Salvage of Declined Extended Criteria DCD Livers Using in-situ Normothermic Regional Perfusion

Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liver grafts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors have lower utilization rates due to inferior graft and patient survival rates, largely attributable to the increased incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy, when compared with grafts from brain dead donors (DBD). Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) may improve the quality of cDCD livers to allow for expansion of the donor pool, helping to alleviate the shortage of transplantable grafts. A systematic review and metanalysis was conducted comparing NRP cDCD livers with both non-NRP cDCD livers and DBD livers. In comparison to non-NRP cDCD outcomes, NRP cDCD grafts had lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy [RR = 0.23, 95% CI (0.11, 0.49), p = 0.0002], primary non-function [RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.27, 0.97), p = 0.04], and recipient death [HR = 0.5, 95% CI (0.36, 0.69), p < 0.0001]. There was no difference in outcomes between NRP cDCD donation compared to DBD liver donation. In conclusion, NRP improved the quality of cDCD livers compared to their non-NRP counterparts. NRP cDCD livers had similar outcomes to DBD grafts. This provides further evidence supporting the continued use of NRP in cDCD liver transplantation and offers weight to proposals for its more widespread adoption.

Machine perfusion in liver transplantation: recent advances and coming challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Machine perfusion has been adopted into clinical practice in Europe since the mid-2010s and, more recently, in the United States (US) following approval of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). We aim to review recent advances, provide discussion of potential future directions, and summarize challenges currently facing the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both NMP and hypothermic-oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) improve overall outcomes after liver transplantation versus traditional static cold storage (SCS) and offer improved logistical flexibility. HOPE offers additional protection to the biliary system stemming from its' protection of mitochondria and lessening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is touted to offer similar protective effects on the biliary system, though this has not been studied prospectively.The most critical question remaining is the optimal use cases for each of the three techniques (NMP, HOPE, and NRP), particularly as HOPE and NRP become more available in the US. There are additional questions regarding the most effective criteria for viability assessment and the true economic impact of these techniques. Finally, with each technique purported to allow well tolerated use of riskier grafts, there is an urgent need to define terminology for graft risk, as baseline population differences make comparison of current data challenging.

SUMMARY

Machine perfusion is now widely available in all western countries and has become an essential tool in liver transplantation. Identification of the ideal technique for each graft, optimization of viability assessment, cost-effectiveness analyses, and proper definition of graft risk are the next steps to maximizing the utility of these powerful tools.

Should advanced perfusion be the standard of care for donation after circulatory death liver transplant?

As an alternative to static cold storage (SCS), advanced perfusion techniques such as normothermic regional perfusion and ex-situ perfusion (normothermic or hypothermic) have emerged as a way to improve the ischemic injury suffered by donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers. Multiple studies have been published that have demonstrated superior post-DCD liver transplant outcomes when using advanced perfusion compared with SCS. In particular, these studies have shown lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy with advanced perfusion. In addition to the improved post-liver transplant outcomes, studies have also demonstrated higher rates of liver utilization from DCD donors when advanced perfusion is used compared with SCS. Given the high rates of graft loss in patients who develop ischemic cholangiopathy, the significant reduction seen in DCD donor livers that have undergone advanced perfusion represents a key step in more broad utilization of these livers. With such compelling evidence from multiple trials, it seems reasonable to ask the question: should advanced perfusion be the standard of care for DCD liver transplant?

Challenges With the Implementation of Machine Perfusion in Clinical Liver Transplantation

Dynamic organ preservation is a relatively old technique which has regained significant interest in the last decade. Machine perfusion (MP) techniques are applied in various fields of solid organ transplantation today. The first clinical series of ex situ MP in liver transplantation was presented in 2010. Since then, the number of research and clinical applications has substantially increased. Despite the notable beneficial effect on organ quality and recipient outcome, MP is still not routinely used in liver transplantation. Based on the enormous need to better preserve organs and the subsequent demand to continuously innovate and develop perfusion equipment further, this technology is also beneficial to test and deliver future therapeutic strategies to livers before implantation. This article summarizes the various challenges observed during the current shift from static to dynamic liver preservation in the clinical setting. The different organ perfusion strategies are discussed first, together with ongoing clinical trials and future study design. The current status of research and the impact of costs and regulations is highlighted next. Factors contributing to costs and other required resources for a worldwide successful implementation and reimbursement are presented third. The impact of research on cost-utility and effectivity to guide the tailored decision-making regarding the optimal perfusion strategy is discussed next. Finally, this article provides potential solutions to the challenging field of innovation in healthcare considering the various social and economic factors and the role of clinical, regulatory, and financial stakeholders worldwide.

Does Time to Asystole in Donors After Circulatory Death Impact Recipient Outcome in Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

The agonal phase can vary following treatment withdrawal in donor after circulatory death (DCD). There is little evidence to support when procurement teams should stand down in relation to donor time to death (TTD). We assessed what impact TTD had on outcomes following DCD liver transplantation.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry on DCD liver transplant recipients from 2006 to 2021. TTD was the time from withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to asystole, and functional warm ischemia time was the time from donor systolic blood pressure and/or oxygen saturation falling below 50 mm Hg and 70%, respectively, to aortic perfusion. The primary endpoint was 1-y graft survival. Potential predictors were fitted into Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred fifty-eight recipients of a DCD liver graft were included. Median TTD in the entire cohort was 13 min (interquartile range, 9-17 min). Restricted cubic splines revealed that the risk of graft loss was significantly greater when TTD ≤14 min. After 14 min, there was no impact on graft loss. Prolonged hepatectomy time was significantly associated with graft loss (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.83; P = 0.003); however, functional warm ischemia time had no impact (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-2.27; P > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

A very short TTD was associated with increased risk of graft loss, possibly because of such donors being more unstable and/or experiencing brain stem death as well as circulatory death. Expanding the stand down times may increase the utilization of donor livers without significantly impairing graft outcome.

Role of Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation

Given the current severe shortage of available livers for transplantation, there is an urgent need to maximize the utilization of donor organs. One of the strategies to increase the number of available livers for transplantation is to improve organ utilization through the use of elderly, overweight, or organs donated after circulatory death. However, the utilization of these "marginal" organs was associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, ischemic biliary complications, or even re-transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of these complications.

Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Early Challenges, Clinical Improvement, and Future Directions

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts remain a widely underutilized source of donor organs for transplantation. Although initially linked with inferior outcomes, DCD liver transplant can achieve excellent patient and graft survival with suitable matching of donor and recipient characteristics, rapid donor recovery and precise donor assessment, and appropriate perioperative management. The advent of clinical liver perfusion modalities promises to redefine the viability parameters for DCD liver allografts and hopefully will encourage more widespread usage of this growing source of donor livers.

Liver transplantation with uncontrolled versus controlled DCD donors using normothermic regional perfusion and ex-situ machine perfusion

In Italy, 20 minutes of continuous, flat-line electrocardiogram are required for death declaration, which significantly increases the risks of donation after circulatory death (DCD) LT. Despite prolonged warm ischemia time, Italian centers reported good outcomes in controlled donation after circulatory death LT by combining normothermic regional and end-ischemic machine perfusion. However, data on uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) LT performed by this approach are lacking. This was a multicenter, retrospective study performed at 3 large-volume centers comparing clinical outcomes of uncontrolled versus controlled DCD LT. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of sequential normothermic regional perfusion and end-ischemic machine perfusion in uncontrolled DCD liver transplantation (LT). Of 153 DCD donors evaluated during the study period, 40 uDCD and 59 donation after circulatory death grafts were transplanted (utilization rate 52% vs. 78%, p = 0.004). Recipients of uDCD grafts had higher MEAF (4.9 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001) and CCI scores at discharge (24.4 vs. 8.7, p = 0.026), longer ICU stay (5 vs. 4 d, p = 0.047), and a trend toward more severe AKI. At multivariate analysis, 90-day graft loss was associated with recipient BMI and lactate downtrend during normothermic regional perfusion. One-year graft survival was lower in uDCD (75% vs. 90%, p = 0.007) but became comparable when non-liver-related graft losses were treated as censors (77% vs. 90%, p = 0.100). The incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy was 10% in uDCD versus 3% in donation after circulatory death, p = 0.356. uDCD LT with prolonged warm ischemia is feasible by the sequential use of normothermic regional perfusion and end-ischemic machine perfusion. Proper donor and recipient selection are key to achieving good outcomes in this setting.

Early national trends of lung allograft use during donation after circulatory death heart procurement in the United States

Objective

Innovative technology such as normothermic regional perfusion and the Organ Care System has expanded donation after circulatory death heart transplantation. We wanted to investigate the impact of donation after circulatory death heart procurement in concurrent lung donation and implantation at a national level.

Methods

We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing database for heart donation between December 2019 and March 2022. Donation after circulatory death donors were separated from donation after brain death donors and further categorized based on concomitant organ procurement of lung and heart, or heart only.

Results

A total of 8802 heart procurements consisted of 332 donation after circulatory death donors and 8470 donation after brain death donors. Concomitant lung procurement was lower among donation after circulatory death donors (19.3%) than in donation after brain death donors (38.0%, P < .001). The transplant rate of lungs in the setting of concomitant procurement is 13.6% in donation after circulatory death, whereas it is 38% in donation after brain death (P < .001). Of the 121 lungs from 64 donation after circulatory death donors, 22 lungs were retrieved but discarded (32.2%). Normothermic regional perfusion was performed in 37.3% of donation after circulatory death donors, and there was no difference in lung use between normothermic regional perfusion versus direct procurement and perfusion (20.2% and 18.8%). There was also no difference in 1-year survival between normothermic regional perfusion and direct procurement and perfusion.

Conclusions

Although national use of donation after circulatory death hearts has increased, donation after circulatory death lungs has remained at a steady state. The implantation of lungs after concurrent procurement with the heart remains low, whereas transplantation of donation after circulatory death hearts is greater than 90%. The use of normothermic regional perfusion lungs has been controversial, and we report comparable 1-year outcomes to standard donation after circulatory death lungs. Further studies are warranted to investigate the underlying mechanisms of normothermic regional perfusion on lung function.

Extended criteria liver donation after circulatory death with prolonged warm ischemia: a pilot experience of normothermic regional perfusion and no subsequent ex-situ machine perfusion

BACKGROUND

Livers from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) with very prolonged warm ischemic time (WIT) are regularly transplanted after abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) plus ex-situ machine perfusion (MP). Considering aNRP as in-situ MP, we investigated whether the results of a pilot experience of extended criteria cDCD liver transplantation (LT) with prolonged WIT, with aNRP alone, were comparable to the best possible outcomes in low-risk cDCD LT.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on 24 cDCD LT, with aNRP alone, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median total and asystolic WIT were 51 and 25 min. Measures within benchmark cut-offs were: median duration of surgery (5.9 h); median intraoperative transfusions (3 units of red blood cells); need for renal replacement therapy (2/24 patients); median intensive care stay (3 days); key complications; overall morbidity, graft loss, and retransplantation up to 12 months; 12-month mortality (2/21 patients). The median hospital stay (33 days, due to logistics) and mortality up to 6 months (2/24 patients, due to graft-unrelated causes) exceeded benchmark thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot experience suggests that livers from cDCD with very prolonged WIT that appear viable during adequate quality aNRP may be safely transplanted, with no need for ex-situ MP, with considerable resource savings.

Routine End-ischemic Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation From Donors After Brain Death: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether end-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is superior to static cold storage (SCS) in preserving livers procured from donors after brain death (DBD).

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence of the benefits of HOPE in liver transplantation, but predominantly in the setting of high-risk donors.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, livers procured from DBDs were randomly assigned to either end-ischemic dual HOPE for at least 2 hours or SCS (1:3 allocation ratio). The Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measure was 90-day morbidity (ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT04812054).

RESULTS

Of the 104 liver transplantations included in the study, 26 were assigned to HOPE and 78 to SCS. Mean MEAF was 4.94 and 5.49 in the HOPE and SCS groups ( P =0.24), respectively, with the corresponding rates of MEAF >8 of 3.8% (1/26) and 15.4% (12/78; P =0.18). Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 20.9 after transplantations with HOPE and 21.8 after transplantations with SCS ( P =0.19). Transaminase activity, bilirubin concentration, and international normalized ratio were similar in both groups. In the case of donor risk index >1.70, HOPE was associated with significantly lower mean MEAF (4.92 vs 6.31; P =0.037) and lower median Comprehensive Complication Index (4.35 vs 22.6; P =0.050). No significant differences between HOPE and SCS were observed for lower donor risk index values.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of HOPE in DBD liver transplantations does not seem justified as the clinical benefits are limited to high-risk donors.

Viability assessment of livers donated after circulatory determination of death during normothermic regional perfusion

BACKGROUND

Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) allows in-situ reperfusion and recovery of abdominal organs metabolism in donors after circulatory death (DCD). Besides improving liver transplantation outcomes, liver injury and function can be assessed during A-NRP.

METHODS

To refine liver viability assessment during A-NRP, prospectively collected data of controlled DCD donors managed at our Institution between October 2019 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, procedural variables and A-NRP parameters of donors whose liver was successfully transplanted were compared to those of donors whose liver was discarded.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven donors were included and in 20 (74%) the liver was accepted (positive outcome). No differences between study groups were observed concerning baseline characteristics and warm ischemia times (WIT). Initial lactate levels were positively correlated with functional WIT (r2  = 0.4, p = 0.04), whereas transaminase levels were not. Blood flow during A-NRP was comparable, whereas oxygen consumption (VO2 ) was significantly higher in the positive outcome group after 1 h. Time courses of lactate, AST and ALT were significantly different between study groups (p < 0.001). Donors whose liver was accepted showed faster lactate clearance, a difference which was amplified by normalizing lactate clearance to oxygen delivery (DO2 ) and VO2 . Lactate clearance was correlated to transaminase levels and DO2 -normalized lactate clearance was the parameter best discriminating between study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DO2 -normalized lactate clearance may represent an element of liver viability assessment during A-NRP.

Machine perfusion and the prevention of ischemic type biliary lesions following liver transplant: What is the evidence?

The widespread uptake of different machine perfusion (MP) strategies for liver transplant has been driven by an effort to minimize graft injury. Damage to the cholangiocytes during the liver donation, preservation, or early posttransplant period may result in stricturing of the biliary tree and inadequate biliary drainage. This problem continues to trouble clinicians, and may have catastrophic consequences for the graft and patient. Ischemic injury, as a result of compromised hepatic artery flow, is a well-known cause of biliary strictures, sepsis, and graft failure. However, very similar lesions can appear with a patent hepatic artery and these are known as ischemic type biliary lesions (ITBL) that are attributed to microcirculatory dysfunction rather than main hepatic arterial compromise. Both the warm and cold ischemic period duration appear to influence the onset of ITBL. All of the commonly used MP techniques deliver oxygen to the graft cells, and therefore may minimize the cholangiocyte injury and subsequently reduce the incidence of ITBL. As clinical experience and published evidence grows for these modalities, the impact they have on ITBL rates is important to consider. In this review, the evidence for the three commonly used MP strategies (abdominal normothermic regional perfusion [A-NRP], hypothermic oxygenated perfusion [HOPE], and normothermic machine perfusion [NMP] for ITBL prevention has been critically reviewed. Inconsistencies with ITBL definitions used in trials, coupled with variations in techniques of MP, make interpretation challenging. Overall, the evidence suggests that both HOPE and A-NRP prevent ITBL in donated after circulatory death grafts compared to cold storage. The evidence for ITBL prevention in donor after brain death grafts with any MP technique is weak.

Utilization of livers donated after circulatory death for transplantation - An international comparison

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver graft utilization rates are a hot topic due to the worldwide organ shortage and the increasing number of transplant candidates on waiting lists. Liver perfusion techniques have been introduced in several countries, and may help to increase the organ supply, as they potentially enable the assessment of livers before use.

METHODS

Liver offers were counted from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors (Maastricht type III) arising during the past decade in eight countries, including Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the US. Initial type-III DCD liver offers were correlated with accepted, recovered and implanted livers.

RESULTS

A total number of 34,269 DCD livers were offered, resulting in 9,780 liver transplants (28.5%). The discard rates were highest in the UK and US, ranging between 70 and 80%. In contrast, much lower DCD liver discard rates, e.g. between 30-40%, were found in Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. In addition, we observed large differences in the use of various machine perfusion techniques, as well as in graft and donor risk factors. For example, the median donor age and functional donor warm ischemia time were highest in Italy, e.g. >40 min, followed by Switzerland, France, and the Netherlands. Importantly, such varying risk profiles of accepted DCD livers between countries did not translate into large differences in 5-year graft survival rates, which ranged between 60-82% in this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, DCD liver discard rates across the eight countries were high, although this primarily reflects the situation in the Netherlands, the UK and the US. Countries where in situ and ex situ machine perfusion strategies were used routinely had better DCD utilization rates without compromised outcomes.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

A significant number of Maastricht type III DCD livers are discarded across Europe and North America today. The overall utilization rate among eight Western countries is 28.5% but varies significantly between 18.9% and 74.2%. For example, the median DCD-III liver utilization in five countries, e.g. Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, and Spain is 65%, in contrast to 24% in the Netherlands, UK and US. Despite this, and despite different rules and strategies for organ acceptance and preservation, 1- and 5-year graft survival rates remain fairly similar among all participating countries. A highly varying experience with modern machine perfusion technology was observed. In situ and ex situ liver perfusion concepts, and application of assessment tools for type-III DCD livers before transplantation, may be a key explanation for the observed differences in DCD-III utilization.