Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels in patients with pneumonia and anastomotic leakage in the postoperative period after esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

Despite being a less-invasive procedure, esophagectomy can cause severe infectious complications, such as pneumonia and anastomotic leakage. Herein, we aimed to clarify the inflammatory characteristics of pneumonia/anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy by assessing the difference between the postoperative trends of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels in patients with pneumonia/anastomotic leakage using the values on the consecutive postoperative day (POD).

METHODS

This study included 439 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy. Serum CRP and PCT levels were measured on PODs 1-7, 10, and 14. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage were defined as Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ 2.

RESULTS

Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 96 and 51 patients, respectively. The CRP and PCT levels peaked on POD 3 (11.6 ± 6.8 mg/dL) and POD 2 (0.69 ± 2.9 ng/mL), respectively. Between PODs 3 and 14, CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with pneumonia and anastomotic leakage than in those without complications (P < 0.001). Between PODs 3 and 14, PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with pneumonia; however, on most PODs, there were no significant differences in PCT levels between patients with and without anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory reactions caused by pneumonia may be more intense than those caused by anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Postoperative trends in serum CRP and PCT levels may vary depending on the complication type. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy can be potentially distinguished by the postoperative trend of PCT values before detailed examinations, such as computed tomography and endoscopy.

Blood flow ratio in the gastric conduit measured by laser Doppler flowmetry: A predictor of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy

Background

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is a common complication. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) can quantitatively evaluate the blood flow in the gastric conduit.

Methods

A total of 326 patients who underwent thoracoscopic/robot-assisted esophagectomy followed by gastric conduit reconstruction and end-to-side anastomosis were enrolled. We divided the gastric conduit into zones I (dominated by the right gastroepiploic vessels), II (dominated by the left gastroepiploic vessels), and III (perfused with short gastric vessels). Before pulling up the gastric conduit to the neck, LDF values were measured at the pylorus, the border between zones I and II (zone I/II), the border between zones II and III (zone II/III), and the gastric conduit tip (tip). The blood flow ratio was calculated as the LDF value divided by the LDF value at the pylorus.

Results

Anastomotic leakage developed in 32 of 326 patients. Leakage was significantly associated with the blood flow ratio at the tip (p < 0.001), but not at zone I/II, zone II/III, and the anastomotic site. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified an anastomotic leakage cutoff ratio of 0.41 (at the tip). A multivariate Cox analysis showed that a blood flow ratio <0.41 at the tip was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was significantly associated with the blood flow ratio at the tip of the gastric conduit. Preservation of the blood supply to the tip via the gastric wall might contribute to a decreased incidence of anastomotic leakage.

Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different techniques have been described for esophagogastric anastomosis. Over the past decades, surgeons have been improving anastomotic techniques with a gradual shift from hand-sewn to stapled anastomosis. Nowadays, circular-stapled (CS) and linear-stapled (LS) anastomosis are commonly used during esophagectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to June 2022. The included studies evaluated short-term outcomes for LS vs. CS anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) and stricture (AS). Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as pooled effect size measures whereas 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to assess relative inference.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (2861 patients) were included. Overall, 1371 (47.9%) underwent CS while 1490 (52.1%) LS. Compared to CS, LS was associated with a significantly reduced RR for AL (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.91; p < 0.01) and AS (RR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.20-0.51; p < 0.0001). Stratified subgroup analysis according to the level of anastomosis (cervical and thoracic) still shows a tendency toward reduced risk for LS. No differences were found for pneumonia (RR 0.78; p = 0.12), reflux esophagitis (RR 0.74; p = 0.36), operative time (SMD -0.25; p = 0.16), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.13; p = 0.51), and 30-day mortality (RR 1.26; p = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

LS anastomosis seems associated with a tendency toward a reduced risk for AL and AS. Although surgeon's own training and experience might direct the choice of esophagogastric anastomosis, our meta-analysis encourages the use of LS anastomosis.