Correlation Between the Warrior/Worrier Gene on Post Burn Pruritus and Scarring: A Prospective Cohort Study

Understanding Neural Factors in Burn-related Pruritus and Neuropathic Pain

Post-burn pruritus and neuropathic pain significantly affect the quality of life of affected individuals in several domains including psychosocial well-being, sleep and general impairment in activities of daily living. Whilst neural mediators involved in itch in the non-burns setting have been well investigated, there remains a lacuna of literature examining the pathophysiological and histological changes unique to burn-related pruritus and neuropathic pain. The aim of our study was to conduct a scoping review into the neural factors that contribute to burn-related pruritus and neuropathic pain. A scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the available evidence. The PubMed, EMBASE and Medline databases were searched for publications. Data regarding neural mediators implicated, population demographics, total body surface area (TBSA) affected and sex was extracted. In total, 11 studies were included in this review with a total of 881 patients. The most frequently investigated neurotransmitter was the Substance P (SP) neuropeptide which appeared in 36% of studies (n = 4), followed by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in 27% of studies (n = 3). Post-burn pruritus and neuropathic pain are symptomatic experiences that are predicated upon a heterogeneous group of underlying mechanisms. What is clear from the literature, however, is that itch and pain may occur secondary to the influence of both neuropeptides, such as SP, and other neural mediators including Transient receptor protein channels. Of the articles included for review, they were characterized by small sample sizes and large differences in statistical methodology and reporting.

Scar Management and Dyschromia: A Summary Report from the 2021 American Burn Association State of the Science Meeting

Burn scars, and in particular, hypertrophic scars, are a challenging yet common outcome for survivors of burn injuries. In 2021, the American Burn Association brought together experts in burn care and research to discuss critical topics related to burns, including burn scars, at its State of the Science conference. Clinicians and researchers with burn scar expertise, as well as burn patients, industry representatives, and other interested stakeholders met to discuss issues related to burn scars and discuss priorities for future burn scar research. The various preventative strategies and treatment modalities currently utilized for burn scars were discussed, including relatively noninvasive therapies such as massage, compression, and silicone sheeting, as well as medical interventions such as corticosteroid injection and laser therapies. A common theme that emerged is that the efficacy of current therapies for specific patient populations is not clear, and further research is needed to improve upon these treatments and develop more effective strategies to suppress scar formation. This will necessitate quantitative analyses of outcomes and would benefit from creation of scar biobanks and shared data resources. In addition, outcomes of importance to patients, such as scar dyschromia, must be given greater attention by clinicians and researchers to improve overall quality of life in burn survivors. Herein we summarize the main topics of discussion from this meeting and offer recommendations for areas where further research and development are needed.

Oxycodone/naloxone versus tapentadol in real-world chronic non-cancer pain management: an observational and pharmacogenetic study

Tapentadol (TAP) and oxycodone/naloxone (OXN) potentially offer an improved opioid tolerability. However, real-world studies in chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) remain scarce. Our aim was to compare effectiveness and security in daily pain practice, together with the influence of pharmacogenetic markers. An observational study was developed with ambulatory test cases under TAP (n = 194) or OXN (n = 175) prescription with controls (prescribed with other opioids (control), n = 216) CNCP patients. Pain intensity and relief, quality of life, morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD), concomitant analgesic drugs, adverse events (AEs), hospital frequentation and genetic variants of OPRM1 (rs1799971, A118G) and COMT (rs4680, G472A) genes, were analysed. Test CNCP cases evidenced a significantly higher pain relief predictable due to pain intensity and quality of life (R² = 0.3), in front of controls. Here, OXN achieved the greatest pain relief under a 28% higher MEDD, 8–13% higher use of pregabalin and duloxetine, and 23% more prescription change due to pain, compared to TAP. Whilst, TAP yielded a better tolerability due the lower number of 4 [0–6] AEs/patient, in front of OXN. Furthermore, OXN COMT-AA homozygotes evidenced higher rates of erythema and vomiting, especially in females. CNCP real-world patients achieved higher pain relief than other traditional opioids with a better tolerability for TAP. Further research is necessary to clarify the potential influence of COMT and sex on OXN side-effects.

The pruritus severity scale-a novel tool to assess itch in burns patients

BACKGROUND

Pruritus assessment is difficult due to the varying subjective nature of the experience. There have been several validated tools described to quantify the severity of itch, however these tools fail to provide a comprehensive assessment or are too cumbersome and therefore lack usability. Our novel burn assessment tool, "The Pruritus Severity Scale" (PSS) allows for accurate quantification of itch components. The aim of this study was to assess its use in the burns population.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients over five years of age with a burn injury over a six month period. Patients underwent subjective evaluation of their itch as determined by two validated scores, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Itch Man scale (IMS) and in addition to the PSS. The pruritus severity scale was correlated with the previously validated scoring methods using bi-variate correlations.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included in the study. The most common cause of injury was due to flame burn. The mean total body surface area was 6.5% (range: 1-26%). Both the IMS and the VAS positively correlated well with the PSS. The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs IMS was 0.81, R² = 0.65 (P<0.05). The Spearman Coefficient for the PSS vs VAS was 0.87 (R² = 0.76 (P<0.01)). There is a positive linear relationship between our novel scoring methods and the currently validated methods, indicating its validity as a burn assessment too.

CONCLUSION

The Pruritus Severity Scale was shown to be an accurate, objective tool that was able to effectively record the patient's experience of itch. We believe that this novel score is quick, easy to use and allows for more comprehensive assessment than other short assessment tools.

Chronic itch in African Americans: an unmet need

Chronic pruritus carries a significant burden of disease and is associated with a negative impact on quality of life. African Americans are disproportionately burdened by chronic pruritic disorders, including but not limited to atopic dermatitis, prurigo nodularis, inflammatory scalp dermatoses, pathologic scarring, and HIV-related dermatoses. Racial differences in skin structure and function may contribute to the pathogenesis of itch in African Americans. Itch perception and response to treatment in African Americans remain understudied and not well understood. As such, there is a large unmet need with regard to the knowledge and management of pruritus in African Americans. This review highlights notable differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, genetic predisposition, clinical presentation, and response to treatment for select pruritic skin conditions. By addressing itch as an unmet need in African Americans, we hope to improve patient outcomes and lessen disparities in dermatologic care.