1
|
Baik H, Kim J, Seo SH, Kim KH, Oh MK, Shin JY, An MS. Shorter interval to surgery after self-expanding metallic stent may result in better oncologic outcomes in colon cancer obstruction. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108539. [PMID: 39067304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colon cancer obstruction is one of the most serious conditions in colorectal surgery. However, the use of self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) has made it possible to avoid emergency surgery and stoma creation, therefore enabling minimally invasive surgery and one-stage operation. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there is an optimal interval from SEMS to surgery for the best long-term oncologic outcomes. METHODS Obstructive colon cancer patients treated with SEMS insertion and received surgery were included in the study. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed in prospectively collected data. Using the ROC curve, the optimal interval to surgery after SEMS insertion was 10 days; the patients were divided into the early surgery group (≤10 days, ES) and the late surgery group (>10 days, LS). Factors contributing to the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS 83 patients were included in this study. Eight patients (9.6 %) had SEMS insertion failure, with 3 perforations and 5 failed expansions. There were no differences between the ES group and the LS group in terms of pathologic characteristics, incidence of stoma creation, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients (31.3 %) had recurrences; local (Arnarson et al., 2023) [6], peritoneal seeding (Lee et al., 2013) [8], liver (Ho et al., 2017) [11], lung [7], bone (van Hooft et al., 2020) [2], and abdominal wall metastasis (Chen and Sheen-Chen, 2000) [1]. The 5-year DFS rate was significantly better in the ES group than the LS group (74.3 % vs. 55.01 %; p = 0.0394). The 5-year OS was slightly better in the ES group than the LS group (76.11 % vs. 58.75 %; p = 0.0901). In univariable analysis, the ES group showed a lower risk of recurrence than the LS group (OR: 0.447 [0.204-0.984], p = 0.0455), but this was not reproduced in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION This study has shown that the long-term oncologic outcomes were better in patients who received surgery after SEMS within 10 days. Hence, we propose with caution that elective surgery might be suggested to take place within 10 days from SEMS insertion for better oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HyungJoo Baik
- Department of Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, South Korea.
| | - Jihyeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, South Korea.
| | - Sang Hyuk Seo
- Department of Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, South Korea
| | - Kwang Hee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, South Korea
| | - Min Kyung Oh
- Clinical Trial Center in Pharmacology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, South Korea
| | - Jin Yong Shin
- Department of Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, South Korea
| | - Min Sung An
- Department of Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanaka S, Matsuda A, Yamada T, Yokoyama Y, Matsumoto S, Takahashi G, Sonoda H, Ohta R, Uehara K, Shinji S, Iwai T, Takeda K, Sekiguchi K, Kuriyama S, Miyasaka T, Yoshida H. Oncologic investigation of the interval from stent placement to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Surg Today 2024:10.1007/s00595-024-02818-w. [PMID: 38526561 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02818-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) procedure for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, evidence regarding the optimal interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery is lacking. METHODS We retrospectively collected data from patients with BTS between January 2013 and October 2021. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses were used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between the short-interval (SI) and long-interval (LI) groups, using a cutoff of 20 days. RESULTS In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study (SI group, n = 63; LI group, n = 75). In the matched cohort, the patients' backgrounds were well balanced. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was not significantly different between the SI and LI groups (19.0% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the SI and LI groups in the 3-year recurrence-free survival (68.0% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.73) or 3-year overall survival rates (86.0% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS A longer interval did not deteriorate the oncological outcomes. Individual perioperative management with an appropriate interval to improve the patient's condition is required to ensure safe surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Kanaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugi-Cho, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugi-Cho, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Kay Uehara
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Seiichi Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Takuma Iwai
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Kohki Takeda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugi-Cho, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Sho Kuriyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Toshimitsu Miyasaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ha GW, Lee MR. Short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent compared with tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 2024; 106:93-105. [PMID: 38318094 PMCID: PMC10838655 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients with obstructive colorectal cancer managed by emergency surgery show high morbidity, mortality, and stoma formation rates. Decompression modalities, including the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and tube drainage (TD), have been used to improve surgical outcomes. However, there have been limited studies comparing the 2 modalities. We performed a meta-analysis on short- and long-term outcomes between SEMS and TD. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Data were pooled, and the overall effect size was calculated using random effect models. Outcome measures were perioperative short-term and 3-year survival outcomes. Results We included 20 nonrandomized studies that examined 2,047 patients in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed SEMS had better short-term outcomes in clinical success rate, decompression-related complications, laparoscopic surgery rate, stoma formation rate, and postoperative complication rate with a relative risk (RR) of 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.54; I2 = 20%), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.50; I2 = 0%), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.66; I2 = 87%), 0.34 (95% CI, 0.24-0.49; I2 = 52%), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54-0.89, I2 = 28%), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in 3-year overall survival (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.27; I2 = 0%). Conclusion Although the long-term oncologic impact of SEMS is still unclear compared with TD, the results of this meta-analysis may suggest that SEMS insertion can be performed more successfully and safely and may have benefits for short-term perioperative outcomes compared with TD. Further studies are warranted to provide more definitive survival results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gi Won Ha
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Min Ro Lee
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park S, Lee JY, Hong SW, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Byeon JS. Influence of endoscopists' expertise level on clinical outcomes after bridge-to-surgery stenting in obstructive colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:2152-2159. [PMID: 37646418 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This study aimed to investigate the effect of stenting-related factors, including endoscopists' expertise, on clinical outcomes after bridge-to-surgery (BTS) stenting for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS We analyzed BTS stenting-related factors, including stenting expertise and the interval between stenting and surgery, in 233 patients (63 [13] years, 137 male) who underwent BTS stenting for obstructive CRC. We evaluated the influence of these factors on post-BTS stenting clinical outcomes such as stent-related complications and cancer recurrence. RESULTS The interval between stenting and surgery was ≤ 7 days in 79 patients (33.9%) and > 7 days in 154 patients (66.1%). BTS stenting was performed by endoscopists with ≤ 50, 51-100, and > 100 prior stenting experiences in 94, 43, and, 96 patients, respectively. The clinical success rate of BTS stenting was 93.1%. Stent-related and postoperative complications developed in 19 (8.2%) and 20 (8.6%) patients, respectively. Cancer recurrence occurred in 76 patients (32.6%). Short BTS interval of ≤ 7 days increased the risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 2.61 [1.03-6.75]; P = 0.043). Endoscopists' stenting experience > 100 showed greater clinical success of stenting (OR, 5.50 [1.45-28.39]; P = 0.021) and fewer stent-related complications (OR, 0.26 [0.07-0.80]; P = 0.028) compared with stenting experience ≤ 50. BTS stenting-related factors did not affect long-term oncological outcomes. CONCLUSION Greater expertise of endoscopists was associated with better short-term outcomes, including high stenting success rate and low rate of stent-related complications after BTS stenting for obstructive CRC. An interval of > 7 days between BTS stenting and surgery was required to decrease postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhyun Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Yong Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Wook Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Wook Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyoung Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Duk Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk-Kyun Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Han JG, Wang ZJ, Dai Y, Li XR, Qian Q, Wang GY, Zhai ZW, Zeng WG. Short-term Outcomes of Elective Surgery Following Self-Expandable Metallic Stent and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Left-Sided Colon Cancer Obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1319-1328. [PMID: 35671281 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonic stenting reduces morbidity and stoma formation for left-sided colon cancer obstruction, and a prolonged interval between stenting and surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered might result in a lower stoma rate and tumor reduction. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of elective surgery following colonic stenting compared with elective surgery following colonic stenting and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with left-sided colon cancer obstruction. DESIGN This is a prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at 5 medical centers. PATIENTS Patients ( n = 100) with acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction undergoing colonic stenting between December 2015 and December 2019 were included. INTERVENTIONS Patients were assigned to the stenting-alone or chemotherapy group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were laparoscopic surgery and stoma rate. RESULTS Of the 100 patients who underwent colonic stenting, 52 were assigned to the stenting group and 48 were assigned to the chemotherapy group. No statistically significant differences were detected in stent-related complications. The adverse events associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were well tolerated. The level of hemoglobin (117.2 vs 107.6 g/L; p = 0.008), albumin (34.2 vs 31.5 g/L; p < 0.001), and prealbumin (0.19 vs 0.16 g/L; p = 0.001) was significantly increased, and the bowel wall thickness (1.09 vs 2.04 mm; p < 0.001) was significantly decreased preoperatively in the chemotherapy group compared with the stenting group. The number of mean harvested lymph nodes was greater in the chemotherapy group than in the stenting group (25.6 vs 21.8; p = 0.04). Laparoscopic surgery was performed more frequently (77.1% vs 40.4%; p < 0.001) and a stoma was created less frequently (10.4% vs 28.8%; p = 0.02) in the chemotherapy group than in the stenting group. LIMITATIONS This trial was limited by the nonrandomized design and a short follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that elective surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and colonic stenting is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment approach with a high laparoscopic resection rate and a low stoma rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B980 . RESULTADOS A CORTO PLAZO DE LA CIRUGA ELECTIVA SEGUIDO DE STENT METLICO AUTOEXPANDIBLE Y QUIMIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE EN PACIENTES CON OBSTRUCCIN POR CNCER DE COLON IZQUIERDO ANTECEDENTES:La colocación de stents colónicos reduce la morbilidad y la formación de estomas por obstrucción por cáncer de colon izquierdo, y el intervalo prolongado entre la colocación de stents y la cirugía con quimioterapia neoadyuvante administrada podría resultar en una menor tasa de estomas y reducción del tumor.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados a corto plazo de la cirugía electiva después de la colocación de stent en el colon en comparación con la cirugía electiva después de la colocación de stent en el colon y la quimioterapia neoadyuvante en pacientes con obstrucción por cáncer de colon izquierdo.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo de cohorte multicéntrico.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en 5 centros médicos.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes (n=100) con obstrucción aguda por cáncer de colon izquierdo que se sometieron a colocación de stent colónico entre diciembre de 2015 y diciembre de 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados al grupo de stent solo o quimioterapia.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Los resultados primarios medidos fueron la cirugía laparoscópica y la tasa de ostomía.RESULTADOS:De los 100 pacientes que se sometieron a la colocación de stent colónico, 52 fueron asignados al grupo de colocación de stent y 48 al grupo de quimioterapia. No se detectaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las complicaciones relacionadas con el stent. Los eventos adversos asociados con la quimioterapia neoadyuvante fueron bien tolerados. Hemoglobina (117,2 g/l vs. 107,6 g/l; p = 0,008), albúmina (34,2 g/l vs. 31,5 g/l; p < 0,001) y prealbúmina (0,19 g/l vs. 0,16 g/l; p = 0,001) aumentaron significativamente y el grosor de la pared intestinal (1,09 mm vs. 2,04 mm; p < 0,001) disminuyó significativamente antes de la operación en el grupo de quimioterapia en comparación con el grupo de colocación de stent. El número medio de ganglios linfáticos extraídos fue mayor en el grupo de quimioterapia que en el grupo de stent (25,6 vs. 21,8; p = 0,04). La cirugía laparoscópica se realizó con mayor frecuencia (77,1 % vs. 40,4 %; p < 0,001) y se creó un estoma con menos frecuencia (10,4 % vs. 28,8 % ; p = 0,02) en el grupo de quimioterapia que en el grupo de colocación de stent.LIMITACIONES:Este ensayo estuvo limitado por el diseño no aleatorio y el corto período de seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio sugiere que la cirugía electiva después de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante y la colocación de stent colónico es un tratamiento seguro, efectivo y bien tolerado, con una alta tasa de resección laparoscópica y una baja tasa de estoma. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B980 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Gang Han
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Jun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, China
| | - Xiao Rong Li
- Department of General Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Hunan, China
| | - Qun Qian
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Gui Ying Wang
- Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China
| | - Zhi Wei Zhai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Gen Zeng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Na JE, Kim ER, Kim JE, Hong SN, Kim YH, Chang DK. The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:259. [PMID: 37612670 PMCID: PMC10463965 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03130-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine short-term and long-term outcomes according to time intervals after stenting and compared them with those of emergency surgery (ES) in colorectal cancer (CRC) with malignant obstruction. METHODS CRC with malignant obstructions was reviewed retrospectively between January 2008 and July 2018. Of a total of 539 patients who visited the emergency room and underwent ES, 133 were enrolled in the ES group. Of a total of 567 patients who initially received stenting and subsequently underwent elective surgery, 220 were enrolled in the SEMS group. The interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery was classified as < 11 days, 11-17 days, and > 17 days. RESULTS For those who received SEMS (n = 220), those with a time interval of 11-17 days (n = 97) had fewer hospital days than those with a time interval of < 11 days (n = 68) (8 days vs. 15 days) and less stoma formation than those with a time interval of > 17 days (n = 55) (1.0% vs. 14.6%). Multivariable analysis revealed a decreased risk of death for the group with a time interval of 11-17 days (20.6%) compared to the ES group (31.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.97). Disease-free survival was comparable between the SEMS and ES groups regardless of the time interval (log-rank p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS The time interval of 11-17 days after stenting to elective surgery appeared to be associated with the most favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Na
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
- Department of Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Eun Ran Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
| | - Ji Eun Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Sung Noh Hong
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Young Ho Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Dong Kyung Chang
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Yokoyama Y, Takahashi G, Yoshida H. Long-term outcomes between self-expandable metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for malignant large bowel obstruction: A multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:583-593. [PMID: 37416739 PMCID: PMC10319605 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To compare the oncological outcomes between self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery and transanal decompression tube (TDT) placement for malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO). Methods A total of 287 MLBO patients who underwent SEMS (n = 137) or TDT placement (n = 150) were enrolled in this multicenter retrospective study. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups were compared. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II and ≥III occurred frequently in the TDT group compared with the SEMS group (P = 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). The 3-y OS in the overall cohort and 3-y DFS in the pathological stage II/III cohort in the SEMS and TDT groups were 68.6% and 71.4%, and 71.0% and 72.6%, respectively. The survival differences were not significantly different in the OS and DFS analyses (P = 0.819 and P = 0.892, respectively). A meta-analysis of nine studies (including our cohort data) demonstrated no significant difference between the SEMS and TDT groups for 3-y OS and DFS (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.57-1.62, P = 0.89 and OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.46-1.04, P = 0.07, respectively). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that SEMS placement had no inferiority regarding long-term outcomes, including OS and DFS, compared with TDT placement. Considering the short-term benefits of SEMS placement, this could be a preferable preoperative decompression method for MLBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
- Department of SurgeryNippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Digestive SurgeryNippon Medical School Musashikosugi HospitalKawasakiKanagawaJapan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Safety of early surgery after self-expandable metallic stenting for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3873-3883. [PMID: 36717427 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09891-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-expanding metallic stenting (SEMS) is usual for the temporary resolution of obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) as a bridge to elective surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding adequate time intervals from stenting to radical surgery. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal time interval that results in favorable short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS Data on patients with obstructive left-sided CRC who underwent elective radical surgery after clinically successful SEMS deployment in five tertiary referral hospitals from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed, retrospectively. An inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analysis was used to minimize bias. Postoperative short- and long-term outcomes were compared between two groups: an early surgery (within 8 days) group and delayed surgery (after 8 days) group. RESULTS Of 311 patients, 148 (47.6%) underwent early and 163 (52.4%) underwent delayed surgery. The median surgery interval was 9.0 days. After adjustment, the groups had similar patient and tumor characteristics. In terms of short-term outcomes, there was no difference in hospitalization length or postoperative complications. No deaths were observed. With a median follow-up of 71.0 months, no significant difference was observed between the groups in 5-year overall survival (early vs. delayed surgery: 79.6% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.370) and 5-year disease-free survival (early vs. delayed surgery: 59.1% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.970). CONCLUSIONS In obstructive left-sided CRC, the time interval between SEMS and radical surgery did not significantly influence short- and long-term outcomes. Therefore, early surgery after SEMS could be suggested if there is no reason to postpone surgery for preoperative medical optimization.
Collapse
|
9
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Takahashi G, Matsumoto S, Yokoyama Y, Sonoda H, Ohta R, Shinji S, Sekiguchi K, Kuriyama S, Kanaka S, Yoshida H. Postoperative infectious complications have a negative oncological impact in patients after stent placement with malignant large bowel obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:2. [PMID: 36602578 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04290-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to investigate the oncological impact of postoperative infection in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction managed by self-expandable metallic stent placement as a bridge to surgery. METHODS The cohort of this multicenter retrospective study comprised 129 patients with pathological stage II/III malignant large bowel obstruction who had undergone bridge to surgery. Patients were allocated to no-postoperative infection (n = 116) and postoperative infection groups (n = 13). RESULTS The postoperative infection group had a significantly greater proportion of men, fewer harvested lymph nodes, and longer postoperative hospital stays than did the no-postoperative infection group. Self-expandable metallic stent-related variables, including clinical failure, were not associated with postoperative infection. Male sex and low body mass index were identified as risk factors for postoperative infection by multivariate logistic regression. Three-year relapse-free survival rates were 75.5% and 30.8% in the no-postoperative infection and postoperative infection groups, respectively; this difference is statistically significant. Male sex, postoperative infection, and T4 were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. The postoperative infection group had a significantly higher total recurrence rate and shorter interval to recurrence than did the no-postoperative infection group. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that postoperative infection in bridge to surgery patients has a negative oncological impact. This finding indicates that further improvement in perioperative management of bridge to surgery patients is required to minimize postoperative infection and that patient-risk stratification and additional therapy would contribute to improving oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Seiichi Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Tama, 206-8512, Japan
| | - Sho Kuriyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Shintaro Kanaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Binetti M, Lauro A, Tonini V. Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:957-966. [PMID: 36618078 PMCID: PMC9813834 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been found that 8%-29% of colorectal cancers are obstructive. The use of “stent as bridge to surgery” is one of the most debated topics in obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer management. The endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metallic stent as bridge to surgery (BTS) could turn an emergency surgery to an elective one, increasing the number of primary anastomoses instead of stoma and facilitating the laparoscopic approach instead of an open one. However, in recent years the possible risk of perforations and microperforations facilitating cancer spread related to the use of self-expanding metallic stent for BTS has been highlighted. Therefore, despite the useful short-term outcomes related to BTS, the recent literature has focused on long-term outcomes investigating the disease-free survival, the recurrence rate and the overall survival. Due to discordant data, international guidelines are still conflicting, and the debate is still open. There is not agreement about using self-expanding metallic stent for BTS as the gold standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Binetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Alma mater Studiorum, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Augusto Lauro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University, Roma 324-00161, Italy
| | - Valeria Tonini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Alma mater Studiorum, Bologna 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yoon S, Pian G, Lim SG, Oh SY. Clinical Significance of Surgical Resection Timing from Endoscopic Stenting for Left-Sided Large-Bowel Obstruction in Colorectal Cancer. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:4895-4905. [PMID: 34981311 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07331-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal interval between self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion and surgery remains controversial in malignant left-sided large-bowel obstruction (MLLO), especially with respect to oncologic aspects. AIMS The aim of this study is to examine whether the time interval to surgery is related to oncologic outcomes. METHODS Prospectively collected database of MLLO between January 2005 and December 2017 were reviewed. They were divided according to established cut-off value of 14 days for the time interval to surgery. The two groups (early and late groups) were compared with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Additional subgroup analysis was performed using the established cut-off values for patients with stage II and III tumors. RESULTS A total of 149 patients underwent surgery after SEMS insertion. There were no significant differences between the early and late groups in the 5-year DFS (78.0% vs 72.4%; P = 0.513) and the OS (74.2% vs 75.7%; P = 0.864) rates in all MLLO. Subgroup analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two groups for DFS and OS in stage II MLLO. The multivariate Cox regression analysis in stage II MLLO demonstrated that the time to surgery was a prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 2.051; 95% CI, 1.528-42.136; P = 0.014) and for OS (HR, 4.947; 95% CI, 1.520-16.107; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS The time to surgery was demonstrated not to be a significant prognostic factor in all MLLO. However, it was a prognostic factor for patients with stage II MLLO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunseok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea
| | - Guangzhe Pian
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea
| | - Sun Gyo Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Seung Yeop Oh
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang Q, Zou MH, Liang WL, Wei JC, Xie JF, Li YQ, Li WL, Cao J. Colon cancer patient with long-term colon stent placement: Case report and literature review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:972454. [PMID: 36081551 PMCID: PMC9445364 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.972454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality globally. Large bowel obstruction (occurring in 15-30% of patients with CRCs) accounts for approximately 80% of medical emergencies related to CRC. Currently, there is no standard treatment of this condition. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) as a bridge (two weeks) to surgery for left-sided obstructing colon cancer. In the present report, we describe an 81-year-old male with colon cancer who underwent colon stent placement for 32 months, but later underwent radical resection. A follow-up of more than four-months revealed that his condition was normal. The history as well as application and advantages of SEMS are discussed in this report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min-hong Zou
- Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-long Liang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-chang Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie-feng Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Qiang Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wang-lin Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Wang-lin Li, ; Jie Cao,
| | - Jie Cao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Wang-lin Li, ; Jie Cao,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen S, Zhou S, Lin Y, Xue W, Huang Z, Yu J, Yu Z, Chen S. Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Left-Sided Acute Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: Optimal Timing for Elective Surgery. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:6015729. [PMID: 36017151 PMCID: PMC9398836 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6015729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This randomized, single-center, retrospective, comparative cohort study is aimed at investigating the optimal time interval from self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement to surgery and potential risk factors for complications in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction. METHODS A total of 64 patients with left-sided acute malignant colorectal obstruction treated with SEMS placement and subsequent surgery between January 2013 and September 2020 were enrolled and allocated to a case group (SEMS placing time ≤ 14 days; n = 19 patients) and a control group (SEMS placing time > 14 days; n = 45 patients). The primary outcome was the difference in baseline information, patients' conditions during surgery, and postoperative conditions between the two groups. The secondary outcome included potential risk factors of postoperative complications. The propensity score matching (PSM) and super learner (SL) methods were used to eliminate multiple confounding factors of baseline data. A cohort of 21 samples was used for external validation, comprising 6 cases and 15 controls. RESULTS A significant difference was observed between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.009), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.002), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥ II) (P < 0.001), stoma creation (P < 0.001), and primary anastomosis (P < 0.001). After a 1 : 3 PSM analysis, no statistically significant differences between eight confounding variables of the two groups were observed (P > 0.05). Caliper set as 0.2 multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the potential risk factor for postoperative complications was SEMS placing time (RR = 0.109, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.028-0.433; P = 0.002), indicating that SEMS placing time > 14 days was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in bridge-to-surgery (BTS) setting. The area under the AUC curve was 76.7% and validated using the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Long duration of SEMS placement (>14 days) may not influence surgical difficulty but could increase the risk of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxian Chen
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Sisi Zhou
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Yiting Lin
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Wenwen Xue
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Zeyu Huang
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Jing Yu
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Zefeng Yu
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Suzuan Chen
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Oh HH, Hong JY, Kim DH, Myung DS, Cho SB, Lee WS, Kim HS, Joo YE. Differences in clinical outcomes according to the time interval between the bridge to surgery stenting and surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:178. [PMID: 35658875 PMCID: PMC9164395 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02644-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is commonly used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). However, the optimal time interval between BTS stenting and surgery for left-sided MCO is unclear, and the results of previous studies are conflicting. This study aimed to determine the differences in clinical outcomes according to the time interval between BTS stenting and surgery in left-sided MCO. Methods Data from 594 patients who underwent SEMS placement for MCO between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. Among them, 148 patients who underwent SEMS placement as BTS treatment and curative surgery were enrolled. The enrolled patients were divided into three groups according to the interval between BTS stenting and surgery: group 1 (interval ≤2 weeks), group 2 (interval 2–3 weeks), and group 3 (interval >3 weeks). Results Group 2 and 3 patients underwent significantly higher rates of laparoscopic surgery than those in group 1 (83.7, 81.0 vs. 53.2 %, respectively; P=0.003, P=0.003, respectively). Also, rates of stoma formation directly after resection were significantly higher in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (21.3 vs 2.3, 6.9%, respectively; P=0.008, P=0.043, respectively). Bridging interval had no effect on SEMS-related complications, resection-related complications, 90-day mortality, permanent stoma formation, 3-year disease-free survival, and 3-year overall survival. Conclusions A bridging interval of > 2 weeks between BTS stenting and surgery for left-sided MCO is preferable for lower stoma formation rates and higher rates of laparoscopic approach operation, with no difference in short-term and long-term outcomes including complication, mortality, and survival. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02644-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung-Hoon Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Yun Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae-Seong Myung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Bum Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Wan-Sik Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Eun Joo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Naruse N, Miyahara K, Sakata Y, Takamori A, Ito Y, Hidaka H, Sameshima R, Tsuruoka N, Shimoda R, Yamanouchi K, Noda T, Fujimoto K, Esaki M. Utility and safety of the self-expandable metallic colonic stent in Japanese patients who received systemic chemotherapy or palliative treatment for obstructive primary advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective single-center medical chart evaluation. JGH Open 2022; 6:324-329. [PMID: 35601122 PMCID: PMC9120876 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim The present study aimed to compare the utility and safety of the colonic self-expandable metallic stent between patients with obstructive primary colorectal cancer who underwent chemotherapy or palliative treatment care and patients bridging for surgery. Methods The cases of 71 patients with colonic obstructive stenosis and in-dwelling stents who were hospitalized between May 2012 and April 2020 at Karatsu Red Cross Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into three groups: bridging for curative surgery (group I), receiving systemic chemotherapy (group II-A), and receiving only palliative treatment (group II-B). Technical and clinical success rates and complication rates after stenting were evaluated. Results No significant differences were observed in the technical (procedure) success rates (group I: 100%; group II, 97.6% [II-A: 100%; II-B: 95.8%]). The total clinical success rate was 85.9% (61/71) and did not vary significantly among the groups (group I: 82.8%; group II 88.0% [II-A: 83.3%; II-B: 91.6%]). No significant differences were observed in the early complication rates between groups I and II and in the late complication rates between groups II-A and II-B. Nutrition status, general condition, tumor staging, and 1-year survival were poorer in group II than in group I. Conclusion The findings show that colonic stenting for malignant obstruction was performed successfully and safely both in patients who received systemic chemotherapy or palliative therapy and in patients bridging for curative surgery, regardless of risk status for malnutrition, poor general condition, cancer stage progression, and short survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Naruse
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalKaratsuJapan
- Department of Internal MedicineSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Koichi Miyahara
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalKaratsuJapan
| | - Yasuhisa Sakata
- Department of Internal MedicineSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Ayako Takamori
- Division of Clinical Research CenterSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Yoichiro Ito
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalKaratsuJapan
| | - Hidenori Hidaka
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalKaratsuJapan
| | | | - Nanae Tsuruoka
- Department of Internal MedicineSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Ryo Shimoda
- Department of Internal MedicineSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| | - Kohei Yamanouchi
- Department of Clinical Medical SciencesInternational University of Health and WelfareFukuokaJapan
| | - Takahiro Noda
- Department of Internal MedicineKaratsu Red Cross HospitalKaratsuJapan
| | - Kazuma Fujimoto
- Department of Clinical Medical SciencesInternational University of Health and WelfareFukuokaJapan
| | - Motohiro Esaki
- Department of Internal MedicineSaga University HospitalSagaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adachi Y, Tokunaga R, Matsumoto K, Nakao Y, Itoyama R, Kuramoto K, Karashima R, Nitta H, Tomiyasu S, Baba H, Takamori H. What are the factors predictive of postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing stenting as a bridge to surgery? J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:982-990. [PMID: 35099817 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using a self-expanding metal stent as a bridge to surgery (BTS) is considered a reasonable strategy for patients with acute malignant large bowel obstruction. Since postoperative complications have a negative impact on patient survival, we aim to clarify the predictors of complications in patients undergoing BTS using a self-expanding metal stent. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 61 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent stenting as a BTS at our institution. We analyzed the association of postoperative complications with clinicopathologic, surgical, and patient factors, and with the prestenting or preoperative laboratory data. RESULTS Both postoperative complications in general and severe complications were significantly associated with a longer stenotic-section length (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003), lower preoperative hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001 and p = 0.081), and lower prestenting hemoglobin levels (p = 0.006 and p = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that lower prestenting (<13.0 g/dl) and preoperative (<11.5 g/dl) hemoglobin levels were independent predictive factors for postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 4.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-18.90; p = 0.040; and OR: 4.93; 95% CI: 1.35-20.28; p = 0.016). A stenotic-section length of 5.0 cm or greater was predictive of severe complications (OR: 25.67; 95% CI: 1.95-1185.00; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that lower hemoglobin levels before stenting and a longer length of the stenotic section of bowel might predict postoperative complications in patients with CRC undergoing BTS for obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Ryuma Tokunaga
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Yosuke Nakao
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Rumi Itoyama
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | | | - Hidetoshi Nitta
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takamori
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sato R, Oikawa M, Kakita T, Okada T, Abe T, Yazawa T, Tsuchiya H, Akazawa N, Yoshimachi S, Ohira T, Harada Y, Okano H, Ito K, Tsuchiya T. A longer interval after stenting compromises the short- and long-term outcomes after curative surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer. Surg Today 2021; 52:681-689. [PMID: 34648067 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02385-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intestinal decompression using self-expandable metallic colonic stents (SEMSs) as a bridge to surgery is now considered an attractive alternative to emergency surgery. However, data regarding the optimal timing of surgery after stenting are limited. METHODS We investigated the impact of the interval between stenting and surgery on short- and long-term outcomes in 92 obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) patients who had a SEMS inserted and subsequently received curative surgery. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 70.5 years, and the median interval between SEMS insertion and the surgery was 17 (range 5-47) days. There were 35 postoperative complications, including seven major postoperative complications. An interval of more than 16 days was an independent predictor of a poor relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-7.81, p = 0.015). An interval of more than 35 days was independently associated with major postoperative complications (HR = 16.6, 95% CI 2.21-125, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION A longer interval between stenting and surgery significantly compromised the short- and long-term outcomes. Surgery within 16 days after stenting might help maximize the benefit of SEMS without interfering with short- and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryuichiro Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan. .,Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Sendai Hospital, 2-43-3 Yagiyama hon-cho, Taihaku-ku, Sendai, 982-8501, Japan.
| | - Masaya Oikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Kakita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Takaho Okada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Tomoya Abe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Takashi Yazawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Haruyuki Tsuchiya
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Naoya Akazawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Shingo Yoshimachi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Ohira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Haruka Okano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Kei Ito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| | - Takashi Tsuchiya
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Veld JV, Kumcu A, Amelung FJ, Borstlap WAA, Consten ECJ, Dekker JWT, van Westreenen HL, Siersema PD, Ter Borg F, Kusters M, Bemelman WA, de Wilt JHW, van Hooft JE, Tanis PJ. Time interval between self-expandable metal stent placement or creation of a decompressing stoma and elective resection of left-sided obstructive colon cancer. Endoscopy 2021; 53:905-913. [PMID: 33339059 DOI: 10.1055/a-1308-1487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal timing of resection after decompression of left-sided obstructive colon cancer is unknown. Revised expert-based guideline recommendations have shifted from an interval of 5 - 10 days to approximately 2 weeks following self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement, and recommendations after decompressing stoma are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the recommended bridging intervals after SEMS and explore the timing of resection after decompressing stoma. METHODS This nationwide study included patients registered between 2009 and 2016 in the prospective, mandatory Dutch ColoRectal Audit. Additional data were collected through patient records in 75 hospitals. Only patients who underwent either SEMS placement or decompressing stoma as a bridge to surgery were selected. Technical SEMS failure and unsuccessful decompression within 48 hours were exclusion criteria. RESULTS 510 patients were included (182 SEMS, 328 decompressing stoma). Median bridging interval was 23 days (interquartile range [IQR] 13 - 31) for SEMS and 36 days (IQR 22 - 65) for decompressing stoma. Following SEMS placement, no significant differences in post-resection complications, hospital stay, or laparoscopic resections were observed with resection after 11 - 17 days compared with 5 - 10 days. Of SEMS-related complications, 48 % occurred in patients operated on beyond 17 days. Compared with resection within 14 days, an interval of 14 - 28 days following decompressing stoma resulted in significantly more laparoscopic resections, more primary anastomoses, and shorter hospital stays. No impact of bridging interval on mortality, disease-free survival, or overall survival was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS Based on an overview of the data with balancing of surgical outcomes and timing of adverse events, a bridging interval of approximately 2 weeks seems appropriate after SEMS placement, while waiting 2 - 4 weeks after decompressing stoma further optimizes surgical conditions for laparoscopic resection with restoration of bowel continuity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Valerie Veld
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aydan Kumcu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Julie Amelung
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Wernard Aat Antoine Borstlap
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Catharina Josephina Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Academic Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmus Adrianus Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Job Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
de Roos MAJ, Hugen N, Hazebroek EJ, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ. Delayed surgical resection of primary left-sided obstructing colon cancer is associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:1146-1153. [PMID: 34346510 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES It is unclear what time interval is optimal between presentation and surgical resection of left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC). This study aims to determine whether a time interval beyond 4 weeks is associated with a better outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of LSOCC between January 2010 and December 2019 were collected from a prospective database. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) Emergency resection (ER group), (2) surgery in less than 4 weeks (early group), and (3) surgery beyond 4 weeks (late group). RESULTS The ER group consisted of 74 (44.0%), the early group of 38 (22.6%), and the late group of 56 (33.3%) patients. Ninety-day mortality was lower in the Late group than in the ER group and the early group (1.8% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.029 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.011). In the late group 5-year recurrence-free survival was better than in the early group (82.1% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.039) and 5-year overall survival (OS) was better than in the ER group (75% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.021). Definitive surgical resection beyond 4 weeks was an independent prognostic factor for OS (Hazard ratio: 0.402, 95% CI: 0.204-0.793, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION In this study surgical resection beyond 4 weeks after presentation seems to have a better short- and long-term outcome for LSOCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marnix A J de Roos
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J Hazebroek
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The optimal time interval between the placement of self-expandable metallic stent and elective surgery in patients with obstructive colon cancer. Sci Rep 2020; 10:9502. [PMID: 32528099 PMCID: PMC7289825 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66508-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A bridge to surgery (BTS) after a colonic stent for obstructive colon cancer has not been accepted as a standard treatment strategy. Also, there is no consensus regarding the optimal time interval for BTS. We aimed to identify the optimal timing for BTS after stent placement to decrease the oncologic risk. We retrospectively collected data of 174 patients who underwent BTS after stent placement for stage II or III obstructive colon cancer from five hospitals. We divided the patients into three groups based on the time interval for BTS after stent placement: within 7 days (Group 1), from 8 to 14 days (Group 2), and after 14 days (Group 3). The primary outcome was to compare the oncologic outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence rate (RR) among the three groups. Groups 1, 2, and 3 involved 75, 56, and 43 patients, respectively. Postoperative morbidity rates were 17.3%, 10.8%, and 9.3% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.337). RRs were 16.0%, 35.7%, and 30.2% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, the time interval for BTS was an independent risk factor for DFS (P < 0.001; HR, 14.463; 95% CI, 1.458–3.255) and OS (P = 0.027; HR, 4.917; 95% CI, 1.071–3.059). In conclusion, the perioperative short-term outcome was not affected by the time interval of BTS. However, elective surgery within 7 days after colonic stent might be suggested to balance the short-term benefits and long-term oncologic risks.
Collapse
|