Effects of previous abdominal surgery incision type on complications and conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Derivation and validation of a predictive model for subtotal cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Rates of subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) are increasing in response to challenging cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to avoid bile duct injury, yet are associated with significant morbidity. The present study identifies risk factors for STC and both derives and validates a risk model for STC.

METHODS

LC performed for all biliary pathology across three general surgical units were included (2015-2020). Clinicopathological, intraoperative and post-operative details were reported. Backward stepwise multivariable regression was performed to derive the most parsimonious predictive model for STC. Bootstrapping was performed for internal validation and patients were categorised into risk groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 2768 patients underwent LC (median age, 53 years; median ASA, 2; median BMI, 29.7 kg/m2), including 99 cases (3.6%) of STC. Post-operatively following STC, there were bile leaks in 29.3%, collections in 19.2% and retained stones in 10.1% of patients. Post-operative intervention was performed in 29.3%, including ERCP (22.2%), laparoscopy (5.0%) and laparotomy (3.0%). The following variables were positive predictors of STC and were included in the final model: age >  60 years, male sex, diabetes mellitus, acute cholecystitis (AC), increased severity of AC (CRP > 90 mg/L), ≥ 3 biliary admissions, pre-operative ERCP with/without stent, pre-operative cholecystostomy and emergency LC (AUC = 0.84). Low, medium and high-risk groups had a STC rate of 0.8%, 3.9% and 24.5%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The present study determines the morbidity of STC and identifies high-risk features associated with STC. A risk model for STC is derived and internally validated to help surgeons identify high-risk patients and both improve pre-operative decision-making and patient counselling.

The effects of previous abdominal surgery and the utilisation of modified access techniques on the operative difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration

BACKGROUND

Early reports suggested that previous abdominal surgery was a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on account of difficulty and potential access complications. This study analyses different types/systems of previous surgery and locations of scars and how they affect access difficulties. As modified access techniques to minimise risk of complications are under-reported the study details and evaluates them.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data from consecutive LC and common bile duct explorations (LCBDE) performed by a single surgeon over 30 years was analysed. Previous abdominal surgery was documented and peri-operative outcomes were compared with patients who had no previous surgery using Chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS

Of 5916 LC and LCBDE, 1846 patients (31.2%) had previous abdominal surgery. The median age was 60 years. Those with previous surgery required more frequent duodenal (RR 1.07; p = 0.023), hepatic flexure (RR 1.11; p = 0.043) and distal adhesiolysis (RR 3.57; p < 0.001) and had more access related bowel injuries (0.4% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001). Previous upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery had the highest rates of adhesiolysis (76.3%), difficult cystic pedicles (58.8%), fundus-first approach (7.2%), difficulty grades (64.9% Grades 3-5) and utilisation of abdominal drains (71.1%). Previous open surgery resulted in longer operative time compared to previous laparoscopic procedures (65vs.55 min; p < 0.001), increased difficulty of pedicle dissection (42.4% vs. 36.0%; p < 0.05) and required more duodenal, hepatic flexure and distant adhesiolysis (p < 0.05) and fundus-first dissection (4% vs 2%; p < 0.05). Epigastric and supraumbilical access and access through umbilical and other hernias were used in 163 patients (8.8%) with no bowel complications.

CONCLUSION

The risks of access and adhesiolysis in patients with previous abdominal scars undergoing biliary surgery are dependent on the nature of previous surgery. Previous open, upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery carried the most significant risks. Modified access techniques can be adopted to safely mitigate these risks.

Clinical Characteristics of Symptomatic Cholecystitis in Post-Gastrectomy Patients: 11 Years of Experience in a Single Center

Background and Objectives: Gallbladder (GB) stones, a major cause of symptomatic cholecystitis, are more likely to develop in post gastrectomy people. Our purpose is to evaluate characteristics of symptomatic cholecystitis after gastrectomy. Materials and Method: In January 2011−December 2021, total 1587 patients underwent operations for symptomatic cholecystitis at our hospital. We reviewed the patients’ general characteristics, operation results, pathologic results, and postoperative complications. We classified the patients into non-gastrectomy and gastrectomy groups, further divided into subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy groups. Result: The patients’ ages, male proportion, and the open surgery rate were significantly higher (127/1543 (8.2%) vs. 17/44 (38.6%); p < 0.001), and the operation time was longer (102.51 ± 52.43 vs. 167.39 ± 82.95; p < 0.001) in the gastrectomy group. Extended surgery rates were significantly higher in the gastrectomy group (56/1543 (3.6%) vs. 12/44 (27.3%); p < 0.001). The period from gastrectomy to symptomatic cholecystitis was significantly shorter in the total gastrectomy group (12.72 ± 10.50 vs. 7.25 ± 4.80; p = 0.040). Conclusion: GB stones were more likely to develop in post-gastrectomy patients and extended surgery rates were higher. The period to cholecystitis was shorter in total gastrectomy. Efforts to prevent GB stones are considered in post-gastrectomy patients.

A New Laparoscopic Entry Point in Patients With Previous Laparotomy: A Prospective Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION

Intraperitoneal access and establishing pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopy is a critical step especially in patients who underwent previous laparotomy due to the higher risk of visceral or vascular injuries. In this study, we propose a new entry point for safe laparoscopic access in cases having previous laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective controlled randomized trial conducted between January 2016 and January 2022 in Ain Shams University Hospitals. It included 232 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures after previous laparotomy. They were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. In group 1, laparoscopic access was carried out by an optical trocar through the new point situated in the subxiphoid region 1 cm below the costal margin and centered 2.5 cm from the midline on either side. In group 2, laparoscopic access was performed by an optical subumbilical trocar after Verres needle insufflation in Palmer point. The primary end points were success and safety of entry, measured by the number of entry attempts and the incidence of bowel and vascular injuries. The secondary end point was the entry time.

RESULTS

In group 1, safe entry into the abdomen was achieved without visceral or vascular injury. In the 3 cases, minor liver injuries occurred. In group 2, 2 major vascular injuries and 5 bowel injuries occurred. There was a significant difference in procedure time (55±7.2 s in group 1 vs. 192±11.6 s in group 2).

CONCLUSION

The suggested entry point is fast, safe, and reliable in patients having previous laparotomy.

Is Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery a Contraindication for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?

Background and objective In this era of minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery procedures, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the prevailing treatment method for symptomatic cholelithiasis. However, there are some contraindications for this operation, such as a previous upper abdominal surgery. Additionally, the median conversion rate of LC is 5%. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of previous upper abdominal surgery on LC. Methods The study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, and observational analysis. A total of 277 LC patients were evaluated by classifying them into two groups - group A: those without previous upper abdominal surgery; group B: those with a history of previous upper abdominal surgery. Results Not surprisingly, the operation time and the degree of adhesions in group B were significantly higher compared to group A (p<0.001). On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of complication rates, conversion rates, and the length of hospital stay (p=0.118, p=0.761, p=0.083, respectively). Conclusion LC is a safe method for cholelithiasis even in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. Previous upper abdominal surgery does not affect the conversion rates and length of hospital stay. Hence, previous upper abdominal surgery should not be accepted as a contraindication for LC.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper midline abdominal surgery: comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gastric surgery and non-gastric surgery using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Previous upper midline abdominal surgery is a reported relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We aimed to investigate the effects of previous upper abdominal surgery on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy; we evaluated the effects of the previous upper abdominal surgery type on laparoscopic cholecystectomy with respect to complications and conversion to open surgery.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 1,258 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including those who underwent upper midline abdominal surgery previously, at a single tertiary referral center. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes-open conversion rate, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay-were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to the previous surgical method into the gastric (n = 77), non-gastric (n = 40), and control (n = 1141) groups. Patients in the gastric + non-gastric groups (n = 117) were 1:1 matched with those in the control group (n = 117) using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before PSM, age, sex, open conversion rate, gallbladder status, port number, overall morbidity, and postoperative hospital stay duration did not significantly differ between the gastric and non-gastric groups; the body mass index (22.3 ± 3.4 versus 24.1 ± 3.8 kg/m², p = 0.009) and operation time (129.9 ± 63.6 versus 97.9 ± 51.1 min, p = 0.004) significantly differed. After PSM, age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiology score did not significantly differ between gastric + non-gastric (n = 117) and conventional groups (n = 117; the operation time (118.9 ± 61.3 versus 75.8 ± 37.1 min, p < 0.001), open conversion rate (n = 6, 5.1% versus n = 0, 0.0%, p = 0.013), port number, overall morbidities (n = 26, 22.2% versus n = 10, 8.5%, p = 0.004), and postoperative hospital stay duration (6.7 ± 4.3 versus 5.5 ± 3.2 days, p = 0.031) significantly differed.

CONCLUSION

Previous upper midline abdominal surgery was not contraindicative to safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with previous upper midline abdominal surgery undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be informed preoperatively of the probability of conversion to open surgery, lengthened duration, and associated morbidities.

The Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery in a High-Acuity Liver Transplant Population

BACKGROUND

It is not uncommon for liver transplant (LT) recipients to have had previous abdominal surgery (PAS) preceding transplant. The impact of PAS on morbidity and mortality in LT patients remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the correlation between PAS and LT outcomes in a high-acuity patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of 936 adult primary LT recipients between 2012 and 2018. Patients were divided based on PAS history. PAS was subdivided into upper abdominal surgery (UAS) and lower abdominal surgery (LAS). UAS was separated into high-impact UAS and low-impact UAS. Finally, we studied patients with PAS ≤90 d versus PAS >90 d.

RESULTS

Extensive adhesiolysis was the only significant perioperative factor between the PAS group (n = 367) and the non-PAS group (n = 569) (P < 0.001). Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (20U versus 17U, P = 0.044) and abdominal packing (24.2% versus 13.3%, P = 0.008) were significantly higher in the UAS group (n = 186) versus the LAS group (n = 181). Patients with high-impact UAS required greater RBC (P = 0.021) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion (P = 0.005), and arterial conduits (P = 0.016) during LT. Compared with recipients with PAS >90 d (n = 338), recipients with PAS ≤90 d (n = 29) had significantly higher RBC transfusion (P = 0.046), fresh frozen plasma transfusion (P = 0.022), and abdominal packing (P = 0.025). No differences in patient and graft survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, with appropriate care in the perioperative setting, PAS is not a contraindication to successful LT. Careful consideration is warranted when risk stratifying patients with multiple comorbidities who had PAS, especially those with UAS or PAS ≤90 d.

Effects of prior abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVES

With increased experience and technological advancement, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be safe and feasible even in the presence of most of the previously recognized contraindications. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of prior upper and lower abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of all sequential patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2014 to June 2016 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups (Group A: patients without any prior abdominal surgical procedures; Group B: patients with prior upper abdominal surgical procedures; and Group C: patients with prior lower abdominal surgical procedures).

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were assessed. Group A consisted of 223, Group B of 18, and Group C of 88 patients. A statistically significantly higher operative time, postoperative pain, and complication rate after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were noted in patients with prior upper abdominal surgery. The groups were comparable regarding patients' demographics and surgery indications. The length of hospital stay was not statistically different between the groups (p=0.065).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of the current study, prior upper abdominal surgery leads to a significantly longer procedure time, higher postoperative pain, and complication rates after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the length of hospital stay was not affected by the parameters investigated.

Predicting prolonged hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Widespread application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has resulted in a high complication rate and leads to prolonged hospital stays. This study aimed to investigate the preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors that relate to prolongation of hospital stay.

METHODS

We studied 370 patients who underwent LC for gallbladder disease between 2008 and 2012. Clinical risk factors were retrospectively collected. The clinical pathway for LC was indicated for all patients, and they were divided into two groups according to postoperative length of stay (LOS): the normal duration group (LOS ≤5 days) and the long duration (LD) group (LOS ≥6 days). Multiple regression analysis was used to predict risk factors that identified hospital prolongation to create a LOS prediction score.

RESULTS

The normal duration group was 236 patients and the LD group was 134. Seventeen patients (4.6%) required conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. LOS was 4.82 days in the normal duration group and 12.08 days in the LD group. In the LD group, 18.7% of the patients stayed more than 14 days, but no patients were readmitted. Thirteen clinical factors were statistically different between the two groups. ASA score and LC difficulty were the most predictive risk factors for LOS prolongation. LOS prediction score consisted of eight variables selected from 13 factors; it helped determine the likelihood of whether a patients' hospital stay was prolonged (sensitivity, 82.1%; specificity, 75.0%).

CONCLUSION

Thirteen factors closely related to hospital stay duration and LOS prediction score could predict the prolongation of a patient's hospital stay.

Transjejunal Extraction of Gallbladder After Mini-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Previous Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Small Case Series

BACKGROUND

The length of incisions on the abdominal wall directly correlates with wound-related morbidities and patient comfort. Both mini-laparoscopy (only ≤5-mm trocars) and natural orifice specimen extraction avoid larger abdominal incisions. This study described a new natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®); American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Oak Brook, IL] and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons [Los Angeles, CA]) cholecystectomy technique by combination of these two advanced laparoscopic techniques for cholelithiasis in patients who had prior laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for obesity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three patients (two males, one female; 39, 62, and 34 years old, respectively) were admitted with symptomatic cholelithiasis (multiple millimeter-sized gallstones), and all had previously had LRYGB. They were treated by mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy using three 5-mm trocars. The gallbladder was removed through the dilated efferent limb of the jejunum, 5 cm distal from the gastrojejunostomy. Transjejunal extraction was performed under endoscopic guidance. The gallbladder in the jejenum was passed through the anastomosis and extracted with an endoscopic snare by the transoral way. The enterotomy was closed intracorporeally.

RESULTS

There was no conversion or additional trocar requirement. All the procedures were completed successfully without problems. Respective operating times were 95, 75, and 120 minutes. Only 1 patient required postoperative analgesic; the others did not. The patients started to get a liquid diet on the night of surgery and were discharged on Days 1, 1, and 2, respectively, with normal diet recommendations. There were no morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is technically feasible in patients with previous LRYGB. Prior LRYGB was not an obstacle for transoral specimen extraction. The dilated efferent jejunal limb is a good alternative route for natural orifice specimen extraction. This report described the first natural orifice surgery through the small bowel.

Evaluation of affecting factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease. Severe inflammation makes laparoscopic dissection technically more demanding in acute cholecystitis. Conversion to open cholecystectomy due to adverse conditions is still required in some patients.

AIM

To evaluate predictive risk factors associated with conversion to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 165 patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in our clinic. Patients who completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and required conversion to open cholecystectomy were compared in terms of age, sex, fever, laboratory and USG findings, operation timing, complications, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

There were 53 (32%) male and 112 (68%) female patients; the mean age was 52.4 ±12.5 years. Forty-six (27.9%) of the 165 patients were converted to open cholecystectomy. Male sex of the patients who underwent conversion (47.1%) was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Preoperative white blood count, blood glucose and amylase values, morbidity rate, and hospital stay were raised in patients who underwent conversion, and all were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex, blood leucocyte, glucose, and raised amylase emerged as the effective factors for conversion cholecystectomy in our study. These factors should help the clinical decision-making process when planning laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. By predicting these risk factors for conversion, preoperative patient counselling can be improved.

Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Factors for Converting Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy

Performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) always carries the risk of having to convert from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy (LOC). Being able to identify these patients preoperatively may allow better preoperative planning and lowering operative cost. All LC and LOC were performed by the Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Surgery retrospectively identified between January 2008 and December 2009. Preoperative risk factors identified in both groups included: age, gender, body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, diabetes mellitus, previous upper abdominal surgery, previous abdominal surgery, presence of pericholecystic fluid, gallbladder wall thickness greater than 3 mm, preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, and pancreatitis. Reasons for conversion in the LOC group were identified from the operative note. A total of 346 LC and LOC were identified. The LOC group had 41 identified with a conversion rate of 11.9 per cent. The LOC group was compared with 100 randomly chosen LC. Risk factors that reached statistical significance for conversion included advanced age, male gender, previous upper abdominal surgery, preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, and gallbladder wall thickness greater than 3 mm ( P = 0.0009). Average operative time was higher in LOC compared with open cholecystectomy (123 minutes average vs 109 minutes average). Of the reasons for conversion, the degree of inflammation was the most common (51.2%). Preoperative risk factors that were associated with need for conversion were advanced age, male gender, previous upper abdominal surgery, preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, and pericholecystitic fluid. In patients who have all of these risk factors, we recommend starting with an open cholecystectomy. This will save operative time and overall cost.

Multivariable analysis of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy: laparoscopy is a feasible initial approach even in the presence of common bile duct stones or acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

When performing cholecystectomy after gastrectomy, we often encounter problems, such as adhesions, nutritional insufficiency, and bowel reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors related to surgical outcome of these associated procedures, with emphasis on the use of a laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 58 patients who had a history of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy. Differences between subgroups with respect to operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications were analyzed. To identify the factors related with outcomes of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy, we performed multivariable analysis with the following variables: common bile duct (CBD) exploration, laparoscopic surgery, gender, acute cholecystitis, history of stomach cancer, age, body mass index, period of surgery, and interval between cholecystectomy and gastrectomy.

RESULTS

We found one case (2.9%) of open conversion. The CBD exploration was the most significant independent factor (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 45.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.53-450.55) related to longer operation time. Acute cholecystitis also was a significant independent factor (adjusted OR, 14.66; 95% CI, 1.46-147.4). The laparoscopic approach was not related to operation time but was related to a shorter hospital stay (adjusted OR, 0.057; 95% CI, 0.004-0.74). Acute cholecystitis was independently related to the occurrence of complications (adjusted OR, 27.68; 95% CI, 1.15-666.24); however, CBD exploration and laparoscopic surgery were not. A lower BMI also was an independent predictor of the occurrence of complications (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.2-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach is feasible for cholecystectomy after gastrectomy, even in cases with CBD stones or acute cholecystitis. This approach does not appear to increase operation time or complication rate and was shown to decrease the length of postoperative hospital stay.

What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy is still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and impact of the underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decided to review the rate and causes of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

METHOD

This study included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies due to gallstone disease undertaken from May 1999 to June 2010. The exclusion criteria were malignancy and/or existence of gallbladder polyps detected pathologically. Patient demographics, indications for cholecystectomy, concomitant diseases, and histories of previous abdominal surgery were collected. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, the underlying reasons for conversion, and postoperative complications were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 5382 patients for whom LC was attempted, 5164 were included this study. The overall rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 3.16% (163 patients). There were 84 male and 79 female patients; the mean age was 52.04 years (range: 26-85). The conversion rates in male and female patients were 5.6% and 2.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common reasons for conversion were severe adhesions caused by tissue inflammation (97 patients) and fibrosis of Calot's triangle (12 patients). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was found to be 16.3% in patients who were converted to open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Male gender was found to be the only statistically significant risk factor for conversion in our series. LC can be safely performed with a conversion rate of less than 5% in all patient groups.

Timing of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with sphincterotomy: a prospective observational study of 308 patients

PURPOSE

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy is associated with higher rates of conversion to open surgery during subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The mechanisms of this association are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the time interval between the two procedures can affect the course of LC in terms of conversion rate or complications.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 308 consecutive patients underwent ERCP with sphincterotomy followed at various intervals by elective LC. According to these intervals, the patients' data were assigned to one of three groups: short-interval (2 days or less), medium-interval (3-42 days), or long-interval (43 days or more). Groups were also defined in terms of whether gallstones were extracted during ERCP and in terms of the number of ERCPs performed (single or multiple) prior to LC. The main outcome measures for all groups were the frequency of complications during or after LC and the frequency of conversions to open surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 308 patients, 43 required conversion to open cholecystectomy (14%). The short-interval (95 patients), medium-interval (100 patients), and long-interval (113 patients) groups did not differ significantly in terms of intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, or conversion to open surgery (p = 0.985, 0.340, and 0.472, respectively). The conversion rate also did not differ significantly according to the presence or absence of gallstones on ERCP (14.7% versus 12.8%, respectively, p = 0.392). However, compared with patients who underwent single ERCP (n = 290), those who underwent multiple ERCPs (n = 18) experienced significantly more conversion to open surgery (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The length of time between endoscopic sphincterotomy and LC did not affect the latter procedure in terms of complications or conversion to open surgery. However, the lack of an association between conversion rate and gallstone presence on ERCP and the higher conversion rate among patients who underwent multiple ERCPs, suggest that ERCP with sphincterotomy itself may be a factor in the higher conversion rates that have been observed after this procedure.