Challenges in surgical management of abdominal pain in the neutropenic cancer patient

Chemotherapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients: a scoping review

Background

The presence of air in the peritoneal cavity (pneumoperitoneum) is often secondary to perforated viscus. Emergent operative intervention is typically warranted in non-cancer patients. Cancer patients present a unique challenge as they have an increased risk of pneumoperitoneum due to local tumour invasion, radiation therapy, and frequent endoscopic procedures. There is a paucity of literature on the management of patients undergoing chemotherapy who present with pneumoperitoneum. The authors conducted a scoping review to identify and synthesize preliminary evidence on the presentation, management, and outcomes of this patient population.

Materials and methods

A scoping review of cases of pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients from 1990 to 2022 was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley five-stage approach. Inclusion criteria were a known diagnosis of cancer, chemotherapy within 6 months of presentation, and imaging confirmation of pneumoperitoneum. The authors' exclusion criteria were cancer diagnosis at the time of presentation, perforation secondary to local cancer invasion, and last chemotherapy session greater than 6 months prior to presentation.

Results

Thirty-four cases (8 paediatric, 26 adults) were identified. The median time from the last chemotherapy treatment to presentation with pneumoperitoneum was 14 days. Twenty-one patients were managed operatively, and 13 were managed non-operatively. The most common source of perforation was multiple sites along the bowel. Thirty-day mortality was 33.3% for the operative cohort and 23.1% for the non-operative group.

Conclusions

Pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients remains a highly morbid condition with a mortality rate of approximately 30%, regardless of the treatment approach. Non-operative management should be pursued whenever possible.

Evaluation of Absolute Neutrophil Count in the Perioperative Setting of Sarcoma Resection

Introduction

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is the preferred surgical treatment for bone sarcomas. Preoperatively, many patients receive chemotherapy and may develop neutropenia. No study has evaluated the effect of a low preoperative absolute neutrophil count (ANC) on postoperative outcomes following LSS.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 114 patients who underwent LSS for bone sarcoma from 2010 to 2020. Preoperative lab values were analyzed by logistic regression to identify the risk of developing surgical complications within 30 days, surgical site infection (SSI), and reoperation.

Results

Three (2.6%) patients experienced a surgical complication within 30 days. Twelve (10.53%) patients experienced postoperative SSI. Twenty-nine (25.4%) required reoperation. Preoperative ANC was not a significant predictor of surgical complications within 30 days, SSI, or reoperation. The only independent predictor of worse overall survival was the presence of a pathologic fracture at the time of surgery.

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate preoperative ANC on postoperative outcomes following LSS. We report no significant differences in surgical complications within 30 days, SSI, or reoperation with low preoperative ANC. Future studies with larger cohorts of neutropenic patients are needed to evaluate these outcomes, as our cohort had very few neutropenic patients due to selection bias.

Neutropenic Enterocolitis: An Uncommon, but Fearsome Complication of Leukemia

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening condition occurring in severely neutropenic patients, following intensive chemotherapy for leukemia. Its pathogenesis is not entirely understood and believed to be multifactorial, including mucosal injury as a result of cytotoxic drugs, profound neutropenia, impaired host defense and possibly microbiota changes. Establishing an early diagnosis is key. The management of NEC remains undefined due to lack of high-quality clinical data. With a better understanding of the disease, a more conservative approach is preferred over surgical intervention. The involvement of a multi-disciplinary team, consisting of the oncologist, infectious diseases specialists and surgeons is highly recommended. This review aims to delineate insights into the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of NEC and to emphasize the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this condition.

Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: How to Select the Correct Imaging for Diagnosis

Abdominal pain is a common presenting complaint in the emergency department, and utilization of diagnostic imaging is often a key tool in determining its etiology. Plain radiography has limited utility in this population. Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality of choice for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful in specific scenarios, primarily in pediatrics and pregnancy, and offer the benefit of eliminating ionizing radiation risk of CT. Guidance for imaging selection is determined by location of pain, special patient considerations, and specific suspected etiologies. Expert guidance is offered by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria^® which outlines imaging options based on location of pain.

Acute Abdominal Complications in Deeply Neutropenic Onco-Hematology Patients: A Retrospective Series of 105 Cases

BACKGROUND

Acute abdominal complications (AAC) in patients with deep neutropenia (DN) is challenging to manage because of the expected influence of AAC on oncological prognosis and higher surgical complication rate in a period of DN. In practice, these parameters are difficult to appreciate. This study reported our experience in managing these patients.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated in our tertiary care cancer center between 2010 and 2020 who developed AAC in the context of a DN were retrospectively analyzed. AAC was defined as an infection (intra-abdominal, perineal, or cutaneous), bowel obstruction, or intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

FINDINGS

Among 105 patients, 18 (17%) required emergent surgery (group 1), 34 patients had a complication requiring surgical oversight (group 2), and 53 patients had a non-surgical etiology (group 3). Fifteen patients underwent surgery in the group 1, three in group 2, and one in group 3. Overall, 28 patients died during hospitalization. Mortality was statistically different between the groups (p = 0·01), with a higher rate in group 1 (n = 9/18, 50%) than in group 2 (n = 11/34, 32%) and group 3 (n = 8/53, 15%). All groups together had a median overall survival (OS) of 14 months and disease-free survival (DFS) of 10 months. OS was not comparable between the groups, and the median length of survival in group 1 was 6 months versus 8 months in group 2 and 23 months in group 3. In group 1, five patients (5/18, 28%) did not relapse at the end of the follow-up compared to 13 in group 2 (13/34, 38%) and 25 in group 3 (25/53, 47%). After discharge, OS and DFS were similar between the groups.

INTERPRETATION

The advent of an AAC necessitating surgery in the context of DN is a deadly event associated with a 50% mortality; nonetheless, in case of unpostponable emergencies, surgery can provide long-term survival in selected patients.

Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies in the Neutropenic Immunocompromised Patient

Surgeons encounter neutropenic patients through elective or emergency consultation with increasing regularity. As medical management continues to extend the lives of patients with benign hematologic diseases, hematologic malignancies, solid malignancies, or iatrogenic neutropenia, more patients are presenting with infectious complications caused and/or complicated by their neutropenia. This leaves surgeons in the difficult position of managing medically fragile patients with unusual presentations of common disease processes. These patients often fall outside of classical guidelines and treatment pathways. Many studies addressing these issues are retrospective and non-randomized. Here, we review common emergency gastrointestinal surgery scenarios and their management in the setting of a neutropenic patient. While biliary disease, appendicitis, anorectal disease, and perforations will be covered in detail, an extensive appreciation of a patient's medical or oncologic disease course and appropriate utilization of consultants such as interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and hematology is often necessary.

Neutropenic Enterocolitis and Sepsis: Towards the Definition of a Pathologic Profile

Background: Neutropenic enterocolitis (NE), which in the past was also known as typhlitis or ileocecal syndrome for the segment of the gastrointestinal tract most affected, is a nosological entity that is difficult to diagnose and whose pathogenesis is not fully known to date. Initially described in pediatric patients with leukemic diseases, it has been gradually reported in adults with hematological malignancies and non-hematological conditions, such as leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, aplastic anemia, and also myelodysplastic syndromes, as well as being associated with other immunosuppressive causes such as AIDS treatment, therapy for solid tumors, and organ transplantation. Therefore, it is associated with high mortality due to the rapid evolution in worse clinical pictures: rapid progression to ischemia, necrosis, hemorrhage, perforation, multisystem organ failure, and sepsis. Case report: A case report is included to exemplify the clinical profile of patients with NE who develop sepsis. Literature Review: To identify a specific profile of subjects affected by neutropenic enterocolitis and the entity of the clinical condition most frequently associated with septic evolution, a systematic review of the literature was conducted. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English language, full-text availability, human subjects, and adult subjects. Finally, the papers were selected after the evaluation of the title and abstract to evaluate their congruity with the subject of this manuscript. Following these procedures, 19 eligible empirical studies were included in the present review. Conclusions: Despite the recent interest and the growing number of publications targeting sepsis and intending to identify biomarkers useful for its diagnosis, prognosis, and for the understanding of its pathogenesis, and especially for multi-organ dysfunction, and despite the extensive research period of the literature review, the number of publications on the topic “neutropenic enterocolitis and sepsis” appears to be very small. In any case, the extrapolated data allowed us to conclude that the integration of medical history, clinical and laboratory data, radiological imaging, and macroscopic and histological investigations can allow us to identify a specific pathological profile.

Appendectomy in pediatric patients with synchronous oncologic diagnosis is safe: an analysis using the national surgical quality improvement project, pediatric

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of children who develop appendicitis while undergoing treatment for an oncologic diagnosis has not been defined, in part due to theoretical concerns for an increased risk of postoperative wound complications. We hypothesized that synchronous oncologic diagnosis conferred no increased odds of developing a wound complication in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Pediatric (2012-2017) of patients < 18 years of age undergoing appendectomy. The main exposure variable was active treatment for an oncologic diagnosis. The primary outcomes of interest were 30-day wound complications (superficial or deep infections or dehiscence, and abscess). For univariate analysis comparison of baseline differences between patients with/without a cancer diagnosis we employed Pearson's χ² and two sample t tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate which covariates were independently associated with our outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 28,219 patients who had undergone appendectomy; 95 (0.3%) were undergoing oncologic treatment at the time of surgery. Patients in the cancer group were more likely to be receiving steroids, have lower white blood cell counts and have higher American Society of Anesthesiology classes as compared to the noncancer patients. Age, gender, rates of perforation, and laparoscopy were similar between the two groups. Patients with an active cancer diagnosis suffered wound complications (measured individually and as an aggregate) at no higher odds than those without a cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients undergoing treatment for cancer do not have increased odds of suffering postoperative wound complications following appendectomy as compared to the general population.

Use of non-operative treatment and interval cholecystectomy for cholecystitis in patients with cancer

Background

Early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) is standard. Often patients with cancer are not EC candidates and require non-surgical treatments. We analyzed factors associated with non-surgical treatments and progression to interval cholecystectomy (IC).

Materials and methods

We performed a case-control study reviewing consults for AC from 2001 to 2017 in a tertiary cancer center. Study patients had cancer, abdominal pain, and positive imaging studies. Univariate analysis and regression modeling evaluated associations between non-surgical management, resolution of AC, and IC.

Results

206 patients met the criteria. 20 underwent EC, 132 took antibiotics (ABX), and were treated with 54 percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes (PCTs). AC resolution was higher with PCT versus ABX (94% vs. 80%, p=0.02). Univariate analysis revealed higher absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) and longer length of stay in PCT, and logistic regression revealed independent associations of abdominal malignancy (OR=6.66, 95% CI 1.36 to 32.6, p=0.09), abdominal radiation (OR=0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.53, p<0.01), and PCT with resolution of AC (OR=4.89, 95% CI 1.18 to 20.2, p=0.01). IC rate was 43%, and median time to IC after was 45 to 67 days. Multivariate analysis revealed nausea/vomiting and increasing platelets are independently associated with IC. Recent chemotherapy increases odds of IC in the presence of rising ANC (OR=1.14, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.30, p=0.05).

Conclusion

PCT has a higher success rate of resolving AC than ABX. Abdominal malignancy increases odds of resolution; abdominal radiation decreases odds. Nausea/vomiting and recent chemotherapy, coupled with rising ANC are associated with IC, but less than 50% of patients return for operation. PCT may not be a bridge to IC in our population.Level of evidence II.

Neutropenic enterocolitis in pediatric leukemia patients treated with intensive chemotherapy in Upper Egypt

IMPORTANCE

In low resource countries, there has been scarcity of research on the risk factors associated with neutropenic enterocolitis, a serious complication that commonly develops during treatment of cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the pattern of intestinal complications in pediatric leukemia patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, including those with neutropenic enterocolitis; to assess the outcome; and to evaluate the risk factors associated with the mortality in these patients.

METHODS

During the period from June 2015 to December 2016, a prospective study was carried out on pediatric patients diagnosed with acute leukemia who received induction/or re-induction phases of chemotherapy at South Egypt Cancer Institute. Patients with documented episodes of intestinal complications were included in the study. Recovery or death from an episode of intestinal complication was utilized as the primary outcome measure for the study. Using univariable and multivariable methods, potential risk factors associated with mortality were delineated by logistic regression analysis, both for the entire intestinal complications episodes as a whole and for those episodes of neutropenic enterocolitis only.

RESULTS

Out of 88 documented episodes of intestinal complications from 77 patients; 58 episodes were identified as neutropenic enterocolitis from 47 patients. In those patients who were having episodes of neutropenic enterocolitis, the presence of abdominal tenderness (OR 4.529, 95%CI 1.062-19.317, P = 0.041); a longer duration of neutropenia (OR 1.215, 95%CI 1.030-1.434, P = 0.021); and hemodynamic instability (OR 17.023, 95%CI 4.095-70.772, P < 0.001), were found to be independently associated with worse outcome.

INTERPRETATION

In Upper Egypt, the use of intensive systemic chemotherapy during the induction phase of acute leukemia was found to be associated with potentially lethal intestinal complications. A high index of clinical suspicion is warranted.

A Novel Severity Score Index for Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Colorectal Diseases

Introduction

Abdominal and anorectal disorders may be the cause of clinical decompensation in neutropenic febrile patients, particularly those with hematologic diseases. Infection is a cause for concern for the colorectal surgeon. Some conditions have few manifestations and can lead to death within a short period of time. This study presents the novel colorectal disorder severity score for febrile neutropenic patients.

Materials and Methods

This was a case series study analyzing the medical records of 897 patients admitted to the Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Unit in a university hospital between the years 2008 and 2013. Seventy-four episodes of febrile neutropenia in 69 patients diagnosed with an abdominal or anorectal infection site were eligible for the study. The new scoring system proposed here is based on the author's clinical experience and an extensive literature review. In addition to the extensive literature review, effect measures were calculated, and a statistical analysis was performed. Based on an evaluation of common biological plausibility criteria, five factors were selected as the main predictors of hospital mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with colorectal disease.

Results

The proposed score demonstrated increased mortality as the condition worsened as reflected by an increasing score (Fisher's exact test: 0.001). When considering the logistic model for the probability of death by score level, the AUC value was 0.82 (0.72-0.925), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic value was 2.3, p = 0.806.

Conclusion

The proposed scoring system allows prediction of the likelihood of death during hospitalization for febrile neutropenic patients with an abdominal and anorectal focus. New studies on the subject are required, and the proposed scoring scale must be validated on a larger and different sample of patients.

Timing and Outcomes of Abdominal Surgery in Neutropenic Patients

BACKGROUND

Surgery in neutropenic patients is challenging due to both atypical manifestations of common conditions and higher perioperative risk. We sought to describe the outcomes of neutropenic patients undergoing abdominal surgery and to identify factors contributing to morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients neutropenic in the 24-hours prior to an abdominal operation at our institution between 1998 and 2017. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and morbidity, respectively. The chi-square test and two-tailed Student's t test were used for univariable comparisons (non-parametric tests used when appropriate). To determine the optimal threshold of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) to discriminate 30-day mortality, we maximized the Youden index (J).

RESULTS

Amongst 237 patients, mortality was 11.8% (28/237) and morbidity 54.5% (130/237). Absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/μL (50% vs. 20.6%, P < 0.01) and perforated viscus (35.7% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.01) were associated with mortality. Perforated viscus (25.4% vs. 7.5%) was also associated with morbidity. Urgent operations were associated with higher morbidity (63.6% vs 34.7%, P < 0.001) and mortality (16.4% vs 1.4%, P = 0.002) when compared to elective operations. Transfer from an outside hospital (22.3% vs. 11.2%, P = 0.02) and longer median time from admission to operation (2 days (IQR 0-6) vs. 1 day (IQR 0-3), P < 0.01) were associated with morbidity. An ANC threshold of 350 provided the best discrimination for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgery in the appropriately chosen neutropenic patient is relatively safe. For patients with obvious surgical pathology, we advocate for earlier operation and a lower threshold for surgical consultation in an effort expedite the diagnosis and necessary treatment.

Bacillus cereus Typhlitis in a Patient with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Bacillus cereus is a Gram-positive rod that is now recognized as a rare cause of frank disease in the neutropenic hematologic malignancy patient. Because this pathogen is rarely isolated in clinical specimens, no large studies exist to guide the management of these acutely ill patients. Individual case reports and case series exist in the literature describing various clinical manifestations of B. cereus in the neutropenic patient including bacteremia/septicemia, pneumonia, meningitis/encephalitis, hepatic abscesses, and gastritis. In this report, we describe a case of typhlitis caused by B. cereus in a 74-year-old female with recently diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and we summarize the available English language literature to draw tentative conclusions regarding the clinical manifestations of this organism.

The prognostic impact of abdominal surgery in cancer patients with neutropenic enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, on behalf the Groupe de Recherche en Réanimation Respiratoire du patient d'Onco-Hématologie (GRRR-OH)

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NE) is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge associated with high mortality rates, with controversial opinions on its optimal management. Physicians are usually reluctant to select surgery as the first-choice treatment, concerns being raised regarding the potential risks associated with abdominal surgery during neutropenia. Nevertheless, no published studies comforted this idea, literature is scarce and surgery has never been compared to medical treatment. This review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of abdominal surgery on outcome of neutropenic cancer patients presenting with NE, versus medical conservative treatment. This meta-analysis included studies analyzing cancer patients presenting with NE, treated with surgical or medical treatment, searched by PubMed and Cochrane databases (1983–2016), according to PRISMA recommendations. The endpoint was hospital mortality. Fixed-effects models were used. The meta-analysis included 20 studies (385 patients). Overall estimated mortality was 42.2% (95% CI = 40.2–44.2). Abdominal surgery was associated with a favorable outcome with an OR of 0.41 (95% CI = 0.23–0.74; p = 0.003). Pre-defined subgroups analysis showed that neither period of admission, underlying malignancy nor neutropenia during the surgical procedure, influenced this result. Surgery was not associated with an excess risk of mortality compared to medical treatment. Defining the optimal indications of surgical treatment is needed.

Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42016048952

Gastrointestinal emergencies in critically ill cancer patients

PURPOSE

To describe gastrointestinal emergencies in cancer patients.

METHODS

All cancer patients admitted to the medical ICU of Saint-Louis Hospital for an acute abdominal syndrome during the study period (1997-2011) were included.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were included. The most common diagnoses were: neutropenic enterocolitis (NE) (n=54, 33%), infectious colitis and peritonitis (n=51, 31%), bowel infiltration by malignancy (n=14, 9%), and mucosal toxicity of chemotherapy (n=12, 7%). Microbiologically documented infections were reported in 82 patients (50%), including 12 fungal infections. Twenty-seven patients (16%) underwent urgent surgery. The hospital mortality rate was 35%. Five factors were independently associated with hospital mortality: the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) score on day 1 (OR 1.03/SAPS II point, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05), microbiological documentation (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.64), neutropenia (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.95), allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.71 to 15.4), and mechanical ventilation (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.37 to 8.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal emergencies in cancer patients are associated with significant mortality. Mortality correlated both with the severity of organ failure upon ICU admission and the underlying diagnosis. Interestingly, patients admitted to the ICU with neutropenia had better survival.

Infections in Cancer Patients with Solid Tumors: A Review

Solid tumors are much more common than hematologic malignancies. Although severe and prolonged neutropenia is uncommon, several factors increase the risk of infection in patients with solid tumors, and the presence of multiple risk factors in the same patient is not uncommon. These include obstruction (most often caused by progression of the tumor), disruption of natural anatomic barriers such as the skin and mucosal surfaces, and treatment-related factors such as chemotherapy, radiation, diagnostic and/or therapeutic surgical procedures, and the increasing use of medical devices such as various catheters, stents, and prostheses. Common sites of infection include the skin and skin structures (including surgical site infections), the bloodstream (including infections associated with central venous catheters), the lungs, the hepato-biliary and intestinal tracts, and the urinary tract, and include distinct clinical syndromes such as post-obstructive pneumonia, obstructive uropathy, and neutropenic enterocolitis. The epidemiology of most of these infections is changing with resistant organisms [MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms] being isolated more often than in the past. Polymicrobial infections now predominate when deep tissue sites are involved. Conservative management of most of these infections (antibiotics, fluid and electrolyte replacement, bowel rest when needed) is generally effective, with surgical intervention being reserved for the drainage of deep abscesses, or to deal with complications such as intestinal obstruction or hemorrhage. Infected prostheses often need to be removed. Reactivation of certain viral infections (HBV, HCV, and occasionally CMV) has become an important issue, and screening, prevention and treatment strategies are being developed. Infection prevention, infection control, and antimicrobial stewardship are important strategies in the overall management of infections in patients with solid tumors. Occasionally, infections mimic solid tumors and cause diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Cancer therapy-related complications in the bowel and mesentery: an imaging perspective

Cancer therapy-induced complications in the bowel and mesentery are fairly common. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these complications and the agents most frequently implicated. Cancer therapy is rapidly evolving and often encompasses both classic cytotoxic drugs and newer molecular targeted agents. Drugs from both broad classes can have numerous adverse effects on the bowel and mesentery that can be detected on imaging. These adverse effects include ileus, various forms of enterocolitis, gastrointestinal perforation, pneumatosis intestinalis, secretory diarrhea, and sclerosing mesenteritis. These complications are diverse and range from relatively benign to life threatening. The management is also variable, but many of these conditions are easily controlled and reversed with supportive care and cessation of the particular cancer therapy. The objective of this pictorial essay is to demonstrate some of the more common cancer therapy-induced complications of the bowel and mesentery, with a focus on the radiographic findings.

Management of neutropenic patients in the intensive care unit (NEWBORNS EXCLUDED) recommendations from an expert panel from the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) with the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care Emergencies (GFRUP), the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), the French Society of Hematology (SFH), the French Society for Hospital Hygiene (SF2H), and the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF)

Neutropenia is defined by either an absolute or functional defect (acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome) of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and is associated with high risk of specific complications that may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Specificities in the management of critically ill neutropenic patients prompted the establishment of guidelines dedicated to intensivists. These recommendations were drawn up by a panel of experts brought together by the French Intensive Care Society in collaboration with the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care Emergencies, the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, the French Society of Hematology, the French Society for Hospital Hygiene, and the French Infectious Diseases Society. Literature review and formulation of recommendations were performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Each recommendation was then evaluated and rated by each expert using a methodology derived from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Six fields are covered by the provided recommendations: (1) ICU admission and prognosis, (2) protective isolation and prophylaxis, (3) management of acute respiratory failure, (4) organ failure and organ support, (5) antibiotic management and source control, and (6) hematological management. Most of the provided recommendations are obtained from low levels of evidence, however, suggesting a need for additional studies. Seven recommendations were, however, associated with high level of evidences and are related to protective isolation, diagnostic workup of acute respiratory failure, medical management, and timing surgery in patients with typhlitis.

Value in palliative cancer surgery: A critical assessment

Emergency operations are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost compared to elective operations. Palliative and emergent surgery for patients with advanced malignancies is associated with additional risk and remains controversial. Emergent or palliative interventions can be broadly categorized according to indication. Tumor related complications (bleeding, obstruction, or perforation) merit specific consideration, as do specific presentations such as pneumoperitoneum, pneumatosis intestinalis, or peritonitis from other causes that may arise during active therapy for malignancies. Although nonoperative, endoscopic, and interventional treatment modalities are frequently available, surgery remains the only effective therapy in selected situations such as small intestinal obstruction and tumor perforation. Selection of patients for surgery requires consideration of factors including overall prognosis, performance status, and patients' priorities. Selection and risk assessment tools underscore the limited capacity of patients' with higher risk features for durable recovery but do not supplant nuanced clinical judgment. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:311-315. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinical approach to diarrheal disorders in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Diarrhea is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), with an average incidence of approximately 40%-50%. A wide variety of etiologies can contribute to diarrhea in HSCT patients, including medication-induced mucosal inflammation, infections, graft-vs-host disease and cord colitis syndrome in umbilical cord blood transplant. Clinical manifestations can vary from isolated diarrheal episodes, to other organ involvement including pneumonia or myocarditis, and rarely multiorgan failure. The approach for diagnosis of diarrheal disorders in HSCT patients depends on the most likely cause. Given the risk of life-threatening conditions, the development of clinically significant diarrhea requires prompt evaluation, supportive care and specific therapy, as indicated. Serious metabolic and nutritional disturbances can happen in HSCT patients, and may even lead to mortality. In this review, we aim to provide a practical approach to diagnosis and management of diarrhea in the post-transplant period.

How to treat severe infections in critically ill neutropenic patients?

Severe infections in neutropenic patient often progress rapidly leading to life-threatening organ dysfunction requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit. Management strategies include early adequate appropriate empirical antimicrobial, early admission to ICU to avoid any delay in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of organ dysfunction. This review discusses the main clinical situations encountered in critically ill neutropenic patients. Specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been proposed for acute respiratory failure, shock, neutropenic enterocolitis, catheter-related infections, cellulitis and primary bacteriemia. Non anti-infectious agents and recent advances will also be discussed. At present, most of large-scale studies and recommendations in neutropenic patients stem from hematological patients and will need further validation in ICU patients.

The palliative index: predicting outcomes of emergent surgery in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of emergent palliative surgery in the setting of advanced malignancy remains a subject of controversy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify clinical predictors of outcome in patients with cancer who undergo nonelective abdominal surgery.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

Individuals who underwent urgent and emergent abdominal operations between 2006 and 2010 at a tertiary cancer center were identified.

MEASUREMENTS

Analyses were performed to identify predictors of 30-day morbidity and mortality as well as overall survival (OS). A risk score was derived from predictors of OS.

RESULTS

Of 143 patients, 93 (65%) had active disease (AD; defined as evidence of malignancy at time of surgery). Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were 36.4% and 9.8%, respectively. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included ASA score >3 (p=0.009) and albumin <2.8 (p=0.040). Median OS was 5.4 months in patients with AD and was not reached in patients without AD (p<0.001). Independent predictors of decreased OS included AD; ASA >3; creatinine >1.3; and a tumor-related indication (i.e., bleeding, obstructing, or perforating tumor). A risk or palliative index (PI) score stratified patients into groups with discreet outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AD did not predict 30-day morbidity, it was the dominant independent predictor of postoperative OS. In cancer patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, outcome is anticipated by disease status and other independent predictors of OS.

Enteric infections

Cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia, are at risk for enteric and intra-abdominal infections. Specific infections and infectious syndromes in this setting include neutropenic enterocolitis, bacterial infections such as Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), viral infections such as CMV colitis, and parasitic infections such as strongyloidiasis. Diagnosing and gauging the severity of CDI presents challenges, as chemotherapy may produce symptoms that mimic CDI and laboratory findings such as leukocytosis are not reliable in this population. Treatment for enteric infections should be pathogen specific, although broad-spectrum antibiotics are often required as initial empiric therapy in patients with neutropenia.

Neutropenic enterocolitis, a growing concern in the era of widespread use of aggressive chemotherapy

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening disease with substantial morbidity and mortality, seen primarily in patients with hematologic malignancies. The frequency of NEC has increased with the widespread use of chemotherapeutic agents such as the taxanes, which cause severe gastrointestinal mucositis. Neutropenic patients with fever and abdominal symptoms (cramping, pain, distention, diarrhea, GI bleeding), should undergo evaluation of the abdomen for bowel wall thickening of >4 mm, the hallmark of NEC. Clostridium difficile infection should be ruled out, as well as other etiologies such as graft-versus-host disease. Complications include bacteremia, which is often polymicrobial, hemorrhage, and bowel wall perforation/abscess formation. Management includes bowel rest, correction of cytopathies and coagulopathies, and broad spectrum antibiotics and antifungal agents. Surgical intervention may be necessary to manage complications such as hemorrhage and perforation and should be delayed, if possible, until recovery from neutropenia.

Frequent and early death limits quality of life assessment in patients with advanced malignancies evaluated for palliative surgical intervention

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and optimal timing of quality of life assessment for patients undergoing palliative surgical evaluation.

METHODS

Patients with an advanced malignancy undergoing consultation for palliative surgical intervention were prospectively enrolled from November 2009 to January 2011. Follow-up quality of life assessment was performed using validated instruments at 1 and 3 months post-enrollment. Univariate analysis of variables was performed to identify clinicopathologic variables associated with questionnaire completion.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients enrolled, the most common clinical presentations included bowel obstruction (32 %), abdominal pain (21 %), wound complications (18 %), and gastrointestinal bleeding (11 %). Of the 77 patients, 34 (44 %) were treated with nonoperative/nonprocedural care, 9 (12 %) with endoscopic or interventional radiologic procedures, and 34 (44 %) with surgery. Follow-up questionnaires were obtained at 1 month and 3 months in 48 % and 15 %, respectively. A total of 31 patients (40 %) died prior to study completion. On univariate analysis, death was the only factor associated with questionnaire response. All other demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not associated with response to questionnaires. There were no significant differences in baseline or follow-up quality of life scores between patients treated with surgical intervention or nonoperative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Death during the study period was a significant factor in limiting adequate follow-up assessment. Future studies attempting to obtain follow-up data on patients evaluated for palliative surgical intervention may require larger patient numbers to account for frequent early death in this population and anticipate the need to account for the high rate of missing data in statistical analysis.

Ileocolonic mucormycosis in adult immunocompromised patients: A surgeon’s perspective

We report three cases of ileocolic mucormycosis in adult immunocompromised patients presenting as acute abdomen. All patients underwent laparotomy but two of them died from multiorgan failure before the diagnoses were confirmed. The diagnosis of gastrointestinal mucormycosis is rarely suspected, and antemortem diagnosis is made in only 25%-50% of cases. These cases illustrate the difficulty encountered by surgeons in managing acute abdomen in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancy. The management of colonic mucormycosis in the published literature is also reviewed.