Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms: outpatient postoperative management

Laparoscopic liver surgery: towards a day-case management

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory surgery (AS) is a contemporary subject of interest. The feasibility and safety of AS for solid abdominal organs are still dubious. In the present study, we aimed at defining potential surgical criteria for AS by analyzing a large database of patients who underwent laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) in two French expert centers.

METHODS

This study was performed using prospectively filled databases including patients that underwent pure LLS between 1998 and 2015. Patients whose perioperative medical characteristics (ASA score <3, no associated extra-hepatic procedure, surgical duration ≤180 min, blood loss ≤300 mL, no intraoperative anesthesiological or surgical complication, no postoperative drainage) were potentially adapted for ambulatory LLS were included in the analysis. In order to determine the risk factors for postoperative complications, multivariate analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

During the study period, pure LLS was performed in 994 patients. After preoperative and intraoperative characteristics screening, 174 (17.5%) patients were considered for the final analysis. Lesions (benign (46%) and liver metastases (43%)) were predominantly single with a mean size of 37 ± 32 mm in an underlying normal or steatotic liver parenchyma (94.8%). The vast majority of LLS performed were single procedures including wedge resections and liver cyst unroofing or left lateral sectionectomies (74%). The global morbidity rate was 14% and six patients presented a major complication (Dindo-Clavien ≥III). The mean length of stay was 5 ± 4 days. Multivariate analysis showed that major hepatectomy [OR 29.04 (2.26-37.19); P = 0.01] and resection of tumors localized in central segments [OR 41.24 (1.08-156.47); P = 0.04] were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In experienced teams, approximately 7% of highly selected patients requiring laparoscopic hepatic surgery (wedge resection, liver cyst unroofing, or left lateral sectionectomy) could benefit from ambulatory surgery management.

Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference

BACKGROUND

Introduced more than 20 years ago, laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LAPS) has not reached a uniform acceptance among HPB surgeons. As a result, there is no consensus regarding its use in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. This study, organized by the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), aimed to develop consensus statements and clinical recommendations on the application of LAPS in these patients.

METHODS

An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreatic surgery. Each panelist performed a critical appraisal of the literature and prepared evidence-based statements assessed by other panelists during Delphi process. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting followed by the second round of Delphi. Modified statements were presented at the plenary session of the 24th International Congress of the EAES in Amsterdam and in a web-based survey.

RESULTS

LAPS included laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), enucleation, central pancreatectomy, and ultrasound. In general, LAPS was found to be safe, especially in experienced hands, and also advantageous over an open approach in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, and quality of life. Eighty-five percent or higher proportion of responders agreed with the majority (69.5%) of statements. However, the evidence is predominantly based on retrospective case-control studies and systematic reviews of these studies, clearly affected by selection bias. Furthermore, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published to date, although four RCTs are currently underway in Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

LAPS is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. LDP is feasible and safe, performed in many centers, while LPD is limited to few centers. RCTs and registry studies are essential to proceed with the assessment of LAPS.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in a solitary true pancreatic cyst

BACKGROUND

Solitary true pancreatic cysts (STPCs), or epithelial cysts, are benign lesions that are extremely rare in adult patients. Advances in radiographic techniques have improved the ability to identify pancreatic cystic lesions. We report a case of a large and symptomatic STPC in a 47-year-old female patient who was treated successfully with spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. We also review the clinical and pathologic features of all reported STPCs within the past 25 years.

DATABASE

To compose the review, we did a search of the international literature for STPCs that had occurred in adults. Fourteen related articles were found describing cases of STPCs. Clinical and pathologic information was collected for all of the reported pancreatic cysts, and a database was formed. STPCs are detected more frequently in women than in men. The mean age of occurrence is 43.2 years, and the mean cyst size is 5.6 cm. Fifty percent of true cysts are located in the head of the pancreas. Size and site are responsible for the symptoms caused, although 22.8% were asymptomatic. Diagnosis was made postoperatively in all cases by histopathologic studies. No case of malignancy was reported in any STPC.

CONCLUSIONS

STPCs are rare and benign lesions commonly discovered incidentally during abdominal imaging. Surgical treatment is considered the appropriate therapy for large and symptomatic STPCs. The definitive diagnosis is established by histopathologic and immunohistochemical studies.

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: preliminary experience and comparison to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), which has been demonstrated to be safely applied on kinds of surgeries, may represent an improvement over conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. However, there are still few clinical experiences of SILS in pancreatic surgery until now. In this study, we will summarize our experience of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (TUSI-LDP), and compare its related parameters with conventional multi-port laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (C-LDP).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for the patients who underwent C-LDP or TUSI-LDP in our department. The demographic data, operative parameters, and postoperative complications in the two groups were summarized and compared.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was performed in a total of 21 cases, among which TUSI-LDP was performed in 14 cases. As far as the demographical results concerned, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The conversion to open surgery was conducted in one case in the TUSI-LDP group because of severe adhesion between pancreatic cyst and surrounding tissues, while in the C-LDP group the only one conversion was for the difficult detection of small lesion. The mean operating time and intraoperative blood loss in TUSI-LDP group was a little shorter (166.4 ± 57.4 versus 202.1 ± 122.5 minutes, p > 0.05, and 157.1 ± 162.4 versus 168.6 ± 157.4 ml, p > 0.05). The postoperative pain and post-operation lengths of hospital stay in the TUSI-LDP group were also less, though there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. For the post-operation complications, in TUSI-LDP group the pancreatic leakage occurred in only one case, and ceased spontaneously with only a drain for 61 days. There were no other complications including postoperative hemorrhage, venous thrombosis, infections and so on in both groups.

CONCLUSION

For the experienced laparoscopic surgeons, in selected patients, TUSI-LDP is a feasible technique, with excellent cosmetic effect, less postoperative pain and post-operation lengths of hospital stay. With the experience accumulated, the operating time and intraoperative blood loss of TUSI-LDP could also gradually reduce.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy: experience from 1 institution

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and readmission remain the significant sources of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We describe a technique of drainage and postoperation management to prevent severe POPF and readmission.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent DP from January 2009 to November 2011 was conducted. The drain was placed just abutting the pancreatic stump by suturing the tissue near the stump. Each patient was discharged carrying an intraabdominal drain, and a strict follow-up was made in the outpatient clinic. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined using the international study group classification for pancreatic fistula definition.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients accepted laparoscopic DP (LDP), and 25 patients accepted open DP (ODP). There was no significant difference in the rate of POPF between the 2 groups (12/32 vs 11/25, P = 0.786). All the POPF cases were grades A and B, but no case was grade C. No case needed a specific intervention. There was no reoperation, readmission, intraabdominal abscess, or surgical site infection.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that our technique of drainage and postoperation management is associated with a low incidence of severe POPF and readmission. Continued investigation of this technique is warranted.