Evaluating the Impact of Surgeon Self-Awareness by Comparing Self vs Peer Ratings of Surgical Skill and Outcomes for Bariatric Surgery

Assessment of laparoscopic intracorporeal intestinal anastomosis training using simulation-based 3D printed models: exploring surgical performance and learning curves

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Intestinal anastomosis is a clinical procedure widely used to reconstruct the digestive tract, but authentic laparoscopic intracorporeal intestinal anastomosis (LIIA) models are lacking. However, three-dimensional (3D) printing can enable authentic and reusable models. In this paper, a novel cost-effective 3D-printing training model of LIIA is designed and the authenticity and validity of the model are tested.

METHODS

A fused deposition modeling 3D printing and an assembled lab model were built to test LIIA. Fifteen surgeons were required to perform LIIA, and their operation score and time were recorded and analyzed. Five experts were invited to assess the face and content validity of the models. A study was also performed to further evaluate and validate the learning curve of surgeons.

RESULTS

The difference in modified anastomosis objective structured assessment of technical skills (MAOSATS) scores between the expert, intermediate, and novice groups were significant (64.1±1.8: 48.5±1.7: 29.5±3.1, P <0.001). In addition, the operation time of the procedure was statistically different for all three groups (21.5±1.9: 30.6±2.8:70.7±4.0, P<0.001 ). The five experts rated the face and content validity of the model very highly, with the median being four out of five. Surgeons who underwent repeated training programs showed improved surgical performance. After eight training sessions, the novices' performance was similar to that of the average level of untrained intermediates, while the operation scores of the intermediates were close to that of the average level of experts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, it is found that the LIIA model exhibits excellent face, content, and construct validity. Repeated simulation training of the LIIA training program improved the surgeon's operative performance, so the model is considered one of the most effective methods for LIIA training and assessment of surgical quality in the future and for reducing healthcare costs.

Young-IFSO Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery Training and Education Survey

BACKGROUND

This international Young-IFSO survey aims to address variations, trends, and obstacles in bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS) training globally, since expectations and resources differ among young surgeons.

METHODS

The Young-IFSO scientific team designed an online confidential questionnaire with 50 questions analyzing the individual BMS training. The survey link was sent to all IFSO/ASMBS members and was shared in social media. All Young-IFSO members (age up to 45 years) were invited to participate between 16 December 2022 and 4 February 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 240 respondents from 61 countries took the survey. Most respondents (70.24%) described their current position as a consultant surgeon with an average of 5.43 years' experience working in BMS, and 55% are working in a bariatric center of excellence. More than 50% of the respondents performed none or less than 10 BMS during residency. Preparation of the stomach and stapling during sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were the first steps performed, and SG was the first BMS completed as a first operating surgeon by most of the respondents (74%). In total, 201 (84.45%) surgeons reported to perform scientific work. Most respondents (90.13%) reported that surgical mentorship had improved their surgical skills.

CONCLUSION

This international experts' survey underlines the lack of a standardized global surgical curriculum of BMS during residency. It shows that SG is the single most performed procedure by young surgeons. These data might underline the importance of advancing surgical education in BMS, and accredited fellowship programs should be offered globally to maintain and raise quality of BMS.

Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Quality of surgery has substantial impact on both short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This stresses the need for objective surgical quality assessment (SQA) for education, clinical practice and research purposes. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of all video-based objective SQA tools in laparoscopic procedures and their validity to objectively assess surgical performance.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase.com and Web of Science were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify all studies focusing on video-based SQA tools of technical skills in laparoscopic surgery performed in a clinical setting. Evidence on validity was evaluated using a modified validation scoring system.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies with a total of 41 video-based SQA tools were identified. These tools were used in 9 different fields of laparoscopic surgery and were divided into 4 categories: the global assessment scale (GAS), the error-based assessment scale (EBAS), the procedure-specific assessment tool (PSAT) and artificial intelligence (AI). The number of studies focusing on these four categories were 21, 6, 31 and 3, respectively. Twelve studies validated the SQA tool with clinical outcomes. In 11 of those studies, a positive association between surgical quality and clinical outcomes was found.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review included a total of 41 unique video-based SQA tools to assess surgical technical skills in various domains of laparoscopic surgery. This study suggests that validated SQA tools enable objective assessment of surgical performance with relevance for clinical outcomes, which can be used for training, research and quality improvement programs.

Introduction to surgical coaching

Surgical coaching is a new approach to continuous professional development (CPD). Advocates claim that coaching improves surgical and non-technical skills, leading to enhanced performance and reduced stress and burnout. Widespread acceptance of coaching in the surgical community is limited due to a paucity of evidence, surgery-specific obstacles and lack of resources. This narrative review introduces what 'surgical coaching' is and describes its origins. Coaching techniques are based on live or video observation of procedures, followed by collaborative analysis, reflection and goal planning in a non-competitive setting aided by an expert, peer or lay coach. Technical skills improvements have been reported using coaching techniques, yet long-term influence on non-technical competencies, overall performance and surgeon wellbeing are largely hypothetical. There are clear potential benefits in the application of surgical coaching to daily surgical practice. However, significant knowledge gaps remain. Dedicated research into the short-term applicability and the long-term effects of surgical coaching are required.

Leadership Development Among Junior Surgery Residents: Communication and Perception

INTRODUCTION

Leadership is necessary for effective health care teams, particularly for surgeons. Trainees similarly must acquire foundational leadership skills to maximize effectiveness. However, surgical leadership is rarely formally assessed, particularly for junior trainees. We aimed to establish themes of communication, perception and engagement styles, as well as strengths and weaknesses among junior surgical residents at a single institution.

METHODS

The Data Dome Inc. (datadome.com) DISC personality assessment was administered in 2018-2021 to junior residents at an academic general surgery training program at a single institution. Resident demographics were recorded, and themes from deidentified reports were analyzed by year (PGY-1 and PGY-2) using JMP 16 Pro Text Explorer.

RESULTS

PGY-1 communication was most frequently described as "accomplished best by well-defined avenues" with "duties and responsibilities of others who will be involved explained" in "friendly terms." PGY-2 communication involved "deal [ing] with people," "strong feelings about a particular problem," and being "good at giving verbal and nonverbal feedback." In ideal environments, PGY-1s self-perceived as "good listener [s]," "good-natured," and "team player [s]." However, under stress, PGY-1s were perceived by others as "poor listener [s]," "self-promoter [s]," "detached," and "insensitive." In ideal environments, PGY-2s were also "good listener [s]," "good-natured," and "team player [s]." However, under stress, PGY-2 external perception was "overly confident," "poor listener [s]," and "self-promoter [s]."

CONCLUSIONS

Clear expectations, friendly work environments, and opportunities to succeed are key to effectively train junior surgical residents. In environments where time is often a limited resource, surgical simulation, stress training, and standardized teaching methods from attending surgeons are needed to develop competent trainees.

Surgesture: a novel instrument based on surgical actions for objective skill assessment

BACKGROUND

Due to varied surgical skills and the lack of an efficient rating system, we developed Surgesture based on elementary functional surgical gestures performed by surgeons, which could serve as objective metrics to evaluate surgical performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

We defined 14 LC basic Surgestures. Four surgeons annotated Surgestures among LC videos performed by experts and novices. The counts, durations, average action time, and dissection/exposure ratio (D/E ratio) of LC Surgestures were compared. The phase of mobilizing hepatocystic triangle (MHT) was extracted for skill assessment by three professors using a modified Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (mGOALS).

RESULTS

The novice operation time was significantly longer than the expert operation time (58.12 ± 19.23 min vs. 26.66 ± 8.00 min, P < 0.001), particularly during MHT phase. Novices had significantly more Surgestures than experts in both hands (P < 0.05). The left hand and inefficient Surgesture of novices were dramatically more than those of experts (P < 0.05). The experts demonstrated a significantly higher D/E ratio of duration than novices (0.79 ± 0.37 vs. 2.84 ± 1.98, P < 0.001). The counts and time pattern map of LC Surgestures during MHT demonstrated that novices tended to complete LC with more types of Surgestures and spent more time exposing the surgical scene. The performance metrics of LC Surgesture had significant but weak associations with each aspect of mGOALS.

CONCLUSION

The newly constructed Surgestures could serve as accessible and quantifiable metrics for demonstrating the operative pattern and distinguishing surgeons with various skills. The association between Surgestures and Global Rating Scale laid the foundation for establishing a bridge to automated objective surgical skill evaluation.

How Do Resident Surgeons Identify Operative Case Complexity? An Analysis of Resident versus Attending Perceptions

OBJECTIVE

Accurate recognition of patient-related complexity of an operation is critical for appropriate surgical decision making. It is not yet understood whether general surgery residents are able to accurately assess the relative complexity of a given operative case. This study investigates the agreement of case complexity ratings between residents and attending surgeons and explores whether resident-related factors correlate with any discordance in perception of patient-related operative complexity.

DESIGN

Residents and attending surgeons rated the relative complexity of completed cases on a 3 point scale via the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) operative assessment smartphone app. Additional trainee demographic data, autonomy ratings, and performance ratings were also obtained from the SIMPL registry for each rated case. Complexity agreement was defined as an equal rating between the resident and attending and assigned a value of zero. Over-estimate ratings were assigned a positive value and under-estimate ratings were assigned a negative value. Trends in complexity agreement were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 43,179 general surgery cases were rated by 1946 categorical general surgery residents and 1520 attending surgeons between 2015 and 2020. Residents and attendings agreed on case complexity in 63.23% of cases, while the residents overestimated complexity in 13.37% of cases and underestimated complexity in 23.40% of cases. Every level of resident except post-graduate year 2 had similar rates of agreement about the complexity of a procedure, while residents who received a higher autonomy rating were more likely to be in agreement with the faculty raters (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that general surgery residents inaccurately perceive the patient-related complexity of a given case approximately one third of the time. Greater experience and operative autonomy appear to be associated with higher complexity agreement. Future research into factors influencing perceived case complexity may provide insight into how to best implement new teaching for surgical residents regarding the concept of case complexity.

Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

Staple line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the most commonly utilized techniques for SLR.

Materials and Methods

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare no reinforcement (NR), suture oversewing (SR), glue reinforcement (GR), bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (Gore® Seamguard®) (GoR), and clips reinforcement (CR). Risk Ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used as pooled effect size measures.

Results

Overall, 3994 patients (17 RCTs) were included. Of those, 1641 (41.1%) underwent NR, 1507 (37.7%) SR, 689 (17.2%) GR, 107 (2.7%) GoR, and 50 (1.3%) CR. SR was associated with a significantly reduced risk of bleeding (RR=0.51; 95% CrI 0.31–0.88), staple line leak (RR=0.56; 95% CrI 0.32–0.99), and overall complications (RR=0.50; 95% CrI 0.30–0.88) compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Operative time was significantly longer for SR (WMD=16.2; 95% CrI 10.8–21.7), GR (WMD=15.0; 95% CrI 7.7–22.4), and GoR (WMD=15.5; 95% CrI 5.6–25.4) compared to NR. Among treatments, there were no significant differences for surgical site infection (SSI), sleeve stenosis, reoperation, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

SR seems associated with a reduced risk of bleeding, leak, and overall complications compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Data regarding GoR and CR are limited while further trials reporting outcomes for these techniques are warranted.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z.

Surgical coaching applied to laparoscopic TME for continuous professional development in rectal surgery: proof of concept

BACKGROUND

Coaching is maturing as a strategy for surgeons' continuous professional development in different types of surgery. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LAP TME) is one of the recognized difficult procedures in colorectal surgery. Aim of this trial is to introduce the surgical coaching as a tool for a continuous technical education of LAP TME for cancer in a consultant surgeon carrier.

METHODS

Twelve Italian colorectal surgeons were enrolled as trainees in the AIMS Academy rectal cancer surgical coaching project and attended a face-to-face 90-min surgical coaching on a pre-edited 45-min-long video of a laparoscopic proctectomy according to pre-determined guidelines. At the end of the coaching, all mentors were asked to fill a questionnaire evaluating the trainee's skills. All trainees had to fill a post-coaching questionnaire addressing the appropriateness of the coaching with respect to their actual level.

RESULTS

Trainees were more confident in performing the extra-pelvic part of the surgical procedures compared to the intra-pelvic dissection. The most challenging steps according to the trainees were the seminal vesicles identification and the pelvic floor dissection. Mentors found the trainees quite confident in the approach to the vascular structures, lymphadenectomy, stapler utilization and bleeding control. The sharpness and the efficacy of the dissection, the dissection of the surgical planes and the anastomosis fashioning were reported at a lower level of confidence. The higher grade of satisfaction reported by the trainee came from the attention that the mentors demonstrated towards them, from the availability of the mentors to take into consideration the surgical issues raised and from the willingness to apply the suggestions received during their next proctectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical coaching applied to LAP TME should be considered as an innovative tool for continuous professional development.