathogenesis. As invasive PDA arises from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and mucinous neoplasm and intraductal papillary neoplasm, screening for them can be beneficial as the disease is curable with resection at an early stage. Routine preoperative biliary drainage has no role in patients suffering from PDA with obstructive jaundice. If performed, metallic stents are preferred over plastic ones. Minimally invasive procedures are preferred to open procedures as they have less morbidity. The duct-to-mucosa technique for pancreaticojejunostomy is presently widely practiced. The role of intraperitoneal drains after surgery for PDA is controversial. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been proven to have a significant role both in locally advanced as well as in resectable PDA. Many new regimens and drugs have been added in the arsenal of chemoradiotherapy for metastatic disease. The roles of immunotherapy and gene therapy in PDA are being investigated. This review article is intended to improve the understanding of the readers with respect to the latest updates of PDA, which may help to trigger new research ideas and make better management decisions.

Previous upper abdominal surgery is a risk factor for nasogastric tube reinsertion after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy without subsequent nasogastric tube management has not been widely adopted due to delayed gastric emptying, the specific and frequent morbidity associated with this surgical procedure. We assessed the feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy without use of nasogastric tubes and the risk factors for subsequent nasogastric tube reinsertion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 465 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution between 2010 and 2019. Primary endpoint was the rate of nasogastric tube reinsertion. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors of nasogastric tube reinsertion and delayed gastric emptying.

RESULTS

The rate of nasogastric tube reinsertion was 10.1% (47/465). The rate of delayed gastric emptying was 9.5% (44/465). Logistic regression analysis identified 4 independent risk factors for nasogastric tube reinsertion: male sex (odds ratio = 4.42; 95% confidence interval 1.50-13.0, P = .007), comorbidity of cardiac ischemia (odds ratio = 3.04; 95% confidence interval 1.05-8.79, P = .041), preoperative cholangitis or cholecystitis (odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval 1.02-4.76, P = .044), and previous upper abdominal surgery (odds ratio = 8.34; 95% confidence interval 3.07-22.7, P < .001). Independent risk factors for delayed gastric emptying were male sex (odds ratio = 3.20; 95% confidence interval 1.11-9.21, P = .031), comorbidity of cardiac ischemia (odds ratio = 3.81; 95% confidence interval 1.34-10.8, P = .012), concomitant organ resection (odds ratio = 3.99; 95% confidence interval 1.10-14.4, P = .035), and previous upper abdominal surgery (odds ratio = 7.21; 95% confidence interval 2.68-19.4, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy without use of nasogastric tubes is feasible, but patients with previous upper abdominal surgery require careful postoperative nasogastric tube management.

Decision points in pancreatoduodenectomy: Insights from the contemporary experts on prevention, mitigation, and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula

BACKGROUND

Despite abundant, high-level scientific evidence, there is no consensus regarding the prevention, mitigation, and management of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of the present investigation is three-fold: (1) to analyze the multiple decision-making points for pancreatico-enteric anastomotic creation and fistula mitigation and management after pancreatoduodenectomy, (2) to reveal the practice of contemporary experts, and (3) to indicate avenues for future research to reduce the burden of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

METHODS

A 109-item questionnaire was sent to a panel of international pancreatic surgery experts, recognized for their clinical and scientific authority. Their practice habits and thought processes regarding clinically relevant pancreatic fistula risk assessment, anastomotic construction, application of technical adjuncts, and mitigation strategies, as well as postoperative management, was explored. Sixteen clinical vignettes were presented to reveal their certain approaches to unique situations-both common and uncommon.

RESULTS

Sixty experts, with a cumulative 48,860 pancreatoduodenectomies, completed the questionnaire. Their median pancreatectomy/pancreatoduodenectomy case volume was 1,200 and 705 procedures, respectively, with a median career duration of 22 years and 200 indexed publications. Although pancreatico-jejunostomy reconstruction with transperitoneal drainage is the standard operative approach for most authorities, uncertainty emerges regarding the employment of objective risk stratification and adaptation of practice to risk. Concrete suggestions are offered to inform decision-making in intimidating circumstances. Early drain removal is frequently embraced, while a step-up approach is unanimously invoked to treat severe clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive conceptual framework of 4 sequential phases of decision-making is proposed-risk assessment, anastomotic technique, mitigation strategy employment, and postoperative management. Basic science studies and outcome analyses are proposed for improvement.

Blumgart Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. A Comprehensive Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

The superiority of Blumgart anastomosis (BA) over non-BA duct to mucosa (non-BA DtoM) still remains under debate.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of studies comparing BA to non-BA DtoM. The primary endpoint was CR-POPF. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), reoperation rate, and length of stay (LOS) were evaluated as secondary endpoints. The meta-analysis was carried out using random effect. The results were reported as odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD), weighted mean difference (WMD), and number needed to treat (NNT).

RESULTS

Twelve papers involving 2368 patients: 1075 BA and 1193 non-BA DtoM were included. Regarding the primary endpoint, BA was superior to non-BA DtoM (RD = 0.10; 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04; NNT = 9). The multivariate ORs' meta-analysis confirmed BA's protective role (OR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.79). BA was superior to DtoM regarding overall morbidity (RD = -0.10; 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.02; NNT = 25), PPH (RD = -0.03; 95% CI -0.06 to -0.01; NNT = 33), and LOS (- 4.2 days; -7.1 to -1.2 95% CI).

CONCLUSION

BA seems to be superior to non-BA DtoM in avoiding CR-POPF.

Division of the pancreas at the neck reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Comparison of pancreatic division at the body

BACKGROUND

objectives: During laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), the optimal site for pancreatic division with consideration of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is unclear. We evaluate which site of pancreatic division, neck or body, has better outcomes after LDP.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study. LDP was performed in 102 consecutive patients between December 2009 and May 2020. After excluding 14 patients with pancreatic division at tail, 88 patients (pancreatic division at neck n = 46, at body n = 42) were included in this study. Short- and long-term outcomes after LDP were compared between pancreatic division at neck and body.

RESULTS

The pancreatic transection site was thicker at body than at neck (17.5 vs. 11.9 mm, P < 0.001), although there were no significant differences of pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct size. The Grade B/C POPF rate was significantly higher when the pancreas was divided at body than when divided at neck (21.4 vs. 6.5%, P = 0.042). We found no significant differences between pancreatic division at neck and body in residual pancreatic volume (34.0 vs. 34.8 ml, P = 0.855), incidence of new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus more than six months after LDP (P = 0.218), or body weight change (six-month: P = 0.116, one-year: P = 0.108, two-year: P = 0.195, tree-year: P = 0.131, four-year: P = 0.608, five-year: P = 0.408).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the pancreatic division at neck might reduce the Grade B/C POPF incidence after LDP, compared to division at body. A potential reason is that the pancreas at body is thicker than that at neck. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm our results.