Relation of Gastric Volume With Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Results of a Prospective Analysis

Posterior fixation of gastric tube with fibrin sealant in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a promising method to prevent revision surgeries

BACKGROUND

We aim to assess the effects of gastric posterior fixation with fibrin sealant in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in aspects of 12th-month body mass index and gastric volume.

METHODS

The patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between January 2019 and February 2021 were divided into two groups preoperatively. The first 75 patients were appointed to the posterior fixation group, and the second 75 were to the control group. Changes in gastric volume and body mass index were assessed in the postoperative 12th month.

RESULTS

There were 110 patients in the final analysis. Fifty-four patients had posterior fixation, and 56 had only laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The posterior fixation group was superior in terms of total weight loss rate (39.1% vs. 34.5%, p<0.001) and less gastric volume increase rate (39.8% vs. 164.7%, p<0.001) in the postoperative 12th month.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that posterior fixation with fibrin sealant in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a promising method for preventing weight regain and creating a need for revision surgery.

Can Weight of The Resected Stomach Predict Weight Loss Results After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Many factors have been investigated in the literature to predict weight loss outcomes after LSG. However, insufficient data regarding the resected stomach weight (RGW) exists. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between RGW and weight loss outcomes 1 year after LSG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients who underwent LSG in a tertiary care center were evaluated retrospectively. The statistical analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between preoperative demographics, RGW, and the excess weight loss percentage (%EWL) and percent total weight loss (%TWL).

RESULTS

The mean RGW was 169.7±40.1, ranging from 101 to 295 grams. The RGW was significantly correlated with preoperative weight (r=0.486; P<0.001), body mass index (r=0.420; P=0.002), and age (r=0.327; P=0.01). However, RGW did not predict postoperative weight loss, as measured by percent total weight loss (%TWL) and percent excess weight loss (%EWL), respectively (r=0.044; P=0.75 and r=-0.216; P=0.11). Multiple linear regression analysis identified age as a negative predictor for both %TWL (β=-0.351, P=0.005) and %EWL (β=-0.265, P=0.03), while preoperative body mass index was a negative predictor for %EWL (β=-0.469, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The RGW, although correlated with patient characteristics, does not serve as a reliable predictor of postoperative weight loss in the first year after LSG. Further research is needed to improve predictive models and patient care in bariatric surgery.