Defining Surgical Difficulty of Liver Transplantation

European validation of the classification for the anticipated difficulty of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Appropriate risk stratification for the difficulty of liver transplantation (LT) is essential to guide the selection and acceptance of grafts and avoid morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Based on 987 LTs collected from 5 centers, perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the 3 difficulty levels. Each LT was retrospectively scored from 0 to 10. Scores of 0-2, 3-5 and 6-10 were then translated into respective difficulty levels: low, moderate and high. Complications were reported according to the comprehensive complication index (CCI).

RESULTS

The difficulty level of LT in 524 (53%), 323 (32%), and 140 (14%) patients was classified as low, moderate and high, respectively. The values of major intraoperative outcomes, such as cold ischemia time (p = 0.04) and operative time (p < 0.0001) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels. There was a corresponding increase in CCI (p = 0.04), severe complication rates (p = 0.05) and length of ICU (p = 0.01) and hospital (p = 0.004) stays across the different difficulty levels.

CONCLUSION

The LT difficulty classification has been validated.

The impact of postoperative complications on oncological outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A competing risk analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of postoperative complications on tumor-related (TRD), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 425 LTs for HCC from 2010 to 2019. Postoperative complications were classified according to Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and the posttransplant risk of TRD assessed through Metroticket 2.0 calculator. The population was stratified into high-risk and low-risk cohorts based on the predicted TRD risk of 80%. In a second step, we re-evaluated TRD, DFS and OS of both cohorts according to a further stratification based on 47.3 points of CCI cut-off.

RESULTS

In the low-risk cohort, we observed a significantly better DFS (84% vs. 46%, p<0.001), TRD (3% vs. 26%, p<0.001) and OS (89% vs. 62%, p<0.001) in the group with CCI < 47.3. In the high-risk cohort, patients with CCI < 47.3 had significantly better DFS (50% vs. 23%, p = 0.003) and OS (68% vs. 42%, p = 0.02) and a comparable TRD (22% vs. 31%, p = 0.142).

CONCLUSIONS

A complicated postoperative course negatively influenced long-term survival. This poorer oncological outcome associated with in-hospital postoperative complications suggests that every effort should be made to improve the early posttransplant course in HCC patients, including a careful donor-to recipient match and use of new perfusion technologies.

Perceptions of surgical difficulty in liver transplantation: A European survey and development of the Pitié-Salpêtrière classification

BACKGROUND

Significant variations exist regarding the definition of difficult liver transplantation. The study goals were to investigate how liver transplant surgeons evaluate the surgical difficulty of liver transplantation and to use the identified factors to classify liver transplantation difficulty.

METHODS

A Web-based online European survey was presented to liver transplant surgeons. The survey was divided into 3 parts: (1) participant demographics and practices; (2) various situations based on recipient, liver disease, tumor treatment, and technical factors; and (3) 8 real-life clinical vignettes with different levels of complexity. In part 3 of the survey, respondents were asked whether they would perform liver transplantation but were not aware that these patients eventually underwent liver transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 143 invites were sent out, and 97 (67.8%) participants completed the survey. Most participants considered previous spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, previous supra-mesocolic surgery, hypertrophy of segment I, and obesity to be recipient factors for high-difficulty liver transplantation. Most participants considered liver transplantation to be challenging in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, Kasai surgery, polycystic liver disease, diffuse portal vein thrombosis, and a history of open hepatectomy. The proportion of participants indicating that liver transplantation was warranted varied across the 8 cases, from 69% to 100%. Our classification of the surgical difficulty of liver transplantation employed these recipient-related, surgical history-related, and liver disease-related variables and 3 difficulty groups were identified: low, intermediate, and high difficulty groups.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides an overview of the surgical difficulty of various situations in liver transplantation that could be useful for further benchmark and textbook outcome studies.

Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions

Postoperative complications represent a major public health burden worldwide. Without standardized, clinically relevant and universally applied endpoints, the evaluation of surgical interventions remains ill-defined and inconsistent, opening the door for biased interpretations and hampering patient-centered health care delivery. We conducted a Jury-based consensus conference incorporating the perspectives of different stakeholders, who based their recommendations on the work of nine panels of experts. The recommendations cover the selection of postoperative outcomes from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders, comparison and interpretation of outcomes, consideration of cultural and demographic factors, and strategies to deal with unwarranted outcomes. With the recommendations developed exclusively by the Jury, we provide a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions, that integrates the main stakeholders' perspectives.

Development of a preoperative score to predict surgical difficulty in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

A difficulty score to predict intraoperative surgical complexity in liver transplantation has never been developed. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with a difficult liver transplant and develop a score to predict difficult surgery.

METHODS

All patients undergoing deceased donor whole liver transplantation from 2012 to 2019 at a single center were included. Estimated intraoperative blood loss (mL/kg) and surgery duration (skin-to-arterial reperfusion time) were used as surrogates of difficulty. Based on these variables, the study population was divided into 2 groups: high risk and standard risk of difficulty. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors associated with a demanding liver transplantation and develop a difficulty score.

RESULTS

A total of 515 patients were included in the study population, and 101 (20%) were considered difficult operations. Patients with a higher risk of difficulty showed a significantly higher rate of Clavien-Dindo ≥III complications (50.5% vs 24.4%, P = .001) and a longer hospital stay (19 vs 16 days, P = .001). Preoperative factors associated with difficulty were retransplantation (odds ratio 4.34, P = .001), preoperative portal vein thrombosis (odds ratio 3.419, P = .001), previous upper abdominal surgery (odds ratio 2.161, P = .003), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (odds ratio 1.985, P < .02), and prior variceal bleeding (odds ratio 1.401, P = .051). A 10-point difficulty score was created, showing a negative predictive value of 84% at 4 points.

CONCLUSION

Difficult liver transplantation surgery, as assessed by skin-to-arterial reperfusion time and estimated blood loss, is associated with worse perioperative outcomes. We developed a simple score with clinical preoperative variables that predicts difficult surgery, and therefore, it may help to optimize allocation policies and perioperative logistics.