Laparoscopy in Crohn Disease: Learning Curve and Current Practice. Ann Surg. 2020;271:317-324. [PMID: 30080737 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002995]

Reversal Surgery for Split Stoma with Peristomal Incision is Associated with Improved Postoperative Outcome in Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Temporary stoma formation is common in Crohn's disease (CD), while stoma reversal is associated with postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of split stoma reversal, SSR (i.e., exteriorization of proximal and distal ends of the stoma through a small common opening) and end stoma closure, ESC (i.e., the proximal stump externalized, and distal end localized abdominally.

METHODS

Patients with CD who underwent stoma reversal surgeries between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed to evaluate outcomes of reversal surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients who underwent stoma reversal surgeries met the inclusion criteria. SSR was superior to ESC in terms of operative time (80.0 vs. 120.0, p = 0.0004), intraoperative blood loss volume (20.0 vs. 100.0, p = 0.0002), incision length (3.0 vs. 15.0, p < 0.0001), surgical wound classification (0 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.04), postoperative hospital stay (7.0 vs. 9.0, p = 0.0007), hospital expense (45.6 vs. 54.2, p = 0.0003), and postoperative complications (23.8% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.0040). Although patients in the ESC group experienced more surgical recurrence than those in the SSR group (8.3% vs. 3.2%) during the follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed no statistical difference (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

The split stoma can be recommended when stoma construction is indicated in patients with Crohn's disease.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Enterography to Predict Pathological Specimen Length in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The European Crohn's and Colitis Organization guidelines have highlighted the importance of the preoperative evaluation of the affected segment length in patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease to determine the best surgical approach.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance enterography in assessing the length of the affected segment in patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease.

DESIGN

This observational study was conducted with a prospectively maintained database and retrospective analysis.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a tertiary center.

PATIENTS

This study included consecutive patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease between August 2014 and June 2020. All patients underwent a preoperative magnetic resonance enterography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The correlation between the length measured on magnetic resonance enterography and pathological examination was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included. The median time between magnetic resonance enterography and surgery was 65.5 (3-331) days. The length of the affected segment on magnetic resonance enterography was correlated with the length assessed on pathological evaluation ( R = 0.48, p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the 2 measurements when imaging was performed >6 months before surgery ( R = 0.14, p = 0.62). The presence of an abscess underestimated the length affected by Crohn's disease on imaging compared to pathology, whereas the presence of a fistula was associated with magnetic resonance enterography overestimation of the length of the affected segment.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations included single-center study and retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSION

In Crohn's disease, preoperative magnetic resonance enterography is a highly reliable tool for predicting the length of the affected segment compared to pathology examination in the absence of an abscess or fistula. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C26 .

ENTEROGRAFA POR RESONANCIA MAGNTICA PREOPERATORIA PARA PREDECIR LA LONGITUD DE MUESTRAS PATOLGICAS EN LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN

ANTECEDENTES:Las guías de la Organización Europea de Crohn y Colitis han resaltado la importancia de la evaluación preoperatoria de la longitud del segmento afectado para determinar el mejor abordaje quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:Evaluamos la precisión de la enterografía por resonancia magnética preoperatoria para evaluar la longitud del segmento afectado en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn ileocólica.DISEÑO:Realizamos un estudio observacional con una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente y un análisis retrospectivo.CONFIGURACIÓN:Este estudio se realizó en un centro terciario.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos sometidos a resección ileocólica por enfermedad de Crohn entre Agosto de 2014 y Junio de 2020. A todos los pacientes se les realizó una enterografía por resonancia magnética preoperatoria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluó la correlación entre la longitud medida en la enterografía por resonancia magnética y el examen patológico.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 96 pacientes. El tiempo mediano entre la enterografía por resonancia magnética y la cirugía fue de 65,5 (3-331) días. La longitud del segmento afectado en la enterografía por resonancia magnética se correlacionó con la longitud evaluada en la evaluación patológica ( R = 0,48, p < 0,001). No hubo correlación entre las 2 mediciones cuando las imágenes se realizaron más de 6 meses antes de la cirugía ( R = 0,14, p = 0,62). La presencia de un absceso subestimó la longitud afectada por la enfermedad de Crohn en las imágenes en comparación con la patología, mientras que la presencia de una fístula se asoció con una sobrestimación de la longitud del segmento afectado por enterografía por resonancia magnética.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyeron un estudio de un solo centro y un análisis retrospectivo.CONCLUSIÓNES:En la enfermedad de Crohn, la enterografía por resonancia magnética preoperatoria es una herramienta altamente confiable para predecir la longitud del segmento afectado en comparación con el examen de patología, en ausencia de absceso o fístula. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C26 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Temporal trends in surgery for Crohn's disease: a ten-year single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that requires surgery in many cases. The aim of this article is to present the experience of a referral center regarding surgical interventions for CD, while also exploring the transformations that have occurred over 10 years.

METHODS

The data of patients underwent abdominal surgery for CD between 2013 and 2022 were collected prospectively. Data were compared between two periods (2013-2017 and 2018-2022). Temporal trends were assessed with the Mann-Kendall trend test.

RESULTS

A total of 1059 individuals underwent 1176 surgical procedures, of which 67.1% were male. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 36.0 years, and an overall increasing trend was observed in surgical volume (z = 3.04; p = 0.002). The proportion of patients treated with biologics increased from the first period (2013-2017) to the second (2018-2022), rising from 19.2% to 33.5% (p < 0.001). In the second stage, the proportion of patients who underwent surgery for abscesses or fistulas increased (47.8% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.028), while the percentage of emergency surgeries declined (3.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.001). Furthermore, there was a rise in the proportion of laparoscopic surgeries (76.5% vs. 63.7%, p < 0.001), coupled with a decrease in stoma rates (15.4% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (23.0% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of biologics use in CD surgery have increased over time, and the proportion of penetrating patients has grown. Minimally invasive surgical methods have become the norm, and surgical outcomes have markedly enhanced, evidenced by a substantial reduction in both stoma rates and complication rates.

Minimally invasive surgery in Crohn's disease: state-of-the-art review

Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) has undergone significant advancements over the last two decades, especially minimally invasive surgery. In addition to its feasibility and safety, minimally invasive surgery provides manifold advantages, including a decreased hospitalization duration, improved aesthetic results, and fewer occurrences of intra-abdominal adhesions. Due to the special intraoperative characteristics of CD, such as chronic inflammation, a thickened mesentery, fistulas, abscesses and large masses, a minimally invasive approach seems to be challenging. Complete implementation of this technique for complex disease has yet to be studied. In this review, we provide a review on the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in CD and future perspectives for the technical advances in the field.

Open approach for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease in the era of minimally invasive surgery: indications and perioperative outcomes in a referral center

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the first-line approach for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease (CD), and it is safe and feasible, even with severe penetrating CD or redo surgery. While MIS indications are continually broadening, challenging CD cases might still require an open approach. This study aimed to report rate and indications for an upfront open approach in ileocolic resection for CD. Comprehensive perioperative data for all consecutive patients undergoing ileocolic resection for CD between 2014 and 2021 in a high-volume referral center for CD and MIS, were collected retrospectively. Indications for an upfront open approach were reviewed separately by two authors according to the preoperative visit. Among 319 ileocolic resections for CD, 45 (14%) were open and 274 (86%) MIS. Two or more of the below indications were present in 40 patients (89%) in the open group, while only in 6 patients (2%) in the MIS group (p < 0.0001). Indications for upfront open approach were severe penetrating disease (58%), adhesions at previous surgery (47%), history of abdominal sepsis (33%), multifocal and extensive disease (24%), abdominal wall involvement (22%), concomitant open procedures (9%), small bowel dilatation (9%), and anesthesiologic contraindications (4%). MIS was never performed in a patient with abdominal wall involvement, concomitant open procedure, and anesthesiologic contraindication to MIS. This study can help guide patients, physicians, and surgeons. An abdominal wall involvement or the presence of two of the above indications predicts a high surgical complexity and may be considered as a no-go for the MIS approach. These criteria should prompt surgeons to strongly consider an upfront open approach to optimize the perioperative planning and care of these complex patients.

Incentive Nursing can Effectively Improve the ESCA Level of Patients with Endometrial Cancer after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Objective

To investigate the effect of incentive nursing on the rehabilitation of patients with endometrial cancer after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Methods

A total of 110 patients with endometrial cancer receiving laparoscopic hysterectomy in our hospital from October 2017 to July 2020 were recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive either routine nursing (control group) or incentive nursing plus routine care (study group). Outcome measures included the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score, the exercise of self-care agency (ESCA) score, postoperative rehabilitation outcomes, the incidence of nursing complications, and nursing satisfaction.

Results

Patients receiving incentive nursing showed significantly lower SAS scores and HAMD scores, and a higher ESCA score versus patients given routine care alone (P < 0.05). Incentive care resulted in a shorter length of hospital stay and postoperative time of out-of-bed activities and exercises versus routine care (P < 0.05). Incentive care was associated with a significantly lower incidence of nursing complications and higher nursing satisfaction versus routine nursing (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Incentive nursing can effectively improve the ESCA level of patients, promote postoperative recovery, and reduce the incidence of complications, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Open versus minimally invasive small bowel resection for Crohn's disease: a NSQIP retrospective review and analysis

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with Crohn's Disease will require surgical resection. While many studies have described outcomes following ileocecectomy, few have evaluated surgical resection of other portions of small bowel. We sought to compare open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches for small bowel resection excluding ileocecectomy of patients with Crohn's Disease using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

METHODS

The NSQIP database was queried for patients with Crohn's disease or complications related to Crohn's disease who underwent segmental small bowel resection utilizing open or minimally invasive approaches between 2012 and 2018. Patients requiring ileocecectomy or diagnosed with ascites, disseminated cancer, pre-operative sepsis, ASA class 5, and patients requiring mechanical ventilation were excluded. The association of pre-operative variables including patient demographic information and comorbidities with surgical approach were examined using Fishers exact test. Intraoperative, and 30-day post-operative outcomes were compared between the groups using both univariate and multivariate logistical regression models. SAS was used for data analysis with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

After exclusions, we found 1697 patients with Crohn's disease who underwent segmental small bowel resection, 1252 of whom underwent open surgery and 445 of whom underwent MIS. After adjusting for possible confounders with multivariable analysis, patients who underwent MIS had a lower incidence of wound events (surgical site, organ space, or deep wound infection, or dehiscence), post-operative bleeding, need for return to the operating room, and shorter total hospital length of stay despite longer operative times compared with open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective review of NSQIP shows that minimally invasive small bowel resection is associated with equivalent or improved morbidity over open surgery in select patients with small bowel Crohn's Disease. We show that in select patients minimally invasive small bowel resection can be safe and performed for patients with isolated small bowel Crohn's disease.

Laparoscopic vs open surgery in ileostomy reversal in Crohn’s disease: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although minimally invasive surgery is becoming more commonly applied for ileostomy reversal (IR), there have been relatively few studies of IR for patients with Crohn's disease (CD). It is therefore important to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of laparoscopy for patients with CD.

AIM

To compare the safety, feasibility, and short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic IR (LIR) vs open IR (OIR) for the treatment of CD.

METHODS

The baseline characteristics, operative data, and short-term (30-d) and long-term outcomes of patients with CD who underwent LIR and OIR at our institution between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrieved from an electronic database and retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients enrolled in this study, LIR was performed for 48 and OIR for 12. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, days to flatus and soft diet, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, readmission rate within 30 d, length of hospitalization, hospitalization costs, or reoperation rate after IR between the two groups. However, patients in the LIR group more frequently required lysis of adhesions as compared to those in the OIR group (87.5% vs 41.7%, respectively, P < 0.05). Notably, following exclusion of patients who underwent enterectomy plus IR, OIR was more advantageous in terms of postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function and hospitalization costs.

CONCLUSION

The safety and feasibility of LIR for the treatment of CD are comparable to those of OIR with no increase in intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn's disease: Propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ileocolic resection (LICR) is the preferred surgical approach for primary ileocolic Crohn’s disease (CD) because it has greater recovery benefits than open ICR (OICR).

AIM

To compare short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent LICR and OICR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ICR for primary CD from 2006 to 2017 at a single tertiary center specializing in CD were included. Patients who underwent LICR and OICR were subjected to propensity-score matching analysis. Patients were propensity-score matched 1:1 by factors potentially associated with 30-d perioperative morbidity. These included demographic characteristics and disease- and treatment-related variables. Factors were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Long-term surgical recurrence-free survival (SRFS) in the two groups was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

During the study period, 348 patients underwent ICR, 211 by the open approach and 137 laparoscopically. Propensity-score matching yielded 102 pairs of patients. The rate of postoperative complication was significantly lower (14% versus 32%, P = 0.003), postoperative hospital stay significantly shorter (8 d versus 13 d, P = 0.003), and postoperative pain on day 7 significantly lower (1.4 versus 2.3, P < 0.001) in propensity-score matched patients who underwent LICR than in those who underwent OICR. Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative complications were significantly associated with preoperative treatment with biologics [odds ratio (OR): 3.14, P = 0.01] and an open approach to surgery (OR: 2.86, P = 0.005). The 5- and 10-year SRFS rates in the matched pairs were 92.9% and 83.3%, respectively, with SRFS rates not differing significantly between the OICR and LICR groups. The performance of additional procedures was an independent risk factor for surgical recurrence [hazard ratio (HR): 3.28, P = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

LICR yielded better short-term outcomes and postoperative recovery than OICR, with no differences in long-term outcomes. LICR may provide greater benefits in selected patients with primary CD.

Colonic Crohn’s disease – decision is more important than incision: A surgical dilemma

The most common localization for intestinal Crohn’s disease (CD) is the terminal ileum and ileocecal area. It is estimated that patients with CD have one in four chance of undergoing surgery during their life. As surgery in ulcerative colitis ultimately cures the disease, in CD, regardless of the extent of bowel removed, the risk of disease recurrence is as high as 40%. In elective surgery, management of isolated Crohn’s colitis continues to evolve. Depending on the type of surgery performed, colonic CD patients often require further medical or surgical therapy to prevent or treat recurrence. The elective surgical treatment of colonic CD is strictly dependent on the localization of disease, and the choice of the procedure is dependent of the extent of colonic involvement and previous resection. The most common surgical options in colonic CD are total proctocolectomy (TPC) with permanent ileostomy, segmental bowel resection, subtotal colectomy. TPC completely removes all colonic and rectal disease and avoids the use of a potentially diseased anus. We will review current options for the elective surgical treatment of colonic CD, based on the current literature and our own personal experience.

Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): Crohn's disease

The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a position statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of Crohn's disease management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of Crohn's disease. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.

Minimal Open Access Ileocolic Resection in Complicated Crohn's Disease of the Terminal Ileum

The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility to undertake an ileocolic resection in complex Crohn's disease using a minimal open abdominal access using standard laparoscopic instruments. The incision was carried out over the previous McBurney scar, with a mean length of 6 cm. Seventy-two patients with complicated Crohn's disease underwent IC resection in the considered period; 12 patients had a McBurney scar due to a previous appendectomy and represented the group of study. Feasibility and safety of the procedure were evaluated. Clinical data and outcome were compared with a control arm of 15 patients who had a standard laparoscopic IC resection, pooled out from our database among those who had a McBurney incision as service incision. Mean operative time and postoperative stay were significantly shorter in the study group. Blood loss and operative costs were also lower in the study group but did not reach statistical significance. Minimal open access ileocolic resection (MOAIR) through a small McBurney incision seems safe and feasible in complex Crohn's disease. Some advantages over standard laparoscopic surgery could be found in surgical outcomes and costs.

Changing trends in surgery for abdominal Crohn's disease

AIM

The introduction of biological agents and laparoscopy are, arguably, the most important developments for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) in the last two decades. Due to the efficacy of biological agents in treating mild disease, it is likely that the percentage of surgery for complex cases may have increased. The objective of this study was to analyse the changing characteristics and results of the surgical treatment of patients with CD over the past 13 years.

METHODS

All patients who underwent abdominal surgery for CD between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. Data were compared between two periods (2004-2010 and 2011-2016).

RESULTS

A total of 908 procedures were performed (48% men, mean age 43 ± 16 years). Demographic and CD characteristics changed significantly over time: comorbidities were more frequent (35% vs 46%, P < 0.0001), and preoperative steroids (28% vs 36%, P < 0.01) and anti-tumour necrosis factor (20% vs 40%, P < 0.0001) treatments were more frequently used in the second period. Smoking (14% vs 8%, P < 0.0001) and use of immunosuppressors (32% vs 22%, P < 0.001) decreased significantly. More cases of penetrating disease (22% vs 32%, P < 0.001) were operated upon in the second period. The laparoscopic approach (49% vs 57%, P < 0.04) was more frequently performed and mean blood loss (167 ± 222 vs 123 ± 243 ml, P < 0.01) decreased significantly. Postoperative morbidity did not change between the two periods.

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher incidence of comorbidities and the use of biologics postoperative morbidity remained unchanged. An increased use of laparoscopy and a decreased intra-operative blood loss may have contributed to offsetting the impact of increased comorbidity.