Perioperative Risks of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review of the MBSAQIP Database

Economic evaluation of weight loss and transplantation strategies for kidney transplant candidates with obesity

Novel antiobesity medications, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), have expanded weight loss (WL) options for kidney transplantation (KT) candidates with obesity beyond lifestyle modifications and bariatric surgery. However, varying effectiveness, risk profiles, and costs make strategy choices challenging. To aid decision-making, we used a Markov model to examine the cost-effectiveness of different WL strategies over a 10-year horizon. A target WL of 15% of total body weight was used for the base case scenario, and we compared these strategies to a "liberal" KT strategy of transplanting candidates with obesity. Outcomes included costs (2023 US dollars), quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. In analysis, a liberal KT strategy was favored over lifestyle modifications and GLP-1RAs. Among WL strategies, bariatric surgery was the most effective and cost the least, whereas lifestyle modification had the highest cumulative costs and was the least effective. Compared to liberal KT, bariatric surgery costs $45 859 per quality-adjusted life year gained. GLP-1RAs were favored over bariatric surgery only when drug costs were below $5000 per year (base cost $12 077). In conclusion, for KT candidates with obesity, a liberal KT strategy and bariatric surgery are preferred over lifestyle modifications alone and GLP-1RAs based on outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

A 5-year propensity-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery can improve renal function in patients with comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) and obesity. Additionally, bariatric surgery can enhance outcomes following renal transplantation. The safety of bariatric surgery in patients with CKD has been debated in the literature. This study evaluates the frequency of perioperative complications associated with CKD.

METHODS

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried from 2015-2019. Patients were included if they had a vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and were stratified based on CKD status. An unmatched and propensity-matched analysis was performed comparing 30-day perioperative outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 717,809 patients included in this study, 5817(0.8%) had CKD, of whom 2266(0.3%) were on dialysis. 74.3% of patients with CKD underwent VSG with 25.7% underwent RYGB. Comparing RYGB to VSG, patients who underwent RYGB had a higher rate of deep organ space infection (0.7%vs.0.1%,p = 0.021) and re-intervention (5.0% vs. 2.2%,p < 0.001). Within the VSG cohort, a matched analysis was performed for those with CKD and without CKD. The CKD cohort had higher risk of complications such as bleeding (2.1%vs. 0.9%,p < 0.001), readmission (9.3%vs.4.9%,p < 0.001), reoperation (2.7%vs.1.3%,p < 0.001), and need for reintervention (2.2%vs.1.3%,p < 0.001). Notably, patients with CKD also had a higher mortality (0.6%vs.0.2%,p = 0.003). No difference was seen between patients with renal insufficiency and patients on dialysis.

CONCLUSION

VSG has been the operation of choice in patients with CKD. Our results showed it is the safer option for patients with CKD compared to RYGB. Although this patient population does have an increased risk of adverse perioperative events, dialysis didn't affect the outcome. Bariatric surgeons who operate on patients with CKD should be well informed and remain vigilant given the increased perioperative risk. The risk is still considerably low, and the potential benefit on renal function and improvement in candidacy for renal transplant outweigh the risk. They should be considered as surgical candidates.

Comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients giving birth after bariatric surgery: reinterventions and obstetric outcomes

BACKGROUND

Women of childbearing age comprise approximately 65% of all patients who undergo bariatric surgery in the USA. Despite this, data on maternal reintervention and obstetric outcomes after surgery are limited especially with regard to comparative effectiveness between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the most common procedures today.

METHODS

Using IBM MarketScan claims data, we performed a retrospective cohort study of women ages 18-52 who gave birth after undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 2-year continuous follow-up. We balanced the cohort on observable characteristics using inverse probability weighting. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between procedure selection and outcomes, including risk of reinterventions (revisions, enteral access, vascular access, reoperations, other) or adverse obstetric outcomes (pregnancy complications, severe maternal morbidity, and delivery complications). In all analyses, we controlled for age, U.S. state, and Elixhauser or Bateman comorbidities.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2016, 1,079 women gave birth within the first two years after undergoing bariatric surgery. Among these women, we found no significant difference in reintervention rates among those who had gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.91-2.21, P = 0.13). We then examined obstetric outcomes in the patients who gave birth after bariatric surgery. Compared to patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, those who had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were not significantly more likely to experience any adverse obstetric outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this first national cohort of females giving birth following bariatric surgery, no significant difference was observed in persons who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy with respect to either reinterventions or obstetric outcomes. This suggests possible equipoise between these two procedures with regards to safety within the first two years following a bariatric procedure among women who may become pregnant, but more research is needed to confirm these findings in larger samples.

Venous thromboembolism: risk factors in the sleeve gastrectomy era

BACKGROUND

Of complications after bariatric surgery, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has the greatest impact on mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To examine risk factors for postoperative VTE and identify high-risk patients who may benefit from prolonged prophylaxis.

SETTING

National Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database METHODS: Patients who underwent primary, laparoscopic bariatric surgery 2015-2019 were identified. Risk factors were sex, age, body mass index (BMI), history of VTE, immobility, venous stasis disease, operative time greater >3 hours, and procedure type. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between factors and the outcome of postoperative VTE. We examined contributions of each factor through average marginal effects and E-values. We added Black versus White race to the same regression model to understand whether race acted as a moderating factor.

RESULTS

In our study, 1677 of 605,782 (.28%) patients experienced postoperative VTE. On multivariable analysis, previous history of VTE had the greatest association, increasing risk of postoperative VTE by +.90% points (95% CI [confidence interval] +.73% to +1.07%). Lower-95% CI E-value bounds were 1.43 for men, 1.11 preoperative BMI, 7.38 history of VTE, and 2.15 operative length >3 hours. Black patients had an additional +.18% (95% CI +.14 to +.22%) risk of postoperative VTE, corresponding to a lower E-value bound of 2.50.

CONCLUSION

In this study using recent years' national bariatric surgery data, we find history of VTE is the greatest driver of postoperative VTE. Most importantly, Black patients are more likely to suffer postoperative VTE. Now is the time to use the power of quality improvement programs to ensure health equity for all our patients.

Successful surgical weight loss with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity prior to kidney transplantation

Morbid obesity in kidney transplant (KT) candidates is associated with increased complications and graft failure. Multiple series have demonstrated rapid and significant weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in this population. Long-term and post-transplant weight evolutions are still largely unknown. A retrospective review was performed in eighty patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who underwent LSG in preparation for KT. From a median initial BMI of 43.7 kg/m² , the median change at 1-year was -10.0 kg/m² . Successful surgical weight loss (achieving a BMI < 35 kg/m² or an excess body weight loss >50%) was attained in 76.3% and was associated with male gender, predialysis status, lower obesity class and lack of coronary artery disease. Thirty-one patients subsequently received a KT with a median delay of 16.7 months. Weight regain (increase in BMI of 5 kg/m² postnadir) and recurrent obesity (weight regain + BMI > 35) remain a concern, occurring post-KT in 35.7% and 17.9%, respectively. Early LSG should be considered for morbidly obese patients with ESKD for improved weight loss outcomes. Early KT after LSG does not appear to affect short-term surgical weight loss. Candidates with a BMI of up to 45 kg/m² can have a reasonable expectation to achieve the limit within 1 year.

Bariatric Surgery and Long-term Survival in Patients With Obesity and End-stage Kidney Disease

Importance

Obesity rates in patients with end-stage kidney disease are rising, contribute to excess morbidity, and limit access to kidney transplant. Despite this, there continues to be controversy around the use of bariatric surgery in this patient population.

Objective

To determine whether bariatric surgery is associated with improvement in long-term survival among patients with obesity and end-stage kidney disease.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective cohort study and secondary analysis of previously collected data from the United States Renal Data System registry (2006-2015). We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to evaluate differences in outcomes for patients receiving bariatric surgery (n = 1597) compared with a matched cohort of nonsurgical patients (n = 4750) receiving usual care. Data were analyzed between September 3, 2019, and November 13, 2019.

Exposure

Receipt of bariatric surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included disease-specific mortality and incidence of kidney transplant.

Results

Surgical and nonsurgical control patients had similar age, demographics, and comorbid disease burden. The mean (SD) age was 49.8 (11.2) years for surgical patients vs 51.7 (11.1) years for nonsurgical patients. Six hundred fifteen surgical patients (38.5%) were black vs 1833 nonsurgical patients (38.6%). Surgery was associated with lower all-cause mortality at 5 years compared with usual care (cumulative incidence, 25.6% vs 39.8%; hazard ratio, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.60-0.78). This was driven by lower mortality from cardiovascular causes at 5 years for patients undergoing bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical control patients (cumulative incidence, 8.4% vs 17.2%; hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65). Bariatric surgery was also associated with an increase in kidney transplant at 5 years (cumulative incidence, 33.0% vs 20.4%; hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.58-2.09). However, at 1 year, bariatric surgery was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared with usual care (cumulative incidence, 8.6% vs 7.7%; hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.85).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with obesity and end-stage kidney disease, bariatric surgery was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with usual care. Bariatric surgery was also associated with an increase in kidney transplant. Bariatric surgery may warrant further consideration in the treatment of patients with obesity and end-stage kidney disease.

Primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: a propensity-matched comparison of 30-day outcomes

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity. There is uncertainty regarding rates of adverse outcomes between the most common methods: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

OBJECTIVES

To compare rates of readmission, reoperation, intervention, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, all-cause and procedure-related mortality, and postoperative complications at 30 days between LRYGB and LSG.

SETTING

Retrospective, observational, multicenter registry.

METHODS

We identified 611,619 patients from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018 (447,326 [73.1%] LSG; 164,293 [26.9%] LRYGB).

RESULTS

Adverse events were more common after LRYGB (readmission: 3% with LSG versus 5.9% with LRYGB [P < .001; odds ratio {OR}, LSG/LRYGB = .489]; intervention: .9% with LSG versus 2.4% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .357]; reoperation: .8% with LSG versus 2.3% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .363]; unplanned ICU admission: .52% with LSG versus 1.1% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .454]; all-cause mortality: .07% with LSG versus .15% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .489]; procedure-related mortality: .04% with LSG versus .08% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .446]; Clavien-Dindo I: .20% with LSG versus .63% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .317]; Clavien-Dindo II: .70% with LSG versus 1.3% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .527]; Clavien-Dindo III: 3.3% with LSG versus 6.6% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .481]; Clavien-Dindo IV: .36% with LSG versus .76% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .466]; and Clavien-Dindo V: .07% with LSG versus .15% with LRYGB [P < .001; OR, LSG/LRYGB = .488]). Surgery type was among the strongest independent predictors of adverse events, and LRYGB conferred higher adjusted odds of all adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 1.791 [P < .001]; procedure-related mortality: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 1.979 [P < .001]; readmission: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 1.921 [P < .001]; unplanned ICU admission: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 1.870 [P < .001]; intervention: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 2.662 [P < .001]; reoperation: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 2.646 [P < .001]; and Clavien-Dindo grade: OR, LRYGB/LSG = 2.007 [P < .001]).

CONCLUSION

The rates of 30-day adverse outcomes are lower after LSG compared with after LRYGB. LRYGB independently conferred increased odds of adverse outcomes compared with LSG, and surgery type was among the strongest predictors of adverse outcomes.

Perioperative risks of bariatric surgery among patients with and without history of solid organ transplant

Bariatric surgery is effective among patients with previous transplant in limited case series. However, the perioperative safety of bariatric surgery in this patient population is poorly understood. Therefore, we assessed the safety of bariatric surgery among previous-transplant patients using a database that captures >92% of all US bariatric procedures. All primary, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures between 2017 and 2018 were identified from the MBSAQIP dataset. Patients with previous transplant (n = 610) were compared with patients without previous transplant (n = 321 447). Primary outcomes were 30 day readmissions, surgical complications, medical complications, and death. Multivariable logistic regression with predictive margins was used to compare outcomes. Previous transplant patients experienced higher incidence of readmissions (8.0% vs 3.5%), surgical complications (5.0% vs 2.7%), and medical complications (4.3% vs 1.5%). There was no difference in incidence of death (0.2% vs 0.1%). Among individual complications, there no statistical differences in intraabdominal leak, unplanned reoperation, myocardial infarction, or infectious complications. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was found to be a strong moderator of primary outcomes, with the highest risk of complications occurring at the lowest baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Given the many long-term benefits of bariatric surgery among patients with previous transplant, our findings should not preclude this patient population from operative consideration.