1
|
Huang J, Xu DW, Li XC, Li A, Zhang Y, Hu M. Laparoscopic caudate lobe resections: How I do it: tips and pitfalls (with video). Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11072-7. [PMID: 39009733 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11072-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The caudate lobe (S1) of the liver, due to its deep central position, presents a formidable challenge for laparoscopic resection. Historical skepticism about laparoscopic approaches has been overshadowed by advancements in technology and technique, with recent studies showing comparable outcomes to open surgery. METHODS This paper introduces the "Easy First" technique and the Sextet strategies for laparoscopic hepatic caudate lobectomy. The strategies include meticulous preoperative planning, optimal trocar placement, and team positioning, tailored to the anatomical complexities of the caudate lobe. RESULTS With a 0% conversion and mortality rate, our series demonstrates the safety of the "Easy First" technique. The Sextet strategies have been instrumental in navigating the technical challenges, emphasizing the importance of patient selection and surgeon expertise. CONCLUSION The "Easy First" technique, with its structured approach and the Sextet strategies, offers a replicable method for laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. It underscores the need for stringent patient selection, advanced technical skill, and high-volume center expertise to ensure procedural success and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Huang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China.
| | - Ding-Wei Xu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Xin-Cheng Li
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Ao Li
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Manqing Hu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Atyah MM, Xu L, Yang Z. Novel definition of textbook outcome in biliary system cancers and its influence on patients' survival and quality of life. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7186. [PMID: 38597789 PMCID: PMC11005687 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The definition of textbook outcome in biliary system cancers is a developing concept in need of expansion and investigation of its association with survival and quality of life. METHODS In this original research, we developed a novel "all or none" textbook outcome definition which addresses the rapid recovery of post-surgical indexes, in addition to short-term mortality, hospital re-admission, prolonged stay, surgical margin and postoperative complications. Based on the fulfillment of relevant criteria, patients were divided into textbook outcome and non-textbook outcome groups and their characteristics and survival data were analyzed. A customized "quality of life" questionnaire was developed to address short-term recovery and post-discharge life quality of patients. Association with quality of life improvement was then investigated. RESULTS A total of 129 patients were included. Textbook outcome was achieved in 25.58% of patients (37.04% of gallbladder cancer patients and 17.8% of cholangiocarcinoma patients). Compared to non-textbook outcome group, patients with textbook outcome had lower rate of pre-operative biliary drainage (p = 0.026), higher rate of normal preoperative liver function (p < 0.001) and tumor markers (p = 0.001), reduced perioperative bleeding (p = 0.006) and blood transfusion (p = 0.005), and higher rate of N0 stage cases (p = 0.008). Textbook outcome was also associated with enhanced survival, significantly in older patients (<65 years) (1-year survival rate: 100% vs. 78.57% (p = 0.108), 2-year survival rate: 87.5% vs. 44% (p = 0.046)). Finally, textbook outcome was significantly associated with enhanced basic daily performance (p < 0.001), social life performance (p = 0.033), and personal evaluation (p < 0.001), and thus improved quality of life (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The novel definition of textbook outcome was able to address the specific nature of recovery after resection of biliary system cancers. Expanding the scope of textbook outcome and addressing the influence on survival and quality of life provides a comprehensive concept able to reflect physical, psychological and functioning enhancements in patients recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manar Mikhail Atyah
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiying Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin X, Tan C, Wu W, Liang C, Qian F, Zhao Y. Evaluation of factors influencing long-term and textbook outcomes in laparoscopic gastrectomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108002. [PMID: 38330541 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome (TO) in gastric cancer surgery is a multidimensional measure of surgical quality. However, its impact on long-term survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate TO in LG, assess its hospital-level relevance, and examine its association with long-term survival. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 2278 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) from January 2004 to December 2017. We determined TO achievement rates, compared preoperative and intraoperative variables between TO and non-TO groups, identified independent predictors of TO, and assessed long-term oncologic outcomes using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 1540 LG patients were analyzed, with 994 (64.5%) achieving TO. The least frequently achieved metric was 'hospital stays ≤21 days' (83.4%), followed by 'lymph nodes retrieved ≥15' (84.0%). Factors independently associated with reduced TO likelihood included age ≥65 years, BMI ≥25, ASA III, conversion to open surgery, operation time ≥260 min, and estimated blood loss ≥150 ml. Furthermore, TO was independently linked to improved 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.519 [0.443-0.609] and HR 0.517 [0.443-0.604], respectively). CONCLUSION Implementing the TO concept in LG provides a benchmark for achieving improved prognoses and empowers surgeons to devise strategies for enhancing surgical care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Lin
- Institution: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China; Institution: Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chenjun Tan
- Institution: Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Weigao Wu
- Institution: Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chenglong Liang
- Institution: Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Feng Qian
- Institution: Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yongliang Zhao
- Institution: Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hołówko W, Serednicki W, Bartkowiak M, Wysocki M, Domurat M, Mielko J, Pierściński S, Hogendorf P, Masior Ł, Kalinowski P, Wierdak M, Frączek M, Tarasik A, Wróblewski T, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M, Grąt M. Early adoption of laparoscopic liver surgery in Poland: a national retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:361-371. [PMID: 37816169 PMCID: PMC10793755 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for safe and efficient dissemination of minimally invasive approach in liver surgery is among the current challenges for hepatobiliary surgeons. After the stage of innovators and pioneers, the following countries should adopt a laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to assess the national experience and trend in implementing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in Poland. MATERIALS AND METHODS A national registry of LLR performed in Poland was established in June 2020. All LLR cases performed before were included retrospectively, followed by prospectively collected new cases. Baseline characteristics, preoperative and intraoperative data, short-term results and long-term follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Since 2010 up to the end of 2022 there were 718 LLRs performed in Poland. The national rate of laparoscopic approach has gradually increased since 2017 ( P <0.001), reaching the rate of 11.7% in 2022. There were 443 (61.7%), 107 (14.9%), and 168 (23.4%) LLRs performed in accordance to increasing grades of difficulty. The move towards more demanding cases had an increasing trend over the years ( P <0.001). Total intraoperative adverse event and postoperative severe complications rates were estimated for 13.5% ( n =97) and 6.7% ( n =48), respectively. 30-day reoperation, readmission and postoperative mortality rates were 3.6% ( n =26), 2.8% ( n =20), and 0.8% ( n =6), respectively. While the R0 resection margin was assessed in 643 (89.6%) cases, the total textbook outcomes (TO) were achieved in 525 (74.5%) cases. Overcoming the learning curve of 60 LLRs, resulted in an increasing TO rate from 72.3 to 80.6% ( P =0.024). CONCLUSIONS It is the first national analysis of a laparoscopic approach in liver surgery in Poland. An increasing trend of minimizing invasiveness in liver resection has been observed. Responsible selection of cases in accordance with difficulty may provide results within global benchmark values and textbook outcomes already during the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wojciech Serednicki
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow
| | | | - Michał Wysocki
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital
| | - Marian Domurat
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Regional Oncological Center, Białystok, Poland
| | - Jerzy Mielko
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin
| | - Stanisław Pierściński
- Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Nicolaus Copernicus University Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz
| | - Piotr Hogendorf
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Łódź, Barlicki Teaching Hospital, Łódź
| | - Łukasz Masior
- Department of General Transplant and Liver Surgery
- Department of General, Vascular and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw
| | | | - Mateusz Wierdak
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow
| | - Mariusz Frączek
- Department of General, Vascular and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw
| | - Aleksander Tarasik
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Regional Oncological Center, Białystok, Poland
| | | | - Andrzej Budzyński
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital
| | - Michał Pędziwiatr
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow
| | - Michał Grąt
- Department of General Transplant and Liver Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mazzola M, Giani A, Calcagno P, Benedetti A, Zironda A, Gualtierotti M, De Martini P, Ferrari G. Pancreatojejunostomy: standing on the shoulders of giants. A single centre retrospective analysis. Updates Surg 2024; 76:97-106. [PMID: 37679576 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01643-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Gaining experience in pancreatic surgery could be demanding especially when minimally invasive approach is used. Pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) is one of the most critical steps during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Our aim was to investigate the impact of a surgeon's experience in performing PJ, especially in a subgroup of patients undergoing laparoscopic PD (LPD). Data of consecutive patients undergoing PD from 2017 to 2022 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: M group included patients in which PJ was performed by an experienced surgeon, D group included those receiving PJ by a less experienced one. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative outcomes. 187 patients were selected (157 in group M and 30 in group D). The cohorts differed in terms of median age (68 vs 74 years, p = 0.016), and previous abdominal surgery (41.4% vs 66.7%, p = 0.011), while no difference was found regarding risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The groups did not differ in terms of surgical outcomes. POPF rate was 15.9% and 10% in the M and D group (p = 0.578), respectively. Among patients undergoing laparoscopic PJ POPF rate was 16.0% and 17.7% in the M and D group (p = 0.867), respectively, without difference. No difference was found in terms of POPF in patients undergoing PD independently from the surgeon who performed the PJ, even during LPD. Moderate/high FRS, BMI > 30 kg/m2 and male sex, but not the surgeon who performed the PJ anastomosis, were independent predictors of POPF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Giani
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Calcagno
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Benedetti
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Zironda
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Gualtierotti
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo De Martini
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ratti F, Ferrero A, Guglielmi A, Cillo U, Giuliante F, Mazzaferro V, De Carlis L, Ettorre GM, Gruttadauria S, Di Benedetto F, Ercolani G, Valle RD, Belli A, Jovine E, Ravaioli M, Aldrighetti L. Ten years of Italian mini-invasiveness: the I Go MILS registry as a tool of dissemination, characterization and networking. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1457-1469. [PMID: 37488408 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01597-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Purposes of this study are to evaluate the main changes that have occurred in the Italian MILS activity in the last decade in terms of indications, approaches and outcomes as reported in the national registry and to provide specific details on the main areas of development of MILS. Data from patients undergoing minimally invasive liver resections at centers included in the I Go MILS Registry from its start-up (November 2014) to March 2023 were analyzed for the purposes of this study. The registry is intention-to-treat and prospective. Global recruitment trends stratified by indication to surgery and type of approach were analysed. 7413 MILS procedures were performed across all centers (median number of procedures per center: 63). Years (2020-2023) displayed a significantly higher proportion of treated patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (38.2% vs. 28.9% and 33.9%, p < 0.001) and cholangiocarcinoma (6.7% vs. 6.5% and 4.2%, p < 0.001) compared to the preceding triennial periods. Additionally, technical complexity demonstrated an increased prominence in Years (2019-2023) with a significantly higher percentage of grade III cases compared to the earlier periods (39.3% vs. 21.7% and 25.6%, p < 0.001). Annual case trends focusing on laparoscopic and robotic techniques demonstrated a steadily increase in the use of these techniques for complex case mix of indications. Overall, attitude and attention to MILS approach has evolved, so that currently indications to hepatic mini-invasiveness have expanded and surgical technique has been refined: Areas mainly involved in increasing growth trends are hepatocellular carcinoma, possible applications of MILS in transplant setting, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and robotic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2-Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center-IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Ramshorst TM, Edwin B, Han HS, Nakamura M, Yoon YS, Ohtsuka T, Tholfsen T, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Learning curves in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a different experience for each generation. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1648-1655. [PMID: 37144678 PMCID: PMC10389345 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Learning curves of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) are mostly based on 'self-taught' surgeons who acquired sufficient proficiency largely through self-teaching. No learning curves have been investigated for 'trained' surgeons who received training and built on the experience of the 'self-taught' surgeons. This study compared the learning curves and outcome of LDP between 'self-taught' and 'trained' surgeons in terms of feasibility and proficiency using short-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients with benign or malignant disease of the left pancreas who underwent LDP by four 'self-taught' and four 'trained' surgeons between 1997 and 2019 were collected, starting from the first patient operated by a contributing surgeon. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analyses were performed to determine phase-1 feasibility (operative time) and phase-2 proficiency (major complications) learning curves. Outcomes were compared based on the inflection points of the learning curves. RESULTS The inflection points for the feasibility and proficiency learning curves were 24 and 36 procedures for 'trained' surgeons compared to 64 and 85 procedures for 'self-taught' surgeons, respectively. In 'trained' surgeons, operative time was reduced after completion of the learning curves (230.5-203 min, P= 0.028). In 'self-taught' surgeons, operative time (240-195 min, P ≤0.001), major complications (20.6-7.8%, P= 0.008), and length of hospital stay (9-5 days, P ≤0.001) reduced after completion of the learning curves. CONCLUSION This retrospective international cohort study showed that the feasibility and proficiency learning curves for LDP of 'trained' surgeons were at least halved as compared to 'self-taught' surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess M.E. van Ramshorst
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, also Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Takao Ohtsuka
- First Department of Surgery, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Tore Tholfsen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Pawlik TM, Aldrighetti LA, Alseidi AA, Cillo U, Kokudo N, Geller DA, Wakabayashi G, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Cherqui D, Cheung TT, Clavien PA, Conrad C, D’Hondt M, Dagher I, Dervenis C, Devar J, Dixon E, Edwin B, Efanov M, Ettore GM, Ferrero A, Fondevilla C, Fuks D, Giuliante F, Han HS, Honda G, Imventarza O, Kooby DA, Lodge P, Lopez-Ben S, Machado MA, Marques HP, O’Rourke N, Pekolj J, Pinna AD, Portolani N, Primrose J, Rotellar F, Ruzzenente A, Schadde E, Siriwardena AK, Smadi S, Soubrane O, Tanabe KK, Teh CS, Torzilli G, Van Gulik TM, Vivarelli M, Wigmore SJ, Abu Hilal M. An International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS). Ann Surg 2023; 277:821-828. [PMID: 35946822 PMCID: PMC10082050 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To reach global expert consensus on the definition of TOLS in minimally invasive and open liver resection among renowned international expert liver surgeons using a modified Delphi method. BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a novel composite measure combining the most desirable postoperative outcomes into one single measure and representing the ideal postoperative course. Despite a recently developed international definition of Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS), a standardized and expert consensus-based definition is lacking. METHODS This international, consensus-based, qualitative study used a Delphi process to achieve consensus on the definition of TOLS. The survey comprised 6 surgical domains with a total of 26 questions on individual surgical outcome variables. The process included 4 rounds of online questionnaires. Consensus was achieved when a threshold of at least 80% agreement was reached. The results from the Delphi rounds were used to establish an international definition of TOLS. RESULTS In total, 44 expert liver surgeons from 22 countries and all 3 major international hepato-pancreato-biliary associations completed round 1. Forty-two (96%), 41 (98%), and 41 (98%) of the experts participated in round 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The TOLS definition derived from the consensus process included the absence of intraoperative grade ≥2 incidents, postoperative bile leakage grade B/C, postoperative liver failure grade B/C, 90-day major postoperative complications, 90-day readmission due to surgery-related major complications, 90-day/in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study providing an international expert consensus-based definition of TOLS for minimally invasive and open liver resections by the use of a formal Delphi consensus approach. TOLS may be useful in assessing patient-level hospital performance and carrying out international comparisons between centers with different clinical practices to further improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Adnan A. Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - David A. Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Horacio J. Asbun
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of surgery and transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - Christos Dervenis
- Department of Surgery, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - John Devar
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Elijah Dixon
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giuseppe M. Ettore
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Oscar Imventarza
- Department of surgery, Hospital Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of surgery, Hospital Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - David A. Kooby
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Peter Lodge
- HPB and Transplant Unit, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, HPB Unit, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Hugo P. Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nick O’Rourke
- Department of HPB Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Antonio D. Pinna
- Abdominal Transplant and HPB Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - John Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Ajith K. Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Manchester University NHS FT, Manchester, UK
| | - Sameer Smadi
- Department of Surgery, King Hussein Medical Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, APHP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Kenneth K. Tanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Catherine S.C. Teh
- Section of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Surgery, St Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Thomas M. Van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Stephen J. Wigmore
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB)/Transplant Surgery, The University of Edinburgh Clinical Surgery, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Global survey on the surgical management of patients affected by colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: impact of surgical specialty and geographic region. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09917-8. [PMID: 36879167 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09917-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus on the best surgical strategy for the management of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM) has not been achieved. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of surgeons involved in the treatment of sCRLM. METHODS Surveys designed for colorectal, hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB), and general surgeons were disseminated through representative societies. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare responses between specialties and continents. RESULTS Overall, 270 surgeons (57 colorectal, 100 HPB and 113 general surgeons) responded. Specialist surgeons more frequently utilized minimally invasive surgery (MIS) than general surgeons for colon (94.8% vs. 71.7%, p < 0.001), rectal (91.2% vs. 64.6%, p < 0.001), and liver resections (53% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.005). In patients with an asymptomatic primary, the liver-first two-stage approach was preferred in most respondents' centres (59.3%), while the colorectal-first approach was preferred in Oceania (83.3%) and Asia (63.4%). A substantial proportion of the respondents (72.6%) had personal experience with minimally invasive simultaneous resections, and an expanding role for this procedure was foreseen (92.6%), while more evidence was desired (89.6%). Respondents were more reluctant to combine a hepatectomy with low anterior (76.3%) and abdominoperineal resections (73.3%), compared to right (94.4%) and left hemicolectomies (90.7%). Colorectal surgeons were less inclined to combine right or left hemicolectomies with a major hepatectomy than HPB and general surgeons (right: 22.8% vs. 50% and 44.2%, p = 0.008; left: 14% vs. 34% and 35.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION The clinical practices and viewpoints on the management of sCRLM differ between continents, and between and within surgical specialties. However, there appears to be consensus on a growing role for MIS and a need for evidence-based input.
Collapse
|
10
|
D'Hondt M, Devooght A, Willems E, Wicherts D, De Meyere C, Parmentier I, Provoost A, Pottel H, Verslype C. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery: clinical outcomes, learning curve effect, and cost-effectiveness. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:79-88. [PMID: 35322342 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01405-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The reproducibility of the implementation of robotic liver surgery (RLS) is still debated. The aim of the present study is to evaluate short-term outcomes and cost differences during the implementation of RLS, performed by an early adopter in laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS). Patients undergoing RLS between February 2020 and May 2021 were included. Short-term outcomes of the robotic group (RG) were compared to the "Initial Phase" group (IP) of 120 LLS cases and the 120 most recent laparoscopic cases or "Mastery Phase" group (MP). A cost analysis per procedure for the three groups was performed. Seventy-one patients underwent RLS during the study period. Median operative time in the RG was comparable to the IP, but significantly shorter in the MP (140 vs 138 vs 120 min, p < 0.001). Median intraoperative blood loss in the RG was lower than in both laparoscopic groups (40 ml [20-90 ml] vs 150 ml [50-250 ml] vs 80 ml [30-150 ml], p < 0.001). Median hospital stay in the RG was significantly shorter than the IP group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication, conversion, or readmission rates. Procedural cost analysis was in favor of robotic surgery (€5008) compared to the IP (€ 6913) and the MP (€6099). Surgeons with sufficient experience in LLS can rapidly overcome the learning curve for RLS. In our experience, the short-term outcomes of the implementation phase of RLS are similar to the mastery phase of LLS. The total average cost per procedure is lower for RLS compared to LLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| | - A Devooght
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - E Willems
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - D Wicherts
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - C De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - I Parmentier
- Department of Oncology and Statistics, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - A Provoost
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - H Pottel
- Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Leuven University Campus Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - C Verslype
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fuji T, Kojima T, Kajioka H, Sakamoto M, Oka R, Katayama T, Narahara Y, Niguma T. The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1262-1273. [PMID: 36175698 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09664-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver fibrosis or cirrhosis frequently makes parenchymal transection more difficult, but the difficulty score of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), including the IWATE criteria, does not include a factor related to liver fibrosis. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate M2BPGi as a predictor of the difficulty of parenchymal transection and the incidence of postoperative complications in LLR. METHODS Data from 54 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial liver resection (LLR-P) and 24 patients who underwent laparoscopic anatomical liver resection between 2017 and 2019 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. All cases were classified according to M2BPGi scores, and reserve liver function, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared among these groups. RESULTS Sixteen cases (29.6%) were M2BPGi negative (cut-off index < 1.0), 25 cases (46.3%) were 1+ (1.0 ≤ cut-off index < 3.0), and 13 cases (24.1%) were 2+ (cut-off index ≥ 3.0). M2BPGi-positive cases had significantly worse hepatic reserve function (K-ICG: 0.16 vs 0.14 vs 0.08, p < 0.0001). Intraoperative bleeding was significantly greater in M2BPGi-positive cases [50 ml vs 150 ml vs 200 ml, M2BPGi (-) or (1+) vs M2BPGi (2+), p = 0.045]. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) were significantly more frequent in M2BPGi-positive cases [0% vs 4% vs 33%, M2BPGi (-) or (1+) vs M2BPGi (2+), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION M2BPGi could predict surgical difficulty and complications in LLR-P. In particular, it might be better not to select M2BPGi (2+) cases as teaching cases because of the massive bleeding during parenchymal transection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomokazu Fuji
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Toru Kojima
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Kajioka
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Misaki Sakamoto
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Ryoya Oka
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Katayama
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Yuki Narahara
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Takefumi Niguma
- Department of Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de’Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Schena CA, Khan J, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Barría Rodríguez AG, Bianchi PP, Biffl W, Bravi F, Ceccarelli G, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Chirica M, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Cotsoglou C, D’Hondt M, Damaskos D, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Diana M, Espin‐Basany E, Fichtner‐Feigl S, Fugazzola P, Gavriilidis P, Gronnier C, Kashuk J, Kirkpatrick AW, Ammendola M, Kouwenhoven EA, Laurent A, Leppaniemi A, Lesurtel M, Memeo R, Milone M, Moore E, Pararas N, Peitzmann A, Pessaux P, Picetti E, Pikoulis M, Pisano M, Ris F, Robison T, Sartelli M, Shelat VG, Spinoglio G, Sugrue M, Tan E, Van Eetvelde E, Kluger Y, Weber D, Catena F. Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36707879 PMCID: PMC9883976 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is widely adopted in elective digestive surgery, but selectively used for surgical emergencies. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence concerning the learning curve to achieve proficiency in emergency MIS and provides five expert opinion statements, which may form the basis for developing standardized curricula and training programs in emergency MIS. METHODS This position paper was conducted according to the World Society of Emergency Surgery methodology. A steering committee and an international expert panel were involved in the critical appraisal of the literature and the development of the consensus statements. RESULTS Thirteen studies regarding the learning curve in emergency MIS were selected. All but one study considered laparoscopic appendectomy. Only one study reported on emergency robotic surgery. In most of the studies, proficiency was achieved after an average of 30 procedures (range: 20-107) depending on the initial surgeon's experience. High heterogeneity was noted in the way the learning curve was assessed. The experts claim that further studies investigating learning curve processes in emergency MIS are needed. The emergency surgeon curriculum should include a progressive and adequate training based on simulation, supervised clinical practice (proctoring), and surgical fellowships. The results should be evaluated by adopting a credentialing system to ensure quality standards. Surgical proficiency should be maintained with a minimum caseload and constantly evaluated. Moreover, the training process should involve the entire surgical team to facilitate the surgeon's proficiency. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence exists concerning the learning process in laparoscopic and robotic emergency surgery. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community while stressing the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France ,grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Jim Khan
- grid.4701.20000 0001 0728 6636Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University of Portsmouth, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Intensive Care Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- grid.415402.60000 0004 0449 3295Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Francesca Bravi
- grid.415207.50000 0004 1760 3756Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mircea Chirica
- grid.450307.50000 0001 0944 2786Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Michallon Hospital, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy ,grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- grid.488519.90000 0004 5946 0028Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA USA
| | | | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- grid.418716.d0000 0001 0709 1919Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eloy Espin‐Basany
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Fichtner‐Feigl
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- grid.15628.380000 0004 0393 1193Department of HBP Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX UK
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- grid.42399.350000 0004 0593 7118Eso-Gastric Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- grid.414959.40000 0004 0469 2139Department of General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Michele Ammendola
- grid.411489.10000 0001 2168 2547Digestive Surgery Unit, Health of Science Department, “Magna Graecia” University Medical School, “Mater Domini” Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
- grid.417370.60000 0004 0502 0983Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente ZGT, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Alexis Laurent
- grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France ,grid.412116.10000 0004 1799 3934Unit of HPB and Service of General Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- grid.415844.80000 0004 1759 7181Unit of Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II” University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ernest Moore
- grid.241116.10000000107903411Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.480511.9Institute for Image‐Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, INSERM U1110, Strasbourg, France
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- grid.411482.aDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1St General Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, ASST Papa Giovanni Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Frederic Ris
- grid.150338.c0000 0001 0721 9812Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tyler Robison
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellow, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | | | - Vishal G. Shelat
- grid.240988.f0000 0001 0298 8161Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD Faculty Member Robotic and Colorectal Surgery‐ IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Edward Tan
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ellen Van Eetvelde
- grid.411326.30000 0004 0626 3362Department of Digestive Surgery, UZ, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dieter Weber
- grid.416195.e0000 0004 0453 3875Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Fausto Catena
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital‐Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vandeputte M, Vansteenkiste F, Ceelen W, De Meyere C, D'Hondt M. Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:16. [PMID: 36624235 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02758-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Technical challenges and a perceived higher risk of complications hinder a wide adoption of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. We aim to further define the place of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy by comparison with the traditional open approach. METHODS A comparison of the surgical outcomes and survival after laparoscopic (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) was retrospectively performed from a prospectively kept database. To reduce the effect of bias and confounding, baseline characteristics of both groups were matched using propensity score matching (NCT05110573; Nov 8, 2021; retrospectively registered). RESULTS From a total of 67 LPD and 105 OPD patients, propensity score matching resulted in two balanced groups of 38 patients. In both groups, 87% of surgeries were performed for cancer. In the LPD group, conversion rate was 22.4%. Mean operative time was significantly longer after LPD versus OPD (320.1 ± 53.8 vs. 277.7 ± 63.8 min; p = .008). Hospital stay was significantly shorter after LPD versus OPD (median 13.5 vs. 17.0 days; p = .039). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, total complication rate (73.7% vs. 86.8%; p = .249), major complication rate (26.5% vs. 10.5%; p = .137), postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (13.2% vs. 7.9%; p = .711), 90-day mortality rate (5.3% vs. 0%; p = .493), R0 resection rate (85.4% vs. 85.8%), or number of lymph nodes (median 10.0 vs. 8.5; p = .273). In cancer patients, no significant differences were observed in overall survival (median 27.1 vs. 23.9 months; p = .693), disease-free survival, or recurrence rate. CONCLUSION LPD provided acceptable short-term and oncological outcomes. Compared to OPD, we noted a higher major complication rate, without compromising surgical safety or oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Vandeputte
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Franky Vansteenkiste
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nassar A, Tzedakis S, Dhote A, Strigalev M, Coriat R, Karoui M, Dohan A, Gaillard M, Marchese U, Fuks D. Multiple Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020435. [PMID: 36672384 PMCID: PMC9856366 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decades, liver cancer's minimally invasive approach has primarily become as a new standard of oncological care. Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are one of the most developed indications of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). CRLM resection is still the best treatment known in terms of survival. As multiple CRLM are found in up to 80% of cases at diagnosis (Manfredi S. and al, Annals of Surgery 2006), a lot of possible technical management approaches are described. With the development of the parenchymal-sparing strategy, multiple concomitant laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are gaining acceptance. However, no recommendation is available regarding its indications and feasibility. Also, laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy is developing for bilobar CRLM, and this also does not have established recommendation. The purpose of this paper was to highlight novelty and updates in the field of multiple minimally invasive liver resections. A review of the international literature was performed. The feasibility of laparoscopic concomitant multiple LLR and two-stage hepatectomy for CRLM as well as their outcomes were discussed. These clarifications could further guide the implementation of minimal resection in multiple colorectal liver metastases therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-1-58-41-17-24
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alix Dhote
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marie Strigalev
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Mehdi Karoui
- Department of General Digestive Surgery and Cancerology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Champavier PG, Beyer-Berjot L, Arnoux PJ, Py M, Casanova R, Berdah S, Birnbaum DJ, Guilbaud T. An Ex Situ Cadaver Liver Training Model Continuously Pressurized to Simulate Specific Skills Involved in Laparoscopic Liver Resection: the Lap-Liver Trainer. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:521-533. [PMID: 36624325 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05566-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) requires delicate skills. The aim of the study was to develop a training model mimicking as much as possible intraoperative bleeding and bile leakage during LLR. We also assessed the educational value of the training model. METHODS The Lap-liver trainer (LLT) combined a continuously pressurized ex situ cadaver liver and a customized mannequin. The customized mannequin was designed by computer-aided design and manufactured by 3D printing. The left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) was chosen to assess the feasibility of a LLR with the LLT. Eighteen volunteers were recruited to perform LLS and to assess the educational value of the LLT using a Likert scale. RESULTS The customized mannequin consisted of a close laparoscopic training device based on a simplified reconstruction of the abdominal cavity in laparoscopic conditions. Ex situ cadaver livers were pressurized to simulate blood and bile supplies. Each expert surgeon (n = 3) performed two LLS. They were highly satisfied of simulation conditions (4.80 ± 0.45) and strongly recommended that the LLT should be incorporated into a teaching program (5.00 ± 0.0). Eight novice and 4 intermediate surgeons completed a teaching program and performed a LLS. Overall, the level of satisfaction was high (4.92 ± 0.29), and performing such a procedure under simulation conditions benefited their learning and clinical practice (4.92 ± 0.29). CONCLUSIONS The LLT could provide better opportunities for trainees to acquire and practice LLR skills in a more realistic environment and to improve their ability to deal with specific events related to LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Beyer-Berjot
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Univ Gustave Eiffel, LBA, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Department of Digestive Surgery, Marseille, France
| | | | - Max Py
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Univ Gustave Eiffel, LBA, Marseille, France
| | | | - Stéphane Berdah
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Univ Gustave Eiffel, LBA, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Department of Digestive Surgery, Marseille, France
| | - David Jérémie Birnbaum
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Department of Digestive Surgery, Marseille, France
| | - Théophile Guilbaud
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Univ Gustave Eiffel, LBA, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Department of Digestive Surgery, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A Comparative Study of an Integrated Ultrasonic/Bipolar Sealing Device Versus an Articulating Bipolar Sealing Device for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery. World J Surg 2022; 46:2963-2972. [PMID: 36131184 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06734-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sealing devices (SD) seal and cut tissue through different energy modalities, and are routinely used in laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS). The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of Thunderbeat (TB), an integrated ultrasonic/bipolar SD, versus Enseal (ES), an articulating bipolar SD, in LLS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted in a single center from December 2013 to September 2020. The primary endpoint was difference in blood loss (BL) between ES and TB. Secondary endpoints were complications, operative time, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS 352 patients were identified: TB (n = 105) and ES (n = 247). Median BL was significantly lower with TB (50 mL [20-120]) compared to ES (100 mL [50-250]) (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were identified for median operative time (TB 115 min [45-300]) vs. ES 140 min [40-370]; p = 0.0008) and median hospital stay (TB 2 days [1-4] vs. ES 4 days [3-6]; p < 0.0001). No major differences were encountered for postoperative bleeding (TB 0% vs. ES 1%; p = 0.5574), biliary leak (TB 1% vs. ES 2%; p = 1.0000), and 90-day mortality (TB 0% vs. ES 1%; p = 1.0000). CONCLUSION The integrated ultrasonic/bipolar SD is superior to the articulating bipolar SD in LLS for intraoperative BL without an increase in complications.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang X, Chen W, Jiang J, Ye Y, Hu W, Zhai Z, Bai X, Liang T. A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's robotic experience in a high-volume center. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:9186-9193. [PMID: 35851817 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09402-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is the most recent advanced minimally invasive approach for distal pancreatectomy. However, its benefits over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) remain undetermined. Previous studies were limited by their small sample size or variations in surgeon skills. This study aimed to compare robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) performed by a single surgeon with LDP performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons in a high-volume center. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive RDP performed by a single surgeon between December 2020 and November 2021 with LDP performed by experienced surgeons during the same period in a high-volume center. Patient characteristics and perioperative variables were compared. RESULTS The analysis included 55 RDP and 146 LDP procedures. The operative time in the RDP group was significantly shorter than the LDP group (171 vs. 222 min, P < 0.001), both in spleen-preserved (154 vs. 212 min, P < 0.001) and spleen-removed (192 vs. 230 min, P = 0.005) procedures. The RDP group made more frequent use of the stapler technique for pancreas transection (87.3 vs. 68.5%, P = 0.007), and its estimated blood loss was lower (79 vs. 155 mL, P < 0.001) than the LDP group. The postoperative hospital stay in the RDP group was significantly shorter than the LDP group (8 vs. 12 days, P < 0.001). The groups were similar in their complication distributions. CONCLUSION RDP is as safe and feasible a minimally invasive approach as LDP. The advanced manipulation and visualization capabilities of the robotic approach in distal pancreatectomy could help reduce operative time and blood loss, and is related to shorter postoperative hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.,Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Jincai Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yufu Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Wendi Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Zhenglong Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China. .,Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. .,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.,Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Hangzhou, China.,The Innovation Center for the Study of Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.,Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ruzzenente A, Bagante F, Poletto E, Campagnaro T, Conci S, De Bellis M, Pedrazzani C, Guglielmi A. A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8869-8880. [PMID: 35604481 PMCID: PMC9652257 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09322-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the last decade, several difficulty scoring systems (DSS) have been proposed to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). The present study aimed to investigate the ability of four DSS for LLR to predict operative, short-term, and textbook outcomes. METHODS Patients who underwent LLR at a single tertiary referral center from January 2014 to June 2020 were included in the present study. Four DSS for LLR (Halls, Hasegawa, Kawaguchi, and Iwate) were investigated to test their ability to predict operative and postoperative complications. Machine learning algorithms were used to identify the most important DSS associated with operative and short-term outcomes. RESULTS A total of 346 patients were included in the analysis, 28 (8.1%) patients were converted to open surgery. A total of 13 patients (3.7%) had severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) complications; the incidence of prolonged length of stay (> 5 days) was 39.3% (n = 136). No patients died within 90 days after the surgery. According to Halls, Hasegawa, Kawaguchi, and Iwate scores, 65 (18.8%), 59 (17.1%), 57 (16.5%), and 112 (32.4%) patients underwent high difficulty LLR, respectively. In accordance with a random forest algorithm, the Kawaguchi DSS predicted prolonged length of stay, high blood loss, and conversions and was the best performing DSS in predicting postoperative outcomes. Iwate DSS was the most important variable associated with operative time, while Halls score was the most important DSS predicting textbook outcomes. No one of the DSS investigated was associated with the occurrence of complication. CONCLUSIONS According to our results DDS are significantly related to surgical complexity and short-term outcomes, Kawaguchi and Iwate DSS showed the best performance in predicting operative outcomes, while Halls score was the most important variable in predicting textbook outcome. Interestingly, none of the DSS showed any correlation with or importance in predicting overall and severe postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy.
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Edoardo Poletto
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Campagnaro
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ueno M, Iida H, Komeda K, Kosaka H, Hirokawa F, Hayami S, Mori H, Kaibori M, Yamaue H. Dorsal vs ventral approach to the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: multicenter retrospective observational study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6464-6472. [PMID: 35024938 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08998-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left hemihepatectomy requires exposure of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) at the cutting-surface. Two procedures are used to approach the MHV: a conventional ventral approach and a laparoscopy-specific dorsal approach. This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of these two procedures. METHODS Clinical records of 38 consecutive patients that underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy in four university hospitals between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measurements were operative blood loss, operating time, trend of postoperative laboratory data within 7 days after hepatectomy, and postoperative complications. Quality of MHV exposure was also evaluated and compared by three-grade evaluation (excellent/good/poor) using recorded still images of the cut-surface of the remnant liver (n = 35). RESULTS Dorsal and ventral approaches were performed in 9 and 29 patients, respectively. Median operating time was 316 min (dorsal) and 314 min (ventral) (P = 0.71). Median operative blood loss was 45 ml (dorsal) and 105 ml (ventral) (P = 0.10). Two patients in the ventral approach group had bleeding in excess of 500 ml, which was not seen in the dorsal approach group. Excellent/good/poor MHV appearance on the cutting-surface was observed in 5/3/1 patients in the dorsal approach group, respectively, and in 7/8/11 patients in the ventral approach group, respectively (P = 0.03). In the ventral approach group, significant increases of aspartate aminotransferase (on postoperative day 1 and day 4/5) and of alanine aminotransferase (on postoperative day 2/3 and 4/5) were observed (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications were observed only in the ventral approach group (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS The dorsal approach could achieve safe and precise anatomical left hemihepatectomy with operation time and operative blood loss comparable to the conventional ventral approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
| | - Hiroya Iida
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Koji Komeda
- Department of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hisashi Kosaka
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fumitoshi Hirokawa
- Department of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinya Hayami
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
| | - Haruki Mori
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Masaki Kaibori
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174268. [PMID: 36077803 PMCID: PMC9454668 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Robotic liver surgery is being applied with increasing frequency. Comparable, and in specific settings superior, perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic liver surgery have been reported. In its current form, the most commonly mentioned advantage of robotic surgery is improved dexterity. Important obstacles to its wider implementation in daily clinical practice are the associated costs, technical difficulties, and a scarce amount of evidence. Robotic liver surgery will likely continue to evolve in parallel with technological developments that enhance the robots’ abilities. Abstract In parallel with the historical development of minimally invasive surgery, the laparoscopic and robotic approaches are now frequently utilized to perform major abdominal surgical procedures. Nevertheless, the role of the robotic approach in liver surgery is still controversial, and a standardized, safe technique has not been defined yet. This review aims to summarize the currently available evidence and prospects of robotic liver surgery. Minimally invasive liver surgery has been extensively associated with benefits, in terms of less blood loss, and lower complication rates, including liver-specific complications such as clinically relevant bile leakage and post hepatectomy liver failure, when compared to open liver surgery. Furthermore, comparable R0 resection rates to open liver surgery have been reported, thus, demonstrating the safety and oncological efficiency of the minimally invasive approach. However, whether robotic liver surgery has merits over laparoscopic liver surgery is still a matter of debate. In the current literature, robotic liver surgery has mainly been associated with non-inferior outcomes compared to laparoscopy, although it is suggested that the robotic approach has a shorter learning curve, lower conversion rates, and less intraoperative blood loss. Robotic surgical systems offer a more realistic image with integrated 3D systems. In addition, the improved dexterity offered by robotic surgical systems can lead to improved intra and postoperative outcomes. In the future, integrated and improved haptic feedback mechanisms, artificial intelligence, and the introduction of more liver-specific dissectors will likely be implemented, further enhancing the robots’ abilities.
Collapse
|
21
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Vanneste G, Libbrecht L, Alaerts H, Parmentier I, Verslype C, D’Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and oncological outcomes in a single-center cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2399-2414. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
22
|
Shen K, Feng E, Lin F, Weng Y, Chen J. Learning Curve of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Direct Anterior Approach without Requiring Corrective Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia. Orthop Surg 2022; 14:840-850. [PMID: 35388599 PMCID: PMC9087452 DOI: 10.1111/os.13231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the learning curve of total hip arthroplasty in direct anterior approach (DA-THA) without requiring corrective osteotomy for patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) through the evaluation of clinical and radiographic results. METHOD From December 2015 to January 2021, we retrospectively evaluated a surgeon's first 100 patients with unilateral hip dysplasia (Crowe I-III) who underwent DA-THA. All procedures were performed by a fellowship-trained joint surgeon. Cementless hemispheric porous-coated acetabular cups and tapered cementless stems were used in all hips. The radiographic data, including leg length, the height of the center of rotation, femoral head offset, the cup anteversion and inclination angle, were measured. The cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis (RA-CUSUM) were used to determine the learning curve of DA-THA for each patient's operation time. By analyzing the operation time, complication rate, postoperative length of hospitalization and creatine kinase (before surgery and the third day after surgery), estimated blood loss, Harris score, radiographic data were compared between the different stages of the learning curve. RESULTS The mean follow-up time was 35.45 ± 16.82 months. The CUSUM method obtained the maximum turning point of the curve at 43 cases, which divided the learning curve into Learning Period and Mastery Period. The CUSUM learning curve was best modeled as a cubic curve with the equation: CUSUM (min) = 0.001x3 - 0.495x2 + 33.60x - 10.00, which had a higher R2 value of 0.967. The pre-operative data, creatine kinase, estimated blood loss and postoperative Harris scores of the two stages were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The mean operation time was 118 min in the Learning Period and 87 min in the Mastery Period. Statistically significant differences were detected in the operation time (P < 0.001), postoperative length of hospitalization(P = 0.024), and postoperative leg length discrepancy (P = 0.012) between the two stages. The overall complication rates were 27.9% in the Learning Period and 12.3% in the Mastery Period (p = 0.049). The overall outliers of radiographic data were 34 cases in the Learning Period and 31 cases in the Mastery Period (79.07% vs 54.39%, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS The DA-THA is a valuable alternative to achieve satisfactory clinical results for mild-to-moderate DDH patients. Furthermore, accurate analysis of the learning curve of DA-THA for hip dysplasia by the CUSUM method showed that the surgeons need to finish about 43 cases to master the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiwei Shen
- Department of Arthrosis Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Eryou Feng
- Department of Arthrosis Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Feitai Lin
- Department of Arthrosis Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yan Weng
- Department of Arthrosis Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jinhua Chen
- Medical Department of Fujian Medicine University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kuemmerli C, Fichtinger RS, Moekotte A, Aldrighetti LA, Aroori S, Besselink MGH, D’Hondt M, Díaz-Nieto R, Edwin B, Efanov M, Ettorre GM, Menon KV, Sheen AJ, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe R, Troisi RI, White SA, Brandts L, van Breukelen GJP, Sijberden J, Pugh SA, Eminton Z, Primrose JN, van Dam R, Hilal MA. Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:206. [PMID: 35264216 PMCID: PMC8908665 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A shift towards parenchymal-sparing liver resections in open and laparoscopic surgery emerged in the last few years. Laparoscopic liver resection is technically feasible and safe, and consensus guidelines acknowledge the laparoscopic approach in the posterosuperior segments. Lesions situated in these segments are considered the most challenging for the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this trial is to compare the postoperative time to functional recovery, complications, oncological safety, quality of life, survival and costs after laparoscopic versus open parenchymal-sparing liver resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery setting. METHODS The ORANGE Segments trial is an international multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial conducted in centres experienced in laparoscopic liver resection. Eligible patients for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to undergo laparoscopic or open resections in an enhanced recovery setting. Patients and ward personnel are blinded to the treatment allocation until postoperative day 4 using a large abdominal dressing. The primary endpoint is time to functional recovery. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative outcomes, length of stay, resection margin, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, time to adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, quality of life and overall survival. Laparoscopic liver surgery of the posterosuperior segments is hypothesised to reduce time to functional recovery by 2 days in comparison with open surgery. With a power of 80% and alpha of 0.04 to adjust for interim analysis halfway the trial, a total of 250 patients are required to be randomised. DISCUSSION The ORANGE Segments trial is the first multicentre international randomised controlled study to compare short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open resections in the posterosuperior segments within an enhanced recovery programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03270917 . Registered on September 1, 2017. Before start of inclusion. PROTOCOL VERSION version 12, May 9, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - Robert S. Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alma Moekotte
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
| | | | - Somaiah Aroori
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Marc G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Rafael Díaz-Nieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giuseppe M. Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aali J. Sheen
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siân A. Pugh
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ronald van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - on behalf of the ORANGE trials collaborative
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zwart MJW, Görgec B, Arabiyat A, Nota CLM, van der Poel MJ, Fichtinger RS, Berrevoet F, van Dam RM, Aldrighetti L, Fuks D, Hoti E, Edwin B, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, Hagendoorn J, Swijnenburg RJ. Pan-European survey on the implementation of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive liver surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:322-331. [PMID: 34772622 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is gaining popularity. Recent data and views on the implementation of laparoscopic and robotic MILS throughout Europe are lacking. METHODS An anonymous survey consisting of 46 questions was sent to all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. RESULTS The survey was completed by 120 surgeons from 103 centers in 24 countries. Median annual center volume of liver resection was 100 [IQR 50-140]. The median annual volume of MILS per center was 30 [IQR 16-40]. For minor resections, laparoscopic MILS was used by 80 (67%) surgeons and robotic MILS by 35 (29%) surgeons. For major resections, laparoscopic MILS was used by 74 (62%) surgeons and robotic MILS by 33 (28%) surgeons. The majority of the surgeons stated that minimum annual volume of MILS per center should be around 21-30 procedures/year. Of the surgeons performing robotic surgery, 28 (70%) felt they missed specific equipment, such as a robotic-CUSA. Seventy (66%) surgeons provided a formal MILS training to residents and fellows. In 5 years' time, 106 (88%) surgeons felt that MILS would have superior value as compared to open liver surgery. CONCLUSION In the participating European liver centers, MILS comprised about one third of all liver resections and is expected to increase further. Laparoscopic MILS is still twice as common as robotic MILS. Development of specific instruments for robotic liver parenchymal transection might further increase its adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice J W Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Istituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Abdullah Arabiyat
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Lancaster Infirmary, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, United Kingdom
| | - Carolijn L M Nota
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center/Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht (RAKU), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel J van der Poel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert S Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Interventional Centre and Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Medicine, University in Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Istituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center/Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht (RAKU), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Learning Curve for Metastatic Liver Tumor Open Resection in Patients with Primary Colorectal Cancer: Use of the Cumulative Sum Method. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19031068. [PMID: 35162093 PMCID: PMC8834355 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: Liver resections have become the first-line treatment for primary and metastatic tumors and, therefore, are considered a core aspect of surgical training. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the extent and safety of liver resection procedures for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: This single tertiary center retrospective analysis includes 158 consecutive cases of small liver resection (SLR) (n = 107) and major liver resection (MLR) (n = 58) procedures. A cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) method was used to investigate the learning curve. Results: The operative time, total blood loss level, and incidence of adverse effects showed a learning curve. For SLRs, the CUSUM curve for operative time and blood loss level peaked at the 19th and 17th case, respectively, while for MLRs, these curves peaked at the 28th and 24th case, respectively. The CUSUM curve for minor adverse effects (MAEs) and severe adverse effects (SAEs) showed a downward slope after the 16th and 68th procedures in the SLRs group and after the 29th and 39th procedures in the MLRs cohort; however, it remained within the acceptable range throughout the entire study. Conclusion: SLR procedures were performed faster with less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative stays than MLRs, and a higher number of completed procedures was required to gain stabilization and repeatability in the operating time and intraoperative blood loss level. In MLR procedures, the reduction of SAEs was accomplished significantly later than the stabilization of the operative time and intraoperative blood loss level.
Collapse
|
26
|
Goh BK, Wang Z, Koh YX, Lim KI. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection
in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2021. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has changed abdominal surgery. We evaluated
the evolution and changing trends associated with adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and
the experience of a surgeon without prior LLR experience.
Methods: A retrospective review of 310 patients who underwent LLR performed by a single surgeon
from 2011 to 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were patients who underwent laparoscopic liver
surgeries such as excision biopsy, local ablation, drainage of abscesses and deroofing of liver cysts.
There were 300 cases and the cohort was divided into 5 groups of 60 patients.
Results: There were 288 patients who underwent a totally minimally invasive approach, including
28 robotic-assisted procedures. Open conversion occurred for 13 (4.3%) patients; the conversion rate
decreased significantly from 10% in the initial period to 3.3% subsequently. There were 83 (27.7%)
major resections and 131 (43.7%) resections were performed for tumours in the difficult
posterosuperior location. There were 152 (50.7%) patients with previous abdominal surgery, including
52 (17.3%) repeat liver resections for recurrent tumours, and 60 patients had other concomitant
operations. According to the Iwate criteria, 135 (44.7%) were graded as high/expert difficulty. Major
morbidity (>grade 3a) occurred in 12 (4.0%) patients and there was no 30-day mortality. Comparison
across the 5 patient groups demonstrated a significant trend towards older patients, higher American
Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, increasing frequency of LLR with previous abdominal
surgery, increasing frequency of portal hypertension and huge tumours, decreasing blood loss and
decreasing transfusion rate across the study period. Surgeon experience (≤60 cases) and Institut
Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) high grade resections were independent predictors of open conversion.
Open conversion was associated with worse perioperative outcomes such as increased blood loss,
transfusion rate, morbidity and length of stay.
Conclusion: LLR can be safely adopted for resections of all difficulty grades, including major resections
and for tumours located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, with a low open conversion rate.
Keywords: Laparoscopic hepatectomy, laparoscopic liver resection, robotic hepatectomy, robotic liver
resection, Singapore
Collapse
|
27
|
Jain SR, Sim W, Ng CH, Chin YH, Lim WH, Syn NL, Kamal NHBA, Gupta M, Heong V, Lee XW, Sapari NS, Koh XQ, Isa ZFA, Ho L, O'Hara C, Ulagapan A, Gu SY, Shroff K, Weng RC, Lim JSY, Lim D, Pang B, Ng LK, Wong A, Soo RA, Yong WP, Chee CE, Lee SC, Goh BC, Soong R, Tan DSP. Statistical Process Control Charts for Monitoring Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Turnaround in Precision Medicine Initiatives. Front Oncol 2021; 11:736265. [PMID: 34631570 PMCID: PMC8498582 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Precision oncology, such as next generation sequencing (NGS) molecular analysis and bioinformatics are used to guide targeted therapies. The laboratory turnaround time (TAT) is a key performance indicator of laboratory performance. This study aims to formally apply statistical process control (SPC) methods such as CUSUM and EWMA to a precision medicine programme to analyze the learning curves of NGS and bioinformatics processes. Patients and Methods Trends in NGS and bioinformatics TAT were analyzed using simple regression models with TAT as the dependent variable and chronologically-ordered case number as the independent variable. The M-estimator "robust" regression and negative binomial regression were chosen to serve as sensitivity analyses to each other. Next, two popular statistical process control (SPC) approaches which are CUSUM and EWMA were utilized and the CUSUM log-likelihood ratio (LLR) charts were also generated. All statistical analyses were done in Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp), and nominal P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results A total of 365 patients underwent successful molecular profiling. Both the robust linear model and negative binomial model showed statistically significant reductions in TAT with accumulating experience. The EWMA and CUSUM charts of overall TAT largely corresponded except that the EWMA chart consistently decreased while the CUSUM analyses indicated improvement only after a nadir at the 82nd case. CUSUM analysis found that the bioinformatics team took a lower number of cases (54 cases) to overcome the learning curve compared to the NGS team (85 cases). Conclusion As NGS and bioinformatics lead precision oncology into the forefront of cancer management, characterizing the TAT of NGS and bioinformatics processes improves the timeliness of data output by potentially spotlighting problems early for rectification, thereby improving care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Rajiv Jain
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wilson Sim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yip Han Chin
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Mehek Gupta
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Valerie Heong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiao Wen Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nur Sabrina Sapari
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xue Qing Koh
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zul Fazreen Adam Isa
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lucius Ho
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlin O'Hara
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Arvindh Ulagapan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shi Yu Gu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kashyap Shroff
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rei Chern Weng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joey S Y Lim
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Diana Lim
- Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brendan Pang
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lai Kuan Ng
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea Wong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ross Andrew Soo
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Peng Yong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Ean Chee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soo-Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Boon-Cher Goh
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Richie Soong
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Pascific Laboratories, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David S P Tan
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P, Fan C, Müller PC, Golriz M, Diener MK, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Mehrabi A, Nickel F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1467-1481. [PMID: 33820689 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been based on non-randomized studies and reviews of these. Aim of this study was to evaluate if the randomized evidence comparing LLR to open liver resection (OLR) supports these findings. METHODS A prospectively registered (reviewregistry866) systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines comparing LLR to OLR for benign and malignant diseases was performed via Medline, Web of Science, CENTRAL up to 31.12.2020. The main outcome was postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0, certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS The search yielded 2080 results. 13 RCTs assessing mostly minor liver resections with 1457 patients were included. There were reduced odds of experiencing any complication (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0·42 [0·30, 0·58]) and severe complications (OR[CI]: 0·51 [0·31, 0·84]) for patients undergoing LLR. LOS was shorter (Mean difference (MD) [CI]: -2·90 [-3·88, -1·92] days), blood loss was lower (MD: [CI]: -115·41 [-146·08, -84·75] ml), and functional recovery was better for LLR. All other outcomes showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS LLR shows significant postoperative benefits. RCTs assessing long-term outcomes and major resections are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelán M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Studier-Fischer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Study Center of the German Surgical Society, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Fan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lanari J, Russolillo N, Cipriani F, Aghayan D, Zimmitti G, Efanov M, Alseidi A, Mocchegiani F, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Rotellar F, Fuks D, D'Hondt M, Vivarelli M, Edwin B, Aldrighetti LA, Ferrero A, Cillo U, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e212064. [PMID: 34076671 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure that captures the most desirable surgical outcomes as a single indicator, yet to date TO has not been defined and assessed in the field of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). Objective To obtain international agreement on the definition of TO in liver surgery (TOLS) and to assess the incidence of TO in LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter database using a propensity-score matched analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all liver diseases between January 2011 and October 2019 were analyzed using a large international multicenter liver surgical database. An international survey was conducted among all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) to reach agreement on the definition of TOLS. The rate of TOLS was assessed for LLR and OLR before and after propensity-score matching. Factors associated with achieving TOLS were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures Textbook outcome, with TOLS defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents of grade 2 or higher, postoperative bile leak grade B or C, severe postoperative complications, readmission within 30 days after discharge, in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. Results A total of 8188 patients (4559 LLR; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]; 2529 were male [55.8%] and 3629 OLR; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-71 years]; 2204 were male [60.7%]) were included in the analysis of whom 69.1% achieved TOLS; 74.8% for LLR and 61.9% for OLR (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III, previous abdominal surgery, histological diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases (odds ratio [OR], 0.656 [95% CI, 0.457-0.940]; P = .02), cholangiocarcinoma, non-CRLM, a tumor size of 30 mm or more, minor resection of posterior/superior segments (OR, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.577-0.887]; P = .002), anatomically major resection (OR, 0.579 [95% CI, 0.418-0.803]; P = .001), and nonanatomical resection (OR, 0.612 [95% CI, 0.476-0.788]; P < .001) were associated with a worse TOLS rate after LLR. For OLR, only histological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (OR, 0.360 [95% CI, 0.214-0.607]; P < .001) and a tumor size of 30 mm or more (30-50 mm = OR, 0.718 [95% CI, 0.565-0.911]; P = .01; 50.1-100 mm = OR, 0.729 [95% CI, 0.554-0.960]; P = .02; >10 cm = OR, 0.550 [95% CI, 0.366-0.826]; P = .004) were associated with a worse TOLS rate. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter study, TOLS was found to be a useful tool for assessing patient-level hospital performance and may have utility in optimizing patient outcomes after LLR and OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davit Aghayan
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Luca A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chua D, Syn N, Koh YX, Goh BKP. Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:351-358. [PMID: 33779690 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has become an important option for the treatment of various liver tumours. A major concern is the learning curve required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and summarize current literature analysing the learning curve for MIH. METHODS A systematic review of the literature pertaining to learning curves in MIH to July 2019 was performed using PubMed and Scopus databases. All original full-text articles published in English relating to learning curves for both laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), robotic liver resection (RLR), or a combination of these, were included. To explore quantitatively the learning curve for MIH, a meta-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Forty studies relating to learning curves in MIH were included. The median overall number of procedures required in studies utilizing cumulative summative (CUSUM) methodology for LLR was 50 (range 25-58) and for RLR was 25 (16-50). After adjustment for year of adoption of MIH, the CUSUM-derived caseload to surmount the learning curve for RLR was 47.1 (95 per cent c.i. 1.2 to 71.6) per cent; P = 0.046) less than that required for LLR. A year-on-year reduction in the number of procedures needed for MIH was observed, commencing at 48.3 cases in 1995 and decreasing to 23.8 cases in 2015. CONCLUSION The overall learning curve for MIH decreased steadily over time, and appeared less steep for RLR compared with LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Chua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore (NUS) Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery: Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2021; 273:949-956. [PMID: 31503017 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the complication-based learning curve and identify learning-associated complications of robotic gastrectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA With the increased popularity of robotic surgery, a sound understanding of the learning curve in the surgical outcome of robotic surgery has taken on great importance. However, a multicenter prospective study analyzing learning-associated morbidity has never been conducted in robotic gastrectomy. METHODS Data on 502 robotic gastrectomy cases were prospectively collected from 5 surgeons. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis was applied to visualize the learning curve of robotic gastrectomy on operation time and complications. RESULTS Twenty-five cases, on average, were needed to overcome complications and operation time-learning curve sufficiently to gain proficiency in 3 surgeons. An additional 23 cases were needed to cross the transitional phase to progress from proficiency to mastery. The moderate complication rate (CD ≥ grade II) was 20% in phase 1 (cases 1-25), 10% in phase 2 (cases 26-65), 26.1% in phase 3 (cases 66-88), and 6.4% in phase 4 (cases 89-125) (P < 0.001). Among diverse complications, CD ≥ grade II intra-abdominal bleeding (P < 0.001) and abdominal pain (P = 0.01) were identified as major learning-associated morbidities of robotic gastrectomy. Previous experience on laparoscopic surgery and mode of training influenced progression in the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study suggesting that technical immaturity substantially affects the surgical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy and that robotic gastrectomy is a complex procedure with a significant learning curve that has implications for physician training and credentialing.
Collapse
|
32
|
Pathak S, Main BG, Blencowe NS, Rees JRE, Robertson HF, Abbadi RAG, Blazeby JM. A Systematic Review of Minimally Invasive Trans-thoracic Liver Resection to Examine Intervention Description, Governance, and Outcome Reporting of an Innovative Technique. Ann Surg 2021; 273:882-889. [PMID: 32511126 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of laparoscopic liver resections undertaken has increased. However, lesions located postero-superiorly are difficult to access. This may be overcome by the novel use of trans-thoracic port(s). Methods for the safe and transparent introduction of new and modified surgical procedures are limited and a summary of these issues, for minimally invasive trans-thoracic liver resections (MITTLR), is lacking. This study aims to understand and summarize technique description, governance procedures, and reporting of outcomes for MITTLR. METHODS A systematic literature search to identify primary studies of all designs describing MITTLR was undertaken. How patients were selected for the new technique was examined. The technical components of MITTLR were identified and summarized to understand technique development over time. Governance arrangements (eg, Institutional Review Board approval) and steps taken to mitigate harm were recorded. Finally, specific outcomes reported across studies were documented. RESULTS Of 2067 screened articles, 16 were included reporting data from 145 patients and 6 countries. Selection criteria for patients was explicitly stated in 2 papers. No studies fully described the technique. Five papers reported ethical approval and 3 gave details of patient consent. No study reported on steps taken to mitigate harm.Technical outcomes were commonly reported, for example, blood loss (15/16 studies), operative time (15/16), and margin status (11/16). Information on patient-reported outcomes and costs were lacking. CONCLUSIONS Technical details and governance procedures were poorly described. Outcomes focussed on short term details alone. Transparency is needed for reporting the introduction of new surgical techniques to allow their safe dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Pathak
- Bristol Center for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Center, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Barry G Main
- Bristol Center for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Center, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Natalie S Blencowe
- Bristol Center for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Center, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan R E Rees
- Bristol Center for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Harry F Robertson
- Bristol Center for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jane M Blazeby
- Bristol Center for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Center, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Guilbaud T, Fuks D, Berdah S, Birnbaum DJ, Beyer Berjot L. Development of a novel educational tool to assess skills in laparoscopic liver surgery using the Delphi methodology: the laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS). Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2321-2333. [PMID: 33871719 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08507-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No specific performance assessment scales have been reported in laparoscopic liver resection. This study aimed at developing an objective scale specific for the assessment of technical skills for wedge resection in anterior segments (WRAS) and left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). METHODS A laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS) was developed using a hierarchical task analysis. A Delphi method obtained consensus among five international experts on relevant steps that should be included into the LLSS for assessment of operative performances. The consensus was predefined using Cronbach's alpha > 0.80. RESULTS A semi-structured review extracted 15 essential subtasks for full laparoscopic WRAS and LLS for evaluation in the Delphi survey. Two rounds of the survey were conducted. Three over 15 subtasks did not reach the predefined level of consensus. Based on the expert's comments, 13 subtasks were reformulated, 4 subtasks were added, and a revised skills scale was developed. After the 2nd round survey (Cronbach's alpha 0.84), 19 subtasks were adopted. The LLSS was composed of three main parts: patient positioning and intraoperative preparation (task 1 to 8), the core part of the WRAS and LLS procedure (tasks 9 to 14), and completion of procedure (task 15 to 19). CONCLUSIONS The LLSS was developed for measuring the skill set for the education of safe and secure laparoscopic WRAS and LLS procedures in a dedicated training program. After validation, this scale could be also used as an assessment tool in the operating room and extrapolated as an operative roadmap to other complex procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Théophile Guilbaud
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. .,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Berdah
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - David Jérémie Birnbaum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Laura Beyer Berjot
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.,Center for Surgical Teaching and Research (CERC), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hobeika C, Fuks D. Reply to: "Letter regarding Benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers". J Hepatol 2021; 74:987-988. [PMID: 33493528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB surgery and Liver transplantation, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Paris Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ziogas IA, Esagian SM, Giannis D, Hayat MH, Kosmidis D, Matsuoka LK, Montenovo MI, Tsoulfas G, Geller DA, Alexopoulos SP. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An individual patient data survival meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2021; 222:731-738. [PMID: 33840443 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) vs. open hepatectomy (OH) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). METHODS A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using PRISMA guidelines (end-of-search date: 08-June-2020). Individual patient data on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses, and one- and two-stage survival analyses were conducted. RESULTS Eight retrospective cohort studies comparing LH (n = 544) vs. OH (n = 2256) were identified. LH demonstrated lower overall complication (Risk ratio [RR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.90; p = 0.01), surgical lymphadenectomy (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; p = 0.01) and margin-positive resection (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; p = 0.04) rates, and higher recurrence-free rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.51; p = 0.04) vs. OH. In Cox regression, no difference was observed regarding OS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.91; p = 0.70) and RFS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.74-1.90; p = 0.47). CONCLUSION The use of LH should be considered when feasible in well-selected iCCA patients by hepatobiliary surgeons with experience in minimally-invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Stepan M Esagian
- Oncology Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Giannis
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece; Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Northwell Health Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Muhammad H Hayat
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dimitrios Kosmidis
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece; Oncology Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Lea K Matsuoka
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Martin I Montenovo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sophoclis P Alexopoulos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
D'Hondt M, Pironet Z, Parmentier I, De Meyere C, Besselink M, Pottel H, Vansteenkiste F, Verslype C. One-stage laparoscopic parenchymal sparing liver resection for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: safety, recurrence patterns and oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1018-1026. [PMID: 33683435 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08366-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) of bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are challenging and the safety and long-term outcomes are unclear. In this study, the short- and long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of one-stage LLR for bilobar CRLM were compared to single laparoscopic resection for CRLM. METHODS This single-center study consisted of all patients who underwent a parenchymal sparing LLR for CRLM between October 2011 and December 2018. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, short-term outcomes, oncologic outcomes and recurrence patterns were compared. Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS Thirty six patients underwent a LLR for bilobar CRLM and ninety patients underwent a single LLR. Demographics were similar among groups. More patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the bilobar group (55.6% vs 34.4%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in conversion rate, R0 resection and transfusion rate. Blood loss and operative time were higher in the bilobar group (250 ml (IQR 150-450) vs 100 ml (IQR 50-250), P < 0.001 and 200 min (IQR 170-230) vs 130 min (IQR 100-165), P < 0.001) and hospital stay was longer (5 days (IQR 4-7) vs 4 days (IQR 3-6), P = 0.015). The bilobar group had more technically major resections (88.9% vs 56.7%, P < 0.001). Mortality was nil in both groups and major morbidity was similar (2.8% vs 3.3%, P = 1.0). There was no difference in recurrence pattern. Overall survival (OS) was similar (1 yr: 96% in both groups and 5 yr 76% vs 66%, P = 0.49), as was recurrence-free survival (RFS) (1 yr: 64% vs 73%, 3 yr: 38 vs 42%, 5 yr: 38% vs 28%, P = 0.62). CONCLUSION In experienced hands, LLR for bilobar CRLM can be performed safely with similar oncologic outcomes as patients who underwent a single LLR for CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| | - Zoë Pironet
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Parmentier
- Department of Oncology and Statistics, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marc Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Pottel
- Interdisciplinary Research Center, Catholic University Leuven, Campus Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Franky Vansteenkiste
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Funamizu N, Ozaki T, Mishima K, Igarashi K, Omura K, Takada Y, Wakabayashi G. Evaluation of accuracy of laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy using the Glissonian approach with indocyanine green fluorescence negative staining by comparing estimated and actual resection volumes: A single-center retrospective cohort study. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 28:1060-1068. [PMID: 33638899 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy (LLMS) may improve patient outcomes, but it is difficult and its accuracy and safety are unknown. We evaluated the accuracy of LLMS using Glissonian approach with indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG) negative staining. METHODS Seventy-four patients eligible for LLMS except for segment 1 were enrolled. Preoperative three-dimensional CT-based surgical simulation was used to determine estimated liver resection volume (ELRV), which was compared with modified actual liver resection volume (ALRV) obtained from actual liver resection mass. The LLMS accuracy was also evaluated based on operator's experience (attending surgeon [AS] or trainee surgeon [TS]). RESULTS Estimated liver resection volumes significantly correlated with ALRVs (r = .82) in all cases. Moreover, TS-conducted LLMS also showed acceptable difference between ELRV and ALRV compared with AS-conducted LLMS. There were no intergroup differences in estimated blood loss, operation time, time of Pringle maneuver, postoperative complications, and length of postoperative hospitalization (P < .05). Moreover, R0 resection was comparable between the AS and TS groups. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy with Glissonian approach using ICG negative imaging ensured safe and accurate procedure owing to facilitated visualization of the resection line. Our approach was effective in avoiding postoperative liver dysfunction and securing radical resection. In addition, it might be helpful in TS education of LLMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naotake Funamizu
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University, Toon-city, Ehime prefecture, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ozaki
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Kazuharu Igarashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Kenji Omura
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Yasutsugu Takada
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University, Toon-city, Ehime prefecture, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:53. [PMID: 33608034 PMCID: PMC7893747 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02155-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed. RESULTS Operative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966). CONCLUSION Direct operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon's qualifications.
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, D'Hondt M. The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:559-568. [PMID: 33537846 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08317-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In selected patients, laparoscopic liver surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) leads to better short-term outcomes and comparable oncologic outcomes in comparison with an open approach. However, its role in two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) remains poorly explored. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the first and second stage of TSH. Demographic data, comorbid factors, perioperative outcomes, and short-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Between September 2011 and May 2020, 23 patients were planned to undergo a TSH. The first stage hepatectomy (FSH) was performed laparoscopically in 22 patients (96%) without need for conversion. The median blood loss was 50 cc (IQR 30-100 cc) and postoperative length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 2.5-5 days). R0 resections were obtained in 18 FSHs (78%), while all others were R1 vascular (22%). Fourteen patients (61%) underwent a second stage hepatectomy (SSH). All SSHs were anatomically major hepatectomies. SSH was performed laparoscopically in 7 patients (50%), with need for conversion in 1 case (14%). The median blood loss was slightly lower in the open liver resection (OLR) group compared to the LLR group (200 cc (IQR 110-375 cc) vs. 240 cc (IQR 150-400 cc), respectively. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 3 days shorter in the LLR group compared to the OLR group (4 days (IQR 3.5-4 days) vs. 7 days (IQR 4.5-8.5 days), respectively). CONCLUSIONS The already proven advantages of LLR in the treatment of CRLM favor the role of a laparoscopic approach in TSH for CRLM. In first stage minor or technically major hepatectomy, LLR is progressively becoming the gold standard. Laparoscopic second stage anatomically major hepatectomy is feasible in experienced hands, but should be limited to selected cases and should be performed in expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taillieu
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:755-772. [PMID: 32681074 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Malignant liver tumours include a wide range of primary and secondary tumours. Although surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment, modern therapies integrate a variety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies and have achieved dramatic improvements in survival. Extensive tumour loads, which have traditionally been considered unresectable, are now amenable to curative treatment through systemic conversion chemotherapies followed by a variety of interventions such as augmentation of the healthy liver through portal vein occlusion, staged surgeries or ablation modalities. Liver transplantation is established in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but is now emerging as a promising option in many other types of tumour such as perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. In this Review, we summarize the available therapies for the treatment of malignant liver tumours, with an emphasis on surgical and ablative approaches and how they align with other therapies such as modern anticancer drugs or radiotherapy. In addition, we describe three complex case studies of patients with malignant liver tumours. Finally, we discuss the outlook for future treatment, including personalized approaches based on molecular tumour subtyping, response to targeted drugs, novel biomarkers and precision surgery adapted to the specific tumour.
Collapse
|
42
|
Goh BK, Low TY, Teo JY, Lee SY, Chan CY, Chow PK, Chung AY, Ooi LPJ. Adoption of Robotic Liver, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery in Singapore: A Single Institution Experience with Its First 100 Consecutive Cases. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2020; 49:742-748. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Presently, robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (RHPBS) is increasingly adopted worldwide. This study reports our experience with the first 100 consecutive cases of RHPBS in Singapore. Methods: Retrospective review of a single-institution prospective database of the first 100 consecutive RHPBS performed over 6 years from February 2013 to February 2019. Eighty-six cases were performed by a single surgeon. Results: The 100 consecutive cases included 24 isolated liver resections, 48 pancreatic surgeries (including 2 bile duct resections) and 28 biliary surgeries (including 8 with concomitant liver resections). They included 10 major hepatectomies, 15 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 6 radical resections for gallbladder carcinoma and 8 hepaticojejunostomies. The median operation time was 383 minutes, with interquartile range (IQR) of 258 minutes and there were 2 open conversions. The median blood loss was 200ml (IQR 350ml) and 15 patients required intra-operative blood transfusion. There were no post-operative 90-day nor in-hospital mortalities but 5 patients experienced major (> grade 3a) morbidities. The median post-operative stay was 6 days (IQR 5 days) and there were 12 post-operative 30-day readmissions. Comparison between the first 50 and the subsequent 50 patients demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss, significantly lower proportion of malignant indications, and a decreasing frequency in liver resections performed. Conclusion: Our experience with the first 100 consecutive cases of RHPBS confirms its feasibility and safety when performed by experienced laparoscopic hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons. It can be performed for even highly complicated major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery with a low open conversion rate. Keywords: Biliary surgery, hepaticojejunostomy, liver resection, pancreas, pancreaticoduodenectomy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - LPJ Ooi
- Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gumbs AA, Hilal MA, Croner R, Gayet B, Chouillard E, Gagner M. The initiation, standardization and proficiency (ISP) phases of the learning curve for minimally invasive liver resection: comparison of a fellowship-trained surgeon with the pioneers and early adopters. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5268-5278. [PMID: 33174100 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08122-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using the Ideal Development Exploration Assessment and Long-term study (IDEAL) paradigm, Halls et al. created risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) curves concluding that Pioneers (P) and Early Adopters (EA) of minimally invasive (MI) liver resection obtained similar results after fewer cases. In this study, we applied this framework to a MI Hepatic-Pancreatic and Biliary fellowship-trained surgeon (FT) in order to assess where along the curves this generation fell. METHODS The term FT was used to designate surgeons without previous independent operative experience who went from surgical residency directly into fellowship. Three phases of the learning curve were defined using published data on EAs and Ps of MI Hepatectomy, including phase 1 (initiation) (i.e., the first 17 or 50), phase 2 (standardization) (i.e., cases 18-46 or 1-50) and phase 3 (proficiency) (i.e., cases after 46, 50 or 135). Data analysis was performed using the Social Science Statistics software ( www.socscistatistics.com ). Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. RESULTS From November 2007 until April 2018, 95 MI hepatectomies were performed by a FT. During phase 1, the FT approached larger tumors than the EA group (p = 0.002), that were more often malignant (94.1%) when compared to the P group (52.5%) (p < 0.001). During phase 2, the FT operated on larger tumors and more malignancies (93.1%) when compared to the Ps (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017, respectively). However, there was no difference when compared to the EA. In the phase 3, the EAs tended to perform more major hepatectomies (58.7) when compared to either the FT (30.6%) (p = 0.002) or the P's cases 51-135 and after 135 (35.3% and 44.3%, respectively) (both p values < 0.001). When compared to the Ps cases from 51-135, the FT operated on more malignancies (p = 0.012), but this was no longer the case after 135 cases by the Ps (p = 0.164). There were no statistically significant differences when conversions; major complications or 30- and 90-day mortality were compared among these 3 groups. DISCUSSION Using the IDEAL framework and RA-CUSUM curves, a FT surgeon was found to have curves similar to EAs despite having no previous independent experience operating on the liver. As in our study, FTs may tend to approach larger and more malignant tumors and do more concomitant procedures in patients with higher ASA classifications than either of their predecessors, without statistically significant increases in major morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION It is possible that the ISP (i.e., initiation, standardization, proficiency) model could apply to other innovative surgical procedures, creating different learning curves depending on where along the IDEAL paradigm surgeons fall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Gumbs
- Departement de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 10, Rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Mohamed Abu Hilal
- Unità Chirurgia Epatobiliopancreatica, Robotica e Mininvasiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, via Bissolati, 57, 25124, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roland Croner
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Haus 60a, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutaliste Montsouris, 42, Boulevard Jourdan, 75004, Paris, France
| | - Elie Chouillard
- Departement de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 10, Rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Michel Gagner
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital du Sacre Coeur, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open? Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5256-5267. [PMID: 33146810 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08118-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although early series focused on benign disease, minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) might be particularly suited for malignancy. Unlike their predecessors, fellowship-trained (FT) Hepatic-Pancreatic and Biliary (HPB) surgeons usually have equal skills in approaching peri-ampullary tumors (PT) either openly or via minimally invasive (MI) techniques. METHOD We retrospectively reviewed a MI-HPB-FT surgeon's 10-year experience with PD. A sub-analysis of malignant PT was also done (MIPD-PT vs. OPD-PT). The primary endpoint was to assess postoperative mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints included operative parameters, length of hospital stay, and survival analysis. Moreover, we addressed practice pattern changes for a surgeon straight out of training with no previous experience of independent surgery. RESULTS From December 2007-February 2018, one MI-HPB-FT performed a total of 100 PDs, including 57 MIPDs and 43 open PDs (OPDs). In both groups, over 70% of PDs were undertaken for malignancy. Eight patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal cancer (PDC) were in the OPD-PT group (as compared to only 2 in the MIPD-PT group) (p = 0.07). Estimated mean blood loss and length of stay were less in the MIPD-PT group (345 mL and 12 days) as compared to the OPD-PT group (971 mL and 16 days), p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively. However, the mean operative time was longer for the MIPD-PT (456 min) as compared to the OPD-PT (371 min), p < 0.001. Thirty and 90-day mortality was 2.6%/5.1% after MIPD-PT compared to 0%/3.2% after OPD-PT, respectively, p = 1. Overall 30-/90-day morbidity rates were similar at 41.0%/43.6% after MIPD-PT and 35.5%/41.9% after OPD-PT, respectively, p = 0.8 and 1. Complete resection (R0) rates were not statistically different, 97.4% after MIPD-PT compared to 87.0% after OPD-PT (p = 0.2). After MIPD and OPD for malignant PT, overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates, and median survival were 82.5%, 59.6% and 46.3% and 38 months as compared to 52.5%, 15.7% and 10.5% and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.01). In the MIDP-PT group, recurrence free survival (RFS) at 1, 3 and 5 years and median RFS were 69.1%, 41.9% and 33.5% and 26 months as compared to 50.4%, 6.3% and 6.3% and 13 months, in the OPD-PT group, respectively (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION FT HPB Surgeons who begin their practice with the ability to do both MI and OPD may preferentially approach resectable peri-ampullary tumors minimally invasively. This may result in decreased blood loss decreased length of hospital stays. Despite longer operative time, the improved visualization of MI techniques may enable superior R0 rates when compared to historical open controls. Moreover, combined with quicker initiation of adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatments, this may eventually result in improved survival.
Collapse
|
45
|
van der Heijde N, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Can MF, D'Hondt M, Di Benedetto F, Ivanecz A, Magistri P, Menon K, Papoulas M, Vivarelli M, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched evaluation. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6139-6149. [PMID: 33140153 PMCID: PMC8523385 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08109-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Although laparoscopic liver resection has become the standard for minor resections, evidence is lacking for more complex resections such as the right posterior sectionectomy (RPS). We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between laparoscopic (LRPS) and open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS). Methods An international multicenter retrospective study comparing patients undergoing LRPS or ORPS (January 2007—December 2018) was performed. Patients were matched based on propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was major complication rate defined as Accordion ≥ 3 grade. Secondary endpoints included blood loss, length of hospital stay (LOS) and resection status. A sensitivity analysis was done excluding the first 10 LRPS patients of each center to correct for the learning curve. Additionally, possible risk factors were explored for operative time, blood loss and LOS. Results Overall, 399 patients were included from 9 centers from 6 European countries of which 150 LRPS could be matched to 150 ORPS. LRPS was associated with a shorter operative time [235 (195–285) vs. 247 min (195–315) p = 0.004], less blood loss [260 (188–400) vs. 400 mL (280–550) p = 0.009] and a shorter LOS [5 (4–7) vs. 8 days (6–10), p = 0.002]. Major complication rate [n = 8 (5.3%) vs. n = 9 (6.0%) p = 1.00] and R0 resection rate [144 (96.0%) vs. 141 (94.0%), p = 0.607] did not differ between LRPS and ORPS, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed similar findings in the previous mentioned outcomes. In multivariable regression analysis blood loss was significantly associated with the open approach, higher ASA classification and malignancy as diagnosis. For LOS this was the open approach and a malignancy. Conclusion This international multicenter propensity score-matched study showed an advantage in favor of LRPS in selected patients as compared to ORPS in terms of operative time, blood loss and LOS without differences in major complications and R0 resection rate. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08109-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky van der Heijde
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mehmet F Can
- Department of Surgery, Lokman Hekim University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Surgery, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Krishna Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK.
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hobeika C, Fuks D, Cauchy F, Goumard C, Gayet B, Laurent A, Soubrane O, Salamé E, Cherqui D, Regimbeau JM, Mabrut JY, Scatton O, Vibert E. Benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers. J Hepatol 2020; 73:1100-1108. [PMID: 32407812 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Herein, we aimed to establish benchmark values - based on a composite indicator of healthcare quality - for the performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) and laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) using data from expert centers. METHODS Data from a nationwide multicenter survey including all patients undergoing LLLS and LRH between 2000 and 2017 were analyzed. Textbook outcome (TO) completion was considered in patients fulfilling all 6 of the following characteristics: negative margins, no transfusion, no complication, no prolonged hospital stay, no readmission and no mortality. For each procedure, a cut-off laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) volume by center was associated with TO on multivariable analysis. These cut-offs defined the expert centers. The benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median outcomes among these expert centers. RESULTS Among 4,400 LLRs performed in 29 centers, 855 patients who underwent LLLS and 488 who underwent LRH were identified. The overall incidences of TO after LLLS and LRH were 43.7% and 23.8%, respectively. LLR volume cut-offs of 25 LLR/year (odds ratio [OR] 2.45; bootstrap 95% CI 1.65-3.69; p = 0.001) and 35 LLR/year (OR 2.55; bootstrap 95% CI 1.34-5.63; p = 0.003) were independently associated with completion of TO after LLLS and LRH, respectively. Eight centers for LLLS and 6 centers for LRH, including 516 and 346 patients undergoing LLLS/LRH respectively, reached these cut-offs and were identified as expert centers. After LLLS, benchmark values of severe complication, mortality and TO completion were defined as ≤5.3%, ≤1.2% and ≥46.6%, respectively. After LRH, benchmark values of severe complication, mortality and TO completion were ≤20.4%, ≤2.8% and ≥24.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an up-to-date reference on the benchmark performance of LLLS and LRH in expert centers. LAY SUMMARY In a nationwide French survey of laparoscopic liver resection, expert centers were defined according to the completion of a textbook outcome, which is a composite indicator of healthcare quality. Benchmark values regarding intra-operative details and outcomes were established using data from 516 patients with laparoscopic left lateral sectionectiomy and 346 patients with laparoscopic right hepatectomy from expert centers. These values should be used as a reference point to improve the quality of laparoscopic resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hobeika
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Sorbonne Université, CRCA Saint Antoine, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Paris Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Hôpital Beaujon, 100 Boulevard Général Leclerc, 92118 Clichy, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Sorbonne Université, CRCA Saint Antoine, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery - Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Paris Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, Île-de-France, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Hôpital Beaujon, 100 Boulevard Général Leclerc, 92118 Clichy, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital of Tours, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Centre hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, 38 rue de la Chapelle, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens, France; SSPC (Simplification des Soins des Patients Complexes) - Unit of Clinical Research, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Sorbonne Université, CRCA Saint Antoine, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, 47 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation - Centre hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, 38 rue de la Chapelle, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Laparoscopic posterior segmental resections: How I do it: Tips and pitfalls. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:178-186. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
48
|
An invited commentary on "Comparison of the learning curves for robotic left and right hemihepatectomy: A retrospective cohort study" (International Journal of Surgery 2020; Epub adhead of print). Int J Surg 2020; 83:25-26. [PMID: 32920190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
49
|
Short-term Outcomes of "Difficult" Laparoscopic Liver Resection at Specialized Centers: Report From INSTALL (International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection)-2 on 4478 Patients. Ann Surg 2020; 275:940-946. [PMID: 32889884 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define the current status of "difficult" LLR, a global database was created and investigated. BACKGROUND In the Second International Consensus Conference in 2014, minor LLR was considered as a standard practice and major LLR remained an innovative procedure. Since then, no updates on worldwide trends have been available. METHODS A questionnaire on all consecutive patients who underwent difficult LLR (major hepatectomy, posterosuperior segmentectomy, sectionectomy, living donor hepatectomy, tumor size ≥10 cm, Child-Pugh grade ≥B, combined with biliary reconstruction, and Iwate criteria difficulty score ≥7) in 2014-2018 was distributed via email to 65 high-volume LLR centers worldwide. Individual data on patient and tumor demographics, surgical information, and short-term outcomes were obtained to create a large-scale international registry for analyses. RESULTS Overall, 58 centers in 19 countries performed 4478 difficult LLR (median, 58.5; range, 5-418) during the study period. Hepatocellular carcinoma accounted for ≥40% of all indications. Half of the patients underwent major hepatectomy, followed by sectionectomy, posterosuperior segmentectomy, and living donor hepatectomy. In the vast majority of procedures, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa complication rates of ≈10% and 90-day mortality rates of ≈1% were achieved. Left or right trisectionectomy had the worst Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa complication rate of ≥10% and 90-day mortality rate of 5%-10%. No significant correlation was observed between center volume and short-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Total 4478 patients underwent difficult LLR worldwide in 2014-2018. Most procedures are safe and feasible when conducted in specialized centers.
Collapse
|
50
|
Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy: A risk score for conversion for the paradigm of difficult laparoscopic liver resections. A single centre case series. Int J Surg 2020; 82:108-115. [PMID: 32861891 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Converted laparoscopic hepatectomies are known to lose some advantages of the minimally-invasiveness, and factors are identified to predict patients at risk. Specific evidence for laparoscopic right hepatectomy is expected of usefulness in clinical practice, given its technical peculiarities. The purpose of the study was the identification of risk factors and the development of a risk score for conversion of laparoscopic right hepatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Laparoscopic right hepatectomy performed at a single hepatobiliary surgical center were analyzed. The cohort was split in half to obtain a derivation and a validation set. Risk factors for conversion were identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. A "conversion risk score" was built assigning each factor 1 point and comparing the score with the conversion status for each patient. The accuracy was assessed by the area-under-the-receiver-operator-characteristic-curve. RESULTS Among 130 operations, 22 were converted (16.9%). Reasons were: 45.5% oncologic inadequacy, 31.8% bleeding, 9.1% adhesions, 9.1% biliostasis, 4.5% anaesthesiological problems. Independent risk factors for conversion were: previous laparoscopic liver surgery (Hazard Ratio 4.9, p 0.011), preoperative chemotherapy ( Hazard Ratio 6.2, p 0.031), malignant diagnosis (Hazard Ratio 3.3, p 0.037), closeness to hepatocaval confluence or inferior vena cava (Hazard Ratio 4.1, p 0.029), tumor volume (Hazard Ratio 2.9, p 0.024). Conversion rates correlated positively with the score, raising from 0 to 100% when the score increased from 0 to 5 (Spearman: p 0.032 in the derivation set, p 0.020 in the validation set). The risk of conversion showed a sharp increase passing from class 3 to 4, reaching a probability estimated between 60 and 71.4%. The score showed good accuracy (area-under-the-receiver-operator-characteristic-curve 0.82). CONCLUSION Specific risk factors for conversion are identified for laparoscopic right hepatectomy. This score may help in standardizing the choice of a pure laparoscopic or open approach for such challenging resections.
Collapse
|