Survival Benefit Associated With the Use of Extracorporeal Life Support for Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Prenatal diagnosis and risk stratification of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare heterogenous disorder with varying degrees of severity. Infant survival rates in high-income countries are approaching 80% in isolated CDH; however, over 50% will have long-term morbidities. Advanced antenatal imaging, including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, has made it possible to prognosticate severity of CDH and to stratify risk when counseling expectant parents. Risk stratification can also better prepare healthcare teams to enable optimal neonatal management, and provide options for fetal intervention or, where legally permitted, pregnancy termination. Factors that may affect the immediate and long-term prognosis for CDH include prenatal diagnosis, gestational age at detection and delivery, side of the defect, presence of additional structural or genetic abnormalities, defect size, estimation of fetal lung volume, the extent of visceral herniation, and the delivery center's experience in caring for neonates with CDH. Optimizing the outcome for families and infants begins with an early prenatal diagnosis followed by referral to a diverse and inclusive multidisciplinary center with CDH expertise. Prediction of disease severity is supported by accurate fetal imaging and comprehensive genetic testing, and allows the care team to provide realistic outcome expectations during the counseling of expectant parents of all racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Racial Inequalities in the Initial Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in the Houston Area

INTRODUCTION

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is readily prenatally diagnosed and associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. Delivery at facilities with adequate resources for neonatal resuscitation, such as Children's Surgery Verification (CSV) centers, is recommended; however, disparities have been clinically noted. We aimed to characterize locoregional care of CDH and the impact of race and ethnicity.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File to identify infants <1 y-old with CDH based on international classification of diseases 9/10 codes (2013-2021). Only initial birth admissions in the Houston region were included. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 257 newborns with CDH. While births were noted across 29 facilities, the majority were at the 2 CSV centers in Houston. There was no significant difference in illness severity, prematurity or insurance status by race. Black and 'other' patients were less likely to deliver at CSV facilities (Black 32% versus 'Other' 48% versus White 70% versus Asian 81%; P < 0.01), receive ECMO (Black 6% versus 'Other' 5% versus White 19% versus Asian 29%; P < 0.01) or undergo a CDH repair (Black 26% versus 'Other' 33% versus White 51% versus Asian 71%; P < 0.01) on their index admission and had lower average daily costs (Black $10,292 [$3219-25,021] versus 'Other' $9106 [$3617-15,672] versus White $12,906 [$9038-18,550] versus Asian $12,896 [$7469-23,817]; P < 0.05). Additionally, black and 'other' patients were more likely to be transferred (Black 23% versus 'Other' 28% versus White 12% versus Asian 14%; P < 0.05). None of the patients born at CSV centers transferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Most Houston-born patients deliver at high-resource centers; however, Black and 'other' patients are less likely to deliver at CSV centers and more likely to require transfer during the critical neonatal period. This suggests a vulnerable population which may benefit from targeted intervention to improve prenatal care and delivery planning.

The role of ECLS in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

In the complex arena of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) management, Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) provides a strategic window for stabilization and surgical correction, during which time marginal gains in patient stability can tip the scales towards survival. In modern neonatal ECLS, the focus is increasingly on minimizing survivor morbidity, which calls for considerable multidisciplinary expertise to enhance patient outcomes. This review will delve into the most up-to-date literature on the management of CDH in the context of ECLS, providing a comprehensive synthesis of current insights.

Ventilator strategies in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

This review focuses on contemporary mechanical ventilator practices used in the initial management of neonates born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Both conventional and non-conventional ventilation modes in CDH are reviewed. Special emphasis is placed on the rationale for gentle ventilation and the current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines that are recommended for supporting these fragile infants. The interplay between CDH lung hypoplasia and other key cardiopulmonary elements of the disease, namely a reduced pulmonary vascular bed, abnormal pulmonary vascular remodeling, and left ventricular hypoplasia, are discussed. Finally, we provide insights into future avenues for mechanical ventilator research in CDH.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: relationship between defect size and outcome. Experience in a reference centre

INTRODUCTION

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a therapeutic challenge. The surgical classification recommended by the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia study group (CDHSG), based on the size of the defect, is used for staging in reference centres. Larger defects are associated with poorer outcomes. Our aim was to describe and compare the morbidity at hospital discharge of newborns who underwent surgical correction of CDH at the Juan P. Garrahan, according to the surgical staging of the defect proposed by the CDHSG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included patients with CDH admitted to the Juan P. Garrahan Hospital between 2012 and 2020, and we analysed the distribution, morbidity and mortality associated with the size of the defect. We carried out a descriptive analysis, calculating measures of central tendency and dispersion, and bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients with CDH were admitted and 158 underwent surgery. We found that defect sizes C and D sizes were associated with an increased risk of chronic pulmonary disease (CPD) (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.2-13.4; P<.0000), need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 3.9; 95% CI, 1.3-12.8; P<.005) and chylothorax (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.8-6.4; P<.10]. The multivariate analysis revealed that a large defect size (C-D) was independently and significantly associated with CPD (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.76-9.95).

CONCLUSION

Staging the defect according to de CDHSG classification during surgery allows the application of uniform management criteria and the prediction of patient outcomes and complications during the hospital stay.

Diagnosis and management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a 2023 update from the Canadian Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Collaborative

OBJECTIVE

The Canadian Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) Collaborative sought to make its existing clinical practice guideline, published in 2018, into a 'living document'.

DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Critical appraisal of CDH literature adhering to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Evidence accumulated between 1 January 2017 and 30 August 2022 was analysed to inform changes to existing or the development of new CDH care recommendations. Strength of consensus was also determined using a modified Delphi process among national experts in the field.

RESULTS

Of the 3868 articles retrieved in our search that covered the 15 areas of CDH care, 459 underwent full-text review. Ultimately, 103 articles were used to inform 20 changes to existing recommendations, which included aspects related to prenatal diagnosis, echocardiographic evaluation, pulmonary hypertension management, surgical readiness criteria, the type of surgical repair and long-term health surveillance. Fifteen new CDH care recommendations were also created using this evidence, with most related to the management of pain and the provision of analgesia and neuromuscular blockade for patients with CDH.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 Canadian CDH Collaborative's clinical practice guideline update provides a management framework for infants and children with CDH based on the best available evidence and expert consensus.

The role of extracorporeal life support and timing of repair in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) serves as a rescue therapy for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and severe cardiopulmonary failure, and only half of these patients survive to discharge. This costly intervention has a significant complication risk and is reserved for patients with the most severe disease physiology refractory to maximal cardiopulmonary support. Some contraindications to ECLS do exist such as coagulopathy, lethal chromosomal or congenital anomaly, very preterm birth, or very low birth weight, but many of these limits are being evaluated through further research. Consensus guidelines from the past decade vary in recommendations for ECLS use in patients with CDH but this therapy appears to have a survival benefit in the most severe subset of patients. Improved outcomes have been observed for patients treated at high-volume centers. This review details the evolving literature surrounding management paradigms for timing of CDH repair for patients receiving preoperative ECLS. Most recent data support early repair following cannulation to avoid non-repair which is uniformly fatal in this population. Longer ECLS runs are associated with decreased survival, and patient physiology should guide ECLS weaning and eventual decannulation rather than limiting patients to arbitrary run lengths. Standardization of care across centers is a major focus to limit unnecessary costs and improve short-term and long-term outcomes for these complex patients.

The CDH Study Group: Past, Present, and Future

The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG) is an international consortium of medical centers actively collecting and voluntarily contributing data pertaining to live born congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients born and/or managed at their institutions. These data are aggregated to construct a comprehensive registry that participating centers can access to address specific clinical inquiries and track patient outcomes. Since its establishment in 1995, 147 centers have taken part in this initiative, including 53 centers from 17 countries outside the United States, with 95 current active centers across the globe. The registry has amassed data on over 14,000 children, resulting in the creation of over 75 manuscripts based on registry data to date. International, multicenter consortia enable health care professionals managing uncommon, complex, and diverse diseases to formulate evidence-based hypotheses and draw meaningful and generalizable conclusions for clinical inquiries. This review will explore the formation and structure of the CDHSG and its registry, outlining their functions, center participation, and the evolution of data collection. Additionally, we will provide an overview of the evidence generated by the CDHSG, with a particular emphasis on contributions post-2014, and look ahead to the future directions the study group will take in addressing CDH.

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Vascular Disease

This review provides a comprehensive summary of the current understanding of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia, outlining the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, methods for assessing PH severity, optimal management strategies, and prognostic implications.

Center Volume and Survival Relationship for Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Treated With Extracorporeal Life Support

OBJECTIVES

Literature is emerging regarding the role of center volume as an independent variable contributing to improved outcomes. A higher volume of index procedures may be associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. This association has not been examined for the subgroup of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Our study aims to examine the risk-adjusted association between center volume and outcomes in CDH-ECLS neonates, hypothesizing that higher center volume confers a survival advantage.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective comparative study using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database.

SETTING

One hundred twenty international pediatric centers.

PATIENTS

Neonates with CDH managed with ECLS from 2000 to 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The cohort included 4,985 neonates with a mortality rate of 50.6%. For the 120 centers studied, mean center volume was 42.4 ± 34.6 CDH ECLS cases over the 20-year study period. In an adjusted model, higher ECLS volume was associated with lower odds of mortality: odds ratio (OR) 0.995 (95% CI, 0.992-0.999; p = 0.014). For an increase in one sd in volume, that is, 1.75 cases annually, the OR for mortality was lower by 16.7%. Volume was examined as a categorical exposure variable where low-volume centers (fewer than 2 cases/yr) were associated with 54% higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.29) compared with high-volume centers. On-ECLS complications (mechanical, neurologic, cardiac, hematologic metabolic, and renal) were not associated with volume. The likelihood of infectious complications was higher for low- (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.06-3.40) and medium-volume (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.03-3.39) compared with high-volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a survival advantage directly proportional to center volume was observed for CDH patients managed with ECLS. There was no significant difference in most complication rates. Future studies should aim to identify factors contributing to the higher mortality and morbidity observed at low-volume centers.

Impact of Repeat Extracorporeal Life Support on Mortality and Short-term In-hospital Morbidities in Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of repeat extracorporeal life support (ECLS) on survival and in-hospital outcomes in the congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) neonates.

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of ECLS, investigations on multiple ECLS courses for CDH neonates are limited.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all ECLS-eligible CDH neonates enrolled in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group registry between 1995 and 2019. CDH infants with estimated gestational age at birth <32 weeks and a birth weight <1.8 kg and/or with major cardiac or chromosomal anomalies were excluded. The primary outcomes were survival and morbidities during the index hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of 10,089 ECLS-eligible CDH infants, 3025 (30%) received 1 ECLS course, and 160 (1.6%) received multiple courses. The overall survival rate for patients who underwent no ECLS, 1 ECLS course, and multicourse ECLS were 86.9±0.8%, 53.8±1.8%, and 43.1±7.7%, respectively. Overall ECLS survival rate is increased by 5.1±4.6% ( P =0.03) for CDH neonates treated at centers that conduct repeat ECLS compared with those that do not offer repeat ECLS. This suggests that there would be an overall survival benefit from increased use of multiple ECLS courses. Infants who did not receive ECLS support had the lowest morbidity risk, while survivors of multicourse ECLS had the highest rates of morbidities during the index hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival is lower for repeat ECLS, the use of multiple ECLS courses has the potential to increase overall survival for CDH neonates. Increased use of repeat ECLS might be associated with improved survival. The potential survival advantage of repeat ECLS must be balanced against the increased risk of morbidities during the index hospitalization.

Long-Term Functional Outcomes at 1-Year After Hospital Discharge in Critically Ill Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

OBJECTIVES

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a birth defect associated with long-term morbidity. Our objective was to examine longitudinal change in Functional Status Scale (FSS) after hospital discharge in CDH survivors.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Center for comprehensive CDH management at a quaternary, free-standing children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Infants with Bochdalek CDH were admitted to the ICU between January 2009 and December 2019 and survived until hospital discharge.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred forty-two infants (58% male, mean birth weight 3.08 kg, 80% left-sided defects) met inclusion criteria. Relevant clinical data were extracted from the medical record to calculate FSS (primary outcome) at hospital discharge and three subsequent outpatient follow-up time points. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) FSS score at hospital discharge was 8.0 (7.0-9.0); 39 patients (27.5%) had at least moderate impairment (FSS ≥ 9). Median (IQR) FSS at 0- to 6-month ( n = 141), 6- to 12-month ( n = 141), and over 12-month ( n = 140) follow-up visits were 7.0 (7.0-8.0), 7.0 (6.0-8.0), and 6.0 (6.0-7.0), respectively. Twenty-one patients (15%) had at least moderate impairment at over 12-month follow-up; median composite FSS scores in the over 12-month time point decreased by 2.0 points from hospital discharge. Median feeding domain scores improved by 1.0 (1.0-2.0), whereas other domain scores remained without impairment. Multivariable analysis demonstrated right-sided, C- or D-size defects, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and chromosomal anomalies were associated with impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of CDH survivors at our center had mild functional status impairment (FSS ≤ 8) at discharge and 1-year follow-up; however, nearly 15% of patients had moderate impairment during this time period. The feeding domain had the highest level of functional impairment. We observed unchanged or improving functional status longitudinally over 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge. Longitudinal outcomes will guide interdisciplinary management strategies in CDH survivors.

Extracorporeal life support in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is the most common indication for ECLS in neonatal respiratory failure. The ultimate purpose of ECLS is to grant cardiopulmonary support, allowing time for operative intervention and optimization of cardiopulmonary function as the pathophysiologic processes of pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary hypoplasia, and ventricular dysfunction either improve or resolve. In CDH, ECLS plays a crucial role in the management of the most challenging patients, facilitating postnatal stabilization, allowing a ventilation strategy which minimizes barotrauma and volutrauma, and permitting treatment of and recovery from pulmonary hypertension and/or cardiac dysfunction. Understanding the nuances of CDH patients, which differ from other forms of neonatal respiratory failure, and the benefits of ECLS for these infants, is crucial for effective management. CDH patients present distinct challenges. Every aspect of ECLS, from mode of support and anticoagulation medication to pump selection, ventilation strategy, pulmonary hypertension management, and the weaning process, requires meticulous consideration. ECLS for CDH serves as a bridge to making informed decisions, granting clinicians stability and time to manage / recover from specific pathophysiologic consequences, and it offers the potential for survival among even the most challenging and complex patients. As overall care and management for infants with CDH receiving ECLS continue to improve, the focus has shifted toward managing survivor morbidity. Given the multisystem nature of the disease, this requires significant experience, expertise, and multidisciplinary teamwork to optimize long-term outcomes for these patients.

Morbidity and Mortality in Neonates with Symptomatic Congenital Lung Malformation

BACKGROUND

Neonatal resection is the mainstay treatment of children presenting with symptomatic congenital lung malformation (CLM) at birth. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality after neonatal CLM resection using a large multicenter database.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System database was performed. Children with a symptomatic CLM managed by lung resection before 30 days of age were included (2016 to 2021). Primary outcomes measures were postoperative respiratory complication and any complication, including death.

RESULTS

Of 1,791 CLM patients identified, 256 (14%) underwent neonatal resection for symptomatic disease. Pathology included 123 (48%) congenital pulmonary airway malformation, 24 (10%) bronchopulmonary sequestration, 5 (2%) congenital lobar emphysema, 16 (6%) hybrid, and 88 (34%) unclassified lesion. Preoperative mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were employed in 149 (58.2%) and 17 (6.7%) of cases, respectively. The median age at resection was 6.5 days (interquartile range 2 to 23). Postoperatively, 25 (10%) required mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more, 3 (1%) continued ECMO, and 3 (1%) required ECMO rescue. The overall respiratory complication rate was 34% (87), rate of any complication was 51% (130), median postoperative length of stay was 20 days (interquartile range 9 to 52), and mortality rate was 14.5% (37). Birthweight was inversely correlated with complication risk (incidence rate ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.83, p = 0.006). Cardiac structural anomaly was associated with a 21-day longer postoperative length of stay (95% CI 6 to 35, p = 0.006) and 2.2 times increased risk of any complication (95% CI 1.18 to 4.02, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multicenter study, ECMO use and mortality are relatively uncommon among neonates undergoing lung resection for a symptomatic CLM. However, postoperative morbidity remains high, particularly in those with cardiac structural disease.

Early nitric oxide is not associated with improved outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

BACKGROUND

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is widely used for the management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH); however, evidence of benefit is limited.

METHODS

This is a multicenter cohort study using data from the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group between 2015 and 2020. The impact of early iNO use in the first 3 days of life prior to ECLS use on mortality or ECLS use was explored using multivariate logistic regression models and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 1777 infants, 863 (48.6%) infants received early iNO treatment. Infants receiving iNO had lower birth weight, larger defect size, more severe pulmonary hypertension, and abnormal ventricular size and function. After controlling for these factors, early iNO use was associated with increased mortality (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.03, P = 0.03) and increased ECLS use (aOR 3.44, 95% CI 2.11-5.60, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses after stratification by echocardiographic characteristics and defect size revealed no subgroup with a reduction in mortality or ECLS use.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of iNO in the first 3 days of life prior to ECLS was not associated with a reduction in mortality or ECLS use in either the regression models or the subgroup analyses. The widespread use of iNO in this vulnerable population requires reconsideration.

IMPACT

Evidence to support widespread use of iNO for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia is limited. The use of iNO in the first 3 days of life was associated with significantly increased mortality and ECLS use. Stratification by echocardiographic characteristics and defect size did not reveal a subgroup that benefited from iNO. Even the subset of patients with R-to-L shunts at both ductal and atrial levels, a surrogate for elevated pulmonary arterial pressures in the absence of significantly decreased LV compliance, did not benefit from early iNO use. Early iNO therapy was of no benefit in the management of acute pulmonary hypertension in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, supporting reconsideration of its use in this population.

Association Between Early Prostacyclin Therapy and Extracorporeal Life Support Use in Patients With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Importance

Prostacyclin (PGI2) is a therapeutic option to treat congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)-associated pulmonary hypertension in neonates. Its use may decrease the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

Objective

To evaluate the association of early PGI2 therapy with ECLS use and outcomes among patients with CDH.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a cohort study from the CDH Study Group (CDHSG) registry of patients born from January 2007 to December 2019. Patients were from 88 different tertiary pediatric referral centers worldwide that contributed data to the CDHSG. Patients were included in the study if they were admitted within the first week of life. Propensity score matching was performed using estimated gestational age, birth weight, transfer status, 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores, highest and lowest partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide in the first 24 hours of life, and degree of pulmonary hypertension as covariates to generate a matched cohort of exposed and unexposed patients. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to December 2022.

Exposures

Early PGI2 therapy was defined as initiation of PGI2 within the first week of life. Patients who received ECLS were included in the early PGI2 group if PGI2 was started prior to ECLS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients receiving ECLS in the exposed and unexposed groups.

Results

Of 6227 patients who met inclusion criteria (mean [SD] gestational age, 37.4 [2.36] weeks; 2618 [42%] female), 206 (3.3%) received early PGI2 therapy. ECLS was used in 46 of 206 patients who received PGI2 (22.2%) and 1682 of 6021 who did not (27.9%). After propensity score matching, there were 147 patients in the treatment and control groups. Thirty-four patients who received PGI2 (23.3%) and 63 who did not (42.9%) received ECLS. Those who received PGI2 were less likely to receive ECLS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.68) and had shorter mean (SD) duration of ECLS (8.6 [3.73] days vs 12.6 [6.61] days; P < .001), although there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, there was decreased use of ECLS and decreased ECLS duration among patients with CDH who started PGI2 therapy during the first week of life. These results identify a potential advantage of early prostacyclin therapy in this population.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes Among Newborns with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Importance

There is some data to suggest that racial and ethnic minority infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) have poorer clinical outcomes.

Objective

To determine what patient- and institutional-level factors are associated with racial and ethnic differences in CDH mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Multicenter cohort study of 49 US children's hospitals using the Pediatric Health Information System database from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Participants were patients with CDH admitted on day of life 0 who underwent surgical repair. Patient race and ethnicity were guardian-reported vs hospital assigned as Black, Hispanic (White or Black), or White. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to March 2022.

Exposures

Patient race and ethnicity: (1) White vs Black and (2) White vs Hispanic; and institutional-level diversity (as defined by the percentage of Black and Hispanic patients with CDH at each hospital): (1) 30% or less, (2) 31% to 40%, and (3) more than 40%.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 60-day mortality. The study hypothesized that hospitals managing a more racially and ethnically diverse population of patients with CDH would be associated with lower mortality among Black and Hispanic infants.

Results

Among 1565 infants, 188 (12%), 306 (20%), and 1071 (68%) were Black, Hispanic, and White, respectively. Compared with White infants, Black infants had significantly lower gestational ages (mean [SD], White: 37.6 [2] weeks vs Black: 36.6 [3] weeks; difference, 1 week; 95% CI for difference, 0.6-1.4; P < .001), lower birthweights (White: 3.0 [1.0] kg vs Black: 2.7 [1.0] kg; difference, 0.3 kg; 95% CI for difference, 0.2-0.4; P < .001), and higher extracorporeal life support use (White: 316 patients [30%] vs Black: 69 patients [37%]; χ21 = 3.9; P = .05). Black infants had higher 60-day (White: 99 patients [9%] vs Black: 29 patients [15%]; χ21 = 6.7; P = .01) and in-hospital (White: 133 patients [12%] vs Black: 40 patients [21%]; χ21 = 10.6; P = .001) mortality . There were no mortality differences in Hispanic patients compared with White patients. On regression analyses, institutional diversity of 31% to 40% in Black patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.78; P = .02) and diversity greater than 40% in Hispanic patients (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89; P = .03) were associated with lower mortality without altering outcomes in White patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 1565 who underwent surgical repair patients with CDH, Black infants had higher 60-day and in-hospital mortality after adjusting for disease severity. Hospitals treating a more racially and ethnically diverse patient population were associated with lower mortality in Black and Hispanic patients.

Ethical Considerations in Critically Ill Neonatal and Pediatric Patients

The care of critically ill neonates and pediatric patients can be particularly emotionally and ethically challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that we can improve the patient, family, and care team experience in the critical care setting through a better understanding and application of ethical frameworks and communication strategies. We conducted a multidisciplinary panel session at the American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition in the fall of 2022 wherein we explored a myriad of ethical and communication considerations in this unique patient population, with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) as the congenital anomaly/disease framework. In this review, we will cover state of the art topics in ethics, communication, and palliative care including basic terminology, communication strategies such as trauma-informed communication, establishing/evolving goals of care, futility, medically inappropriate treatment, ethical frameworks, parental discretion, establishing milestones, internal/external intentions, and re-direction of care. These topics will be helpful to many specialties who are involved in the care of critically ill neonates and children including maternal fetal medicine, pediatrics, neonatology, pediatric critical care, palliative care, and pediatric surgery, along with the pediatric surgical subspecialties. We use a theoretical CDH case as an example and include the live audience responses from the interactive session. This primer provides overarching educational principles, as well as practical communication concepts, that can cultivate compassionate multidisciplinary teams, equipped to optimize family-centered, evidence-based compassionate communication and care.

Risk-stratified results among congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients in two large extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers in South America

INTRODUCTION

Mortality related to CDH is high, but with great variability among centers. There are few studies on patients with this condition born in South America which show poor outcomes. The goal of this study is to present the outcome of CDH in several high-volume quaternary centers in South America, ascertain the factors associated with lower mortality in our population, and compare our outcomes to those of the CDH Study Group (CDHSG).

METHODS

The data from two South American centers were retrospectively analyzed and compared with contemporary data from other CDHSG participating centers. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were also evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2018, the two South American centers saw 335 patients with CDH with an overall survival rate of 73.1%. Survival for the high, intermediate, and low-risk groups as determined by the Brindle score was 50%, 70%, and 87%, respectively. In our cohort the strongest predictors of mortality were ECMO use and early PaCO₂. There were no significant differences in mortality between the two South American centers and the other CDHSG centers when adjusted by risk score, however, the South American centers had higher use of ECMO in the intermediate-risk group.

DISCUSSION

Quaternary South American centers had similar outcomes to CDHSG centers worldwide. The availability and coordination of centralized dedicated care allow more efficient use of scarce technical and professional resources in patients with CDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Minimally Invasive Fetal Surgery and the Next Frontier

Most patients with congenital anomalies do not require prenatal intervention. Furthermore, many congenital anomalies requiring surgical intervention are treated adequately after birth. However, there is a subset of patients with congenital anomalies who will die before birth, shortly after birth, or experience severe postnatal complications without fetal surgery. Fetal surgery is unique in that an operation is performed on the fetus as well as the pregnant woman who does not receive any direct benefit from the surgery but rather lends herself to risks, such as hemorrhage, abruption, and preterm labor. The maternal risks involved with fetal surgery have limited the extent to which fetal interventions may be performed but have, in turn, led to technical innovations that have significantly advanced the field. This review will examine congenital abnormalities that can be treated with minimally invasive fetal surgery and introduce the next frontier of prenatal management of fetal surgical pathology.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival in an English regional ECMO center

Introduction

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a cause of neonatal death. Our aims are to describe contemporary rates of survival and the variables associated with this outcome, contrasting these with our study of two decades earlier and recent reports.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of all infants diagnosed in a regional center between January 2000 and December 2020 was performed. The outcome of interest was survival. Possible explanatory variables included side of defect, use of complex ventilatory or hemodynamic strategies (inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and Prostin), presence of antenatal diagnosis, associated anomalies, birth weight, and gestation. Temporal changes were studied by measuring outcomes in each of four consecutive 63-month periods.

Results

A total of 225 cases were diagnosed. Survival was 60% (134 of 225). Postnatal survival was 68% (134 of 198 liveborn), and postrepair survival was 84% (134 of 159 who survived to repair). Diagnosis was made antenatally in 66% of cases. Variables associated with mortality were the need for complex ventilatory strategies (iNO, HFOV, Prostin, and ECMO), antenatal diagnosis, right-sided defects, use of patch repair, associated anomalies, birth weight, and gestation. Survival has improved from our report of a prior decade and did not vary during the study period. Postnatal survival has improved despite fewer terminations. On multivariate analysis, the need for complex ventilation was the strongest predictor of death (OR=50, 95% CI 13 to 224, p<0.0001), and associated anomalies ceased to be predictive.

Conclusions

Survival has improved from our earlier report, despite reduced numbers of terminations. This may be related to increased use of complex ventilatory strategies.

Successful on-ECLS Repair of CDH and Omphalocele in a Newborn

Both congenital diaphragmatic hernias (CDHs) and omphaloceles show relevant overall mortality rates as individual findings. The combination of the two has been described only sparsely in the literature and almost always with a fatal course. Here, we describe a term neonate with a rare high-risk constellation of left-sided CDH and a large omphalocele who was successfully treated on extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Prenatally, the patient was diagnosed with a large omphalocele and a left CDH with a lung volume of ∼27% and an observed to expected lung-to-head ratio of 30%. Due to respiratory insufficiency, an ECLS device was implanted. As weaning from ECLS was not foreseeable, the female infant underwent successful surgery on ECLS on the ninth day of life. Perioperative high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and circulatory and coagulation management under point-of-care monitoring were the main anesthesiological challenges. Over the following 3 days, ECLS weaning was successful, and the patient was extubated after another 43 days. Surgical treatment on ECLS can expand the spectrum of therapy in high-risk constellations if potential risks are minimized and there is close interdisciplinary cooperation.

Management of the CDH patient on ECLS

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is the most common indication for respiratory extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in neonates. The survival rate of CDH neonates treated with ECLS is 50%, and this figure has remained relatively stable over the last few decades. This is likely because the current population of CDH neonates who require ECLS have a higher risk profile [1]. The management of neonates with CDH has evolved over time to emphasize postnatal stabilization, gentle ventilation, and multi-modal treatment of pulmonary hypertension. In order to minimize practice variation, many centers have adopted CDH-specific clinical practice guidelines, however care is not standardized between different centers and outcomes vary [3]. The purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of issues central to the care of neonates with CDH treated with ECLS and specifically highlight how the use of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) data have added to our understanding of CDH.

Surgical Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a challenging surgical disease that requires complex preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care. Survival depends on successful reduction and repair of the defect, and numerous complex decisions must be made regarding timing and preparation for surgery. This review describes the challenges and controversies inherent to surgical CDH care and provides recommendations for management based on the most recent evidence.

Variation across centers in standardized mortality ratios for congenital diaphragmatic hernia receiving extracorporeal life support

BACKGROUND

We sought to elucidate the degree of variation across centers by calculating center-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) requiring extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

METHODS

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry data (2000-2019) were used to estimate SMRs. Center-specific SMRs and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to identify centers with mortality as significantly worse (SW), significantly better (SB), or not different (ND) relative to the median standardized mortality rate.

RESULTS

We identified 4,223 neonates with CDH from 109 centers. SMRs were risk-adjusted for pre-ECLS case-mix (birthweight, sex, race, 5 min Apgar, blood gases, gestational age, hernia side, prenatal diagnosis, pre-ECLS arrest, and comorbidities). Observed (unadjusted) mortality rates across centers varied substantially (range: 14.3%-90.9%; interquartile range [IQR]: 42.9%-62.1%). Thirteen centers (11.9%) had SB SMRs< 1 (SMR 0.52 to 0.84), 7 centers (6.4%) had SW SMRs>1 (SMR 1.25 to 1.43), and 89 centers (81.7%) had SMRs ND relative to the median SMR rate across all centers (i.e., SMR not different from one). Descriptive analyses demonstrated that SB centers had a lower proportion of cases with renal complications, infectious complications and discontinuation of ECLS owing to complications, as well as differences in pre-ECLS treatments and timing of CDH repair, compared to SW and ND centers.

CONCLUSION

This study specifically identified ECLS centers with higher and lower survival for patients with CDH, which may serve as a benchmark for institutional quality improvement. Future studies are needed to identify those specific processes at those centers that leads to favorable outcomes with the goal of improving care globally.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of fetal treatments for congenital diaphragmatic hernia on lung development

The extent of lung hypoplasia impacts the survival and severity of morbidities associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The alveoli of CDH infants and in experimental models of CDH have thickened septa with fewer type II pneumocytes and capillaries. Fetal treatments of CDH-risk preterm birth. Therefore, treatments must aim to balance the need for increased gas exchange surface area with the restoration of pulmonary epithelial type II cells and the long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental consequences of prematurity. Achievement of sufficient lung development in utero for successful postnatal transition requires adequate intra-thoracic space for lung growth, maintenance of sufficient volume and appropriate composition of fetal lung fluid, regular fetal breathing movements, appropriate gas exchange area, and ample surfactant production. The review aims to examine the rationale for current and future therapeutic strategies to improve postnatal outcomes of infants with CDH.

Improved survival for infants with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia

BACKGROUND

Survival for severe (observed to expected lung-head ratio (O:E LHR) < 25%) congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a challenge (15-25%). Management strategies have focused on fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (ECMO) utilization.

OBJECTIVE(S)

Describe single center outcomes for infants with severe CDH.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study of 13 severe CDH infants managed with ECMO, a protocolized DR algorithm, and early repair on ECMO with an innovative perioperative anticoagulation strategy.

RESULTS

13/140 (9.3%) infants met criteria and were managed with ECMO. 77% survived ECMO and 69% survived to discharge. 22% underwent tracheostomy. Median days on mechanical ventilation was 39 days (IQR 22:107.5) and length of stay 135 days (IQR 62.5:211.5). All infants received a gastrostomy tube (GT) and were discharged home on oxygen and pulmonary hypertension (PH) meds.

CONCLUSION

Survival for infants with severe CDH can be optimized with early aggressive intervention and protocolized algorithms (149).

Image-based prenatal predictors of postnatal survival, extracorporeal life support, and defect size in right congenital diaphragmatic hernia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between prenatal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics in right congenital diaphragmatic hernia (RCDH) with postnatal outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

CDH Study Group data were reviewed for all RCDH infants (n = 156) born between 2015 and 2019. Prenatal US and MRI lung size measurements were correlated with survival, extracorporeal life support (ECLS), and defect size.

RESULT

Overall survival was 64.1%. ECLS was required in 40.4%. US and MRI-based prenatal assessment of pulmonary hypoplasia does not predict survival. Prenatal measurement of lung size using either US or MRI correlates with ECLS use. Only MRI-based measures of lung size are associated with defect size.

CONCLUSION

Image-based prenatal predictors of survival, ECLS, and defect size are of limited value in RCDH. Extrapolation of prenatal survival and morbidity indicators from left to right-sided CDH is not appropriate. There is an urgent need to develop RCDH prenatal prediction models.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare birth defect characterized by incomplete closure of the diaphragm and herniation of fetal abdominal organs into the chest that results in pulmonary hypoplasia, postnatal pulmonary hypertension owing to vascular remodelling and cardiac dysfunction. The high mortality and morbidity rates associated with CDH are directly related to the severity of cardiopulmonary pathophysiology. Although the aetiology remains unknown, CDH has a polygenic origin in approximately one-third of cases. CDH is typically diagnosed with antenatal ultrasonography, which also aids in risk stratification, alongside fetal MRI and echocardiography. At specialized centres, prenatal management includes fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion, which is a surgical intervention aimed at promoting lung growth in utero. Postnatal management focuses on cardiopulmonary stabilization and, in severe cases, can involve extracorporeal life support. Clinical practice guidelines continue to evolve owing to the rapidly changing landscape of therapeutic options, which include pulmonary hypertension management, ventilation strategies and surgical approaches. Survivors often have long-term, multisystem morbidities, including pulmonary dysfunction, gastroesophageal reflux, musculoskeletal deformities and neurodevelopmental impairment. Emerging research focuses on small RNA species as biomarkers of severity and regenerative medicine approaches to improve fetal lung development.

Center Volume and Cost-Effectiveness in the Treatment of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH)

BACKGROUND

The care of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is expensive, yet little is known about variability in cost-of-care for these patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of CDH treatment, comparing high- versus low-volume centers.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of neonatal patients with CDH at U.S. hospitals using data from the Pediatric Health Information System database (2015-2018). Centers were considered high-volume if they had ≥10 patients with CDH for ≥ 2 y. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with cost per survivor as the outcome measure, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1687 patients were included in the study. Overall mortality was 24.4%. Patients at high-volume centers had a longer mean length of stay (64 d versus 48 d for low-volume centers, P = 0.0001) and higher extracorporeal life support (ECLS) rates (32% versus 24%, P = 0.002). Risk-adjusted mortality did not differ between high- and low-volume centers (23.9% versus 25.9%, P = 0.39), except when ECLS was involved (42% versus 56%, P = 0.011). Costs were significantly higher at high-volume centers ($395,291 ± 508,351 versus $255,074 ± 308,802, P < 0.0001). Survival status, ECLS use, operative repair, length of stay, high-volume status, and gestational age were identified as independent drivers of cost. On cost-effectiveness analysis, low-volume hospitals were more cost-effective in 95% of simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume centers have substantially higher costs without an associated survival benefit and are less cost-effective than low-volume centers. Standardization of care is necessary to minimize the delivery of low-value care.

Impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on number of patients and patterns of injuries at a level I trauma center

OBJECTIVE

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) and its associated illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has led to a global health crisis burdening frontline emergency departments, including orthopedic and trauma units. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the impact of the lockdown secondary to the pandemic on patient numbers and pattern of injuries at the department of traumatology of the Medical University of Vienna.

METHODS

This retrospective, descriptive study identified all patients admitted and enrolled onto the trauma registry at a level I trauma center, between 15 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 (lockdown) and compared them to those between 15 March 2019 and 30 April 2019 (baseline). Variables collected included patient age, sex, reason for hospital admission, place of injury, death, injury severity score (ISS), as well as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score.

RESULTS

A total of 10,938 patient visits to the trauma emergency department were analyzed, 8353 presentations during the baseline period and 2585 during lockdown. Only 1869 acutely injured and 716 follow-up patients presented during lockdown, compared to 6178 and 2175, respectively, during baseline. Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown there were significant reductions in both workplace and traffic accidents, sports injuries, number of hospitalized patients, and overall visits to the trauma emergency department; however, the number of major traumas and hip fractures remained similar. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the frequency of injuries at home as well as hospital admissions due to attempted suicide.

CONCLUSION

Despite the reduction in total number of patients, trauma departments should continue to provide adequate service during lockdown considering that severe injuries showed no change. Conditions such as breakdown of social networks and limited access to mental health care and support might account for the significant rise in hospital admissions due to suicides. We recommend that more attention and effort should be made to prevent this excess of suicide deaths.