The Transareola Endoscopic Approach Yields Adequate Oncological Dissection as Open Approach in the Treatment of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy approaches for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objectives

This network meta-analysis assesses the outcomes of seven endoscopic approaches, offering valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in choosing the best method for thyroid cancer patients.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases up to March 2023. The analysis included seven endoscopic approaches, with a focus on their respective outcomes through network meta-analysis.

Results

This meta-analysis included 44 studies involving 8,672 patients. The axillo-bilateral breast approach (ABBA) and unilateral axillo-breast approach (UABA) showed advantages in terms of reduced operative time compared to other approaches (MD = 19.66 minutes, 95% CI = -31.66 to 70.98; MD = 30.32 minutes, 95% CI = -1.45 to 62.09, respectively). The UABA and anterior chest approach (ACA) exhibited superiority in controlling intraoperative bleeding (MD = -3.37 mL, 95% CI = -22.58 to 15.85; MD = -13.77 mL, 95% CI = -28.85 1.31, respectively). UABA and ACA also showed advantages in reducing hospital stays (MD = -0.39 days, 95% CI = -1.48 to 0.71; MD = -0.26 days, 95% CI = -1.33 to 0.81, respectively). The transoral approach (OA) yielded results comparable to those of conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) and outperformed other endoscopic surgeries with regards to lymph node retrieval and metastatic lymph node assessment. For the stimulated serum thyroglobulin (TG) levels, no significant difference was observed between bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) and OA compared to COT. However, chest-breast approach (CBA) showed significantly lower levels than COT (MD=-0.40 ng/ml, 95% CI =-0.72 to -0.09). Patients in the gasless unilateral transaxillary approach (GUA) group experienced a significant improvement in cosmetic satisfaction (MD=-2.08, 95% CI =-3.35 to -0.82). Importantly, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of surgical complications between endoscopic thyroidectomy and COT.

Conclusion

Endoscopic thyroid surgery is a safe and effective choice for thyroid cancer patients. Different approaches have their advantages, allowing personalized selection based on the patient's needs. ABBA and UABA have shorter operative times, while UABA and ACA excel at controlling bleeding and shortening hospital stays. OA shows promise for lymph node assessment. These findings contribute to the growing evidence supporting endoscopic methods, expanding treatment options for thyroid cancer patients.

Comparison of Supraclavicular Oblique Incision With Traditional Low Collar Incision Approach for Thyroidectomy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Background

Various incisions and approaches for thyroidectomy have been developed to treat differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Supraclavicular oblique incision (SOI) thyroidectomy (SOIT) has been applied in DTC patients over the past ten years. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach were yet to be confirmed.

Aim

This study aimed to compare the surgical and patient-related outcomes between SOIT and traditional low collar incision thyroidectomy (TLCIT) in patients with DTC.

Methods

We retrospectively screened all patients with DTC who received thyroid lobectomy from October 2020 to October 2021. The surgical results and patient-related outcomes assessed at 1 and 6 months after surgery by questionnaire were compared between the SOIT and TLCIT groups.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included in this study, of whom 38 patients (30.5%) were operated on with SOIT and 89 patients (69.5%) with TLCIT. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics and thyroid features between the two groups. Despite comparable operative time (61.9 ± 12.1 vs. 59.9 ± 15.0 min, p = 0.425), the SOIT group had a smaller neck incision (4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 5.0 ± 1.0 cm, p = 0.002), a shorter duration of postoperative drainage (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9 days, p = 0.019), less volume of postoperative drainage (48.4 ± 24.6 vs. 60.3 ± 22.8 ml, p = 0.040), and shorter postoperative hospitalization (3.2 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days p = 0.006), as compared with the TLCIT group. At 1-month follow-up after surgery, SOIT showed better performance in preventing hypoparathyroidism (p = 0.026) and abnormal neck sensation (p = 0.010) and in improving cosmetic satisfaction (p = 0.036) than TLCIT. At 6-month follow-up, SOIT was feedback with better cosmetic satisfaction (p < 0.001) and a lower percent of abnormal neck sensation (p = 0.031) or movement (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that minimally invasive surgery using the SOI provides superior surgical and patient-related outcomes compared with surgery using a traditional low collar incision (TLCI) in patients with DTC.