1
|
Park JO, Lafaro K, Hagendoorn J, Melstrom L, Gerhards MF, Görgec B, Marsman HA, Thornblade LW, Pilz da Cunha G, Yang FF, Labadie KP, Sham JG, Swijnenburg RJ, He J, Fong Y. Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy: Multinational Study of 307 Cases. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 239:61-67. [PMID: 38770933 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000001107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For open minor hepatectomy, morbidity and recovery are dominated by the incision. The robotic approach may transform this "incision dominant procedure" into a safe outpatient procedure. STUDY DESIGN We audited outpatient (less than 2 midnights) robotic hepatectomy at 6 hepatobiliary centers in 2 nations to test the hypothesis that the robotic approach can be a safe and effective short-stay procedure. Establishing early recovery after surgery programs were active at all sites, and home digital monitoring was available at 1 of the institutions. RESULTS A total of 307 outpatient (26 same-day and 281 next-day discharge) robotic hepatectomies were identified (2013 to 2023). Most were minor hepatectomies (194 single segments, 90 bi-segmentectomies, 14 three segments, and 8 four segments). Thirty-nine (13%) were for benign histology, whereas 268 were for cancer (33 hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 biliary, and 208 metastatic disease). Patient characteristics were a median age of 60 years (18 to 93 years), 55% male, and a median BMI of 26 kg/m 2 (14 to 63 kg/m 2 ). Thirty (10%) patients had cirrhosis. One hundred eighty-seven (61%) had previous abdominal operation. Median operative time was 163 minutes (30 to 433 minutes), with a median blood loss of 50 mL (10 to 900 mL). There were no deaths and 6 complications (2%): 2 wound infections, 1 failure to thrive, and 3 perihepatic abscesses. Readmission was required in 5 (1.6%) patients. Of the 268 malignancy cases, 25 (9%) were R1 resections. Of the 128 with superior segment resections (segments 7, 8, 4A, 2, and 1), there were 12 positive margins (9%) and 2 readmissions for abscess. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient robotic hepatectomy in well-selected cases is safe (0 mortality, 2% complication, and 1.6% readmission), including resection in the superior or posterior portions of the liver that is challenging with nonarticulating laparoscopic instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O Park
- From the Division of General Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (Park, Yang, Labadie, Sham)
| | - Kelly Lafaro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Lafaro, He)
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands (Hagendoorn)
| | - Laleh Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA (Melstrom, Fong)
| | - Michael F Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Gerhards, Marsman)
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Görgec, Pilz da Cunha, Swijnenburg)
| | - Hendrik A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Gerhards, Marsman)
| | - Lucas W Thornblade
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Fransisco, San Fransisco, CA (Thornblade)
| | - Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Görgec, Pilz da Cunha, Swijnenburg)
| | - Frank F Yang
- From the Division of General Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (Park, Yang, Labadie, Sham)
| | - Kevin P Labadie
- From the Division of General Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (Park, Yang, Labadie, Sham)
| | - Jonathan G Sham
- From the Division of General Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (Park, Yang, Labadie, Sham)
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Görgec, Pilz da Cunha, Swijnenburg)
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Lafaro, He)
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA (Melstrom, Fong)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wakabayashi T, Fujiyama Y, Mishima K, Igarashi K, Nie Y, Berardi G, Alomari M, Colella M, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopically Limited Anatomic Liver Resections: A Single-Center Analysis for Oncologic Outcomes of the Conceptual Procedure. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1243-1251. [PMID: 37947973 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14462-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited anatomic resections (LARs), such as segmentectomies, performed using a fully laparoscopic approach, have gained popularity for liver malignancies. However, the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic LARs (Lap-LARs) needs further investigation. This cohort study evaluated the oncologic outcomes of Lap-LAR for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). METHODS At a Japanese referral center, 112 patients underwent Lap-LAR using the Glissonean approach and indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), time to interventional failure (TIF), and time to surgical failure (TSF) were assessed. RESULTS Among the 112 patients (median age, 74 years [range, 66-80 years]; 80 men [71.4 %]), Lap-LAR showed promising results. The median operative time was 348 min (range, 280-460 min), and the median blood loss was 190 mL (range, 95.5-452.0 mL). The median error between the estimated and actual liver volumes was 2 % (1.2-4.8 %). Complications greater than Clavien-Dindo 3a were observed in 11.6 % of the patients. The 5-year RFS, OS, and TIF rates for HCC were 45.1 % ± 7.9 %, 73.1 % ± 6.7 %, and 74.2 % ± 6 .6 %, respectively. The 5-year RFS, OS, and TSF rates for CRLM were 36.8 % ± 8.7 %, 60.1 % ± 13.3 %, and 63.6 % ± 10.4 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Lap-LAR showed favorable oncologic outcomes for HCC and CRLM. Its precise technique makes it a promising therapeutic option for liver malignancies. Further comparisons with conventional approaches are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiga Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Yoshiki Fujiyama
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazuharu Igarashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yusuke Nie
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Malek Alomari
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Marco Colella
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vivarelli M, Mocchegiani F, Wakabayashi T, Gaudenzi F, Nicolini D, Al-Omari MA, Conte G, Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Rossi R, Fujiyama Y, Giovagnoni A, Wakabayashi G, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A. Prevention of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for HCC: Has the Round Ligament to Be Preserved? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:364. [PMID: 38254855 PMCID: PMC10814940 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. The factors related to PHLF are represented not only by the volume and function of the future liver remnant but also by the severity of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess whether the preservation of the round ligament (RL) may mitigate portal hypertension, thus decreasing the risk of PHLF and ascites in cirrhotic patients while undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). All the cirrhotic patients who underwent MILS for HCC from 2016 to 2021 in two international tertiary referral centers were retrospectively analyzed, comparing cases with the RL preserved vs. those with the RL divided. Only patients with cirrhosis ≥ Child A6, portal hypertension, and ICG-R15 > 10% were included. Main postoperative outcomes were compared, and the risk factors for postoperative ascites (severe PHLF, grade B/C) were investigated through a logistic regression. After the application of the selection criteria, a total of 130 MILS patients were identified, with 86 patients with the RL preserved and 44 with the RL divided. The RL-preserved group showed lower incidences of severe PHLF (7.0% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.023) and ascites (5.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.026) in comparison with the RL-divided group. After uni/multivariate analysis, the risk factors related to postoperative ascites were RL division and platelets < 92 × 103/µL, calculated with ROC analysis. The preservation of the round ligament during MILS may mitigate portal hypertension, preventing PHLF and ascites in cirrhotic patients with borderline liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Vivarelli
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Federico Gaudenzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Daniele Nicolini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Malek A. Al-Omari
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Grazia Conte
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberta Rossi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| | - Yoshiki Fujiyama
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-8588, Japan; (T.W.); (M.A.A.-O.)
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (M.V.); (F.G.); (D.N.); (A.B.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim SH, Kim KH, Cho HD, Suh KS, Hong SK, Lee KW, Choi GS, Kim JM, Choon Hyuck David K, Cho JY, Han HS, Han J, Han YS. Donor Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Korean Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1198-e1203. [PMID: 37395608 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify safety and risk factors of living donor after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy in a Korean multicenter cohort study. BACKGROUND Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is not yet a standardized surgical procedure due to lack of data. METHODS This retrospective study included 543 patients undergoing PLRDH between 2010 and 2018 in 5 Korean transplantation centers. Complication rates were assessed and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of open conversion, overall complications, major complications, and biliary complications. RESULTS Regarding open conversion, the incidence was 1.7% and the risk factor was body mass index >30 kg/m 2 [ P =0.001, odds ratio (OR)=22.72, 95% CI=3.56-146.39]. Rates of overall, major (Clavien-Dindo classification III-IV), and biliary complications were 9.2%, 4.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. For overall complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.007, OR=2.66, 95% CI=1.31-5.41), estimated blood loss ( P <0.001, OR=4.84, 95% CI=2.50-9.38), and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=2.46, 95% CI=1.25-4.88). For major complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.002, OR=4.01, 95% CI=1.67-9.62) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.003, OR=3.84, 95% CI=1.60-9.21). For biliary complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.01, OR=4.34, 95% CI=1.40-13.45) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=4.16, 95% CI=1.34-12.88). CONCLUSION Careful donor selection for PLRDH considering body mass index, graft weight, estimated blood loss, and operation time combined with skilled procedure can improve donor safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Hoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwon Choon Hyuck David
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaryung Han
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook, National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, School of Medicine Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Han
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook, National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, School of Medicine Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xia F, Zhang Q, Zheng J, Huang Z, Ndhlovu E, Gao H. Risk Factors of Positive Resection Margin in Hepatectomy for Resectable Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Prediction and Prognosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1400-1411. [PMID: 37095336 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05618-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Clinical work has revealed that hepatectomy for resectable ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) has a relatively high percentage of positive resection margins found in postoperative pathology. It is necessary to evaluate the risk factors associated with R1 resection in patients undergoing hepatectomy for rHCC. METHODS A total of 408 patients with resectable rHCC originating from three centers undergoing surgery from January 2012 to January 2020 were consecutively enrolled in the study to study the prognostic impact of R1 resection using Kaplan-Meier plotting of survival curves. One center with 280 served as the training group, and the other two centers served as the validation group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis screened for variables affecting R1 and developed prediction models, and the models were tested in the validation cohort using the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration curves. RESULTS The prognosis of rHCC patients with positive cut margins was worse than that of patients with R0 resection. Risk factors for R1 resection were tumor max length (OR = 2.668 [1.161-6.131]), microvascular invasion (MVI) (OR = 3.655 [1.766-7.566]), times of hepatic inflow occlusion (1/0:OR = 2.213 [1.113-4.399]; 2/0:OR = 5.723 [2.010-8.289]) and timing of hepatectomy (OR = 5.284 [2.394-9.661]), using tumor max length, times of HIO, and timing of hepatectomy to construct the nomogram, the area under the curve of the model was 0.810 (0.781-0.842) and 0.782 (0.752-0.805) in the training and validation groups, respectively, and the calibration curve of the model was basically on the 45° line. CONCLUSIONS This study constructs a clinical model to predict R1 resection after hepatectomy for resectable rHCC, which can be used to better plan perioperative strategies for the incidence of R1 resection during hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qiao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Guangdong, China
| | - Jun Zheng
- Department of Science and Education, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiyuan Huang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Elijah Ndhlovu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hengyi Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen Longhua District People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weixler B, Lobbes LA, Scheiner L, Lauscher JC, Staubli SM, Zuber M, Raptis DA. The Value of Indocyanine Green Image-Guided Surgery in Patients with Primary Liver Tumors and Liver Metastases. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1290. [PMID: 37374073 DOI: 10.3390/life13061290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Successful R0 resection is crucial for the survival of patients with primary liver cancer (PLC) or liver metastases. Up to date, surgical resection lacks a sensitive, real-time intraoperative imaging modality to determine R0 resection. Real-time intraoperative visualization with near-infrared light fluorescence (NIRF) using indocyanine green (ICG) may have the potential to meet this demand. This study evaluates the value of ICG visualization in PLC and liver metastases surgery regarding R0 resection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with PLC or liver metastases were included in this prospective cohort study. ICG 10 mg was administered intravenously 24 h before surgery. Real-time intraoperative NIRF visualization was created with the SpectrumTM fluorescence imaging camera system. First, all liver segments were inspected with the fluorescence imaging system and intraoperative ultrasound for identification of the known tumor, as well as additional lesions, and were compared to preoperative MRI images. PLC, liver metastases, and additional lesions were then resected according to oncological principles. In all resected specimens, the resection margins were analyzed with the fluorescence imaging system for ICG-positive spots immediately after resection. Histology of additional detected lesions, as well as ICG fluorescence compared to histological resection margins, were assessed. RESULTS Of the 66 included patients, median age was 65.5 years (IQR 58.7-73.9), 27 (40.9%) were female, and 18 (27.3%) were operated on laparoscopically. Additional ICG-positive lesions were detected in 23 (35.4%) patients, of which 9 (29%) were malignant. In patients with no fluorescent signal at the resection margin, R0 rate was 93.9%, R1 rate was 6.1%, and R2 rate was 0% compared to an ICG-positive resection margin with an R0 rate of 64.3%, R1 rate of 21.4%, and R2 rate of 14.3% (p = 0.005). One- and two-year overall survival rates were 95.2% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION The presented study provides significant evidence that ICG NIRF guidance helps to identify R0 resection intraoperatively. This offers true potential to verify radical resection and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, implementation of NIRF-guided imaging in liver tumor surgery allows us to detect a considerable amount of additional malignant lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Weixler
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonard A Lobbes
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Scheiner
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes C Lauscher
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Staubli
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Markus Zuber
- Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dimitri A Raptis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Pawlik TM, Aldrighetti LA, Alseidi AA, Cillo U, Kokudo N, Geller DA, Wakabayashi G, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Cherqui D, Cheung TT, Clavien PA, Conrad C, D’Hondt M, Dagher I, Dervenis C, Devar J, Dixon E, Edwin B, Efanov M, Ettore GM, Ferrero A, Fondevilla C, Fuks D, Giuliante F, Han HS, Honda G, Imventarza O, Kooby DA, Lodge P, Lopez-Ben S, Machado MA, Marques HP, O’Rourke N, Pekolj J, Pinna AD, Portolani N, Primrose J, Rotellar F, Ruzzenente A, Schadde E, Siriwardena AK, Smadi S, Soubrane O, Tanabe KK, Teh CS, Torzilli G, Van Gulik TM, Vivarelli M, Wigmore SJ, Abu Hilal M. An International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS). Ann Surg 2023; 277:821-828. [PMID: 35946822 PMCID: PMC10082050 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To reach global expert consensus on the definition of TOLS in minimally invasive and open liver resection among renowned international expert liver surgeons using a modified Delphi method. BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a novel composite measure combining the most desirable postoperative outcomes into one single measure and representing the ideal postoperative course. Despite a recently developed international definition of Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS), a standardized and expert consensus-based definition is lacking. METHODS This international, consensus-based, qualitative study used a Delphi process to achieve consensus on the definition of TOLS. The survey comprised 6 surgical domains with a total of 26 questions on individual surgical outcome variables. The process included 4 rounds of online questionnaires. Consensus was achieved when a threshold of at least 80% agreement was reached. The results from the Delphi rounds were used to establish an international definition of TOLS. RESULTS In total, 44 expert liver surgeons from 22 countries and all 3 major international hepato-pancreato-biliary associations completed round 1. Forty-two (96%), 41 (98%), and 41 (98%) of the experts participated in round 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The TOLS definition derived from the consensus process included the absence of intraoperative grade ≥2 incidents, postoperative bile leakage grade B/C, postoperative liver failure grade B/C, 90-day major postoperative complications, 90-day readmission due to surgery-related major complications, 90-day/in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study providing an international expert consensus-based definition of TOLS for minimally invasive and open liver resections by the use of a formal Delphi consensus approach. TOLS may be useful in assessing patient-level hospital performance and carrying out international comparisons between centers with different clinical practices to further improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Adnan A. Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - David A. Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Horacio J. Asbun
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of surgery and transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - Christos Dervenis
- Department of Surgery, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - John Devar
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Elijah Dixon
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giuseppe M. Ettore
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Oscar Imventarza
- Department of surgery, Hospital Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of surgery, Hospital Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - David A. Kooby
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Peter Lodge
- HPB and Transplant Unit, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, HPB Unit, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Hugo P. Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nick O’Rourke
- Department of HPB Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Antonio D. Pinna
- Abdominal Transplant and HPB Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - John Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Ajith K. Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Manchester University NHS FT, Manchester, UK
| | - Sameer Smadi
- Department of Surgery, King Hussein Medical Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, APHP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Kenneth K. Tanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Catherine S.C. Teh
- Section of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Surgery, St Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Thomas M. Van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Stephen J. Wigmore
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB)/Transplant Surgery, The University of Edinburgh Clinical Surgery, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Montalti R, Rompianesi G, Cassese G, Pegoraro F, Giglio MC, De Simone G, Rashidian N, Venetucci P, Troisi RI. Role of preoperative 3D rendering for minimally invasive parenchyma sparing liver resections. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00125-9. [PMID: 37149483 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 3D rendering (3DR) represents a promising approach to plan surgical strategies. The study aimed to compare the results of minimally invasive liver resections (MILS) in patients with 3DR versus conventional 2D CT-scan. METHODS We performed 118 3DR for various indications; the patients underwent a preoperative tri-phasic CT-scan and rendered with Synapse3D® Software. Fifty-six patients undergoing MILS with pre-operative 3DR were compared to a similar cohort of 127 patients undergoing conventional pre-operative 2D CT-scan using the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS The 3DR mandated pre-operative surgical plan variations in 33.9% cases, contraindicated surgery in 12.7%, providing a new surgical indication in 5.9% previously excluded cases. PSM identified 39 patients in both groups with comparable results in terms of conversion rates, blood loss, blood transfusions, parenchymal R1-margins, grade ≥3 Clavien-Dindo complications, 90-days mortality, and hospital stay respectively in 3DR and conventional 2D. Operative time was significantly increased in the 3DR group (402 vs. 347 min, p = 0.020). Vascular R1 resections were 25.6% vs 7.7% (p = 0.068), while the conversion rate was 0% vs 10.2% (p = 0.058), respectively, for 3DR group vs conventional 2D. CONCLUSION 3DR may help in surgical planning increasing resectability rate while reducing conversion rates, allowing the precise identification of anatomical landmarks in minimally invasive parenchyma-preserving liver resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Montalti
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University, Naples, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplant Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rompianesi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplant Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplant Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Pegoraro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplant Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariano C Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplant Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Simone
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Nikdokht Rashidian
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pietro Venetucci
- Division of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Department of Onco-Hematology, Diagnostic and Morphologic Imaging, and Forensic Medicine, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplant Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bozkurt E, Sijberden JP, Abu Hilal M. Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Right or Extended Right Hemi Hepatectomy Following Modulation of the Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023. [PMID: 37015071 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Major hepatectomies after future liver remnant (FLR) modulation are technically demanding procedures, especially when performed as minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to assess current evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation. Materials and Methods: The Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for studies involving laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation, from their inception to December 2021. Two reviewers independently selected eligible articles and assessed their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the included studies and summarized. Results: Six studies were included. In these studies, the median length of stay after the second stage ranged from 4.5 to 15.5 days and postoperative complication rates between 4.5% and 42.8%. Overall, 7.4% of patients developed liver failure, and 90-day mortality occurred in 3.2% of patients. The R0 resection rate was 93.5%. Only one study reported long-term outcomes, describing comparable 3-year overall survival rates following laparoscopic and open surgery (80% versus 54%, P = .154). Conclusions: The current evidence is scarce, but it suggests that in experienced centers, laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomy, following FLR modulation, is a safe and feasible procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Bozkurt
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041179. [PMID: 36831521 PMCID: PMC9954110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the two most common malignant tumors that require liver resection. While liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC, organ shortages and high costs limit the availability of this option for many patients and make resection the mainstay of treatment. For patients with CRLM, surgical resection with negative margins is the only potentially curative option. Over the last two decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly adopted for the resection of a variety of tumors and was found to have similar long-term outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR) while offering the benefits of improved short-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the outcomes of LLR vs. OLR for patients with HCC and CRLM. Although the use of LLR for HCC and CRLM is increasing, it is not appropriate for all patients. We describe an approach to selecting patients best-suited for LLR. The four common difficulty-scoring systems for LLR are summarized. Additionally, we review the current evidence behind the emerging robotically assisted liver resection technology.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaprin AD, Ivanov SA, Petrov LO, Isaeva AG. [Indocyanine green in liver tumor resection]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:5-10. [PMID: 37682541 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20230925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Primary liver cancer and colorectal cancer liver metastases are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Surgery is one of the main methods of treatment to achieve the best results in overall and recurrence-free survival. The main objectives in this surgery are preoperative planning, assessment of functional viability of liver parenchyma and total resection with low complication rate. Post-resection liver failure is one of the most formidable and often fatal complication following functional failure of liver remnant. Thus, preoperative assessment of liver functional reserves is a necessary step for adequate selection of patients and safe surgery. Passive liver tests, such as biochemical parameters or clinical scales, do not accurately reflect the actual functional component of liver parenchyma. The most accurate method is dynamic quantitative test of liver, such as indocyanine green clearance. The authors discuss the practical aspects of preoperative assessment of liver functional reserves using indocyanine green, as well as the concept and technical foundations of fluorescent imaging in hepatobiliary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Kaprin
- National Medical Research Radiology Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - S A Ivanov
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - L O Petrov
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - A G Isaeva
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Symeonidis D, Tepetes K, Tzovaras G, Kissa L, Samara AA, Bompou E, Zacharoulis D. Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted? Clin Pract 2022; 12:1102-1110. [PMID: 36547120 PMCID: PMC9777184 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract12060112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in an incomplete tumor resection, in terms of leaving macroscopic residual tumor in the future liver remnant, is not associated with survival benefits. However, the prognostic implications of a microscopically positive surgical margin or a clear margin of less than 1 mm (R1) on pathology are debatable. Although it has been a field of extensive research, the relevant literature often reports contradictory results. The purpose of the present study was to define, assess the risk factors for, and, ultimately, analyze the effect that an R1 hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases might have on local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis by reviewing the relevant literature. Achieving an R0 hepatic resection, optimally with more than 1 mm of clear margin, should always be the goal. However, in the era of the aggressive multimodality treatment of liver metastatic colorectal cancer, an R1 resection might be the cost of increasing the pool of patients finally eligible for resection. The majority of literature reports have highlighted the detrimental effect of R1 resections on local recurrence and overall survival. However, there are indeed studies that degraded the prognostic handicap as a consequence of an R1 resection in selected patients and highlighted the presence of RAS mutations, the response to chemotherapy, and, in general, factors that reflect the biology of the disease as important, if not the determinant, prognostic factors. In these patients, the aggressive disease biology seems to outperform the resection margin status as a prognostic factor, and the recorded differences between R1 and R0 resections are equalized. Properly and accurately defining this patient group is a future challenge in the field of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Collapse
|
13
|
MISHIMA K, WAKABAYASHI T, FUJIYAMA Y, ALOMARI M, COLELLA M, WAKABAYASHI G. Resection margin status in laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: literature review and future perspectives. Minerva Surg 2022; 77:428-432. [DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.22.09568-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
14
|
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review on Dose and Timing of Administration. Ann Surg 2022; 275:1025-1034. [PMID: 35121701 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has proven to be a high potential navigation tool during liver surgery; however, its optimal usage is still far from being standardized. METHODS A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed for English articles that contained the information of dose and timing of ICG administration until February 2021. Successful rates of tumor detection and liver segmentation, as well as tumor/patient background and imaging settings were also reviewed. The quality assessment of the articles was performed in accordance with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). RESULTS Out of initial 311 articles, a total of 72 manuscripts were obtained. The quality assessment of the included studies revealed usually low; only 9 articles got qualified as high quality. Forty articles (55%) focused on open resections, whereas 32 articles (45%) on laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. Thirty-four articles (47%) described tumor detection ability, and 25 articles (35%) did liver segmentation ability, and the others (18%) did both abilities. Negative staining was reported (42%) more than positive staining (32%). For tumor detection, majority used the dose of 0.5 mg/kg within 14 days before the operation day, and an additional administration (0.02-0.5 mg/kg) in case of longer preoperative interval. Tumor detection rate was reported to be 87.4% (range, 43%-100%) with false positive rate reported to be 10.5% (range, 0%-31.3%). For negative staining method, the majority used 2.5 mg/body, ranging from 0.025 to 25 mg/body. For positive staining method, the majority used 0.25 mg/body, ranging from 0.025 to 12.5 mg/body. Successful segmentation rate was 88.0% (range, 53%-100%). CONCLUSION The time point and dose of ICG administration strongly needs to be tailored case by case in daily practice, due to various tumor/patient backgrounds and imaging settings.
Collapse
|
15
|
Masetti M, Fallani G, Ratti F, Ferrero A, Giuliante F, Cillo U, Guglielmi A, Ettorre GM, Torzilli G, Vincenti L, Ercolani G, Cipressi C, Lombardi R, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E. Minimally invasive treatment of colorectal liver metastases: does robotic surgery provide any technical advantages over laparoscopy? A multicenter analysis from the IGoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry. Updates Surg 2022; 74:535-545. [DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01245-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
16
|
Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Görgec B, Lanari J, Cipriani F, Russolillo N, Mocchegiani F, Zimmitti G, Alseidi A, Ruzzenente A, Edwin B, D'Hondt M, Besselink MG, Giuliante F, Fuks D, Rotellar F, López-Ben S, Ferrero A, Aldrighetti L, Cillo U, Vivarelli M, Abu Hilal M. Outcome of major hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients; does surgical approach matter? A propensity score matched analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:1226-1239. [PMID: 34855277 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Major hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients still represents a great challenge for liver surgeons. Hence, the aim in the present study is to investigate the clinical impact of major hepatectomy and to assess whether the surgical approach influences the outcome of cirrhotic patients. METHODS Multicenter retrospective study including cirrhotic patients undergoing major laparoscopic (mjLLR) and open liver resection (mjOLR) in 14 Western liver centers was performed (2009-2020). Clinical, demographic, and perioperative data were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Long-term outcome after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma was analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 352 patients were included; 108 after mjLLR and 244 after mjOLR. After PSM, 88 patients were matched in each group. In the mjLLR group, compared to mjOLR, less blood loss (P = .042), lower overall and severe complication (P < .001, .020), such as surgical site infection, acute kidney injury and liver failure were observed, parallel to a shorter length of hospital stay. Stratifying patients based on the type of resection, less severe complications was observed only after laparoscopic left hepatectomy (P = .044), while the advantages of laparoscopy tend to decrease during right hepatectomy. Subgroup analysis of long-term survivals following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma showed no difference between mjLLR and mjOLR. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter experience suggests potential short-term benefits of mjLLR in cirrhotic patients compared to mjOLR, without compromising long-term outcome. These findings might have interesting clinical implications for the management of patients with chronic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Bjorn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB surgery, Institute of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Santiago López-Ben
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Lanari J, Russolillo N, Cipriani F, Aghayan D, Zimmitti G, Efanov M, Alseidi A, Mocchegiani F, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Rotellar F, Fuks D, D'Hondt M, Vivarelli M, Edwin B, Aldrighetti LA, Ferrero A, Cillo U, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e212064. [PMID: 34076671 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure that captures the most desirable surgical outcomes as a single indicator, yet to date TO has not been defined and assessed in the field of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). Objective To obtain international agreement on the definition of TO in liver surgery (TOLS) and to assess the incidence of TO in LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter database using a propensity-score matched analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all liver diseases between January 2011 and October 2019 were analyzed using a large international multicenter liver surgical database. An international survey was conducted among all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) to reach agreement on the definition of TOLS. The rate of TOLS was assessed for LLR and OLR before and after propensity-score matching. Factors associated with achieving TOLS were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures Textbook outcome, with TOLS defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents of grade 2 or higher, postoperative bile leak grade B or C, severe postoperative complications, readmission within 30 days after discharge, in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. Results A total of 8188 patients (4559 LLR; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]; 2529 were male [55.8%] and 3629 OLR; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-71 years]; 2204 were male [60.7%]) were included in the analysis of whom 69.1% achieved TOLS; 74.8% for LLR and 61.9% for OLR (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III, previous abdominal surgery, histological diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases (odds ratio [OR], 0.656 [95% CI, 0.457-0.940]; P = .02), cholangiocarcinoma, non-CRLM, a tumor size of 30 mm or more, minor resection of posterior/superior segments (OR, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.577-0.887]; P = .002), anatomically major resection (OR, 0.579 [95% CI, 0.418-0.803]; P = .001), and nonanatomical resection (OR, 0.612 [95% CI, 0.476-0.788]; P < .001) were associated with a worse TOLS rate after LLR. For OLR, only histological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (OR, 0.360 [95% CI, 0.214-0.607]; P < .001) and a tumor size of 30 mm or more (30-50 mm = OR, 0.718 [95% CI, 0.565-0.911]; P = .01; 50.1-100 mm = OR, 0.729 [95% CI, 0.554-0.960]; P = .02; >10 cm = OR, 0.550 [95% CI, 0.366-0.826]; P = .004) were associated with a worse TOLS rate. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter study, TOLS was found to be a useful tool for assessing patient-level hospital performance and may have utility in optimizing patient outcomes after LLR and OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davit Aghayan
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Luca A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Protic M, Krsmanovic O, Solajic N, Kukic B, Nikolic I, Bogdanovic B, Radovanovic Z, Kresoja M, Mannion C, Man YG, Stojadinovic A. Prospective Non-Randomized Study of Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Resection Margin of Colo-Rectal Liver Metastases. J Cancer 2021; 12:3701-3714. [PMID: 33995645 PMCID: PMC8120181 DOI: 10.7150/jca.58580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: More than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases during the natural course of disease. Surgical resection is currently the most potentially curative method in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The goal of surgery is to achieve a negative resection margin (RM) of at least 1 mm, which provides the best prognosis for patients. The RM can be assessed by the pathologist of the resected liver specimen (RLS) and by the surgeon intraoperatively. The aim of this research paper is to determine the degree of agreement on intraoperative assessment of the RM by the surgeon and histopathological RM assessment by the pathologist. Material and methods: This prospective non-randomized double-blind study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04634526. The study was conducted at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia. An experienced hepatobiliary surgeon assessed RM for every specimen intra-operatively, immediately after CRLM resection. Resected CRLM lesions were analyzed by two experienced pathologists. These data were compared with pathological RM assessment as a “gold standard”. RM of 1 mm or more was rated as negative RM (RM-). Disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence rate was calculated by RM status defined by surgeon and by pathologist. Results: From 01 January 2015 to 31 August 2019, 98 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 219 RLS with 245 CRLM. The surgeon registered positive RM (RM+) of <1mm in 41 (18.7%) RLS. Taking the result of the histopathological assessment (HPA) as the “gold standard”, it was determined that RM was true positive in 32 (14.6%) cases. False positive RM was found in 9 (4.1%) cases. False negative RM was found in 20 (9.1%) cases. True negative RM was found in 158 (72.2%) cases. Sensitivity of surgical assessment (SA) of RM+ was 61.5% (32/52). Specificity of SA of RM+ was 94.6% (158/167). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 78.0% (32/41), while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.8% (158/178). The overall accuracy of the RM+ SA was 86.8% (190/219). There was no statistically significant difference in the assessment of RM+ per RLS by surgeon and pathologists (p=0.061), but it was significant when analyses per patients was performed (p=0.017). Recurrence rate for RM+ patients was 48.1% (13/27, p=0.05) for SA and 35.0% (14/40, p=0.17) for HPA. Three year DFS for RM- and RM+ was 66.5% and 27.9% (p=0.04), respectively, by SA, and 64.8% and 42.1% (p=0.106), respectively, by HPA. Conclusion: Intraoperative assessment of RM- by surgeon of RLS is clinically meaningful. There is not a statistically significant difference in the assessment of RM+ by surgeon and pathologists per RLS, but it was statically significant on a per patient basis. RM determined by surgeon has better prognostic impact on recurrence rate and 1- and 3-year DFS than standard histopathological assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mladjan Protic
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Olivera Krsmanovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Logistics Command, Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Nenad Solajic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Department of Pathoanatomical and Laboratory Diagnostics, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Biljana Kukic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Clinic for Internal Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Ivan Nikolic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.,Clinic for Internal Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Bogdan Bogdanovic
- Clinic for Internal Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Zoran Radovanovic
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Milana Kresoja
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Ciaran Mannion
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.,Department of Pathology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yan-Gao Man
- Department of Pathology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Funamizu N, Ozaki T, Mishima K, Igarashi K, Omura K, Takada Y, Wakabayashi G. Evaluation of accuracy of laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy using the Glissonian approach with indocyanine green fluorescence negative staining by comparing estimated and actual resection volumes: A single-center retrospective cohort study. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 28:1060-1068. [PMID: 33638899 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy (LLMS) may improve patient outcomes, but it is difficult and its accuracy and safety are unknown. We evaluated the accuracy of LLMS using Glissonian approach with indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG) negative staining. METHODS Seventy-four patients eligible for LLMS except for segment 1 were enrolled. Preoperative three-dimensional CT-based surgical simulation was used to determine estimated liver resection volume (ELRV), which was compared with modified actual liver resection volume (ALRV) obtained from actual liver resection mass. The LLMS accuracy was also evaluated based on operator's experience (attending surgeon [AS] or trainee surgeon [TS]). RESULTS Estimated liver resection volumes significantly correlated with ALRVs (r = .82) in all cases. Moreover, TS-conducted LLMS also showed acceptable difference between ELRV and ALRV compared with AS-conducted LLMS. There were no intergroup differences in estimated blood loss, operation time, time of Pringle maneuver, postoperative complications, and length of postoperative hospitalization (P < .05). Moreover, R0 resection was comparable between the AS and TS groups. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy with Glissonian approach using ICG negative imaging ensured safe and accurate procedure owing to facilitated visualization of the resection line. Our approach was effective in avoiding postoperative liver dysfunction and securing radical resection. In addition, it might be helpful in TS education of LLMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naotake Funamizu
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University, Toon-city, Ehime prefecture, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ozaki
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Kazuharu Igarashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Kenji Omura
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| | - Yasutsugu Takada
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University, Toon-city, Ehime prefecture, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan
| |
Collapse
|