1
|
Berns J, Rogers C, Christie B. An evidence-based review of optimal perioperative practices in minor hand surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84:203-213. [PMID: 37339545 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Like many surgical subspecialties, there have been frequent advancements and discoveries in the field of hand and upper extremity surgery. With a rapidly growing literature base, it can be difficult to remain updated on the latest recommendations. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was completed on PubMed using MeSH terms. Topics included nutrition management, anticoagulation, immunosuppressive medication management, antibiotic use, skin preparation, splinting, tourniquet use, and suture choice. Data from articles with a level of evidence 1A-3 C were included. RESULTS A total of 42 articles were identified and reviewed to provide evidence for recommendations regarding various aspects of pre-, intra-, and post-operative care. CONCLUSIONS The objective of this manuscript is to serve as a resource for evidence-based recommendations by the findings of recent evidence related to perioperative care in elective hand surgery. Additional studies are required in certain areas of the literature in order to provide stronger recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Berns
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Corianne Rogers
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Brian Christie
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Columbo JA, Scali ST, Neal D, Beach JM, Powell RJ, Sarosi G, Crippen C, Ponukumati AS, Stone DH. Postoperative Clostridium difficile infection has a differential procedure-specific association with surgical outcomes in contemporary United States practice. Surgery 2023; 173:1015-1022. [PMID: 36543732 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has made the prevention of in-hospital Clostridium difficile infection a priority. However, whether there is a differential impact of Clostridium difficile on surgical patients remains undefined. Therefore, we quantified the procedure-specific association between postoperative Clostridium difficile and surgical outcomes to define opportunities for targeted quality improvement. METHODS We studied patients undergoing major cardiac, vascular, general, or oncologic procedures using the Vizient database from 2015 to 2019. Our primary exposure was postoperative Clostridium difficile infection. Our primary outcomes were postoperative length of stay, hospitalization cost, readmission, and in-hospital mortality. We used linear and logistic regression for risk adjustment. RESULTS The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was 1.6% (n = 6,506/397,750). Patients with Clostridium difficile were older, more comorbid, and more frequently underwent urgent surgery. The median postoperative length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range: 5-11 days), and it was 66% longer among those with Clostridium difficile (P < .001). Similarly, the median hospitalization cost was $31,000 (interquartile range: $20,000-$49,000), and it was 51% greater among patients with Clostridium difficile (P < .001). Postoperative Clostridium difficile was associated with more readmissions after coronary artery bypass grafting, small bowel resection, colectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, and infrainguinal bypass (adjusted odds ratio range: 1.4-1.7), but not after open aneurysm repair, suprainguinal bypass, or esophagectomy. Clostridium difficile was associated with increased mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting, small bowel resection, colectomy, and infrainguinal bypass (adjusted odds ratio range: 1.3-2.7), but not after open aneurysm repair, suprainguinal bypass, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, or pancreatectomy. CONCLUSION Postoperative Clostridium difficile infection was differentially associated with increased length of stay, cost, readmissions, and mortality across specific procedures. This was most apparent after infrainguinal bypass, small bowel resection, colectomy, and coronary artery bypass grafting. Accordingly, a targeted Clostridium difficile reduction effort for these procedures may offer a more effective approach toward reducing infection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse A Columbo
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
| | - Salvatore T Scali
- University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Surgery, Malcolm Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL
| | - Dan Neal
- University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jocelyn M Beach
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Richard J Powell
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - George Sarosi
- University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Cristina Crippen
- University of Florida School of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | | | - David H Stone
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. https://twitter.com/dhstonemd
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sykes KJ, Gibbs H, Farrokhian N, Arthur A, Flynn J, Shnayder Y, Kakarala K, Nallani R, Smith JB, Penn J, Fassas S, Cummings E, Arambula Z, Karadaghy O, Bur AM. Pilot randomized, controlled, preoperative intervention for nutrition trial in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2023; 45:156-166. [PMID: 36250283 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several prospective studies report improved outcomes with pretreatment nutrition interventions prior to radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), but none have assessed similar interventions before surgery for HNC. METHODS POINT, a pilot randomized controlled trial, was conducted to evaluate a multimodal nutrition intervention. Patients undergoing primary surgery with free flap reconstruction for HNC were randomly assigned to the control arm or a preoperative multimodal nutrition intervention. RESULTS POINT included 49 patients. Nutrition risk scores did not change significantly for either the intervention or control group. Control patients had a significant decrease in body weight in the preoperative period (p < 0.001). Conversely, weight among intervention patients did not significantly decrease (p = 0.680). The intervention mitigated weight loss in patients with dysphagia (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative nutrition optimization shows potential to reduce weight loss normally experienced by patients with head and neck cancer prior to surgical extirpation, especially among those with subjective dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Sykes
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Heather Gibbs
- Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Nathan Farrokhian
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Anna Arthur
- Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - John Flynn
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Yelizaveta Shnayder
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Kiran Kakarala
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Rohit Nallani
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Joshua B Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Joseph Penn
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Scott Fassas
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Emily Cummings
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Zack Arambula
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Omar Karadaghy
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Andrés M Bur
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iida H, Kai T, Kuri M, Tanabe K, Nakagawa M, Yamashita C, Yonekura H, Iida M, Fukuda I. A practical guide for perioperative smoking cessation. J Anesth 2022; 36:583-605. [PMID: 35913572 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-022-03080-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The perioperative management of patients who are smokers presents anesthesiologists with various challenges related to respiratory, circulatory, and other clinical problems. Regarding 30-day postoperative outcomes, smokers have higher risks of mortality and complications than non-smokers, including death, pneumonia, unplanned tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Given the benefits of smoking cessation and the adverse effects of smoking on perioperative patient management, patients should quit smoking long before surgery. However, anesthesiologists cannot address these issues alone. The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists established guidelines in 2015 (published in a medical journal in 2017) to enlighten surgical staff members and patients regarding perioperative tobacco cessation. The primary objective of perioperative smoking cessation is to reduce the risks of adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events, wound infection, and other perioperative complications. Perioperative preparations constitute a powerful teachable moment, a "golden opportunity" for smoking cessation to achieve improved primary disease outcomes and prevent the occurrence of tobacco-related conditions. This review updates the aforementioned guidelines as a practical guide to cover the nuts and bolts of perioperative smoking cessation. Its goal is to assist surgeons, anesthesiologists, and other medical professionals and to increase patients' awareness of smoking risks before elective surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Iida
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan. .,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan. .,Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, Central Japan International Medical Center, 1-1 Kenkonomachi, Minokamo, Gifu, 505-8510, Japan.
| | - Tetsuya Kai
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Michioki Kuri
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Kumiko Tanabe
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masashi Nakagawa
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Japan
| | - Chizuru Yamashita
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yonekura
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mami Iida
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Ikuo Fukuda
- Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Smoking Cessation Working Group, Kobe, Japan.,Cardiovascular Center, Suita Tokushukai Hospital, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mbamalu O, Bonaconsa C, Nampoothiri V, Surendran S, Veepanattu P, Singh S, Dhar P, Carter V, Boutall A, Pennel T, Hampton M, Holmes A, Mendelson M, Charani E. Patient understanding of and participation in infection-related care across surgical pathways: a scoping review. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 110:123-134. [PMID: 34293491 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the existing evidence on patient understanding of and/or participation in infection-related care in surgical specialties. METHOD A scoping review of the literature was conducted. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature sources were searched using predefined search criteria for policies, guidelines, and studies in the English language. Data synthesis was done through content and thematic analysis to identify key themes in the included studies. RESULTS The initial search identified 604 studies, of which 41 (36 from high-income and five from low- and middle-income countries) were included in the final review. Most of the included studies focused on measures to engage patients in infection prevention and control (IPC) activities, with few examples of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) engagement strategies. While patient engagement interventions in infection-related care varied depending on study goals, surgical wound management was the most common intervention. AMS engagement was primarily limited to needs assessment, without follow-up to address such needs. CONCLUSION Existing evidence highlights a gap in patient participation in infection-related care in the surgical pathway. Standardization of patient engagement strategies is challenging, particularly in the context of surgery, where several factors influence how the patient can engage and retain information. Infection-related patient engagement and participation strategies in surgery need to be inclusive and contextually fit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluchi Mbamalu
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Candice Bonaconsa
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Vrinda Nampoothiri
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Surya Surendran
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Pranav Veepanattu
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Sanjeev Singh
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Puneet Dhar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Vanessa Carter
- e-Patient Scholar and Africa CDC Civil Society Champion for Antimicrobial Resistance; Healthcare Communications and Social Media, South Africa
| | - Adam Boutall
- Colorectal Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Timothy Pennel
- Chris Barnard Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mark Hampton
- Dr Matley & Partners Surgical Practice, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alison Holmes
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Marc Mendelson
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Esmita Charani
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Putting the 2019 Nutrition Recommendations for Pressure Injury Prevention and Treatment into Practice. Adv Skin Wound Care 2021; 33:462-468. [PMID: 32810059 DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000688412.05627.96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
GENERAL PURPOSE To explore the changes in the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries (CPG) nutrition recommendations and strategies for implementation. TARGET AUDIENCE This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Synthesize the current evidence regarding nutrition approaches to medical conditions, including pressure injury prevention and treatment.2. Summarize the changes and recommendations in the 2019 edition of the CPG. ABSTRACT Healthy diets provide essential nutrients needed to maintain healthy skin and prevent or manage pressure injuries. The 2019 Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries published by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance includes specific nutrition recommendations for patients with pressure injuries. The purpose of this CE/CME article is to explore the changes in the nutrition recommendations and strategies for implementation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bamba R, Wiebe JE, Ingersol CA, Dawson S, Sinha M, Cohen AC, Hartman BC, Lester ME, Hassanein AH. Do Patient Expectations of Discharge Affect Length of Stay after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction? J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 38:34-40. [PMID: 33853122 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a common method of breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) postoperative protocols have been used to optimize patient outcomes and facilitate shorter hospital stays. The effect of patient expectations on length of stay (LOS) after DIEP has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patient expectations affect LOS. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2020. All patients were managed with the same ERAS protocol. Patients were divided in Group I (early expectations) and Group II (standard expectations). Group I patients had expectations set for discharge postoperative day (POD) 2 for unilateral DIEP and POD 3 for bilateral DIEP. Group II patients were given expectations for POD 3 to 4 for unilateral DIEP and POD 4 to 5 for bilateral. The primary outcome variable was LOS. RESULTS The study included 215 DIEP flaps (45 unilateral and 85 bilateral). The average age was 49.8 years old, and the average body mass index (BMI) was 31.4. Group I (early expectations) included 56 patients (24 unilateral DIEPs, 32 bilateral). Group II (standard expectations) had 74 patients (21 unilateral, 53 bilateral). LOS for unilateral DIEP was 2.9 days for Group I compared with 3.7 days for Group II (p = 0.004). Group I bilateral DIEP patients had LOS of 3.5 days compared with 3.9 days for Group II (p = 0.02). Immediate timing of DIEP (Group I 42.9 vs. Group II 52.7%) and BMI (Group I 32.1 vs. Group II 30.8) were similar (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION Our study found significantly shorter hospital stay after DIEP flap for patients who expected an earlier discharge date despite similar patient characteristics and uniform ERAS protocol. Patient expectations should be considered during patient counseling and as a confounding variable when analyzing ERAS protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravinder Bamba
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jordan E Wiebe
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Christopher A Ingersol
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Steven Dawson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mithun Sinha
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Adam C Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Community Health Network, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Brett C Hartman
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mary E Lester
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Aladdin H Hassanein
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andrade EG, Guerra JJ, Punch L. A Multi-Modal Approach to Closing Exploratory Laparotomies Including High-Risk Wounds. Cureus 2020; 12:e9087. [PMID: 32789037 PMCID: PMC7417030 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparotomy incisions with contamination have a high incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). One strategy to reduce SSI has been to allow these wounds to heal by secondary intention; however, this results in an ongoing need for wound care after discharge. Methods A prospectively maintained Acute and Critical Care Surgery database was queried for patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy during 2008-2018. Patients were stratified into two groups: 2008-2015 (no protocol [NP]) and 2016-2018 (closure protocol [CP]). CP patients were operated on by a single surgeon utilizing a multi-modal high-risk incisional closure protocol, which included dilute chlorhexidine lavage, closed suction drains for incisions deeper than 3 centimeters, and incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines were used to determine wound classification and SSI based on chart review. Groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results A total of 139 patients met the study criteria. The overall SSI rate, including superficial and deep space infections, was no different in NP versus CP (21.6 vs. 24.1%; p=0.74). The rate of superficial SSI was similar between NP and CP (11.8 vs. 8.4%; p=0.53). Rates of wound closure at discharge were higher in the CP group than the NP group across wound classes, with the greatest difference among dirty wounds (50.0% NP vs. 94.9% CP; p<0.01). CP significantly increased the likelihood of wound closure (OR=179.2; p<0.001) even after controlling for body mass index, wound classification, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status, and initially open abdomen. Conclusions By addressing both tissue factors and bacterial burden through the use of a multi-modal high-risk incisional closure protocol involving iNPWT, all wounds can be considered for closure without increasing the risk of SSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laurie Punch
- Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nagel SJ, Frizon L, Maiti T, Machado AG, Gillies GT, Helland L, Woodroffe RW, Howard MA, Wilson S. Contemporary Approaches to Preventing and Treating Infections of Novel Intrathecal Neurostimulation Devices. World Neurosurg 2019; 128:e397-e408. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
10
|
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a dismal prognosis and surgery is the only chance for cure. However, only few of the patients have localized tumor eligible for curative complete resection. Preoperative management and well-staging of the disease are the cornerstone for appropriate surgery and major issues to define the best therapeutic strategy. This review focuses on the surgical and optimal perioperative management of PDAC and summarizes updates data on the subject.
Collapse
|